Does needle size matter? Effects of micro-hypodermic needle injections of botulinum toxin type A in patients with hemifacial spasm.

INTRODUCTION: Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) injections are the first-line treatment for primary hemifacial spasms (HFS), but require frequent painful injections. Although micro-hypodermic needles are commonly used for aesthetic BoNT/A injections to lessen pain and bruising, their benefits in HFS remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare side effects of BoNT/A injection, specifically pain and bruising, between primary HFS patients who received injections using micro-hypodermic needles (34-G) and those using standard needles (30-G). METHODS: This cross-over, double-blind, randomised controlled trial involved HFS patients who received BoNT/A injections using either a 34-G or 30-G needle at two visits 12 weeks apart. Primary outcomes, pain and bruising were assessed immediately after injection using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (Thai version, SF-MPQ). Bruise assessment was also conducted one week after each injection. Secondary outcomes involved comparing efficacy of BoNT/A between the two types of needles and assessing other complications beyond pain and bruising. RESULTS: 65 HFS patients (47 women and 18 men; mean age 59.46 ± 11.48 years; mean disease duration 5.86 ± 4.16 years) were included in the study. Patients who received 34-G needle injections reported significantly reduced pain, as indicated by VAS, total SF-MPQ scores, and bruise scores, compared to those who received 30-G needle injections (p < 0.001, each). There were no differences in efficacy or occurrence of other complications associated with BoNT/A between the two needle types. CONCLUSION: In HFS patients, BoNT/A injections using micro-hypodermic needles resulted in reduced pain and bruising, compared to standard needles, while maintaining similar BoNT/A benefits.

The rise of Parkinson's disease is a global challenge, but efforts to tackle this must begin at a national level: a protocol for national digital screening and "eat, move, sleep" lifestyle interventions to prevent or slow the rise of non-communicable diseases in Thailand.

The rising prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD) globally presents a significant public health challenge for national healthcare systems, particularly in low-to-middle income countries, such as Thailand, which may have insufficient resources to meet these escalating healthcare needs. There are also many undiagnosed cases of early-stage PD, a period when therapeutic interventions would have the most value and least cost. The traditional "passive" approach, whereby clinicians wait for patients with symptomatic PD to seek treatment, is inadequate. Proactive, early identification of PD will allow timely therapeutic interventions, and digital health technologies can be scaled up in the identification and early diagnosis of cases. The Parkinson's disease risk survey (TCTR20231025005) aims to evaluate a digital population screening platform to identify undiagnosed PD cases in the Thai population. Recognizing the long prodromal phase of PD, the target demographic for screening is people aged ≥ 40 years, approximately 20 years before the usual emergence of motor symptoms. Thailand has a highly rated healthcare system with an established universal healthcare program for citizens, making it ideal for deploying a national screening program using digital technology. Designed by a multidisciplinary group of PD experts, the digital platform comprises a 20-item questionnaire about PD symptoms along with objective tests of eight digital markers: voice vowel, voice sentences, resting and postural tremor, alternate finger tapping, a "pinch-to-size" test, gait and balance, with performance recorded using a mobile application and smartphone's sensors. Machine learning tools use the collected data to identify subjects at risk of developing, or with early signs of, PD. This article describes the selection and validation of questionnaire items and digital markers, with results showing the chosen parameters and data analysis methods to be robust, reliable, and reproducible. This digital platform could serve as a model for similar screening strategies for other non-communicable diseases in Thailand.

Improving functional disability in patients with tremor: A clinical perspective of the efficacies, considerations, and challenges of assistive technology.

Despite advances in treatments for tremor disorders, many patients are still left with functional disability affecting both basic and complex tasks needed for independent living, reflecting a significant gap in the current management of tremor disorders. Assistive devices present a possible solution to bridge the gap between symptom burden and current therapies, offering safe and effective tremor suppression. Although not yet considered as an option in most therapeutic guidelines for tremor disorders, assistive technologies (AT) offer a unique opportunity as adjunctive interventions utilising new portable technologies at lower cost, with minimal adverse effects. Here, the clinical concept of Human Activity Assistive Technology model via two groups of AT (limb weights and handheld devices; orthoses and exoskeletons) in patients with tremor is reviewed, supported by clinical evidence on reduction of tremor severity or improved functional performance. Although most devices are prototypes with limited clinical evidence, many are approved as medical devices and are commercially available. However, despite increased availability of these devices, there are still barriers to their adoption, mostly influenced by perceptions on privacy, trust, and functionality/added value. Long-term adherence to these devices is also unknown. In order to promote accessibility and usability of AT for tremor, an evaluation consensus by an interdisciplinary team (users, prescribers, and technicians) is required to identify those in need and to offer device recommendations. Future developments of AT for tremor should improve user comfort by incorporating softer, lightweight materials and explore new mechanisms to enhance wearability and long-term efficacies. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.

Patient selection and injection techniques for botulinum neurotoxin in oromandibular dystonia.

Oromandibular dystonia (OMD) is a form of focal dystonia that involves the masticatory, lower facial, labial, and lingual musculature. It is a disabling disorder which had limited treatment options until the recent introduction of botulinum toxin (BoNT) as the recommended first-line therapy by most experts and evidence-based literature. Owing to the complex relationship between the muscles of mastication and surrounding muscles, there is a wide variety of dynamic clinical presentations, making clinical recognition and the corresponding approach to BoNT injection therapy difficult. In this review, the authors provide a framework for practical clinical approaches, beginning with the recognition of clinical subtypes of OMD (jaw-opening, jaw-closing, jaw-deviating, lingual, peri-oral, and/or pharyngeal dystonias), followed by patient selection and clinical evaluation to determine function interferences, with injection techniques illustrated for each subtype. Careful stepwise planning is recommended to identify the muscles that are primarily responsible and employ a conservative approach to dosing titration. Treating physicians should be diligent in checking for adverse events, especially for the first few injection cycles, as muscles involved in OMD are small, delicate, and situated in close proximity. It is recommended that future studies should aim to establish the clinical efficacy of each subtype, incorporating muscle targeting techniques and patient-centred outcome measures that are related to disturbed daily functions.