The Integration of Diabetic Eye Screening into Hemodialysis Units in Northern Ireland.

Background: Diabetes is rising globally and is the most common cause of both end-stage renal disease and blindness. People on hemodialysis have to attend several dialysis appointments per week, which can affect their attendance at diabetic eye screening. In addition, previous literature suggests patients on hemodialysis are more likely to have sight-threatening diabetic eye disease. This study aims to determine attendance at the Diabetic Eye Screening Program in Northern Ireland, diabetic retinopathy severity, and use of handheld retinal imaging in people with diabetes attending hemodialysis units in Northern Ireland. Methods: All patients with diabetes attending hemodialysis clinics regionally were screened and graded by the Diabetic Eye Screening Program in Northern Ireland using a handheld and/or conventional nonmydriatic fundus camera. Results: All eligible people (N=149) were offered a Diabetic Eye Screening Program in Northern Ireland appointment, 132 attended, 34% of whom had not been seen in >3 years and 15% of whom had never attended the Diabetic Eye Screening Program in Northern Ireland despite multiple previous appointments. Altogether, 13% required urgent referral to hospital eye services, which is significantly higher than the national average of 0.4%. Conclusions: Those on hemodialysis are at high risk for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Implementing the Diabetic Eye Screening Program in Northern Ireland in hemodialysis clinics enables timely diagnosis and referral.

Metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of [14C]INCB018424, a selective Janus tyrosine kinase 1/2 inhibitor, in humans.

The metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of 3-(4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-3-cyclopentylpropanenitrile (INCB018424), a potent, selective inhibitor of Janus tyrosine kinase1/2 and the first investigational drug of its class in phase III studies for the treatment of myelofibrosis, were investigated in healthy human subjects given a single oral 25-mg dose of [(14)C]INCB018424 as an oral solution. INCB018424 and total radioactivity were absorbed rapidly (mean time to reach the maximal drug concentration <1 h), declining in a monophasic or biphasic fashion (mean t(1/2) of 2.32 and 5.81 h, respectively). Recovery of administered radioactivity was fairly rapid (>70% within 24 h postdose) with 74 and 22% recovered in urine and feces, respectively. Parent compound was the predominant entity in the circulation, representing 58 to 74% of the total radioactivity up to 6 h postdose, indicating that the overall circulating metabolite burden was low (<50% of parent). Two metabolite peaks in plasma (M18 and a peak containing M16/M27, both hydroxylations on the cyclopentyl moiety) were identified as major (30 and 14% of parent based on area under the curve from 0 to 24 h). The exposures of other circulating INCB018424-related peaks were <10% of parent, consisting of mono- and dihydroxylated metabolites. The profiles in urine and feces consisted of hydroxyl and oxo metabolites and subsequent glucuronide conjugates with parent drug accounting for <1% of the excreted dose, strongly suggesting that after an oral dose, INCB018424 was >95% absorbed. In healthy subjects administered daily oral doses of unlabeled INCB018424, there were minimal differences in parent and metabolite concentrations between day 1 and day 10, indicating a lack of accumulation of parent or metabolites between single and multiple dosing.

The effect of CYP3A4 inhibition or induction on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally administered ruxolitinib (INCB018424 phosphate) in healthy volunteers.

Ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1&2 inhibitor in development for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms, is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4. The effects of inhibition or induction of CYP3A4 on single oral dose ruxolitinib pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) were evaluated in healthy volunteers. Coadministration of ketoconazole (a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor) and erythromycin (a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor) increased total ruxolitinib plasma exposure (AUC(0-∞)) by 91% and 27%, respectively, and ruxolitinib PD, as measured by the inhibition of interleukin (IL)-6-stimulated STAT3 phosphorylation in whole blood, was generally consistent with the PK observed. Pretreatment with rifampin, a potent CYP3A4 inducer, decreased ruxolitinib AUC(0-∞) by 71% while resulting in only a 10% decrease in the overall PD activity. This apparent PK/PD discrepancy may be explained, in part, by an increase in the relative abundance of ruxolitinib active metabolites with the rifampin coadministration. The collective PK/PD data suggest that starting doses of ruxolitinib should be reduced by 50% if coadministered with a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, whereas adjustments in ruxolitinib starting doses may not be needed when coadministered with inducers or mild/moderate inhibitors of CYP3A4. All study doses of ruxolitinib were generally safe and well tolerated when given alone and in combination with ketoconazole, erythromycin, or rifampin.