The effect of different dosing regimens of motesanib on the gallbladder: a randomized phase 1b study in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder toxicity, including cholecystitis, has been reported with motesanib, an orally administered small-molecule antagonist of VEGFRs 1, 2 and 3; PDGFR; and Kit. We assessed effects of motesanib on gallbladder size and function. METHODS: Patients with advanced metastatic solid tumors ineligible for or progressing on standard-of-care therapies with no history of cholecystitis or biliary disease were randomized 2:1:1 to receive motesanib 125 mg once daily (Arm A); 75 mg twice daily (BID), 14-days-on/7-days-off (Arm B); or 75 mg BID, 5-days-on/2-days-off (Arm C). Primary endpoints were mean change from baseline in gallbladder size (volume by ultrasound; independent review) and function (ejection fraction by CCK-HIDA; investigator assessment). RESULTS: Forty-nine patients received ≥1 dose of motesanib (Arms A/B/C, n = 25/12/12). Across all patients, gallbladder volume increased by a mean 22.2 cc (from 38.6 cc at baseline) and ejection fraction decreased by a mean 19.2% (from 61.3% at baseline) during treatment. Changes were similar across arms and appeared reversible after treatment discontinuation. Three patients had cholecystitis (grades 1, 2, 3, n = 1 each) that resolved after treatment discontinuation, one patient developed grade 3 acute cholecystitis requiring cholecystectomy, and two patients had other notable grade 1 gallbladder disorders (gallbladder wall thickening, gallbladder dysfunction) (all in Arm A). Two patients developed de novo gallstones during treatment. Twelve patients had right upper quadrant pain (Arms A/B/C, n = 8/1/3). The incidence of biliary "sludge" in Arms A/B/C was 39%/36%/27%. CONCLUSIONS: Motesanib treatment was associated with increased gallbladder volume, decreased ejection fraction, biliary sludge, gallstone formation, and infrequent cholecystitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00448786.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of motesanib in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib for the treatment of solid tumors: a phase 1b study.

BACKGROUND: This phase 1b study assessed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and pharmacokinetics of motesanib (a small-molecule antagonist of VEGF receptors 1, 2, and 3; platelet-derived growth factor receptor; and Kit) administered once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in combination with erlotinib and gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors. METHODS: Patients received weekly intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and erlotinib (100 mg QD) alone (control cohort) or in combination with motesanib (50 mg QD, 75 mg BID, 125 mg QD, or 100 mg QD; cohorts 1-4); or erlotinib (150 mg QD) in combination with motesanib (100 or 125 mg QD; cohorts 5 and 6). RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were enrolled and received protocol-specified treatment. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 11 patients in cohorts 1 (n = 2), 2 (n = 4), 3 (n = 3), and 6 (n = 2). The MTD of motesanib in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib was 100 mg QD. Motesanib 125 mg QD was tolerable only in combination with erlotinib alone. Frequently occurring motesanib-related adverse events included diarrhea (n = 19), nausea (n = 18), vomiting (n = 13), and fatigue (n = 12), which were mostly of worst grade < 3. The pharmacokinetics of motesanib was not markedly affected by coadministration of gemcitabine and erlotinib, or erlotinib alone. Erlotinib exposure, however, appeared lower after coadministration with gemcitabine and/or motesanib. Of 49 evaluable patients, 1 had a confirmed partial response and 26 had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with motesanib 100 mg QD plus erlotinib and gemcitabine was tolerable. Motesanib 125 mg QD was tolerable only in combination with erlotinib alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01235416.

Health status and quality of life in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease treated on Southwest Oncology Group Study 9133.

PURPOSE: We describe the short and intermediate-term quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in patients treated on a randomized clinical trial in early-stage Hodgkin's disease (Southwest Oncology Group [SWOG] 9133) comparing subtotal lymphoid irradiation (STLI) with combined-modality treatment (CMT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-seven patients participated in the QOL study (SWOG 9208), completing several standardized instruments (Symptom Distress Scale; Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System - Short Form; Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Vitality Scale; and a health perception item), as well as questions about work, marital status, and concerns about having children. This article reports on results from baseline before random assignment, at 6 months, and at 1 and 2 years after random assignment. RESULTS: Patients receiving CMT experienced significantly greater symptom distress (P = .0001), [corrected] fatigue (P =.0001), [corrected] and poorer QOL (P =.015) at 6 months than the STLI patients, reflecting a shorter time since completion of therapy in the CMT arm. Importantly, patients in the two groups did not differ on any outcomes at the 1-and 2-year assessments. The study cohort at randomization exhibited more fatigue [corrected] than healthy reference populations. Fatigue levels did not exceed baseline estimates by the end of the study. [corrected]. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease experience a short-term decrease in QOL and an increase in symptoms and fatigue with treatment, which is more severe with CMT; by 1 year, however, CMT and STLI patients report similar outcomes. Fatigue scores for both arms were lower at baseline than scores for the general population and did not return to normal levels 2 years after random assignment. The mechanisms responsible for this lingering problem warrant further investigation.

Motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the randomized controlled MONET1 study.

INTRODUCTION: The phase 3 MONET1 study evaluated motesanib (a small-molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors) plus carboplatin/paclitaxel versus placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Treatment and enrollment of patients with squamous histology were permanently discontinued following higher early mortality and gross hemoptysis in those with squamous NSCLC who received motesanib. Enrollment of patients with nonsquamous histology was temporarily halted, but resumed following a protocol amendment (Scagliotti et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2829-2836). Herein, we report data from the squamous cohort. METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent squamous NSCLC (without prior systemic therapy for advanced disease) received up to six 3-week cycles of chemotherapy (carboplatin, area under the curve 6 mg/mL•min/paclitaxel, 200 mg/m) and were randomized 1:1 to receive motesanib 125 mg (Arm A) or placebo (Arm B) once daily. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: Three-hundred and sixty patients with squamous NSCLC were randomized (Arm A, n = 182; Arm B, n = 178) between July 2007 and November 2008. Twenty-three patients (13%) in Arm A and 10 (6%) in Arm B had fatal adverse events within the first 60 days of treatment. Among these, six patients in Arm A, but none in Arm B, had fatal bleeding events. At final analysis, serious adverse events had occurred in 47% of patients in Arm A and 29% of patients in Arm B. Median overall survival was similar in Arms A and B (11.1 versus 10.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: Motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel had unacceptable toxicity compared with carboplatin/paclitaxel alone in patients with advanced squamous NSCLC.

International, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: MONET1.

PURPOSE: We evaluated whether motesanib (a selective oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3; platelet-derived growth factor receptor; and Kit) combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in the subset of patients with adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC (no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease) were randomly assigned 1:1 to carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg/ml · min) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) intravenously for up to six 3-week cycles plus either motesanib 125 mg (arm A) or placebo (arm B) once daily orally. OS was the primary end point. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and association between placental growth factor (PLGF) change and OS. RESULTS: A total of 1,090 patients with nonsquamous NSCLC were randomly assigned (arms A/B, n = 541 of 549); of those, 890 had adenocarcinoma (n = 448 of 442). Median OS in arms A and B was 13.0 and 11.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.04; P = .14); median OS for the adenocarcinoma subset was 13.5 and 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.03; P = .11). In descriptive analyses (arms A v B), median PFS was 5.6 months versus 5.4 months (P = < .001); ORR was 40% versus 26% (P < .001). There was no association between PLGF change and OS in arm A. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs (arms A and B, 73% and 59%, respectively) and grade 5 AEs (14% and 9%, respectively) was higher with motesanib treatment. CONCLUSION: Motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel did not significantly improve OS over carboplatin/paclitaxel alone in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC or in the adenocarcinoma subset.

Efficacy and safety of motesanib, an oral inhibitor of VEGF, PDGF, and Kit receptors, in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase 2 study assessed the tolerability and efficacy of motesanib, an oral inhibitor of Kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR), in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). METHODS: Patients with advanced GIST who failed imatinib mesylate after ≥8 weeks of treatment with ≥600 mg daily received motesanib 125 mg orally once daily continuously for 48 weeks or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective tumor response per RECIST and independent review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP); objective response by (18)FDG-PET and by changes in tumor size and/or density (Choi criteria); pharmacokinetics and safety. RESULTS: In the patients evaluable for response (N = 102), the objective response rate was 3%; 59% of patients achieved stable disease, with 14% achieving durable stable disease ≥24 weeks; 38% had disease progression. Higher objective response rates were observed per (18)FDG-PET (N = 91) (30%) and Choi criteria (41%). The median PFS was 16 weeks (95% CI = 14-24 weeks); the median TTP was 17 weeks (95% CI = 15-24 weeks). The most common motesanib treatment-related grade 3 adverse events included hypertension (23%), fatigue (9%), and diarrhea (5%). Motesanib did not accumulate with daily dosing. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with imatinib-resistant GIST, motesanib treatment resulted in acceptable tolerability and modest tumor control as evident in the proportion of patients who achieved stable disease and durable stable disease.

Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Some, but not all, studies using registry data have suggested a small but significant long-term survival advantage following a curative surgical resection of gastric cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because such data may be significantly influenced by the impact of postoperative mortality, and may be imbalanced for factors important to survival, the true nature of this relationship remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a nested volume-outcome study in a sample of 448 surgical survivors with stage IB through IV (M0) gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, previously randomized to adjuvant chemoradiation after surgery or surgery alone, to measure the effect of hospital surgical volume, as assessed by Medicare claims data, on overall survival and gastric cancer recurrence. RESULTS: In this selected sample of postoperative survivors, hospital surgical volume was not predictive of overall survival (P = 0.46) or disease-free survival (P = 0.43) at a median follow-up of 8.9 years. However, patients who underwent either a D1 or D2 dissection at a high- or moderate-volume center experienced an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.53-1.20) for overall survival and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53-1.14) for disease-free survival compared with those patients resected at a low-volume hospital; these results were not statistically significant. When a D0 resection was performed, hospital procedure volume showed no impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Excluding the impact of perioperative mortality by utilizing prospectively recorded data from a large postoperative adjuvant trial, hospital procedure volume had no overall effect on long-term gastric cancer survival. The potential benefit of moderate- to high-volume centers for patients who underwent a D1 or D2 dissection requires confirmation in larger studies.

Phase II trial of PN401, 5-FU, and leucovorin in unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

From February, 2001 to September, 2002, the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) accrued 65 patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma to a phase II trial of weekly 5-FU, leucovorin, and the orally-administered uridine analog PN401. Of these 65 patients, 57 were assessable for survival and toxicity, which were the endpoints for the study. Treatment consisted of the administration of 1200 mg/m(2) of 5-FU, 500 mg/m(2) of leucovorin, and 6 grams of PN401 every 8 h, beginning 8 h after the completion of the 5-FU infusion, and continuing for a total of 8 doses (48 grams) during each weekly chemotherapy session. Therapy was delivered for six weeks out of every 8-week treatment cycle. The gastrointestinal toxicity of this regimen was mild with 2 patients experiencing grade 3 stomatitis, and 6 patients having grade 3 diarrhea; and the hematologic toxicity was acceptable with 6 of 57 patients found to have had grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, and 14 of 57 patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. There were two deaths judged possibly related to treatment; one in a patient who experienced a variety of Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicities and died at home with an unknown cause of death; and a second patient who also died at home, and for whom treatment-related sepsis could not be ruled out. The overall median survival was 7.2 months. The ability to safely deliver twice the usual dose of 5-FU with leucovorin on a weekly schedule suggests that oral uridine analog supplementation with PN401 may enhance the therapeutic index of the fluoropyrimidines.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus irinotecan in patients with esophageal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trial.

OBJECTIVES: Metastatic esophageal carcinoma is an incurable disease with median survival duration of 6 to 8 months. Based on preclinical data suggesting a dose-dependent synergy between gemcitabine and irinotecan we have conducted a phase II trial in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: Patient eligibility included a diagnosis of squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus/gastroesophageal (GE) junction, metastatic or recurrent disease, no CNS metastasis, no prior chemotherapy, prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed, no prior gemcitabine or irinotecan, performance status of 0 to 2 and adequate organ function. Patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 given day 1 and day 8, every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the 6-month survival rate. The secondary end point was to assess qualitative and quantitative toxicities. RESULTS: Fifty-seven eligible patients were accrued. There were 4 treatment-related deaths. The primary grade 3 to 4 toxic events were diarrhea, dehydration, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and anorexia; and 4 episodes of grade 3 to 5 febrile neutropenia, 1 fatal. The study was designed to detect a difference between the null hypothesis of 30% 6-month survival and the alternative hypothesis of 50% 6-month survival. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 6-month survival is 56% (95% CI: 43-69%), with a median of 6.3 months. The median time to progression was 3.7 months. The 6-month progression-free survival estimate is 25% (95% CI: 13-36%). CONCLUSIONS: The length of survival suggests that this combination has benefit similar to platinum containing regimens, however, the toxicity is substantial and is unlikely to prove superior to platinum containing regimens.

Phase II trial of R115777 (NSC #70818) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this Phase II multi-institutional trial was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of R115777 in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically confirmed colorectal cancer with distant metastatic disease that was not surgically curable. They could not have received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. R115777 was given at a dose of 300 mg p.o. twice a day for 21 days every 28 days until tumor progression or toxicity or other reason for discontinuation occurred. The primary endpoint was to determine the confirmed response probability with this treatment. RESULTS: There were 55 eligible patients accrued to the study. There were no complete responses, but one confirmed partial response for a confirmed response probability of 2% (95%CI 0-10%). Three additional patients had an unconfirmed partial response for an overall response probability of 7%. The time to treatment failure was 1.7 months and the estimated median survival was 8.1 months. One patient died of treatment related infection and there were 7 other patients with grade 4 toxicities consisting of neutropenia, leukopenia, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, depression, increased bilirubin, anemia, and pneumonitis/infiltrates. CONCLUSION: R115777 given as a single agent by this dose and schedule is ineffective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Phase II trial of erlotinib in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinomas: SWOG 0127.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of the oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas stratified according to primary tumor location into two groups: gastroesophageal junction (GEJ)/cardia and distal gastric adenocarcinomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the GEJ or stomach (ST) that was unresectable or metastatic; presence of measurable disease; no prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic cancer; Zubrod performance status (PS) of 0 to 1; and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function were treated with erlotinib 150 mg/d orally. Patient characteristics were median age, GEJ-63 years, ST-64 years; sex, GEJ-84% male and 16% female, ST-60 male and 40 female; Zubrod PS, GEJ-25 had a PS of 0 and 18 had a PS 1, ST-13 had a PS of 0 and 12 had a PS of 1. RESULTS: Percentage of common toxicities were skin rash, 86% and 72%; fatigue, 51% and 44%; and AST/ALT elevation, 28% and 28%, respectively for GEJ and ST. There has been one confirmed complete response, three confirmed partial responses (PRs) and one unconfirmed PR for an overall response probability of 9% confirmed (95% CI, 3% to 22%), all occurring in GEJ stratum. No responses were observed in ST stratum. The median survival was 6.7 months in GEJ and 3.5 months in ST stratum. Neither intratumoral EGFR, transforming growth factor-alpha or phosphorylated Akt kinase expression nor plasma proteomic analyses were predictive of clinical outcome. No somatic mutations of the EGFR exons 18, 19, or 21 were detected and there was no gross amplification of EGFR by fluorescence in situ hybridization. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib is active in patients with GEJ adenocarcinomas, but appears inactive in gastric cancers. The molecular correlates examined were not predictive of the patient therapeutic response.

A Phase II trial of epothilone B analogue BMS-247550 (NSC #710428) ixabepilone, in patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this Phase II multi-institutional study was to define the efficacy and toxicity of ixabepilone in patients with advance pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have pancreatic adenocarcinoma and metastatic or recurrent disease that was not amenable to curative resection. Performance status was 0-1, and patients could not have had prior chemotherapy, or chemoradiation therapy for their advanced disease although prior local palliative radiation was allowed. Ixabepilone was administered iv as a 3 hour infusion every 21 days. Initially, the dose was 50 mg/m(2) but this was lowered to 40 mg/m(2) shortly after the trial opened because of concerns about neurotoxicity. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were registered however 2 were ineligible because they did not have recurrent or metastatic disease. For the 60 eligible patients, 22 had performance status of 0 and 38 performance status of 1. The estimated 6-month survival was 60% (95% CI 48%-72%) with a median survival of 7.2 months and an estimated time to treatment failure of 2.3 months. Out of 56 patients with measurable disease there were 5 confirmed partial responses for a confirmed response probability of 9% (95% CI 3%-20%) and 7 unconfirmed partial responses for an overall response probability of 21% (95% CI 12%-34%). Common toxicities were neutropenia/granulocytopenia, nausea and vomiting and neuropathy. There was one death, cause not determined but judged "possibly" related to treatment. CONCLUSION: Ixabepilone shows encouraging activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and should be investigated further in this disease.

A phase II study of farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 in pancreatic cancer: a Southwest oncology group (SWOG 9924) study.

Ninety per cent of pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PC) contain mutations of the K-Ras proto-oncogene resulting in constitutively activated Ras protein. A critical step in Ras activation is farnesylation of Ras protein. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors are compounds that inhibit farnesylation. We report the results of a phase II trial of R115777, an oral farnesyl transferase inhibitor, in patients with surgically incurable locally advanced or metastatic PC. Between 6/1/2000 and 11/20/2001, 58 cases were accrued, 53 of whom were eligible and analyzable. Patients were required to have a performance status (PS) 0 to 1, be able to take oral medications, and to have adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic functions. Fifty-five percent were male. Median age was 64.7 years (38.9 to 80.6), and patients had no previous systemic therapy for advanced PC. Treatment consisted of R115777 300 mg po bid given for 3 out of every 4 weeks. Toxicities were as follows: Grade 3 in 19/53 (36%), grade 4 in 53 (173%), and grade 5 in 53 (8%). Most frequent toxicities were: anemia 35/53 (66%), fatigue and malaise 33/53 (62%), nausea 31/53 (58%). Grade 5 toxicities included: thromboembolism 1, infection 2, other 1. Median survival was 2.6 months (mo) (95% CI 2.1-3.6), 6-mo survival is 19% (95% CI, 8-29%), median time to treatment failure was 1.4 mo (95% GI 1.1-1.6). R115777 is ineffective as monotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Pattern mixture models for longitudinal quality of life studies in advanced stage disease.

Analyses of longitudinal quality of life (QOL) for patients with advanced stage disease are frequently plagued by problems of non-random drop-out attributable to deteriorating health and/or death. As an example, Moinpour et al. cite specific challenges which limited their report and assessment of QOL for patients treated for advanced stage colorectal cancer in a clinical trial of several chemotherapeutic regimes performed by the Southwest Oncology Group. A particular source of confusion that arises in studies of advanced stage disease is whether or not to differentiate loss of follow-up due to death from drop-out where the patient is still alive but has dropped from the study. In this paper we examine exploratory data techniques for longitudinal QOL data with non-random missingness due to drop-out and censorship by death. We propose a pattern mixture model for longitudinal QOL, time of drop-out and survival, which allows for straightforward implementation of sensitivity analyses and explicit comparisons to the raw data. Our method is illustrated in the context of analysing the data and addressing the challenges posed by Moinpour et al.