Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills for Validation of Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills Tasks.

PURPOSE: The BLUS (Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills) consortium sought to address the construct validity of BLUS tasks and the wider problem of accurate, scalable and affordable skill evaluation by investigating the concordance of 2 novel candidate methods with faculty panel scores, those of automated motion metrics and crowdsourcing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A faculty panel of surgeons (5) and anonymous crowdworkers blindly reviewed a randomized sequence of a representative sample of 24 videos (12 pegboard and 12 suturing) extracted from the BLUS validation study (454) using the GOALS (Global Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills) survey tool with appended pass-fail anchors via the same web based user interface. Pre-recorded motion metrics (tool path length, jerk cost etc) were available for each video. Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's R and ROC with AUC statistics were used to evaluate concordance between continuous scores, and as pass-fail criteria among the 3 groups of faculty, crowds and motion metrics. RESULTS: Crowdworkers provided 1,840 ratings in approximately 48 hours, 60 times faster than the faculty panel. The inter-rater reliability of mean expert and crowd ratings was good (α=0.826). Crowd score derived pass-fail resulted in 96.9% AUC (95% CI 90.3-100; positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 89%). Motion metrics and crowd scores provided similar or nearly identical concordance with faculty panel ratings and pass-fail decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance of crowdsourcing with faculty panels and speed of reviews is sufficiently high to merit its further investigation alongside automated motion metrics. The overall agreement among faculty, motion metrics and crowdworkers provides evidence in support of the construct validity for 2 of the 4 BLUS tasks.

Validation of the AUA BLUS Tasks.

PURPOSE: Standardized assessment of laparoscopic skill in urology is lacking. We investigated whether the AUA (American Urological Association) BLUS (Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills) skill tasks are valid to address this need. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board approved study included 27 medical students, 42 urology residents, 18 fellows and 37 faculty urologists across 8 sites. Using the EDGE (Electronic Data Generation and Evaluation) device (Simulab, Seattle, Washington) 454 recordings were collected on peg transfer, pattern cutting, suturing and clip applying tasks, which together comprise the expert determined BLUS tasks. We collected synchronized video and tool motion data for each trial. For each task errors, time, path length, economy of motion, peak grasp force and EDGE score were collected. An expert panel of 5 faculty members performed GOALS (Global Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills) evaluations on a representative subset of peg transfer and suturing skill tasks performed by 24 participants (IRR = 0.95). RESULTS: Demographically derived skill levels proved unsuitable to evaluate construct validity. Separation of mean scores by grouped skill levels was strongest for the suturing task. Objective motion metrics and errors supported construct validity vis-à-vis correlation with blinded expert video ratings (motion metrics R(2) = 0.95, p <0.01). Expert scores appeared to reward errors in suturing but not in block transfer. CONCLUSIONS: BLUS skill task performance scoring can discriminate among basic laparoscopic technical skill levels. Self-reported demographics are an unreliable source of determining laparoscopic technical skill.

Effect of the American Urological Association Annual Review course on the results of the urology qualifying examination.

PURPOSE: In this study we assess the impact of a urology dedicated review course on the scores of the corresponding board qualifying examination for attendees of the urology review course. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ABU (American Board of Urology) Qualifying Examination scores from 2009, 2010 and 2011 were categorized into group 1 candidates who attended the AUA (American Urological Association) Annual Review Course the same year, and group 2 candidates who did not attend the AUA Annual Review Course that same year, and were compared. The scores of the preceding year's In-Service Examination were also compared for the same groups of candidates and compared to their subsequent first time taken Qualifying Examination scores. RESULTS: There was no difference in Qualifying Examination scores of resident candidates attending vs not attending the AUA Annual Review Course in all 3 years. The overall failure rate was low, and essentially the same for all candidates in all years regardless of attendance at the AUA Annual Review Course at 2% in 2009, 2% in 2010 and 4% in 2011. Of group 1 candidates the majority (80% to 98%) considered the Annual Review Course helpful or very helpful in preparation for the Qualifying Examination. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of candidates are adequately prepared to pass their Qualifying Examination at the conclusion of their residency training program regardless of their attendance of the AUA Annual Review Course. This course may help bolster the confidence of the candidate preparing for their Qualifying Examination.

High fidelity simulation based team training in urology: a preliminary interdisciplinary study of technical and nontechnical skills in laparoscopic complications management.

PURPOSE: Simulation based team training provides an opportunity to develop interdisciplinary communication skills and address potential medical errors in a high fidelity, low stakes environment. We evaluated the implementation of a novel simulation based team training scenario and assessed the technical and nontechnical performance of urology and anesthesiology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urology residents were randomly paired with anesthesiology residents to participate in a simulation based team training scenario involving the management of 2 scripted critical events during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, including the vasovagal response to pneumoperitoneum and renal vein injury during hilar dissection. A novel kidney surgical model and a high fidelity mannequin simulator were used for the simulation. A debriefing session followed each simulation based team training scenario. Assessments of technical and nontechnical performance were made using task specific checklists and global rating scales. RESULTS: A total of 16 residents participated, of whom 94% rated the simulation based team training scenario as useful for communication skill training. Also, 88% of urology residents believed that the kidney surgical model was useful for technical skill training. Urology resident training level correlated with technical performance (p=0.004) and blood loss during renal vein injury management (p=0.022) but not with nontechnical performance. Anesthesia resident training level correlated with nontechnical performance (p=0.036). Urology residents consistently rated themselves higher on nontechnical performance than did faculty (p=0.033). Anesthesia residents did not differ in the self-assessment of nontechnical performance compared to faculty assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Residents rated the simulation based team training scenario as useful for interdisciplinary communication skill training. Urology resident training level correlated with technical performance but not with nontechnical performance. Urology residents consistently overestimated their nontechnical performance.

Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool?

PURPOSE: Virtual reality simulators are often used for surgical skill training since they facilitate deliberate practice in a controlled, low stakes environment. However, to be considered for assessment purposes rigorous construct and criterion validity must be demonstrated. We performed face, content, construct and concurrent validity testing of the dV-Trainer™ robotic surgical simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urology residents, fellows and attending surgeons were enrolled in this institutional review board approved study. After a brief introduction to the dV-Trainer each subject completed 3 repetitions each of 4 virtual reality tasks on it, including pegboard ring transfer, matchboard object transfer, needle threading of rings, and the ring and rail task. One week later subjects completed 4 similar tasks using the da Vinci® robot. Subjects were assessed on total task time and total errors using the built-in scoring algorithm and manual scoring for the dV-Trainer and the da Vinci robot, respectively. RESULTS: Seven experienced and 13 novice robotic surgeons were included in the study. Experienced surgeons were defined by greater than 50 hours of clinical robotic console time. Of novice robotic surgeons 77% ranked the dV-Trainer as a realistic training platform and 71% of experienced robotic surgeons ranked it as useful for resident training. Experienced robotic surgeons outperformed novices in many dV-Trainer and da Vinci robot exercises, particularly in the number of errors. On pooled data analysis dV-Trainer total task time and total errors correlated with da Vinci robot total task time and total errors (p = 0.026 and 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the face, content, construct and concurrent validity of the dV-Trainer, which may have a potential role as an assessment tool.

A history and evolution of laparoscopic nephrectomy: perspectives from the past and future directions in the surgical management of renal tumors.

June 25, 2010 marks the twentieth anniversary of the first clinical laparoscopic nephrectomy. Since the advent of this procedure a paradigm shift toward minimally invasive options for urological surgery has been witnessed, resulting in rapid technological innovations and improved patient outcomes. A history of the minimally invasive surgical management of renal masses is presented with a focus on laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing.

PURPOSE: With the rapid and widespread adoption of robotics in surgery, the minimally invasive surgical landscape has changed markedly within the last half decade. This change has had a significant impact on patients, surgeons and surgical trainees. This is no more apparent than in the field of urology. As with the advent of any new surgical technology, it is imperative that we develop comprehensive and responsible training and credentialing initiatives to ensure surgical outcomes and patient safety are not compromised during the learning process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on surgical training curricula as well as robotic surgery training and credentialing to provide best practice recommendations for the development of a robotic surgery training curriculum and credentialing process. RESULTS: For trainees to attain the requisite knowledge and skills to provide safe and effective patient care, surgical training in robotics should involve a structured, competency based curriculum that allows the trainee to progress in a graduated fashion. This structured curriculum should involve preclinical and clinical components to facilitate the proper adoption and application of this new technology. Robotic surgery credentialing should involve an expert determined, standardized educational process, including a minimum criterion of proficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than being based on a set number of completed cases, robotic surgery credentialing should involve the demonstration of proficiency and safety in executing basic robotic skills and procedural tasks. In addition, the accreditation process should be iterative to ensure accountability to the patient.

Robotic pyeloplasty: the University of California-Irvine experience.

PURPOSE: For the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty have similar outcomes. We present our experience with robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all adult robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasties performed at our institution between November 2002 and July 2009. Preoperative evaluation included abdominal computerized tomography angiogram to assess for crossing vessels and diuretic renal scan to quantify the degree of obstruction. Followup with diuretic renal scan and a patient pain analog scale was performed 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. If the study was normal at 12 months, the patient was followed with ultrasound of the kidneys and bladder to look for ureteral jets. Absent ureteral jets, worsening hydronephrosis or patient complaint of pain necessitated repeat diuretic renogram. RESULTS: A total of 61 robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasties were performed in 21 men and 40 women. Followup was available for 57 patients with an average ± SD age of 35 ± 16 years and average followup of 18 ± 15 months. Mean operative time was 335 ± 88 minutes and estimated blood loss was 61 ± 48 ml. Average hospitalization time was 2 ± 0.9 days and the average postoperative analgesia requirement was 13 ± 9.6 mg morphine sulfate equivalents. The overall success rate was 81% based on a normal diuretic renogram and lack of pain using a validated pain scale. There were 3 grade III Clavien complications for a 4.9% major complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: Robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty is a feasible technique for ureteropelvic junction reconstruction. When measured by the more stringent application of diuretic renography and analog pain scales, the success rate for ureteropelvic junction obstruction management appears similar to that of open or standard laparoscopic approaches.

Sprayed fibrin sealant as the sole hemostatic agent for porcine laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Tisseel® is used to control minor bleeding during laparoscopic procedures. The DuploSpray MIS™ spray system allows thin, even application over a larger surface area. We use sprayed Tisseel as the sole agent to control hemorrhage and seal the renal collecting system after severe porcine laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed staged bilateral severe laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 12 Yucatan pigs using a longitudinal cut from upper to lower pole through the entire collecting system. In each pig 1 kidney was harvested immediately while the other was harvested after 4 weeks. After hilar clamping laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was done with cold scissors in 6 pigs while LigaSure™ was used in the other 6. Sprayed Tisseel was applied, and bleeding and urinary leakage were evaluated. Additional Tisseel was applied for repeat bleeding. We performed retrograde pyelogram (chronic) and burst pressure testing of the arterial and collecting systems. RESULTS: All animals survived 4 weeks. One urinoma was seen on retrograde pyelogram in the cold cut group. Average hilar clamp time was similar in the acute and chronic study arms. Average estimated blood loss was significantly less in the LigaSure group (p = 0.0045). Average arterial burst pressure was significantly different in the chronic and acute groups (605.8 vs 350.4 mm Hg, p = 0.008) but average collecting system burst pressure was similar (186.3 and 149.5 mm Hg, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sprayed Tisseel without suturing effectively sealed the arterial and collecting system after severe laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the porcine model.

Optimal freeze cycle length for renal cryotherapy.

PURPOSE: To our knowledge the optimal freeze cycle length in renal cryotherapy is unknown. Ten-minute time based freeze cycles were compared to temperature based freeze cycles to -20C. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic renal cryotherapy was performed on 16 swine. Time based trials consisted of a double 10-minute freeze separated by a 5-minute thaw. Temperature based trials were double cycles of 1, 5 or 10-minute freeze initiated after 1 of 4 sensors indicated -20C. A 5-minute active thaw was used between freeze cycles. Control trials consisted of cryoneedle placement for 25 minutes without freeze or thaw. Viability staining and histological analysis were done. RESULTS: There was no difference in cellular necrosis between any of the temperature based freeze cycles (p = 0.1). Time based freeze cycles showed more nuclear pyknosis, indicative of necrosis, than the 3 experimental freeze cycles for the renal cortex (p = 0.05) but not for the renal medulla (p = 0.61). Mean time to -20C for freeze cycle 1 was 19 minutes 10 seconds (range 9 to 46 minutes). In 4 of 21 trials (19%) -20C was never attained despite freezing for 25 to 63 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in immediate cellular necrosis among double 1, 5 or 10-minute freeze cycles. Cellular necrosis was evident on histological analysis for trials in which -20C was attained and in freeze cycles based on time alone. With a standard 10-minute cryoablation period most treated parenchyma 1 cm from the probe never attained -20C. Cell death appeared to occur at temperatures warmer than -20C during renal cryotherapy.

Prospective randomized trial of three different methods of nephrostomy tract closure after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.

OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 'tubeless' nephrostomy tract closure in reducing postoperative morbidity after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: • In all, 31 patients undergoing PCNL were randomized into three groups, each with a different method of nephrostomy tract closure: using either a gelatin matrix haemostatic sealant (FloSeal), fascial stitch or Cope loop nephrostomy tube. • We compared operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative stay, analgaesics use, changes in creatinine and haemoglobin levels, and stone clearance rate, as well as postoperative short-form (SF)-36 quality-of-life and pain analogue scores at five different time points after surgery. • All data were analysed using a one-way anova test. • A repeated measures anova test was used selectively to assess the progression of SF-36 and pain analogue scores. RESULTS: • The preoperative variables operative time, EBL, postoperative stay (P = 0.45), analgaesia use (P = 0.79), changes in creatinine (P = 0.28) and haemoglobin (P = 0.09) levels, and postoperative SF-36 scores were not significantly different. • In contrast, the differences in analogue pain scales at 1 week after surgery (P = 0.02) and the trends of analogue pain score progression (P = 0.03) were statistically significant. • Three patients underwent second-look procedures for residual stones and there was one case of postoperative pyelonephritis in a multiple sclerosis patient. CONCLUSIONS: • The Cope loop closure patients recovered fastest, while FloSeal closure patients experienced initial increase in pain followed by resolution at 1 month. • As a result of the small study group sizes, it is difficult to show any significant difference in postoperative pain, especially in long-term follow-up; further clinical evaluation is necessary.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: six degrees of haemostasis.

OBJECTIVE: • To describe six steps for haemostasis and collecting system closure ('six degrees of haemostasis') that are reproducible and that minimize the two most concerning complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: haemorrhage and urine leakage. METHODS: • A retrospective study of 23 consecutive laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases performed by a single surgeon between 2005 and 2008 using the 'six degrees of haemostasis' was carried out. RESULTS: • There were no cases of intraoperative, postoperative or delayed bleeding. • There were no cases of urine leakage. CONCLUSION: • The 'six degrees of haemostasis' technique for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy described in the present study provides a reliable and reproducible method to reassure the surgeon of haemostasis and provide a decreased risk of urine leakage.

Impact of a laparoscopic renal surgery mini-fellowship program on postgraduate urologist practice patterns at 3-year followup.

PURPOSE: To assist practicing urologists incorporate laparoscopic renal surgery into their practice we established a 5-day mini-fellowship program with a mentor, preceptor and a potential proctor at our institution. We report the impact of our mini-fellowship program at 3-year followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 106 urologists underwent laparoscopic ablative (44) or laparoscopic reconstructive (62) renal surgery training. The 1:2 teacher-to-attendee experience included tutorial sessions, hands-on inanimate and animate skills training, and clinical case observations. Participants were asked to complete a detailed questionnaire on laparoscopic practice patterns 1, 2 and 3 years after the mini-fellowship. RESULTS: The questionnaire response rate at 1 to 3 years was 77%, 65% and 68%, respectively. Of responders 72%, 71% and 71% performed laparoscopic renal surgery at 1 to 3 years, respectively. Of the 106 participants 32 (39%) had previous laparoscopic experience, including 78% who responded to the questionnaire at 3 years. Of those surgeons there was an increase in the practice of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (88% vs 72%), nephroureterectomy (56% vs 13%), pyeloplasty (40% vs 6%) and partial nephrectomy (32% vs 6%) at 3 years. Of the 106 participants 74 (70%) were laparoscopy naïve, including 48 (65%) who responded to the questionnaire at 3 years. The take rate in this group was 76%, 52%, 34% and 23% for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, pyeloplasty and partial nephrectomy, respectively. Of the participants 90% indicated that they would recommend this training to a colleague. CONCLUSIONS: An intensive 5-day laparoscopic ablative and reconstructive renal surgery course enabled postgraduate urologists to effectively introduce and expand the volume and breadth of their laparoscopic renal surgery practice.

In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo isotherms for renal cryotherapy.

PURPOSE: Preoperative planning for renal cryotherapy is based on isotherms established in gel. We replicated gel isotherms and correlated them with ex vivo and in vivo isotherms in a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PERC-17 CryoProbes (1.7 mm) and IceRods (1.47 mm) underwent trials in gel, ex vivo and in vivo porcine kidneys. Temperatures were recorded at 13 predetermined locations with multipoint thermal sensors. RESULTS: At the cryoprobe temperatures were not significantly different along the probe in any medium for either system (p = 0.0947 to 0.9609). However, away from the probe ex vivo and in vivo trials showed warmer temperatures toward the cryoprobe tip for each system (p = 0.0003 to 0.2141). Mean +/- SE temperature 5 mm distal to the cryoprobe tip in vivo was 19.2C +/- 16.1C for CryoProbes and 27.3C +/- 11.2C for IceRods. Temperatures were consistently colder with CryoProbes than with IceRods in gel (p <0.00005), ex vivo (p <0.00005) and in vivo (p = 0.0014). At almost all sites temperatures were significantly colder in gel and in ex vivo kidney than in in vivo kidney for CryoProbes (p = 0.0107 and 0.0008, respectively) and for IceRods (each p <0.00005). CONCLUSIONS: Gel and ex vivo isotherms do not predict the in vivo pattern of freezing. Thus, they should not be used for preoperative planning. The cryoprobe should be passed 5 mm beyond the tumor border to achieve suitably cold temperatures. Multipoint thermal sensor probes are recommended to record actual temperature during renal cryotherapy.

Comparative study of in vivo lymphatic sealing capability of the porcine thoracic duct using laparoscopic dissection devices.

PURPOSE: Sealing the lymphatic vessels during abdominal and pelvic surgery is important to prevent the leakage of lymphatic fluid and its resultant sequelae. To our knowledge we compared for the first time the quality of lymphatic sealing by each of 4 commonly used laparoscopic dissection devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 domestic pigs were used to test dissecting devices, including monopolar scissors (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio), Harmonic ACE Scalpel, LigaSure V, EnSeal and Trissector. A midline incision was made from mid sternum to umbilicus, the diaphragm was divided and the porcine thoracic duct was isolated. In all animals each device was used to seal an area of the duct and each seal was placed at least 2 cm from the prior seal. In group 1 the thoracic duct of 6 pigs was cannulated with a 5Fr catheter and the seal was subjected to burst pressure testing using a burst pressure measuring device (Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, Illinois). In the 6 pigs in group 2 each seal was immediately sent for histopathological evaluation. Specimens were given a score for the extent of cautery damage, including 0-none, 1-minimal, 2-moderate, 3-severe and 4-extreme. RESULTS: A total of 64 seals were created, of which 35 were subjected to burst pressure testing. Mean size of the thoracic duct was 2.6 mm. No acute seal failures were observed with any bipolar device or the harmonic shears. However, 2 immediate failures (33%) were seen with monopolar scissors. Mean burst pressure for monopolar scissors, Harmonic ACE Scalpel, LigaSure V, EnSeal and Trissector was 46 (range 0 to 165), 540 (range 175 to 795), 258 (range 75 to 435), 453 (range 255 to 825) and 379 mm Hg (range 175 to 605), respectively (p <0.05). Trissector, Harmonic ACE Scalpel and EnSeal generated seals with significantly higher burst pressure than that of monopolar scissors (p <0.05). Histopathological evaluation revealed that LigaSure caused less thermal damage than Trissector and EnSeal (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Each device tested except monopolar scissors consistently produced a supraphysiological seal and should be suitable for sealing lymphatic vessels during laparoscopic surgery.

Long-term impact of a robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy mini fellowship training program on postgraduate urological practice patterns.

PURPOSE: Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy has stimulated a great deal of interest among urologists. We evaluated whether a mini fellowship for robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy would enable postgraduate urologists to incorporate this new procedure into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2003 to July 2006, 47 urologists participated in the robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy mini fellowship program. The 5-day course had a 1:2 faculty-to-attendee ratio. The curriculum included lectures, tutorials, surgical case observation, and inanimate, animate and cadaveric robotic skill training. Questionnaires assessing practice patterns 1, 2 and 3 years after the mini fellowship program were analyzed. RESULTS: One, 2 and 3 years after the program the response rate to the questionnaires was 89% (42 of 47 participants), 91% (32 of 35) and 88% (21 of 24), respectively. The percent of participants performing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in years 1 to 3 after the mini fellowship was 78% (33 of 42), 78% (25 of 32) and 86% (18 of 21), respectively. Among the surgeons performing the procedure there was a progressive increase in the number of cases each year with increasing time since the mini fellowship training. In the 3 attendees not performing the procedure 3 years after the mini fellowship training the reasons were lack of a robot, other partners performing it and a feeling of insufficient training to incorporate the procedure into clinical practice in 1 each. One, 2 and 3 years following the mini fellowship training program 83%, 84% and 90% of partnered attendees were performing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, while only 67%, 56% and 78% of solo attendees, respectively, were performing it at the same followup years. CONCLUSIONS: An intensive, dedicated 5-day educational course focused on learning robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy enabled most participants to successfully incorporate and maintain this procedure in clinical practice in the short term and long term.

Preliminary study of virtual reality and model simulation for learning laparoscopic suturing skills.

PURPOSE: Repetitive practice of laparoscopic suturing and knot tying can facilitate surgeon proficiency in performing this reconstructive technique. We compared a silicone model and pelvic trainer to a virtual reality simulator in the learning of laparoscopic suturing and knot tying by laparoscopically naïve medical students, and evaluated the subsequent performance of porcine laparoscopic cystorrhaphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 medical students underwent a 1-hour didactic session with video demonstration of laparoscopic suturing and knot tying by an expert laparoscopic surgeon. The students were randomized to a pelvic trainer (10) or virtual reality simulator (10) for a minimum of 2 hours of laparoscopic suturing and knot tying training. Within 1 week of the training session the medical students performed laparoscopic closure of a 2 cm cystotomy in a porcine model. Objective structured assessment of technical skills for laparoscopic cystorrhaphy was performed at the procedure by laparoscopic surgeons blinded to the medical student training format. A video of the procedure was evaluated with an objective structured assessment of technical skills by an expert laparoscopic surgeon blinded to medical student identity and training format. The medical students completed an evaluation questionnaire regarding the training format after the laparoscopic cystorrhaphy. RESULTS: All students were able to complete the laparoscopic cystorrhaphy. There was no difference between the pelvic trainer and virtual reality groups in mean +/- SD time to perform the porcine cystorrhaphy at 40 +/- 15 vs 41 +/- 10 minutes (p = 0.87) or the objective structured assessment of technical skills score of 8.8 +/- 2.3 vs 8.2 +/- 2.2 (p = 0.24), respectively. Bladder leak occurred in 3 (30%) of the pelvic trainer trained and 6 (60%) of the virtual reality trained medical student laparoscopic cystorrhaphy procedures (Fisher exact test p = 0.37). The only significant difference between the 2 groups was that 4 virtual reality trained medical students considered the training session too short compared to none of those trained on the pelvic trainer (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference between the pelvic trainer and virtual reality trained medical students in proficiency to perform laparoscopic cystorrhaphy in a pig model, although both groups require considerably more training before performing this procedure clinically. The pelvic trainer training may be more user-friendly for the novice surgeon to begin learning these challenging laparoscopic skills.

Preliminary evaluation of a genitourinary skills training curriculum for medical students.

PURPOSE: Basic urology training in medical school is considered important for many medical and surgical disciplines. We developed a 2-day intensive genitourinary skills training curriculum for medical students beginning their clinical clerkship training years and evaluated the initial experience with this program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 94 third-year medical students at the University of California, Irvine were required to participate in a 5.5-hour genitourinary examination skills training program. The teaching course included 1.5 hours of didactic lecture and video presentation with questions and answers, followed by 5, 45-minute hands-on stations including male Foley catheter placement, female Foley catheter placement, testicular examination and digital rectal examination training with a standardized patient, virtual reality cystourethroscopy and, lastly, a urologist led tutorial of abnormal genitourinary findings. The students completed questionnaires before and after the course concerning their experience. At the end of the course the students rated the usefulness of each part of the curriculum and evaluated the faculty. In addition, they were required to complete a multiple choice examination that included 4 genitourinary specific questions. RESULTS: All 94 medical students completed the genitourinary skills training course. Before the course less than 10% of students reported comfort with genitourinary skills, including testicular examination (5%), digital rectal examination (10%), male Foley catheter placement and female Foley catheter placement (2%). Following the course the comfort level improved in all parameters of digital rectal examination (100%) and testicular examination, male Foley catheter placement and female Foley catheter placement (98%). The students rated in the order of most to least useful training 1) standardized patient for testicular examination and digital rectal examination teaching, 2) male Foley catheter placement and female Foley catheter placement training, 3) didactic lecture, 4) tutorial of abnormal genitourinary examination findings and 5) virtual reality cystourethroscopy. On the examination questions following the course 80% to 98% of the class answered each urology content question correctly. CONCLUSIONS: An intensive skills training curriculum significantly improved medical student comfort and knowledge with regard to basic genitourinary skills including testicular examination, rectal examination, and Foley catheter placement in the male and female patient. Further followup will be performed to determine the application of these skills during clinical clerkship rotations.

The 'buoy' stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model.

OBJECTIVE To assess a prototype ureteric 'buoy' stent with a 10 F upper body tapering to a 3F tail, developed to potentially reduce stent-related irritative symptoms while providing an adequate mould for healing after endopyelotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighteen Yucatan minipigs had the stent placed either into the intact ureter (phase I) or after Acucise proximal endoureterotomy (phase II). Buoy stents were compared to 10/7 F endopyelotomy stents and to standard 7 F stents in phases I and II, respectively. The pigs were assessed for vesico-ureteric reflux, hydronephrosis and infection, before stent insertion and at harvest. Stents were weighed before and after placement and the removal force was measured. Pressure/flow studies, antegrade nephrostograms and specimens for histopathology from the renal pelvis, ureter and vesico-ureteric junction (VUJ) were obtained at harvest. RESULTS Thirteen minipigs survived the entire study. Ureteric flow with the stents in situ was better for buoy stents than for 10/7 F stents (P < 0.005). Ureteric flow after endoureterotomy and subsequent stent removal was similar for buoy stents and standard 7 F stents. None of the stents refluxed. There was no difference between stents in removal force, weight change or incidence of hydronephrosis. At 1 and 12 weeks, buoy stents tended to produce lower histopathological alteration scores than control stents, especially at the VUJ (phase I, 2.0 vs 3.9, P = 0.092; phase II, 0.6 vs 1.7, P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS The novel buoy stents are easily placed and removed via the urethra. They can cause less VUJ inflammation than standard stents while allowing for adequate ureteric flow and healing after proximal endoureterotomy.