Hyperendemic H. pylori and tapeworm infections in a U.S.-Mexico border population.

OBJECTIVE: A higher incidence of infectious disease has been documented in U.S. regions bordering Mexico compared with non-border areas. We assessed the prevalence of important gastrointestinal infections in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, and El Paso, Texas, the largest binational community along the U.S.-Mexico border. METHODS: Fecal specimens from a sample of the asymptomatic population representing all ages were tested for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia spp., and other intestinal parasitic pathogens using flotation, immunoassays, and/or polymerase chain reaction. We also measured indicators of microbiological contamination of drinking water, hands of food preparers, and kitchen surfaces. RESULTS: Overall, of the 386 participants, H. pylori was present in 38.2%, Taenia spp. in 3.3%, Giardia spp. in 2.7%, Cryptosporidium spp. in 1.9%, Entamoeba dispar in 1.3%, and Ascaris lumbricoides and Necator americanus in 0.3% of the study subjects; Cyclospora spp. and Entamoeba histolytica were not found. H. pylori infection was associated with handwashing (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0, 1.8). Taenia spp. was found more often on the U.S. side (PR=8.6, 95% CI 2.3, 30.8). We did not find an association between these infections and the occurrence of total coliforms or fecal coliforms on kitchen surfaces. In addition, Escherichia coli was not found in any drinking water sample. CONCLUSION: The study results indicated that H. pylori and Taenia spp. infections may be highly prevalent along the U.S.-Mexico border. Additional research is necessary to adequately characterize the prevalence, as well as determine whether interventions that reduce these infections are warranted.

Suppression of extraintestinal and intestinal Nippostrongylus brasiliensis-induced eosinophilia by Eimeria nieschulzi.

Eosinophil responses in extraintestinal and intestinal tissues were examined in August and Sprague-Dawley rats infected with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis or Eimeria nieschulzi (or both), and in uninfected controls to test the hypothesis that E. nieschulzi suppresses the systemic N. brasiliensis-induced eosinophil response. Caudal vein blood, femoral bone marrow, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, peritoneal lavage fluid, and duodenal and jejunal samples were collected on day 8 postinfection (PI) with E. nieschulzi, on day 16 PI of the N. brasiliensis infection, when these days coincided in the concurrently infected rats, and from uninfected controls. Differential white blood cell counts were made from blood smears and cytocentrifuged preparations, and duodenal and jejunal eosinophils per villus crypt unit were quantified. Eimeria nieschulzi significantly reduced N. brasiliensis-induced eosinophil levels in peripheral blood, lavage fluids, and duodenal and jejunal tissues in both rat strains. August and Sprague-Dawley rats monospecifically infected with N. brasiliensis and concurrently with both parasites demonstrated elevated eosinopoiesis compared with uninfected controls and rats infected with only E. nieschulzi; however, despite this, concurrently infected rats had a significantly greater level of eosinopoiesis than those infected with only the nematode. In addition, E. nieschulzi induced elevated neutrophil levels in both monospecifically and concurrently infected rats in all extraintestinal tissues examined in both rat strains, whereas lymphocyte counts decreased concomitantly. This study suggests that the intestinal coccidian E. nieschulzi has the ability to modulate the systemic inflammatory response to N. brasiliensis and that this is not a rat strain-specific phenomenon.