RESUMO
The reliability of physical examination of the breast was evaluated by determining the extent of agreement among four experienced breast surgeons who examined the same 100 patients. The consequences of disagreements among surgeons were assessed by determining the diagnostic accuracy of each examiner. Despite differences in the frequency with which each surgeon found abnormalities or masses, or recommended mammography or biopsy, the diagnostic accuracy of the surgeons was very similar, and most disagreements concerned the findings in patients who did not have breast cancer. Breast examination carried out by more than one surgeon may reduce the frequency with which biopsy is performed in patients who do not have breast cancer.
Assuntos
Mama , Exame Físico , Biópsia , Doenças Mamárias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia , Palpação , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are dependent upon early detection of the disease by physical examination and mammography. Although mammography is a relatively good and cost-effective method of early breast cancer detection, there are some inherent weaknesses associated with this imaging modality that limit its sensitivity and specificity. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breasts provides the additional capability to answer questions raised or unanswered with conventional imaging methods. This paper reviews contrast-enhanced breast MRI interpretation guidelines and patient preselection criteria for diagnostic problem cases. Technical aspects using a commercially available three-dimensional (3D) spoiled gradient-echo technique are discussed.