Improved outcomes for myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome: a report from the Children's Oncology Group AAML0431 trial.

Patients with myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome (ML-DS) have favorable event-free survival (EFS), but experience significant treatment-related morbidity and mortality. ML-DS blast cells ex vivo have increased sensitivity to cytarabine (araC) and daunorubicin, suggesting that optimizing drug dosing may improve outcomes while reducing toxicity. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) AAML0431 trial consisted of 4 cycles of induction and 2 cycles of intensification therapy based on the treatment schema of the previous COG A2971 trial with several modifications. High-dose araC (HD-araC) was used in the second induction cycle instead of the intensification cycle, and 1 of 4 daunorubicin-containing induction cycles was eliminated. For 204 eligible patients, 5-year EFS was 89.9% and overall survival (OS) was 93.0%. The 5-year OS for 17 patients with refractory/relapsed leukemia was 34.3%. We determined the clinical significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) levels as measured by flow cytometry on day 28 of induction I. MRD measurements, available for 146 of the 204 patients, were highly predictive of treatment outcome; 5-year disease-free survival for MRD-negative patients (n = 125) was 92.7% vs 76.2% for MRD-positive patients (n = 21) (log-rank P = .011). Our results indicated that earlier use of HD-araC led to better EFS and OS in AAML0431 than in past COG studies. A 25% reduction in the cumulative daunorubicin dose did not impact outcome. MRD, identified as a new prognostic factor for ML-DS patients, can be used for risk stratification in future clinical trials. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00369317.

Health economic models in hemophilia A and utility assumptions from a clinician's perspective.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia are well-established and include the following: reduced bleeding episodes, prevention of joint damage, decreased inhibitor development, and improved health-related quality of life. However, the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis is still not clear. PROCEDURES: We reviewed the published hemophilia prophylaxis economic models focusing on utility assumptions. RESULTS: We found six cost-utility studies that compared prophylaxis and on-demand regimens. These studies reported remarkably different results, using utility values based on different assumptions and data sources. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that cooperation among key stakeholders (clinicians, patient organizations and health-care decision makers) as a means of collecting evidence-based and experiential data to represent both the utility and the quality of life changes for patients with Hemophilia A who are treated with prophylaxis or receive on-demand treatments may represent a winning strategy with which to resolve the outstanding issues related to health technology assessments in the care of patients with hemophilia.

AAML03P1, a pilot study of the safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination with chemotherapy for newly diagnosed childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: The development of antigen-targeted therapies may provide additional options to improve outcomes in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The Children's Oncology Group AAML03P1 trial sought to determine the safety of adding 2 doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, a humanized anti-CD33 antibody-targeted agent, to intensive chemotherapy during remission induction and postremission intensification for children with de novo AML. METHODS: AAML03P1 enrolled 350 children with previously untreated AML. Patients with a matched family donor received 3 courses of chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; those without a matched family donor received 5 courses of chemotherapy. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin 3 mg/m(2)/dose was administered on Day 6 of Course 1 and Day 7 of Course 4. RESULTS: Toxicities observed in all courses of therapy were typical of AML chemotherapy regimens, with infection being most common. Patients achieved a complete remission rate of 83% after 1 course and 87% after 2 courses. The mortality rate was 1.5% after the first gemtuzumab ozogamicin-containing induction course and 2.6% after 2 induction courses. The 3-year event-free survival and overall survival rates were 53 ± 6% and 66 ± 5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This trial determined that it is safe and feasible to include gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination with intensive chemotherapy. The survival rates compare favorably with the recently published results of clinical trials worldwide.

Prophylaxis and hemophilia care in LATAM: Baring it all-Highlights from the CLAHT 2021 symposium.

A large group of countries constitute Latin American (LATAM) countries, where hemophilia care is as varied as the landscape of this region. To better understand the care provided to persons with bleeding disorders, especially hemophilia, a symposium was organized as part of the CLAHT Congress 2021 in Colombia to highlight the issues of hemophilia care and challenges faced by persons with hemophilia in four LATAM countries, Colombia, Peru, Argentina, and Mexico. A summary of the symposium is provided. Four clinicians highlighted the issues in their own country, the status, and the path forward to bring the standard of care to the international level in each of these countries. The geography of the country, the health infrastructure, and the resources available are obstacles in these countries to provide state-of-the-art care to the bleeding disorder community. However, depending on the country, its infrastructure and the resources available, progress is being made to upend the care provided. Indeed, the care of persons with hemophilia has been greatly improved, including personalized prophylaxis. The information summarized here first emphasizes how the geography of a country and the different healthcare infrastructures play a major role in how care is offered. It also provides a path for other countries to evaluate these issues in their own realities. In parallel, these data provide hope to many developing countries; despite obstacles, strides can be made in the care of the bleeding disorder community.

Safety and efficacy of low molecular weight heparins in children: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of single-arm studies.

Within the last two decades low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have gained increasing widespread use as anticoagulants in children. The use of LMWH has been implemented into clinical care even though there is a lack of firm evidence on the efficacy and safety of LMWH in this population due to the absence of sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials. In the absence of clinical trials, we performed a meta-analysis of available single-arm studies using LMWH in children. A systematic search of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, OVID, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library) for studies published from 1980 to 2010 was conducted using keywords in combination both as MeSH terms and text words. Two authors independently screened citations and those meeting a priori defined inclusion criteria were retained. Data on year of publication, study design, country of origin, number of patients, ethnicity, venous thromboembolic events type, and frequency of recurrence and major bleedings were abstracted. Pooled incidence rates (IR) including 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) on efficacy and safety data of LMWH administration on primary prophylaxis, as well as on secondary prophylaxis in children following symptomatic thromboembolism (TE) were shown. We included 2251 pediatric patients derived from 35 single-arm studies from 12 study countries who were eligible for analysis in the present systematic review. Pooled incidence rates (95% CI) to develop first TE on primary prophylaxis, further TE event on LMWH secondary prophylaxis, or a major bleeding event on LMWH were 0.047 (0.023 to 0.091), 0.052 (0.037 to 0.073) for efficacy, and 0.054 (0.039 to 0.074) for safety (treatment data only), respectively. Efficacy and safety data are comparable with adult data. The present systematic review suggests that use of LMWH in children as primary prophylaxis and in treatment of symptomatic thrombosis is effective and safe. However, properly designed randomized controlled trials are needed.

A phase II study of amifostine in children with myelodysplastic syndrome: a report from the Children's Oncology Group study (AAML0121).

Based on its potential role in adult myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the Children's Oncology Group (COG) embarked on a phase II study using amifostine in pediatric MDS (WHO 2001 criteria) patients. Responses were evaluated after two cycles. Ten patients were enrolled; five were deemed ineligible, and four withdrew after the first course. Only one patient completed two courses, and was found to be in complete remission. The study was closed after being open for 2 years due to slow accrual. Studying a rare disease like MDS may pose insurmountable obstacles even in a large clinical trials group such as COG, in part because of the changing definitions of MDS and the rarity of adult type MDS in children. The role of amifostine in pediatric MDS was not known at the time of study.

Perspective - The case for zero bleeds and drug bioequivalence in the treatment of congenital hemophilia A in 2021.

Not all patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) respond optimally to a given dose of a given product. Within-individual variance in cross-over studies makes each patient unique in the response to each standard half-life (SHL) factor VIII (FVIII) product in pharmacokinetic (PK) terms. This hampers the prediction of efficacy when a SHL FVIII product is employed. PK data showing that half-lives of SHL rFVIII are unsatisfactory to achieve zero bleeding in individual HA patients provide the rationale for switching from SHL to extended half-life (EHL) products. However, not all subjects receiving prophylaxis with EHL products achieve zero bleeding, the most cogent objective of personalized prophylaxis. Known determinants of FVIII half-life (age, von Willebrand factor [VWF] levels, blood group) cumulatively account for one third of the total inter-individual variation in FVIII clearance in subjects with severe HA. Investigations into precision, and accuracy of laboratory measurement to be employed; newer pathways for the clearance of both free-FVIII and VWF-bound FVIII, and adequately powered studies on omics and phenotypic heterogeneity, are likely to provide additional information on the remaining two thirds of inter-individual variation in FVIII clearance in HA. Variability in the clinical response has also been documented in patients when FVIII activity is mimicked by fixed subcutaneous doses of the bispecific antibody emicizumab. National registries that collect PK data of available FVIII products and ad hoc information on the individual response to emicizumab should be encouraged, to establish newer standards of care and ease personalized clinical decisions to achieve zero bleeding.

Significant reduction in hemarthrosis in boys with severe hemophilia A: The China hemophilia individualized low-dose secondary prophylaxis study.

INTRODUCTION: In countries with restricted access to clotting factor concentrates, early implementation of low-dose prophylaxis is recommended over episodic treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this 1-year prospective secondary prophylaxis study was to evaluate the efficacy of a dose/frequency escalating protocol in young boys with hemophilia A in China. METHODS: Boys were started on a low-dose protocol (minimum 10-15 IU/kg of factor VIII [FVIII] twice weekly). Escalation was based on index joint bleeding, swelling/persistent joint swelling, and serial ultrasound (gray scale and color Doppler) examinations of index joints. RESULTS: Thirty-three boys, median age 4.8 years (interquartile range, 3.8-6.1) were enrolled in a 3-month observation period that preceded a 1-year prophylaxis phase. A significant reduction in total bleeding events (43.0%, P = .001), index joint bleeds (53.2%, P = .002), and target index joint bleeds (70.0%, P = 0.02) was observed during the prophylaxis phase. During the prophylaxis period, 40% of target joints resolved. The percentage of boys with zero index joint bleeds increased significantly (P = .004) from 51.5% during the observation phase to 81.8% in last quarter of the prophylaxis phase (months 10-12). There was no progression of arthropathy based on physical examination (Hemophilia Joint Health Score), X-ray, and ultrasound obtained at entry into the prophylaxis phase and at study exit. The median FVIII consumption over the prophylaxis phase was 1786 IU/kg/y. CONCLUSION: A low-dose, individualized prophylaxis protocol, guided by individual bleeding profiles and serial assessment of joint status, enables escalation of treatment intensity in boys with severe hemophilia A, leading to a significant reduction in bleeding events and reduction in target joint bleeding.

Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia.

BACKGROUND: Effective ways to prevent arthropathy in severe hemophilia are unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned young boys with severe hemophilia A to regular infusions of recombinant factor VIII (prophylaxis) or to an enhanced episodic infusion schedule of at least three doses totaling a minimum of 80 IU of factor VIII per kilogram of body weight at the time of a joint hemorrhage. The primary outcome was the incidence of bone or cartilage damage as detected in index joints (ankles, knees, and elbows) by radiography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: Sixty-five boys younger than 30 months of age were randomly assigned to prophylaxis (32 boys) or enhanced episodic therapy (33 boys). When the boys reached 6 years of age, 93% of those in the prophylaxis group and 55% of those in the episodic-therapy group were considered to have normal index-joint structure on MRI (P=0.006). The relative risk of MRI-detected joint damage with episodic therapy as compared with prophylaxis was 6.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 24.4). The mean annual numbers of joint and total hemorrhages were higher at study exit in the episodic-therapy group than in the prophylaxis group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). High titers of inhibitors of factor VIII developed in two boys who received prophylaxis; three boys in the episodic-therapy group had a life-threatening hemorrhage. Hospitalizations and infections associated with central-catheter placement did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with recombinant factor VIII can prevent joint damage and decrease the frequency of joint and other hemorrhages in young boys with severe hemophilia A. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00207597 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Pharmacokinetic characteristics of the triple inactivated plasma-derived Kedrion FIX concentrate: data from the KB037 clinical trial.

The pharmacokinetics data of phase I/II clinical trials (EudraCT Number: 2005-006186-14) of the new, triple inactivated plasma-derived Kedrion FIX concentrate was designed according to the recommendations of SSC-ISTH [1,2]: 11 post-infusion FIX/time points samples during the first 72 h. The PK data were also analysed by a modified, less dense, 9 FIX/time points, sample design. The outcomes of the safety and efficacy study and the pharmacokinetics' results have been previously and partially described [3,4]. The single-dose PK at enrolment (PK I) and the end of the trial (PK II) were analyzed by WinNonlin 7.0 (Pharsight) and according to three different methods: Non-Compartment Analysis (NCA), One Compartment Method (OCM), and Two-Compartment Method (TCM). The outcomes of PK parameters by TCM show that a higher number of FIX/time concentration points may not always give a better definition of the decay curve. On the other hand, the Terminal HL of NCA is deeply affected by the goodness of the last two-three points. The quite long Kedrion FIX HL may allow for a cost/effective tailoring of prophylaxis in haemophilia B patients.

Pathologic Features of Down Syndrome Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Protocol AAML0431.

CONTEXT.­: Detailed diagnostic features of acute myeloid leukemia in Down syndrome are lacking, leading to potential misdiagnoses as standard acute myeloid leukemia occurring in patients with Down syndrome. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate diagnostic features of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in patients with Down syndrome. DESIGN.­: Diagnostic bone marrow samples from 163 patients enrolled in the Children's Oncology Group study AAML0431 were evaluated by using central morphologic review and institutional immunophenotyping. Results were compared to overall survival, event-free survival, GATA1 mutation status, cytogenetics, and minimal residual disease results. RESULTS.­: Sixty myelodysplastic syndrome and 103 acute myeloid leukemia samples were reviewed. Both had distinctive features compared to those of patients without Down syndrome. They showed megakaryocytic and erythroid but little myeloid dysplasia, and marked megakaryocytic hyperplasia with unusual megakaryocyte morphology. In acute myeloid leukemia cases, megakaryoblastic differentiation of blasts was most common (54 of 103, 52%); other cases showed erythroblastic (11 of 103, 11%), mixed erythroid/megakaryoblastic (20 of 103, 19%), or no differentiation (10 of 103, 10%). Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia cases had similar event-free survival and overall survival. Leukemic subgroups showed interesting, but not statistically significant, trends for survival and minimal residual disease. Cases with institutional diagnoses of French American British M1-5 morphology showed typical features of Down syndrome disease, with survival approaching that of other cases. CONCLUSIONS.­: Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia in Down syndrome display features that allow discrimination from standard cases of disease. These distinctions are important for treatment decisions, and for understanding disease pathogenesis. We propose specific diagnostic criteria for Down syndrome-related subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Impact of inherited thrombophilia on venous thromboembolism in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to estimate the impact of inherited thrombophilia (IT) on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) onset and recurrence in children by a meta-analysis of published observational studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, OVID, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library) for studies published from 1970 to 2007 was conducted using key words in combination as both MeSH terms and text words. Citations were independently screened by 2 authors, and those meeting the inclusion criteria defined a priori were retained. Data on year of publication, study design, country of origin, number of patients/controls, ethnicity, VTE type, and frequency of recurrence were abstracted. Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated, and summary odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated with both fixed-effects and random-effects models. Thirty-five of 50 studies met inclusion criteria. No significant heterogeneity was discerned across studies. Although >70% of patients had at least 1 clinical risk factor for VTE, a statistically significant association with VTE onset was demonstrated for each IT trait evaluated (and for combined IT traits), with summary odds ratios ranging from 2.63 (95% CI, 1.61 to 4.29) for the factor II variant to 9.44 (95% CI, 3.34 to 26.66) for antithrombin deficiency. Furthermore, a significant association with recurrent VTE was found for all IT traits except the factor V variant and elevated lipoprotein(a). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis indicates that detection of IT is clinically meaningful in children with, or at risk for, VTE and underscores the importance of pediatric thrombophilia screening programs.

Thrombotic events in neonates receiving recombinant factor VIIa or fresh frozen plasma.

BACKGROUND: Numerous recent reports have described the use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in non-hemophilia bleeding situations for achievement of hemostasis. However, its use in clinical situations other than hemophilia patients with inhibitors has been complicated by some reports of thrombotic events. rFVIIa has been used successfully to treat coagulopathic and/or bleeding neonates. The prevalence of thrombotic events in these neonates is completely unknown. This study was initiated to determine the risk of thrombotic events associated with rFVIIa use in neonates. PROCEDURE: All published literature in non-hemophilic, non-congenital factor VII deficient neonates receiving rFVIIa was reviewed. In addition, all data submitted to the SeveN Bleep Registry, a web-based registry of rFVIIa uses in non-hemophilic children was analyzed. As the baseline risk of thrombotic events in bleeding and/or coagulopathic neonates is not known, we also reviewed the records of 100 consecutive neonates from a single institution who received fresh frozen plasma (FFP) alone to treat their coagulopathy and/or bleeding episode. RESULTS: A total of 134 neonates received rFVIIa. Of these, 10 (7.5%) had a thrombotic event. The baseline risk of thrombotic events in neonates receiving FFP was 7%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall the prevalence of thrombotic events in bleeding and/or coagulopathic neonates appears to be around 7%, whether or not they receive rFVIIa.

Cerebral microbleeds: hearing through the silence-a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: The term cerebral microbleed (CMB) refers to lesions documented as unexpected findings during computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging examination of the brain. Initially, a CMB was thought to represent hemosiderin-laden macrophages marking an area of a tiny hemorrhage. Recently, histopathologic studies have shown that the structure of a CMB can be variable. To aid in dealing with this finding and judging its clinical significance, this review addresses important aspects of a CMB, including the definition, prevalence, and incidence in various populations, end-organ damage, associated conditions, and whether any action or treatment by the clinician might be indicated. METHODS: PubMed Medline, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Current Contents, and Derwent Drug Files databases were searched for the keywords "microbleeds-detection-damage", "silent bleeds", "microbleeds", or "silent bleeds AND hemophilia" from 2011-2016. References of retrieved articles were also reviewed and included if applicable. RESULTS: The published data are found primarily in the imaging literature and focus on diagnostic techniques. Some publications address relationships with diverse, co-existing clinical conditions and implications for treatment, especially in stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and antithrombotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: It is critical for non-radiologist clinicians (primary care, internists, neurologists, hematologists) to be aware of the potential importance of the finding of a CMB, and the fact that these lesions are not always truly silent or without important clinical consequences. As additional studies appear, clinicians may be able to "hear" more clearly through the silence of the CMB and understand potential clinical implications in patients.

Chronic hepatitis B and other correlates of spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus among HIV-infected people with hemophilia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify correlates of spontaneous hepatitis C virus (HCV) clearance among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection. DESIGN: Baseline (2001-2004) analysis of a cohort study of people with hemophilia. METHODS: Detailed questionnaire data were used to identify dates of primary HCV and HIV infections and to categorize sex; race; alcohol use; interferon treatment; hepatitis B virus (HBV) status; and HIV/AIDS history, treatment and current status. Spontaneous HCV clearance was defined as nondetection of HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction assay in paired annual plasma, excluding those treated with interferon. Chi-squared, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression were used to identify correlates of clearance. RESULTS: Among 478 HIV-infected participants, 61 (12.8%) had cleared HCV. Among the 31 participants with chronic HBV (as well as HIV), 16 (51.6%) had cleared HCV. With chronic HBV, HCV clearance was increased 11.2-fold (95% confidence interval, 5.1-24.8), after adjusting for sex, race, and hemophilia severity. Excluding the participants with chronic HBV, the prevalence of HCV clearance was 10.1%; and it was significantly reduced among males (9.7%, P = 0.05), blacks (1.6%, P = 0.01), and participants with severe hemophilia (8.2%, P = 0.02). HCV clearance was not associated with HIV RNA detection in plasma, CD4 cell count, anti-HIV therapy, AIDS history, ages at or years of HIV or HCV infection, or alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: HCV clearance is unambiguously and markedly increased with chronic HBV infection among HIV co-infected people.

Haemostatic efficacy and safety of bolus and continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIIa are comparable in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major surgery. Results from an open-label, randomized, multicenter trial.

Bolus infusion (BI) recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) administration is safe and effective in the surgical management of haemophilia patients with inhibitors but has not been compared directly with continuous infusion (CI). We conducted an open-label, randomized, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa administered by BI or CI for the surgical management of haemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors to FVIII or FIX. Safety was compared with that of a control group of non-inhibitor patients receiving FVIII or FIX concentrates for major surgery. All inhibitor subjects received an initial bolus dose of 90 microg/kg rFVIIa and were then randomly assigned to BI (n = 12) or CI (n = 12). The BI group received 90 microg/kg rFVIIa every two hours (h) during surgery through day 5, then every four hours for days 6-10. The CI group received 50 microg/kg/h rFVIIa through day 5, then 25 mg/kg/h for days 6-10. The control group (n = 12) received FVIII or FIX per institutional protocols. Twenty-two major surgeries included orthopedic procedures on the knee (n = 13), hip (n = 3), and abdominal/pelvis procedures (n = 4). One patient with an autoimmune FVIII inhibitor randomized to the BI arm was excluded from efficacy analysis. Haemostatic efficacy of rFVIIa in each group was comparable: effective in 8/11 and 9/12 subjects in the BI and CI arms, respectively, and ineffective in three subjects in each arm. Serious adverse events were related to continued or increased bleeding. In conclusion, haemostatic efficacy and safety of BI and CI of rFVIIa are comparable for the surgical management of haemophilia subjects with inhibitors.

Current opinion on inhibitor treatment options.

Inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia complicates hemostatic management. Currently, high doses of factor concentrates are used to override low-titer, low-responding inhibitors during acute bleeding episodes. Bypassing agents, such as the activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity, Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex, Vapor Heated (FEIBA; Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria), and activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), are commonly used to treat acute bleeding episodes in patients with high-titer, high-responding inhibitors, whereas long-term therapeutic options include inhibitor eradication using immune tolerance induction. Neither FEIBA nor rFVIIa can be monitored with a laboratory assay, making it difficult to establish optimal dosages. Comparative studies evaluating the efficacy of FEIBA and rFVIIa for bleed control have been sparse, prompting investigators to initiate crossover comparison studies to assess the efficacy and cost of aPCC and rFVIIa in the treatment of joint hemorrhages. Both the cost of therapy and the outcome of therapy will need to be considered in the development of future hemostatic agents for patients with inhibitors.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of recombinant factor VIIa versus APCC in the treatment of minor-to-moderate bleeds in hemophilia patients with inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of three treatment regimens using recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa), NovoSeven, and activated prothrombin-complex concentrate (APCC), FEIBA VH, for home treatment of minor-to-moderate bleeds in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. METHODS: A literature-based, decision-analytic model was developed to compare three treatment regimens. The regimens consisting of first-, second-, and third-line treatments were: rFVIIa-rFVIIa-rFVIIa; APCC-rFVIIa-rFVIIa; and APCC-APCC-rFVIIa. Patients not responding to first-line treatment were administered second-line treatment, and those failing second-line received third-line treatment. Using literature and expert opinion, the model structure and base-case inputs were adapted to the US from a previously published analysis. The percentage of evaluable bleeds controlled with rFVIIa and APCC were obtained from published literature. Drug costs (2005 US$) based on average wholesale price were included in the base-case model. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (second-order Monte Carlo simulation) were conducted by varying the efficacy, re-bleeding rates, patient weight, and dosing to ascertain robustness of the model. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the average cost per resolved bleed using rFVIIa as first-, second-, and third-line treatment was $28 076. Using APCC as first-line and rFVIIa as second- and third-line treatment resulted in an average cost per resolved bleed of $30 883, whereas the regimen using APCC as first- and second-line, and rFVIIa as third-line treatment was the most expensive, with an average cost per resolved bleed of $32 150. Cost offsets occurred for the rFVIIa-only regimen through avoidance of second and third lines of treatment. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the rFVIIa-only strategy was the least expensive strategy more than 68% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The management of minor-to-moderate bleeds extends beyond the initial line of treatment, and should include the economic impact of re-bleeding and failures over multiple lines of treatment. In the majority of cases, the rFVIIa-only regimen appears to be a less expensive treatment option in inhibitor patients with minor-to-moderate bleeds over three lines of treatment.