Lower limb events in individuals with type 2 diabetes: evidence for an increased risk associated with diuretic use.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Recently, safety data signalled an increased risk of amputations in people taking canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor. If this side effect is due to drug-induced hypovolaemia, diuretics should also increase that risk. The aim of this study was to analyse the association between diuretic use and the risk of lower limb events (LLEs) in people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: SURDIAGENE (SUivi Rénal, DIAbète de type 2 et GENEtique) is a prospective observational cohort that includes people with type 2 diabetes enrolled from 2002 to 2012 and followed-up until onset of LLE, death or 31 December 2015, whichever came first. Primary outcome was the first occurrence of LLE, a composite of lower limb amputation (LLA) and lower limb revascularisation (LLR). The rates of primary outcome were compared between participants taking and not taking diuretics at baseline in a Cox-adjusted model. RESULTS: At baseline, of the 1459 participants included, 670 were taking diuretics. In participants with and without diuretics, the mean ages were 67.1 and 62.9 years and 55.8% and 59.8% were men, respectively. During a median follow-up of 7.1 years, the incidence of LLE was 1.80 per 100 patient-years in diuretic users vs 1.00 in non-users (p < 0.001). The HR for LLE in users vs non-users was 2.08 (95% CI 1.49, 2.93), p < 0.001. This association remained significant in a multivariable-adjusted model (1.49 [1.01, 2.19]; p = 0.04) and similar after considering death as a competing risk (subhazard ratio 1.89 [1.35, 2.64]; p < 0.001). When separated, LLA but not LLR, was associated with the use of diuretics: 2.01 (1.14, 3.54), p = 0.02 and 1.05 (0.67, 1.64), p = 0.84, respectively, in the multivariable-adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Among people with type 2 diabetes treated with diuretics, there was a significant increase in the risk of LLE, predominantly in the risk of LLA.

Non-severe hypoglycaemia is associated with weight gain in patients with type 1 diabetes: Results from the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial.

It is unclear whether the frequent non-severe episodes of hypoglycaemia observed during intensive glucose control in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are associated with subsequent weight gain. We analysed the association between non-severe hypoglycaemia and weight gain in 1441 Diabetes Control and Complication Trial (DCCT) participants. Non-severe hypoglycaemia was assessed by hypo-score (ie, number of blood glucose values <70 mg/dL divided by the total number of measurements during the DCCT quarterly visits). Significant associations were observed between the hypo-score and annual and total weight gain. The annual weight gain by hypo-score tertiles was 0.8 ± 1.2 (T1), 1.3 ± 1.5 (T2) and 1.4 ± 1.3 kg/y (T3), P < .001 for T2 and T3 vs T1, and for T3 vs T2. The odds ratio for a weight gain of 1.8 kg/y was 2.14 (95% CI, 1.56-2.93) for T2, and 2.53 (95%CI, 1.85-3.45) for T3 vs T1. These differences in weight gain and in risk of weight gain remained significant after adjustment for sex, age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c at baseline and treatment arms. In conclusion, our analysis shows a significant association between non-severe hypoglycaemia and weight gain in individuals with T1D from the DCCT.

Initiation of the Fixed Combination IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Prior Injectable Therapy: Insights from the EASY French Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: Combining basal insulin (BI) with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) is recognized as a relevant option to optimize glucose control in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The EASY real-world study aimed to evaluate the modalities of initiation and the effectiveness of the insulin Degludec plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) fixed-ratio combination in the French health care system. METHODS: A retrospective analysis included all patients with T2D and prior injectable therapy (GLP1-RA and/or insulin) who started treatment with IDegLira from September 2016 to December 2017 in 11 French diabetes centers. Baseline characteristics, reasons for IDegLira initiation, and modes of implementation were collected from the medical records. Changes in HbA1c and body weight were determined in patients with available follow-up data (nearest 6-month visit). RESULTS: IDegLira was initiated in 629 patients previously treated with GLP-1RA alone (11.6%), insulin alone (31.5% including 16.5% with BI and 14.9% with multiple daily injections [MDI]) or a free combination of GLP-1RA and insulin (56.9% including 44.8% with BI and 12.1% with MDI), associated or not with oral agents. IDegLira starting dose (mean of 29 ± 11 dose steps) most often exceeded the recommended dose, and was significantly correlated with prior BI but not GLP-1RA dosage. At initiation, mean age, body mass index (BMI) and HbA1c were 60.1 ± 10.2 years, 33.4 ± 6.2 kg/m2 and 8.8 ± 1.7%, respectively. In 461 patients with available follow-up (median 178 days), HbA1c decreased in all subgroups submitted to treatment intensification (- 1.7 ± 1.8% [p < 0.0001], - 1.2 ± 1.8% [p < 0.001] and - 0.8 ± 1.8% [p = 0.0026] in patients with prior GLP-1RA, BI or MDI therapy, respectively) but also in those switching from BI and GLP-1RA free combination (- 0.2 ± 0.9%, p = 0.0419). Significant body weight gain occurred in patients previously treated with GLP-1RA alone (+ 1.5 ± 5.8 kg, p = 0.0572) or combined to BI (+ 1.0 ± 3.1 kg, p < 0.0001) while those on BI (- 1.4 ± 4.6 kg, p = 0.0139) or MDI (- 1.4 ± 5.0 kg, p = 0.0484) experienced weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: While providing new information on the use of IDegLira in the French healthcare system, these data confirm the effectiveness of this fixed-ratio combination in the management of T2D.

Newborn's first bath: any preferred timing? A pilot study from Lebanon.

OBJECTIVE: To try to find the most appropriate time for the newborn's first bath. This prospective randomized study was conducted in one hospital (July-September 2017). RESULTS: A higher percentage of newborns who had a skin-to-skin contact with their mothers had their bath at 24 h vs 2 h after birth (65.2% vs 33.3%; p = 0.01). A higher percentage of mothers who helped in their baby's bath had their baby's bath at 24 h vs 2 h (65.2% vs 5.9%; p < 0.001) and vs 6 h (65.2% vs 15.7%; p < 0.001) respectively. A higher mean incubation time was seen between newborns who had their bath at 2 h (2.10 vs 1.78; p = 0.002) and 6 h (2.18 vs 1.78; p = 0.003) compared to those who had their bath at 24 h respectively. A higher percentage of newborns who took their first bath 24 h after birth were calm compared to crying vigorously (38.6% vs 9.1%; p = 0.04). Delaying newborn first bath until 24 h of life was associated with benefits (reducing hypothermia and vigorous crying, benefit from the vernix caseosa on the skin and adequate time of skin-to-skin contact and mother participation in her child's bathing.