Biological Testing and Interpretation of Laboratory Results Associated with Detecting Newborns with Substance Exposure.

BACKGROUND: Substance use during pregnancy is common, as is biological testing that is intended to help identify prenatal exposures. However, there is no standardized requirement for biological testing with either maternal or newborn specimens, nor is there standardization related to when testing occurs, how frequently testing occurs, what specimen(s) to test, what substances to test for, or how to perform testing. CONTENT: We review common specimen types tested to detect maternal and newborn substance exposure with a focus on urine, meconium, and umbilical cord tissue. We also review common analytical methods used to perform testing, including immunoassay, and mass spectrometry platforms. Considerations regarding the utilization of testing relative to the purpose of testing, the drug analyte(s) of interest, the specific testing employed, and the interpretation of results are emphasized to help guide decisions about clinical utilization of testing. We also highlight specific examples of unexpected results that can be used to guide interpretation and appropriate next steps. SUMMARY: There are strengths and limitations associated with all approaches to detecting substance exposure in pregnant persons as well as biological testing to evaluate a newborn with possible substance exposure. Standardization is needed to better inform decisions surrounding evaluation of substance exposures in pregnant people and newborns. If biological sampling is pursued, testing options and results must be reviewed in clinical context, acknowledging that false-positive and -negative results can and do occur.

Cannabis Exposure and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Related to Placental Function.

Importance: Cannabis use is increasing among reproductive-age individuals and the risks associated with cannabis exposure during pregnancy remain uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the association between maternal cannabis use and adverse pregnancy outcomes known to be related to placental function. Design, Setting, and Participants: Ancillary analysis of nulliparous individuals treated at 8 US medical centers with stored urine samples and abstracted pregnancy outcome data available. Participants in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be cohort were recruited from 2010 through 2013; the drug assays and analyses for this ancillary project were completed from June 2020 through April 2023. Exposure: Cannabis exposure was ascertained by urine immunoassay for 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol using frozen stored urine samples from study visits during the pregnancy gestational age windows of 6 weeks and 0 days to 13 weeks and 6 days (visit 1); 16 weeks and 0 days to 21 weeks and 6 days (visit 2); and 22 weeks and 0 days to 29 weeks and 6 days (visit 3). Positive results were confirmed with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The timing of cannabis exposure was defined as only during the first trimester or ongoing exposure beyond the first trimester. Main Outcome and Measure: The dichotomous primary composite outcome included small-for-gestational-age birth, medically indicated preterm birth, stillbirth, or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy ascertained by medical record abstraction by trained perinatal research staff with adjudication of outcomes by site investigators. Results: Of 10 038 participants, 9257 were eligible for this analysis. Of the 610 participants (6.6%) with cannabis use, 32.4% (n = 197) had cannabis exposure only during the first trimester and 67.6% (n = 413) had ongoing exposure beyond the first trimester. Cannabis exposure was associated with the primary composite outcome (25.9% in the cannabis exposure group vs 17.4% in the no exposure group; adjusted relative risk, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.07-1.49]) in the propensity score-weighted analyses after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, body mass index, medical comorbidities, and active nicotine use ascertained via urine cotinine assays. In a 3-category cannabis exposure model (no exposure, exposure only during the first trimester, or ongoing exposure), cannabis use during the first trimester only was not associated with the primary composite outcome; however, ongoing cannabis use was associated with the primary composite outcome (adjusted relative risk, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.09-1.60]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter cohort, maternal cannabis use ascertained by biological sampling was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes related to placental dysfunction.

Clinical pharmacogenomic testing and reporting: A technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Pharmacogenomic testing interrogates germline sequence variants implicated in interindividual drug response variability to infer a drug response phenotype and to guide medication management for certain drugs. Specifically, discrete aspects of pharmacokinetics, such as drug metabolism, and pharmacodynamics, as well as drug sensitivity, can be predicted by genes that code for proteins involved in these pathways. Pharmacogenomics is unique and differs from inherited disease genetics because the drug response phenotype can be drug-dependent and is often unrecognized until an unexpected drug reaction occurs or a patient fails to respond to a medication. Genes and variants with sufficiently high levels of evidence and consensus may be included in a clinical pharmacogenomic test; however, result interpretation and phenotype prediction can be challenging for some genes and medications. This document provides a resource for laboratories to develop and implement clinical pharmacogenomic testing by summarizing publicly available resources and detailing best practices for pharmacogenomic nomenclature, testing, result interpretation, and reporting.

The prevalence and clinical relevance of 2R/2R TYMS genotype in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies treated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of 2R/2R TYMS genotype is variable but estimated to be around 20-30% in Caucasians. The clinical relevance of TYMS 2R/2R genotype in predicting severe fluoropyrimidine-related adverse events (FrAE) is controversial. Here, we explored the prevalence and clinical relevance of 2R/2R TYMS genotype. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2018, 126 patients were genotyped for TYMS. FrAEs were graded according to CTCAE version 5.0. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of TYMS 2R/2R genotype was 24.6%. Among patients with TYMS genotypes (N = 71) that predict decreased TS expression, 2R/2R TYMS genotype was the most common TYMS genotype seen in female (57%) and African American (60%) patients. Among patients with genotypes that predict increased TS expression (N = 55), 12 patients had grade 3-4 FrAEs (22%), while among patients with genotypes that predict decreased TS expression (N = 71), 30 patients had grade 3-4 FrAEs (42%) (p = 0.0219). Compared to patients with genotypes predicting increased TS expression, 17 out of 31 patients (55%) with TYMS 2R/2R genotype had grade 3-4 FrAEs (p = 0.0039) and 15 out 40 patients (38%) with TYMS 2R/3RC and TYMS 3RC/3RC genotype had grade 3-4 FrAEs (p = 0.1108). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of TYMS 2R/2R genotype was 24.6%, and it had a unique sex and ethnic distribution. Polymorphism in the promoter region of TYMS gene that predicts decreased TS expression due to 2R/2R variant was associated with grade 3-4 FrAEs. These data suggest that genotyping patients who are not DPD deficient for TYMS might identify patients at risk of severe FrAEs.

Impact of the Opioid Epidemic on Drug Testing.

BACKGROUND: This review provides a description of how the opioid epidemic has impacted drug testing. METHODS: Four major service areas of drug testing were considered, including emergency response, routine clinical care, routine forensics, and death investigations. RESULTS: Several factors that the opioid epidemic has impacted in drug testing are discussed, including specimens, breadth of compounds recommended for testing, time to result required for specific applications, analytical approaches, interpretive support requirements, and examples of published practice guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Both clinical and forensic laboratories have adapted practices and developed new testing approaches to respond to the opioid epidemic. Such changes are likely to continue evolving in parallel with changes in both prescription and nonprescription opioid availability and use patterns, as well as emerging populations that are affected by the "waves" of the opioid epidemic.

Evaluation of Imatinib Concentrations in Samples Submitted for BCR-ABL1 or Imatinib Testing-Evidence to Support Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Dose Optimization?

BACKGROUND: Imatinib is one of the first-line therapies for chronic myeloid leukemia. Achieving a major molecular response early in treatment, as indicated by a BCR-ABL1 major international scale result of ≤0.1% within 6 months, is associated with better patient outcomes and is statistically associated with a trough imatinib concentration of approximately 1000 ng/mL. Adherence to therapy, drug resistance, drug-drug interactions, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic factors may hinder attaining this target. Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib is not currently standard-of-care, but may help to evaluate adherence and optimize treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. This study aimed to evaluate imatinib concentrations in real-world patient plasma samples to identify the proportion of imatinib-treated patients who achieved the therapeutic target of 1000 ng/mL. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study that measured imatinib in residual plasma samples used for BCR-ABL1 tests (n = 1022) and analyzed clinician-ordered imatinib tests for therapeutic drug monitoring (n = 116). Imatinib was measured by competitive immunoassay. The frequency of imatinib concentrations achieving the therapeutic target was determined and correlated with BCR-ABL1 major international scale, age, and sex. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of patients tested for BCR-ABL1 may not have been prescribed or were not adherent to imatinib therapy. In the 29% of patients who did not achieve major molecular response, but had quantifiable imatinib concentrations, the therapeutic concentration was not met. For clinician-ordered imatinib tests, 45% of samples did not exceed the therapeutic target and 4% had potentially toxic plasma concentrations (>3000 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic drug monitoring for imatinib may assist clinicians in the identification of patients who may not be adherent to therapy, display variable pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics, or may be experiencing toxicity or treatment failure.

Effect of Low-Intensity vs Standard-Intensity Warfarin Prophylaxis on Venous Thromboembolism or Death Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The optimal international normalized ratio (INR) to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in warfarin-treated patients with recent arthroplasty is unknown. Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of a target INR of 1.8 vs 2.5 for VTE prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: The randomized Genetic Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis enrolled 1650 patients aged 65 years or older initiating warfarin for elective hip or knee arthroplasty at 6 US medical centers. Enrollment began in April 2011 and follow-up concluded in October 2016. Interventions: In a 2 × 2 factorial design, participants were randomized to a target INR of 1.8 (n = 823) or 2.5 (n = 827) and to either genotype-guided or clinically guided warfarin dosing. For the first 11 days of therapy, open-label warfarin dosing was guided by a web application. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the composite of VTE (within 60 days) or death (within 30 days). Participants underwent screening duplex ultrasound postoperatively. The hypothesis was that an INR target of 1.8 would be noninferior to an INR target of 2.5, using a noninferiority margin of 3% for the absolute risk of VTE. Secondary end points were bleeding and INR values of 4 or more. Results: Among 1650 patients who were randomized (mean age, 72.1 years; 1049 women [63.6%]; 1502 white [91.0%]), 1597 (96.8%) received at least 1 dose of warfarin and were included in the primary analysis. The rate of the primary composite outcome of VTE or death was 5.1% (41 of 804) in the low-intensity-warfarin group (INR target, 1.8) vs 3.8% (30 of 793) in the standard-treatment-warfarin group (INR target, 2.5), for a difference of 1.3% (1-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 3.05%, P = .06 for noninferiority). Major bleeding occurred in 0.4% of patients in the low-intensity group and 0.9% of patients in the standard-intensity group, for a difference of -0.5% (95% CI, -1.6% to 0.4%). The INR values of 4 or more occurred in 4.5% of patients in the low-intensity group and 12.2% of the standard-intensity group, for a difference of -7.8% (95% CI, -10.5% to -5.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among older patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty and receiving warfarin prophylaxis, an international normalized ratio goal of 1.8 compared with 2.5 did not meet the criterion for noninferiority for risk of the composite outcome of VTE or death. However, the trial may have been underpowered to meet this criterion and further research may be warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01006733.

Detection of Drug-Exposed Newborns.

Maternal substance abuse during pregnancy is a growing problem with major public health and legal concerns. In utero substance exposure may adversely affect neonatal development; pregnancy outcome; and the long-term behavioral, cognitive, and developmental abilities of the child. Also, serious legal implications are associated with substance abuse during pregnancy, including charges of child abuse and neglect that may result in the removal of the neonate from parental care and loss of custodial rights. Timely detection of in utero drug exposure is necessary for early identification and effective management of exposed newborns. Accurate identification of drug-exposed newborns relies on maternal history; clinical presentation of the newborn; and laboratory testing of biological maternal matrices (ie, urine, blood, oral fluid, sweat, hair, and breast milk), neonatal matrices (ie, urine, meconium, hair, and umbilical cord blood and tissue), and/or matrices from both the mother and neonate (ie, placenta and amniotic fluid). Evaluation of biological matrices can account for in utero exposure at various stages of gestation and approximate the period (recent versus chronic use) of substance exposure. Each matrix has its own unique advantages and limitations in terms of ease of collection, the window of gestational exposure represented, and sensitivity for different parent drug analytes and metabolites, which must be carefully considered for accurate interpretation of results. Analytical approaches to sample preparation and analysis vary based on the complexity of these biological matrices. Immunoassays are routinely used for screening, and chromatographic separation coupled to mass spectrometry detection method is commonly used for definitive (confirmatory) testing. Some laboratories use a single technology for all testing. This review provides a discussion on approaches used to detect drug-exposed newborns, biological specimens that have been studied to identify and characterize drug exposures, example analytical methods for meconium and umbilical cord tissue as well as considerations surrounding the interpretation of results. A possible algorithm for testing is also proposed.

Effect of Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing on Clinical Events and Anticoagulation Control Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: The GIFT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Warfarin use accounts for more medication-related emergency department visits among older patients than any other drug. Whether genotype-guided warfarin dosing can prevent these adverse events is unknown. Objective: To determine whether genotype-guided dosing improves the safety of warfarin initiation. Design, Setting, and Patients: The randomized clinical Genetic Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis included patients aged 65 years or older initiating warfarin for elective hip or knee arthroplasty and was conducted at 6 US medical centers. Enrollment began in April 2011 and follow-up concluded in October 2016. Interventions: Patients were genotyped for the following polymorphisms: VKORC1-1639G>A, CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, and CYP4F2 V433M. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, patients were randomized to genotype-guided (n = 831) or clinically guided (n = 819) warfarin dosing on days 1 through 11 of therapy and to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of either 1.8 or 2.5. The recommended doses of warfarin were open label, but the patients and clinicians were blinded to study group assignment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the composite of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death. Patients underwent a screening lower-extremity duplex ultrasound approximately 1 month after arthroplasty. Results: Among 1650 randomized patients (mean age, 72.1 years [SD, 5.4 years]; 63.6% women; 91.0% white), 1597 (96.8%) received at least 1 dose of warfarin therapy and completed the trial (n = 808 in genotype-guided group vs n = 789 in clinically guided group). A total of 87 patients (10.8%) in the genotype-guided group vs 116 patients (14.7%) in the clinically guided warfarin dosing group met at least 1 of the end points (absolute difference, 3.9% [95% CI, 0.7%-7.2%], P = .02; relative rate [RR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.95]). The numbers of individual events in the genotype-guided group vs the clinically guided group were 2 vs 8 for major bleeding (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-1.15), 56 vs 77 for INR of 4 or greater (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99), 33 vs 38 for venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54-1.34), and there were no deaths. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty and treated with perioperative warfarin, genotype-guided warfarin dosing, compared with clinically guided dosing, reduced the combined risk of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death. Further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of personalized warfarin dosing. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01006733.

Patterns of Drugs and Drug Metabolites Observed in Meconium: What Do They Mean?

BACKGROUND: Meconium drug testing is performed to detect potentially harmful drug exposures in a newborn. Interpretation of meconium drug testing results can be complicated based on the patterns and proportional concentrations of the drug(s) and/or drug metabolite(s) detected. METHODS: The objective of this study was to analyze meconium drug testing patterns in a de-identified dataset from a national reference laboratory (n = 76,631) and in a subset of the data, wherein specimens originated at a single academic medical center for which detailed chart review was possible (n = 3635). Meconium testing was performed using 11 immunoassay-based drug screens. Specimens that were positive for one or more drug screens were reflexed to corresponding confirmation tests performed by gas chromatography or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection, targeted to identify and quantitate specific parent drug(s) and metabolite(s). RESULTS: The positivity rate was the highest for the cannabis metabolite 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (25.2%, n = 18,643), followed by opiates/oxycodone (23.2%, n = 17,778), amphetamine/methamphetamine (6.7%, n = 5134), cocaine metabolites (5.5%, n = 4205), methadone (5.3%, n = 4093), benzodiazepines (3.4%, n = 2603), barbiturates (1.1%, n = 834), propoxyphene (1.0%, n = 749), and phencyclidine (0.1%, n = 44). Based on documented pharmacy history, drugs administered to either the mother or newborn during the birth hospitalization were detected in meconium, providing evidence that drugs can be incorporated into meconium rapidly. Drugs administered directly to the newborn after birth were recovered in meconium as both parent drug and metabolites, providing evidence of neonatal metabolism. Overall, patterns observed in meconium exhibited many similarities to those patterns commonly reported with urine drug testing. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of meconium drug testing results requires comparison of results with clinical and analytical expectations, including maternal admissions to drug use, pharmacy history, recognized metabolic patterns for drugs of interest, cutoff concentrations, and other performance characteristics of the test. Concentrations of drug(s) and drug metabolites(s) may not reliably predict timing of drug use, extent of drug use, or frequency of drug exposures.

Detection of neonatal drug exposure using umbilical cord tissue and liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: A method for qualitative detection of 57 drugs and metabolites in umbilical cord tissue using liquid chromatography time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry is described. METHODS: Results from 32 deidentified positive specimens analyzed by an outside laboratory using "screen with reflex to confirmation" testing were compared with TOF results. In addition, 57 umbilical cord tissue specimens paired with corresponding chart review data and 37 with meconium test results were analyzed by TOF. Urine drug test results from mother (n = 18) and neonate (n = 30) were included if available. Cutoff concentrations, recovery, and matrix effects were determined by analyzing fortified drug-free cord tissue and negative specimens. Cutoffs (in nanograms per gram) ranged from 1 to 10 for opioids and opioid antagonists, 5-10 for benzodiazepines and nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics, 20-40 for barbiturates, 8 for stimulants, and 4 for phencyclidine. Adequate sensitivity for the detection of cannabis exposure could not be realized with this method. CONCLUSIONS: Liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry can provide accurate and sensitive detection of in utero drug exposure using umbilical cord tissue.

Retrospective analysis of the diagnostic yield of newborn drug testing.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify high-yield screening risk factors for detecting maternal non-medical drug use during pregnancy. METHODS: A four year retrospective analysis was conducted at an academic medical center. Detailed chart review of both the newborn and mother's medical record was performed on all cases for which one or more drug(s) or metabolite(s) were identified and confirmed in meconium or urine. RESULTS: 229 (9.2%) of 2,497 meconium samples out of 7,749 live births confirmed positive for one or more non-medical drugs. History of maternal non-medical drug and/or tobacco use in pregnancy was present in 90.8% of non-medical drug use cases. Addition of social risk factors and inadequate prenatal care increased the yield to 96.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Use of focused screening criteria based on specific maternal and social risk factors may detect many prenatal non-medical drug exposures.

Retrospective Data Analysis Reveals Unusual Metabolism Pattern of Ethanol in Pediatrics as Compared to Adult and Geriatric Populations.

BACKGROUND: About 95% of consumed ethanol is metabolized by oxidative pathways. Less than 1% is metabolized via nonoxidative pathways: glucuronidation, sulfation, and the formation of fatty acid esters of ethanol. In neonates, the glucuronidation pathway has been reported to be underdeveloped but matures with age. This work compared the test results of patients' random urine samples submitted to our facility for ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) measurements across pediatric and adult populations. METHODS: Test results (n = 63 498) from urine samples tested for EtG and EtS by quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry at our facility were utilized for this study. EtG and EtS concentrations were compared across the age partitions 0 to 17 years (pediatric), 18 to 80 years (adult), and 81 to 100 years (geriatric). Eight pediatric patients from a tertiary academic hospital contributed clinical context via abstracted clinical information. RESULTS: Across the individual age partitions, 60% to 65% of patients had both EtG and EtS present in urine. Approximately 5% to 10% of patients had only EtG, and 25% to 35% had neither metabolite present. The lowest percentages (<1.5%) had EtS present in the absence of EtG. Markedly, no pediatric patients had only EtS present; compared to the adult population, this was statistically significant (Fisher exact test, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: From the data presented in this work, EtG is more prevalent relative to EtS in urine samples of patients assessed for ethanol exposure.

Can Umbilical Cord and Meconium Results Be Directly Compared? Analytical Approach Matters.

Maternal drug use during pregnancy is a significant concern. Drug-exposed newborns are often born premature and may suffer from birth defects, neonatal abstinence syndrome and cognitive and developmental delays. Because of this, testing of neonatal specimens is carried out to assess fetal drug exposure during pregnancy. Umbilical cord tissue (UC) and meconium are commonly used specimens for this purpose. However, comprehensive studies comparing drug positivity rates and concentration in the two specimen types are lacking. To this end, 4,036 paired UC and meconium specimens originating from 13 states within the USA were identified, and retrospective analysis of drug positivity rates and drug concentration was performed for 31 analytes in 5 drug classes. Testing for 11-Nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) is a separate orderable for UC specimen at our laboratory, so a second data set was created for evaluation of this drug analyte with 2,112 paired UC and meconium specimens originating from 11 states. Testing of UC was performed by semi-quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) assays, whereas, for meconium, an immunoassay-based screening preceded LC-MS-MS confirmation tests. Results generated for UC and meconium specimens were therefore compared for a total of 32 drug analytes from 6 drug classes. Drug concentrations for analytes were higher in meconium compared to UC, with the exception of phencyclidine. Despite this, the positivity rates for individual analytes were higher in UC, with the exception of THC-COOH and cocaine. Furthermore, analysis for multidrug positivity revealed that THC-COOH and opioids were the most common multidrug combination detected in both matrices. In conclusion, this study suggests that for most drug compounds, UC was more analytically sensitive to assess neonatal drug exposure by current methodologies. Additionally, by demonstrating that meconium has higher drug concentrations for most compounds, this study sets the stage for developing more sensitive assays in meconium.

Deceptively Simple: Can Urine Samples from CLIA-Waived Urine Drug Screen Devices Be Reused for Confirmatory Testing?

BACKGROUND: Many low-complexity urine drug screen (UDS) devices are approved by the Food and Drug Administration as waived under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) criteria. Labeling instructs patients to urinate directly into the device and also states that positive results should be confirmed. However, the device itself may pose a risk of drug adsorption and/or specimen contamination that could affect results in confirmatory assays if specimens are reused. Collecting urine in a separate container before performing the UDS would reclassify the test as nonwaived, negating the conveniences of a CLIA-waived test. Also, patients may be unable or unwilling to urinate in an additional container for confirmatory testing. This study examined reusing urine from a UDS device (NexScreen) for confirmatory testing. METHODS: 25 patient specimens were pooled and verified to be drug-free. To evaluate drug leaching from the UDS device, 30 mL of this pool was incubated in NexScreen cups, followed by confirmatory testing. To evaluate drug adsorption, 14 representative analytes were spiked slightly over the NexScreen positivity cutoffs, followed by incubation in NexScreen cups and confirmation testing. RESULTS: All negative samples incubated in NexScreen cups remained negative upon confirmation testing, indicating that NexScreen test strips do not contaminate the specimen. For the drug adsorption experiment, 11 of 14 analytes had recoveries of at least 95%, whereas buprenorphine and 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol recovered at 94% and 87%, respectively, suggesting minor adsorption. All analytes recovered above their respective confirmation cutoffs. CONCLUSIONS: Urine aliquots from NexScreen cups may be used for confirmatory testing.

Does Labetalol Trigger False Positive Drug Testing Results?

OBJECTIVES: Labetalol, an α- and ß-adrenergic antagonist used to treat hypertension in pregnancy has been blamed for causing false-positive amphetamine and methamphetamine results. In this study, we tested 3 concentrations of labetalol prepared with 4 specimen types (urine, plasma, meconium, and umbilical cord tissue), for amphetamine, methamphetamine, and several other drugs with screen and confirmation tests. METHODS: Residual drug-free specimens were pooled. Labetalol hydrochloride dissolved in methanol was used to prepare spikes in triplicate per specimen type (2.7, 50, and 100 µM), which were tested with 41 previously validated drug tests performed by immunoassay or liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: Labetalol triggered false-positive amphetamine and methamphetamine results by immunoassay in meconium but did not trigger positive results for any of the targeted drugs or drug metabolites tested by LC-MS/MS. No positive results were generated by any immunoassay or LC-MS/MS test included in the study, when challenged with high concentrations of labetalol in urine, plasma, or umbilical cord tissue. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, false-positive results can be generated by labetalol when tested by immunoassay, but false-positive results are not expected when testing is performed by highly specific analytical approaches such as LC-MS/MS.

Analysis of Mitragynine and Speciociliatine in Umbilical Cord by LC-MS-MS for Detecting Prenatal Exposure to Kratom.

Kratom is an herbal drug that is legal in the USA. While it is marketed as a safer alternative to opioids, it can cause opioid-like withdrawal symptoms when discontinued after regular use. Several case studies have shown that kratom exposure in utero can lead to symptoms in newborns consistent with neonatal abstinence syndrome. Here, we present a validated method for the detection of kratom in umbilical cord by liquid chromatography--tandem mass spectrometry. The umbilical cord is homogenized in solvent and kratom analytes are purified by solid phase extraction (strong cation exchange). Diastereomeric kratom alkaloids mitragynine (MG), speciociliatine (SC), speciogynine and mitraciliatine are separated by reverse phase chromatography on a phenyl-hexyl column. Applying this method to residual umbilical cords submitted to our laboratory for drug testing, 29 positive specimens exhibiting varied kratom analyte distributions were observed. MG and SC were the most abundant kratom analytes and were selected as biomarkers of kratom exposure. A cutoff concentration of 0.08 ng/g was established for both MG and SC.

Nicotine and Tobacco Alkaloid Testing and Challenges: Lessons Learned From a College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Survey.

CONTEXT.­: Consequences related to nicotine (NIC) use remain a major health concern, leading to demand for testing to detect NIC, metabolites such as cotinine (COT), and related tobacco alkaloids, including anabasine (ANAB). NIC-related testing is not standardized among laboratories, nor are there clinical or regulatory guidelines to inform decisions such as appropriate screening cutoffs or limits of quantitation. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate analytical performance and reporting practices of laboratories that perform NIC-related testing by reviewing participant responses to the Nicotine and Tobacco Alkaloid (NTA) Proficiency Testing Survey. DESIGN.­: NTA results were retrieved from 2017 (the first year of the survey) through 2020. Survey participants, methodologies, and results were evaluated for all analytes, and simulated grading was performed for COT. Additional data, including limits of quantitation, qualitative cutoffs, and reasons for testing, were reviewed. RESULTS.­: Participant growth was steady for qualitative COT testing. Participation was stable for NIC, ANAB, and quantitative COT testing. Overall, participants performed well on survey challenges. However, reporting thresholds were widely divergent, ranging from 10 to 3000 ng/mL and 0.5 to 300 ng/mL, respectively, for qualitative and quantitative COT testing. Screening cutoffs were as high as 100 ng/mL for ANAB and 1000 ng/mL for NIC. CONCLUSIONS.­: Although participating laboratories performed well on the NTA Survey, the wide diversity of qualitative and quantitative reporting thresholds creates substantial risk for misinterpretation of results, and could lead to analytical concerns such as excessively high false-negative or false-positive rates. NIC-related testing would benefit from evidence-based guidelines to drive standardization of reporting.

Unresolved discrepancies between cannabinoid test results for infant urine.

BACKGROUND: False-positive drug screen results for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have been observed. This study investigated the rate of unconfirmed positive screen results in infant and noninfant urine samples and evaluated possible reasons for differences. METHODS: The rate of unconfirmed positive THC screen results for urine samples was determined retrospectively in 2 independent data sets (n = 14,859, reference laboratory; n = 21,807, hospital laboratory) by comparing positive immunoassay-based drug screen results with the associated results of confirmation tests. We then assessed the rate of positive THC screens for samples with varying likelihoods of cannabinoid presence to evaluate the contribution of infant-specific urine constituents to positive results. Finally, a method to detect a THC metabolite (11-hydroxy-Δ9-THC) that occurs in meconium was developed to determine its prevalence in infant urine. RESULTS: Positive screen results failed to confirm more frequently in samples from infants (47%) than in noninfants (0.8%). The hospital laboratory observed a similar discrepancy with a different immunoassay. Infant samples with a high likelihood of containing cannabinoids despite negative confirmatory results had a similar rate of positive screening results (50%, n = 20), whereas all samples with a low likelihood of containing cannabinoids screened negative (n = 23). 11-Hydroxy-Δ9-THC was not detected in any infant urine sample tested (n = 16). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional confirmatory methods for THC may be inappropriate for urine samples from infants. Our results suggest that one or more currently unrecognized THC-associated compounds are responsible for positive THC screen results for infant urine, as opposed to an infant-associated interference.