S2-AI screw placement with the aide of electronic conductivity device monitoring: a retrospective analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of two consecutive patients who underwent a novel surgical technique. OBJECTIVE: A report of a novel surgical technique utilizing an electronic conductivity device guidance to aide placement of S2-Alar-Iliac (S2-AI) instrumentation. Electronic conductivity guidance for instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine is an accepted means of improving intraoperative accuracy. Although commercially available for percutaneous techniques, there is a paucity of literature regarding its use. Percutaneous implantation of S2-AI screws has been previously described as another technique surgeons can avail, primarily employing fluoroscopy as a means of intraoperative feedback. We describe a novel technique that utilizes electronic conductivity as an added feedback measure to increase accuracy of percutaneous S2-AI fixation. METHODS: Two patients were treated by the senior author (FAS) who underwent surgery employing S2-AI fixation utilizing an electronic conductivity device (Pediguard cannulated probe, Spineguard, Paris, France). The surgical technique, case illustrations, and radiographic outcomes are discussed. RESULTS: Stable and accurate fixation was attained in both patients. There were no peri-operative complications related to hardware placement. CONCLUSION: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported literature combining S2-AI screws with electronic conductivity for immediate intraoperative feedback. This technique has the opportunity to provide surgeons with increased accuracy for placement of S2-AI screws while improving overall radiation safety. This feedback can be particularly helpful when surgeons are learning new techniques such as placement of S2AI screws.

Lateral Approaches for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Spondylolisthesis is a common cause of lower back pain in people of all ages. When nonsurgical management is unsuccessful in treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis, surgical treatment algorithms can be used. This article focuses on lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). It represents a minimally invasive approach that affords surgeons an increased ability to restore disc height, indirectly decompress the neural elements, and affect global spinal alignment. As the role for circumferential minimally invasive spine surgery continues to expand, the use of LLIF in the setting of spondylolisthesis-and other pathologies-will continue to represent a robust fusion option.

C2-C3 spinal fracture subluxation with ligamentous and vascular injury: a case report and review of management.

Introduction: Spinal cord injury is one of the leading causes of paralysis and permanent morbidity. High cervical spine injuries, in particular, have the potential to be fatal and debilitating due to injury to multiple components, including but not limited to, discoligamentous disruption, vascular insult and spinal cord injury. To date, no unifying algorithm exists making it challenging to guide treatment decisions. Case presentation: We present the case of a 29-year-old polytrauma patient with an unstable C2-C3 fracture subluxation secondary to hyperextension and rotation injury with complete ligamentous dissociation and vertebral artery dissection after a high-velocity injury. We review the literature on injury patterns, associated complications and neurological outcomes in subaxial cervical spine injuries. Discussion: Our patient's injuries had several components including fracture subluxation, ligamentous disruption, central cord syndrome, and vascular insult. The lack of a unifying algorithm to guide treatment decisions highlights the variations in pathology and subsequent limitations in generalizability of current literature. Our patient underwent an open anterior C2-C3 reduction and discectomy with fusion and plating and a subsequent C2-C4 posterior instrumented fusion. The patient regained some motor function postoperatively and through rehabilitation. Careful consideration of multiple components is crucial when treating subaxial spine injuries.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Spine Trauma.

The role for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) continues to expand in the management of spinal pathology. In the setting of trauma, operative techniques that can minimize morbidity without compromising clinical efficacy have significant value. MIS techniques are associated with decreased intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and morbidity, while providing patients with comparable outcomes when compared with conventional open procedures. MIS interventions further enable earlier mobilization, decreased hospital stay, decreased pain, and an earlier return to baseline function when compared with traditional techniques. This article reviews patient selection and select MIS techniques for those who have suffered traumatic spinal injury.

Surgical Adhesive Drape (IO-ban) as Postoperative Surgical Site Dressing.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart analysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the senior author's (MNN) experience applying a widely available surgical drape as a postoperative sterile surgical site dressing for both cranial and spinal procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical site infection (SSI) is an important complication of spine surgery that can result in significant morbidity. There is wide variation in wound care management in practice, including dressing type. Given the known bactericidal properties of the surgical drape, there may be a benefit of continuing its use immediately postoperatively. METHODS: All of the senior author's cases from September 2014 through September 2015 were reviewed. These were contrasted to the previous year prior to the institution of a sterile surgical drape as a postoperative dressing. RESULTS: Only one surgical case out of 157 operative interventions (35 cranial, 124 spinal) required operative debridement due to infection. From September 2013 to September 2014, prior to the institution of a sterile surgical drape as dressing, the author had five infections out of 143 operations (46 cranial, 97 spinal) requiring intervention. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a sterile surgical drape as a closed postoperative surgical site dressing has led to a decrease in surgical site infections. The technique is simple and widely available, and should be considered for use to diminish surgical site infections.