Constitutive hypercoagulability in pediatric sickle cell disease patients with hemoglobin SS genotype.

Background: Constitutive inflammation and hemostatic activation have been identified as key contributors to the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD), leading to clinical consequences such as vaso-occlusive crises and stroke. Patients with hemoglobin SS (HbSS) and hemoglobin SC (HbSC) genotypes are reported to have different symptoms, as do patients in steady-state and crisis situations. Differences among these groups remain unclear in pediatric patients. Objectives: To compare hemostatic activity in HbSS and HbSC pediatric patients during steady state, in crisis, and in clinical follow-up and compare HbSS and HbSC patients with normal healthy children. Methods: Whole-blood coagulation assay thromboelastography (TEG) was used to assess hemostatic activity. In parallel, flow cytometry was used to assess procoagulant surface expression of platelets and red blood cells. Results: TEG results indicated no significant differences in clotting onset (R time), clot maximum amplitude, or maximum rate of thrombus generation among steady-state, crisis, and follow-up subgroups of HbSS and HbSC patients. TEG parameters did not differ significantly between HbSC patients and healthy children, while HbSS patients showed significantly shorter R time and greater maximum amplitude and maximum rate of thrombus generation, all indicative of a constitutive hypercoagulable state. Flow cytometry results did not detect increased platelet integrin αIIbß3 activation or red blood cell procoagulant surface expression in SCD patients compared with unaffected children. Conclusion: Our results indicate that pediatric SCD patients with the HbSS genotype have constitutively activated hemostasis relative to HbSC patients and healthy children. It remains to be determined how treatments that improve clinical outcomes in SCD patients affect this constitutively hypercoagulable state.

Sickle cell disease: Reducing the global disease burden.

Sickle cell disease has been largely an invisible global health issue, especially in regions of high incidence mainly due to lack of awareness among both the local health policy makers and the public. Public health interventions, such as screening of newborns, provision of prophylaxis against bacterial infections, and immunizations against pneumococcal infections can have the greatest impact. Family education on assessment of spleen size and subsequent detection of splenic sequestration and promptness to seek medical attention for a febrile child is also important in the control of the morbidity and mortality of children with SCD living in resource-poor countries. In addition to these affordable interventions, hydroxyurea therapy is necessary to decrease both the acute and chronic complications of sickle cell anemia. Sickle cell disease has been recognized to have global health significance by key institutions including the World Health Organization in 2006 and the United Nation is 2008. In 2010, the WHO released national health care management goals and set targets to be achieved by the countries in sub-Saharan Africa for the control and management of SCD. These are yet to be translated into action. To do, this would require active and sustainable public-private partnerships for sustainable program development in these regions. Effective interventions should be integrated into existing health systems, the best examples linking primary healthcare facilities to specialized sickle cell disease centers in regional and tertiary healthcare institutions.