Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes for People With and Without COVID-19 Diagnoses Receiving Inpatient Rehabilitation Care Across the US in 2020-2021.

Objective: To assess sociodemographic, medical complexity, and outcomes of persons receiving care at inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) with and without a diagnosis of COVID-19. Design: A retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record (EMR) data from 138 IRFs across 34 states and Puerto Rico. Setting: N/A. Participants: IRF EMR data for 212,663 patients discharged between 04/01/2020 and 05/31/2021 (N=212,663), of which 16,199 (COVID-19 group) had a primary or secondary COVID-19 diagnosis based upon ICD codes set (ICD-10 codes U07.1, B94.8, Z86.19, Z86.16). Main Outcome Measures: Four categories: (a) sociodemographic, (b) medical complexity, (c) process, that is, standard IRF processes, and clinical outcomes (collected routinely as part of administrative reporting), and (d) functional outcomes. Patients with missing functional data associated with short/incomplete stays (n=623) were excluded from analysis of functional outcomes category only. Standard descriptive analysis techniques were employed for comparing categorical and continuous variables between groups. Results: Statistically significant differences were noted between the COVID-19 group and non-COVID groups for race (26.0% vs 19.7% non-minority, P<.001), Case Mix Index (1.49 vs 1.46, P<.001), Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services 60% rule qualification (79.0% vs 73.4%, P<.001), time to onset (24.3 vs 18.0 days, P<.001), length of stay (14.2 vs 12.9 days, P<.001), and discharge disposition (to community: 75.3% vs 81%, P<.001; to acute care facility: 15.6% vs 10.8%, P<.001). The COVID-19 group had higher frequency of respiratory and cardiovascular disease, diabetes, encephalopathy, morbid obesity, and critical illness neuropathy and myopathy. Clinically insignificant differences were noted for age, sex, depression, and cognitive assessment. Ability to participate and functional outcomes were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: There are significant differences between the COVID-19 and non-COVID group in some sociodemographic, medical complexity, process and clinical outcomes, but not in functional outcomes. The ability to participate in the IRF-required intensity of therapy services along with attainment of comparable levels of functional outcomes supports the benefit of IRFs for persons with COVID-19.

Clinical utilization of species-specific immunoassays for identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae in orthopedic infections.

Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B streptococcus, GBS) are common causes of deep musculoskeletal infections (MSKI) and result in significant patient morbidity and cost to the healthcare system. One of the major challenges with MSKI is the lack of faithful diagnostics to correctly identify the primary pathogen, as standard culture-based assays are prone to false positives in the case of polymicrobial infections, and false negatives due to limitations in sample acquisition and antibiotic use before presentation. To improve upon our current diagnostic methods for MSKI, we developed a multiplex immunoassay for antigen-specific IgGs in serum (Luminex), and medium enriched for newly synthesized antibodies (MENSA) for anti-S. aureus and GBS generated from cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of orthopedic infection patients undergoing surgical treatment. Samples were obtained from 110 MSKI patients: 80 diabetic foot ulcer, 21 periprosthetic joint infection, 5 septic arthritis, 2 spine, 1 hand, and 1 fracture-related infection (FRI). Anti-S. aureus and anti-GBS antibody titers were compared to culture results to assess their concordance in identifying the pathogens. Immunoassay, particularly MENSA, showed high diagnostic potential for monomicrobial S. aureus and GBS orthopedic infections (AUC > 0.95). MENSA also demonstrated diagnostic potential for GBS polymicrobial orthopedic infection and for GBS DFU (AUC > 0.83 for both). Serum showed high diagnostic potential for S. aureus PJI (AUC > 0.95). Taken together, these findings support the development of species-specific immunoassays for the identification of causal pathogens in active MSKI, especially in conjunction with standard culture.

Blood pressure regulation in neurally intact human vs. acutely injured paraplegic and tetraplegic patients during passive tilt.

We investigated autonomic control of cardiovascular function in able-bodied (AB), paraplegic (PARA), and tetraplegic (TETRA) subjects in response to head-up tilt following spinal cord injury. We evaluated spectral power of blood pressure (BP), baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), baroreflex effectiveness index (BEI), occurrence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) ramps, baroreflex sequences, and cross-correlation of SBP with heart rate (HR) in low (0.04-0.15 Hz)- and high (0.15-0.4 Hz)-frequency regions. During tilt, AB and PARA effectively regulated BP and HR, but TETRA did not. The numbers of SBP ramps and percentages of heartbeats involved in SBP ramps and baroreflex sequences increased in AB, were unchanged in PARA, and declined in TETRA. BRS was lowest in PARA and declined with tilt in all groups. BEI was greatest in AB and declined with tilt in all groups. Low-frequency power of BP and the peak of the SBP/HR cross-correlation magnitude were greatest in AB, increased during tilt in AB, remained unchanged in PARA, and declined in TETRA. The peak cross-correlation magnitude in HF decreased with tilt in all groups. Our data indicate that spinal cord injury results in decreased stimulation of arterial baroreceptors and less engagement of feedback control as demonstrated by lower 1) spectral power of BP, 2) number (and percentages) of SBP ramps and barosequences, 3) cross-correlation magnitude of SBP/HR, 4) BEI, and 5) changes in delay between SBP/HR. Diminished vasomotion and impaired baroreflex regulation may be major contributors to decreased orthostatic tolerance following injury.

Pilot study of a 360-degree assessment instrument for physical medicine & rehabilitation residency programs.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a pilot test on a new format for multidisciplinary assessment of resident physicians' professionalism and clinical performance in acute inpatient rehabilitation settings. DESIGN: In this pilot study, a 26-item ratings instrument was developed for use by therapists, nurses, social workers, case managers, and psychologists to rate inpatient residents. RESULTS: A total of 421 ratings forms were returned over four academic years. Alpha reliability coefficient for instrumentation sample was 0.99. chi2 and analysis of variance procedures examined item mean differences. Significant differences (P