Positive airway pressure therapy for chronic pain in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. OSA may lead to low sleep quality and an increase in pain sensitivity. Patients reporting greater sleep impairment tend to experience higher pain intensity and vice versa. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the current gold standard treatment for OSA. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of PAP therapy in patients with comorbid chronic pain and OSA in influencing pain outcomes like pain intensity, tolerance, threshold, and sensitivity. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search for studies published after 1990, utilizing the following databases: Medline, Medline In-Process/ePubs, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Search terms included "chronic pain," "sleep disorders," and "positive airway pressure." RESULTS: Of 1982 initial studies, ten studies met the study inclusion criteria. Seven of these studies examined the effect of PAP therapy on chronic pain, of which five demonstrated improved pain outcomes, specifically, headache pain. The effect of PAP therapy on chronic non-headache pain was found to be inconclusive. When examining the three studies that did not involve chronic pain patients, PAP therapy effectively increased pain threshold and tolerance in two studies (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: An association exists between PAP therapy and decreased chronic headache outcomes in patients with OSA. Additionally, research shows that PAP therapy may increase pain tolerance and threshold. Future high-quality evidence is required to further investigate the association between PAP and non-headache chronic pain.

Effect of intravenous acetaminophen on postoperative outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

PURPOSE: Hip fractures are debilitating in older adults because of their impact on quality of life. Opioids are associated with adverse effects in this population, so oral acetaminophen is commonly prescribed to minimize opioid use. Intravenous (iv) acetaminophen has been reported to have superior efficacy and bioavailability than oral acetaminophen. Nevertheless, its effect on postoperative outcomes in emergency hip fractures is unclear. This systematic review assessed the effect of iv acetaminophen on postoperative outcomes in older hip fracture patients. SOURCE: We searched multiple databases from inception to June 2021 for studies on adults > 50 yr of age undergoing emergency hip fracture surgery who received iv acetaminophen (or paracetamol) and that reported postoperative outcomes. Relevant titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened based on the eligibility criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the selected papers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 3,510 initial studies, four met the inclusion criteria. One was a prospective cohort study and three were retrospective cohort studies. All four studies used historical control groups. Three studies reported a significantly lower mean opioid dose with iv acetaminophen than with oral acetaminophen. Three studies also reported a significantly shorter hospital stay. One study each reported a significant decrease in the number of missed physical therapy sessions, the need for one-to-one supervision, and episodes of delirium. CONCLUSION: There is very limited low-level evidence that iv acetaminophen improves preoperative and postoperative analgesia and shortens hospital stay in older hip fracture patients. Nevertheless, our results should be interpreted with caution since there are no prospective randomized trials investigating whether iv acetaminophen improves postoperative outcomes in this patient population. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021198174); registered 15 August 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les fractures de la hanche sont débilitantes chez les personnes âgées en raison de leur impact sur leur qualité de vie. Les opioïdes sont associés à des effets indésirables chez cette population, de sorte que l'acétaminophène par voie orale est couramment prescrit pour minimiser la consommation d'opioïdes. L'acétaminophène par voie intraveineuse (IV) a une efficacité et une biodisponibilité supérieures à celles de l'acétaminophène par voie orale. Néanmoins, son effet sur les devenirs postopératoires dans les fractures d'urgence de la hanche n'est pas clair. Cette revue systématique a évalué l'effet de l'acétaminophène IV sur les devenirs postopératoires chez les patients âgés avec une fracture de la hanche. SOURCES: Nous avons effectué des recherches dans plusieurs bases de données de leur création à juin 2021 pour en tirer les études portant sur des adultes > 50 ans bénéficiant d'une chirurgie d'urgence pour une fracture de la hanche et ayant reçu de l'acétaminophène IV (ou paracétamol), et qui rapportait les devenirs postopératoires. Les titres, résumés et textes intégraux pertinents ont été sélectionnés en fonction des critères d'admissibilité. L'échelle de Newcastle-Ottawa a été utilisée pour évaluer la qualité des articles sélectionnés. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Sur les 3510 études initiales, quatre ont répondu aux critères d'inclusion. L'une était une étude de cohorte prospective et trois étaient des études de cohorte rétrospectives. Les quatre études ont utilisé des groupes témoins historiques. Trois études ont rapporté une dose moyenne d'opioïdes significativement plus faible avec l'acétaminophène IV qu'avec de l'acétaminophène par voie orale. Trois études ont également rapporté un séjour à l'hôpital significativement plus court. Une diminution significative du nombre de séances de physiothérapie manquées a été rapporté dans une étude, une autre a rapporté une diminution significative de la nécessité de supervision individuelle, et une troisième une réduction des épisodes d'état confusionnel aigu. CONCLUSION: : Il n'existe que très peu de données probantes qui sont de faible qualité et selon lesquelles l'acétaminophène IV améliore l'analgésie préopératoire et postopératoire et réduit la durée de séjour à l'hôpital chez les patients âgés atteints d'une fracture de hanche. Néanmoins, nos résultats doivent être interprétés avec prudence car il n'existe pas d'étude randomisée prospective évaluant si l'acétaminophène IV améliore les issues postopératoires dans cette population de patients. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42021198174); enregistrée le 15 août 2021.

Trends in Representation of Female Applicants and Matriculants in Canadian Residency Programs Across Specialties, 1995 to 2019.

Importance: Disparities in representation between sexes have been shown at multiple career stages in medicine despite increasing representation in the overall physician workforce. Objective: To assess sex representation of applicants to the Canadian R-1 entry match for postgraduate training programs from 1995 to 2019, comparing distribution between different specialties as well as applied vs matched applicants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis of aggregate data provided by the Canadian Resident Matching Service between 1995 and 2019 analyzed aggregate data for the Canadian R-1 residency match from 1995 through 2019. Exposures: Applicant sex as reported in the Canadian Resident Matching Service database. Main Outcomes and Measures: The sex representation of applicants was compared and the longitudinal trends in sex representation were analyzed by specialty between 1995 and 2019. The sex representation of overall applicants to the Canadian R-1 entry match were compared with matched applicants, and both were stratified by specialty. Results: A total of 48 424 applicants were identified (26 407 [54.5%] female applicants), of which 41 037 were matched applicants. Using specialty groupings, female applicants were most highly represented in obstetrics and gynecology (1776 of 2090 [85.0%]) and least represented in radiology (658 of 2055 [32.0%]). Within individual subspecialties, female applicants had the lowest representation in neurosurgery (90 of 394 [22.8%]). While female applicants represented an increasing proportion of the overall applicant population between 1995 and 2019 (z = 2.71; P = .007), significant increases were seen in some, but not all, individual specialties. Differences by sex were found among Canadian medical graduate match rates to their top-ranked specialty: female applicants had a lower likelihood of being rejected for family medicine (rejection of male applicants: OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39-0.54; P < .001) and psychiatry (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.76; P < .001) and were more likely to be rejected for all-encompassing surgery (acceptance of male applicants: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.10-1.28; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Increasing representation of female residency applicants over time was seen in some, but not all, medical specialties in Canada, and sex-based differences in successful match rates were observed in some specialties. The reasons for these disparities require further investigation for corrective strategies to be identified.