RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The increase and spread of virulent-outbreak associated, methicillin and vancomycin resistant (MRSA/VRSA) Staphylococcus aureus require a better understanding of the resistance and virulence patterns of circulating and emerging strains globally. This study sought to establish the resistance phenotype, and strains of 32 non-duplicate clinical MRSA and MSSA S. aureus isolates from four Kenyan hospitals, identify their resistance and virulence genes and determine the genetic relationships of MRSA with global strains. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were determined on a Vitek 2, genomic DNA sequenced on an Illumina Miseq and isolates typed in-silico. Resistance and virulence genes were identified using ARIBA and phylogenies generated using RAxML. RESULTS: The MRSA isolates were 100% susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and tigecycline. Nine distinct CC, 12 ST and 15 spa types including the novel t17826 and STs (4705, 4707) were identified with CC8 and CC152 predominating. MRSA isolates distributed across 3 CCs; CC5-ST39 (1), CC8 - ST241 (4), a novel CC8-ST4705 (1), ST8 (1) and CC152 (1). There was > 90% phenotype-genotype concordance with key resistance genes identified only among MRSA isolates: gyrA, rpoB, and parC mutations, mecA, ant (4')-lb, aph (3')-IIIa, ermA, sat-4, fusA, mphC and msrA. Kenyan MRSA isolates were genetically diverse and most closely related to Tanzanian and UK isolates. There was a significant correlation between map, hlgA, selk, selq and cap8d virulence genes and severe infections. CONCLUSION: The findings showed a heterogeneous S. aureus population with novel strain types. Though limited by the low number of isolates, this study begins to fill gaps and expand our knowledge of S. aureus epidemiology while uncovering interesting patterns of distribution of strain types which should be further explored. Although last-line treatments are still effective, the potential for outbreaks of both virulent and resistant strains remain, requiring sustained surveillance of S. aureus populations.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/classificação , Fatores de Virulência/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Genótipo , Humanos , Quênia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Fenótipo , Filogenia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidadeRESUMO
Visceral leishmaniasis is a deadly infectious disease and is one of the world's major neglected health problems. Because the symptoms of infection are similar to other endemic diseases, accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate treatment. Definitive diagnosis using splenic or bone marrow aspirates is highly invasive, and so, serological assays are preferred, including the direct agglutination test (DAT) or rK39 strip test. These tests, however, are either difficult to perform in the field (DAT) or lack specificity in some endemic regions (rK39), making the development of new tests a research priority. The availability of Leishmania spp. genomes presents an opportunity to identify new diagnostic targets. Here, we use genome data and a mammalian protein expression system to create a panel of 93 proteins consisting of the extracellular ectodomains of the Leishmania donovani cell surface and secreted proteins. We use these panel and sera from murine experimental infection models and natural human and canine infections to identify new candidates for serological diagnosis. We observed a concordance between the most immunoreactive antigens in different host species and transmission settings. The antigen encoded by the LdBPK_323600.1 gene can diagnose Leishmania infections with high sensitivity and specificity in patient cohorts from different endemic regions including Bangladesh and Ethiopia. In longitudinal sampling of treated patients, we observed reductions in immunoreactivity to LdBPK_323600.1 suggesting it could be used to diagnose treatment success. In summary, we have identified new antigens that could contribute to improved serological diagnostic tests to help control the impact of this deadly tropical infectious disease. IMPORTANCE: Visceral leishmaniasis is fatal if left untreated with patients often displaying mild and non-specific symptoms during the early stages of infection making accurate diagnosis important. Current methods for diagnosis require highly trained medical staff to perform highly invasive biopsies of the liver or bone marrow which pose risks to the patient. Less invasive molecular tests are available but can suffer from regional variations in their ability to accurately diagnose an infection. To identify new diagnostic markers of visceral leishmaniasis, we produced and tested a panel of 93 proteins identified from the genome of the parasite responsible for this disease. We found that the pattern of host antibody reactivity to these proteins was broadly consistent across naturally acquired infections in both human patients and dogs, as well as experimental rodent infections. We identified a new protein called LdBPK_323600.1 that could accurately diagnose visceral leishmaniasis infections in humans.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antiprotozoários , Antígenos de Protozoários , Leishmania donovani , Leishmaniose Visceral , Proteínas de Protozoários , Testes Sorológicos , Leishmania donovani/genética , Leishmania donovani/imunologia , Leishmaniose Visceral/diagnóstico , Leishmaniose Visceral/imunologia , Leishmaniose Visceral/parasitologia , Animais , Humanos , Camundongos , Cães , Antígenos de Protozoários/genética , Antígenos de Protozoários/imunologia , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/imunologia , Proteínas de Protozoários/genética , Proteínas de Protozoários/imunologia , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/imunologia , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Proteínas de Membrana/imunologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Doenças do Cão/parasitologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are often caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria contaminating hospital environments which can cause outbreaks as well as sporadic transmission. METHODS: This study systematically sampled and utilized standard bacteriological culture methods to determine the numbers and types of MDR Enterococcus faecalis/faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter species, and Escherichia coli (ESKAPEE) from high-touch environments of five Kenyan hospitals; level 6 and 5 hospitals (A, B, and C), and level 4 hospitals (D and E), in 2018. Six hundred and seventeen high-touch surfaces across six hospital departments; surgical, general, maternity, newborn, outpatient and pediatric were sampled. RESULTS: 78/617 (12.6%) of the sampled high-touch surfaces were contaminated with MDR ESKAPEE; A. baumannii, 23/617 (3.7%), K. pneumoniae, 22/617 (3.6%), Enterobacter species, 19/617 (3.1%), methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 5/617 (0.8%), E. coli, 5/617 (0.8%), P. aeruginosa, 2/617 (0.3%), and E. faecalis and faecium, 2/617 (0.3%). Items found in patient areas, such as beddings, newborn incubators, baby cots, and sinks were the most frequently contaminated. Level 6 and 5 hospitals, B, 21/122 (17.2%), A, 21/122 (17.2%), and C, 18/136 (13.2%), were more frequently contaminated with MDR ESKAPEE than level 4 hospitals; D, 6/101 (5.9%), and E, 8/131 (6.1%). All the sampled hospital departments were contaminated with MDR ESKAPEE, with high levels observed in newborn, surgical and maternity. All the A. baumannii, Enterobacter species, and K. pneumoniae isolates were non-susceptible to piperacillin, ceftriaxone and cefepime. 22/23 (95.6%) of the A. baumannii isolates were non-susceptible to meropenem. In addition, 5 K. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to all the antibiotics tested except for colistin. CONCLUSION: The presence of MDR ESKAPEE across all the hospitals demonstrated gaps in infection prevention practices (IPCs) that should be addressed. Non-susceptibility to last-line antibiotics such as meropenem threatens the ability to treat infections.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Humanos , Criança , Quênia/epidemiologia , Meropeném , Escherichia coli , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Hospitais , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Departamentos Hospitalares , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
Introduction: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPECs) are a significant cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs). In Kenya, UTIs are typically treated with ß-lactam antibiotics without antibiotic susceptibility testing, which could accelerate antibiotic resistance among UPEC strains. Aim: This study determined the occurrence of UPEC producing extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs), the genes conferring resistance to ß-lactams, and the phylogenetic groups associated with ESBLs in Kenyan UPECs. Methodology: Ninety-five UPEC isolates from six Kenyan hospitals were tested for ESBL and plasmid-mediated AmpC ß-lactamase (pAmpC) production by combined disk diffusion and disk approximation tests, respectively. Real-time and conventional polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were used to detect three ESBL and six pAmpC genes, respectively, and phylogenetic groups were assigned by a quadruplex PCR method. Results: Twenty-four percent UPEC isolates were ESBL producers with blaCTX-M (95.6%), blaTEM (95.6%), and blaSHV (21.7%) genes detected. Sixteen isolates had blaCTX-M/TEM, whereas five had blaTEM/CTX-M/SHV. A total of 5/23 ESBLs were cefoxitin resistant, but no AmpC genes were detected. The UPECs belonged predominantly to phylogenetic groups B2 (31/95; 32.6%) and D (30/95; 31.6%), while groups B2 and A had the most ESBL producers. Conclusions: ß-Lactam antibiotics have reduced utility for treating UTIs as a quarter of UPECs were ESBL producing. Single or multiple ESBL genes were present in UPECs, belonging primarily to phylogenetic groups B2 and A.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Escherichia coli Uropatogênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli Uropatogênica/genética , beta-Lactamases/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Genes Bacterianos , Genótipo , Hospitais , Quênia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , FenótipoRESUMO
Background: Enterococci are clinically significant because of their increasing antibiotic resistance and their ability to cause severe infections due to an arsenal of virulence genes. Few studies in the developing world have examined virulence factors that may significantly impact patient outcomes. This study describes the antimicrobial resistance profiles and prevalence of five key Enterococcal virulence genes gelE, asa, cylA, esp, and hyl in forty-four clinical Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium isolates in Kenya and their association with patients' demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: All E. faecium isolates were obtained from hospital-acquired skin and soft tissue infections. While E. faecalis was associated with community-acquired urinary tract infections. All isolates were resistant to erythromycin, whereas 11/44 (27.5%), 25/44 (56.8%), 28/44 (63.6%), 37/44 (84.1%), 40/44 (90.0%), and 43/44 (97.5%) were susceptible to tetracycline, levofloxacin, gentamicin, ampicillin, nitrofurantoin, and teicoplanin, respectively. All isolates were susceptible to tigecycline, vancomycin, and linezolid. There was little difference in the antibiotic resistance profiles between E. faecalis and E. faecium. The prevalence of the virulence genes among the 44 isolates were 27 (61.4%) for gelE, 26 (59.1%) for asa1, 16 (36.3%) for esp, 11 (25.0%) for cylA, and 1 (2.3%) for hyl. 72.9% of E. faecalis isolates had multiple virulence genes compared to 57% of E. faecium isolates with no virulence genes. The hyl gene was only detected in E. faecium, while cylA and asa1 were only detected in E. faecalis. A significant correlation was observed between the presence of asa1 and esp virulence genes and tetracycline resistance (P=0.0305 and 0.0363, respectively). A significant correlation was also observed between the presence of virulence genes gelE and asa1 and nitrofurantoin resistance (P=0.0175 and 0.0225, respectively) and ampicillin resistance (P=0.0005 and 0.0008, respectively). Conclusion: The study highlights the high levels of erythromycin resistance in E. faecalis and E. faecium, the demographic factors influencing the species distribution among patients, and the accumulation of multiple virulence genes in E. faecalis. The significant association of gelE, asa1, and esp virulence genes with drug resistance could explain the pathogenic success of E. faecalis and provides a guide for future studies.
RESUMO
Microbial monitoring of hospital surfaces can help identify target areas for improved infection prevention and control (IPCs). This study aimed to determine the levels and variations in the bacterial contamination of high-touch surfaces in five Kenyan hospitals and identify the contributing modifiable risk factors. A total of 559 high-touch surfaces in four departments identified as high risk of hospital-acquired infections were sampled and examined for bacterial levels of contamination using standard bacteriological culture methods. Bacteria were detected in 536/559 (95.9%) surfaces. The median bacterial load on all sampled surfaces was 6.0 × 104 CFU/cm2 (interquartile range (IQR); 8.0 × 103-1.0 × 106). Only 55/559 (9.8%) of the sampled surfaces had acceptable bacterial loads, <5 CFU/cm². Cleaning practices, such as daily washing of patient sheets, incident rate ratio (IRR) = 0.10 [95% CI: 0.04-0.24], providing hand wash stations, IRR = 0.25 [95% CI: 0.02-0.30], having running water, IRR = 0.19 [95% CI: 0.08-0.47] and soap for handwashing IRR = 0.21 [95% CI: 0.12-0.39] each significantly lowered bacterial loads. Transporting dirty linen in a designated container, IRR = 72.11 [95% CI: 20.22-257.14], increased bacterial loads. The study hospitals can best reduce the bacterial loads by improving waste-handling protocols, cleaning high-touch surfaces five times a day and providing soap at the handwash stations.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Hospitais , Carga Bacteriana , Desinfecção das Mãos , Humanos , QuêniaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Data on the clonal distribution of Staphylococcus aureus in Africa are scanty, partly due to the high costs and long turnaround times imposed by conventional genotyping methods such as spa and multilocus sequence typing (MLST), which means there is a need for alternative typing approaches. This study evaluated the discriminatory power, cost of and time required for genotyping Kenyan staphylococcal isolates using iPlex MassARRAY compared to conventional methods. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-four clinical S. aureus isolates from three counties were characterized using iPlex MassARRAY, spa and MLST typing methods. Ten single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the S. aureus MLST loci were assessed by MassARRAY. >RESULTS: The MassARRAY assay identified 14 unique SNP genotypes, while spa typing and MLST revealed 22 spa types and 21 sequence types (STs) that displayed unique regional distribution. spa type t355 (ST152) was the dominant type overall while t037/t2029 (ST 241) dominated among the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. MassARRAY showed 83 % and 82 % accuracy against spa typing and MLST, respectively, in isolate classification. Moreover, MassARRAY identified all MRSA strains and a novel spa type. MassARRAY had a reduced turnaround time (<12 h) compared to spa typing (4 days) and MLST (20 days). The MassARRAY reagent and consumable costs per isolate were approximately $18 USD compared to spa typing ($30 USD) and MLST ($126 USD). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that iPlex MassARRAY can be adapted as a useful surveillance tool to provide a faster, more affordable and fairly accurate method for genotyping African S. aureus isolates to identify clinically significant genotypes, MRSA strains and emerging strain types.