Immune response to ART initiation in advanced HIV infection.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare the immunological responses to commonly used antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens among people with advanced HIV in the USA and to assess virological outcomes and regimen persistence. METHODS: This study included ART-naïve adults with advanced HIV infection (CD4 cell count <200 cells/µL) initiating ART with bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF), boosted darunavir (bDRV), dolutegravir (DTG), or elvitegravir (EVG/c)-containing regimens between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020 in the Observational Pharmaco-Epidemiology Research and Analysis (OPERA) cohort. Cox proportional hazards models and linear mixed models with random intercept were fit with inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Overall, 1349 people with advanced HIV (816 B/F/TAF, 253 DTG, 146 EVG/c, 134 bDRV) were followed for a median of 22 months. Compared with B/F/TAF, a lower likelihood of achieving a CD4 cell count ≥200 cells/µL was observed with bDRV (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.96), DTG (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69-0.98), and EVG/c (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.93). All groups had a similar pattern of CD4:CD8 ratio changes: a rapid increase in the first 6 months (ranging from +0.15 to +0.16 units), followed by a slower increase thereafter. Only 40 individuals (4%) achieved CD4:CD8 ratio normalization (≥1). B/F/TAF was associated with a faster time to virological suppression (viral load <200 copies/mL) and a slower time to discontinuation compared with other regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Among people with advanced HIV infection, B/F/TAF initiation was associated with faster CD4 cell count recovery and favourable virological outcomes compared with bDRV-, DTG-, and EVG/c-based regimens, although no difference was observed in CD4:CD8 ratio changes over time across regimens.

Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in older individuals with HIV: Results of a 96-week, phase 3b, open-label, switch trial in virologically suppressed people ≥65 years of age.

OBJECTIVES: Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) is an effective treatment for HIV-1 infection; however, clinical trial data in older people living with HIV (PLWH) are lacking. The primary 24-week and secondary 48-week analyses of study GS-US-380-4449 (NCT03405935), which assessed the efficacy and safety of switching to B/F/TAF in older PLWH, have been published. Here we report the results of the final 96-week analyses from the study. METHODS: In this 96-week, phase 3b, open-label, single-arm trial, virologically suppressed PLWH aged ≥65 years switched from elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimen to B/F/TAF. Viral suppression, resistance, immune response, safety, tolerability and adherence were evaluated through week 96. RESULTS: Of 90 participants screened, 86 were enrolled and switched to B/F/TAF. No participants had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/ml (by FDA Snapshot algorithm) at weeks 72 or 96; virologic suppression rates were 94.2% (81/86; 95% CI 87.0-98.1) and 74.4% (64/86; 95% CI 63.9-83.2), respectively. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed, and CD4 counts remained stable. There were no study drug-related serious adverse events. Three participants experienced drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events that led to premature drug discontinuation. There were no clinically relevant changes from baseline to week 96 in fasting lipid parameters, and the median change in body weight at week 96 was 0.0 kg (IQR -2.3, 2.0). Median self-reported adherence was 100% (IQR 100-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to B/F/TAF is an effective long-term option for virologically suppressed adults ≥65 years of age, with favourable safety and tolerability profiles in this population.

Bioavailability of dissolved and crushed single tablets of bictegravir, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide in healthy adults: the SOLUBIC randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Crushing or dissolving bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (BIC/TAF/FTC) tablets is not recommended because there are no data supporting this practice. METHODS: A crossover, randomized trial in healthy adults (NCT04244448) investigated the bioavailability of two off-label uses of BIC/TAF/FTC (50/200/25 mg), dissolved in water or crushed in apple compote, compared with the solid tablet. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated from sequential intensive plasma antiretroviral concentrations over a 72 h period post dose. Bioequivalence was met if the 90% CIs of the geometric least-squares means ratios comparing BIC/TAF/FTC exposures (AUC and Cmax) from the experimental phases were within 80%-125% of the reference. RESULTS: Eighteen subjects participated in each of the three phases. Dissolved tablet Cmax geometric mean ratio (90% CI) for BIC/TAF/FTC was 105% (93-119)/97% (87-108)/96% (74-124), respectively. Dissolved tablet AUC geometric mean ratio (90% CI) for BIC/TAF/FTC was 111% (100-122)/100% (94 to 105)/99% (81 to 120), respectively. Crushed tablet Cmax geometric mean ratio (90%) CI for BIC/TAF/FTC was 110% (97 to 124)/70% (63-78)/66% (51-85), respectively. Crushed tablet AUC geometric mean ratio (90%) CI for BIC/TAF/FTC was 107% (96-118)/86% (82-91)/84% (69-103), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Crushing BIC/TAF/FTC tablets may lead to suboptimal emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide drug exposures. Dissolving BIC/TAF/FTC in water may be acceptable if the tablet cannot be swallowed whole.

Pilot comparison of the ease of swallowing of single tablet antiretroviral regimens.

Daily adherence to lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) is required to achieve long term treatment success. However, patient preferences for ART tablet size have not been well studied. Our study assessed factors associated with the ease of swallowing (EoS) and tolerability of two placebo tablets representing and matching B/F/TAF (BPT) and DTG/ABC/3TC (DPT). Fifty ART-naïve patients were randomized into a two-period cross-over study. Likert scale (1-5) questionnaires were administered to assess patient factors influencing the ease of swallowing, adherence, home medications, medication preferences and perceptions. Comparisons were done using Student t-tests and ordinal regression. Participants were 64% female, 61% white, mean age 43 years, and taking a mean (median) of 4(1) pills/day. BPT was reported to be easier than DPT with ease of swallowability 1.76 vs. 2.42 (p < 0.001) (1 = very easy). DPT tablet was correctly perceived as larger than BPT (p < 0.001); with both tablets perceived as smaller than actual size (p < 0.001). EoS of either tablet was positively associated with the EoS of the largest home tablet medication (p = 0.021, p = 0.03). Patient's perceptions of EoS can affect their medication adherence, especially in HIV, and should be considered in treatment regimens.

Differential detection of M184V/I between plasma historical HIV genotypes and HIV proviral DNA from PBMCs.

BACKGROUND: The M184V/I reverse transcriptase mutation, which confers major resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine, is still quite frequent in people living with HIV. The underlying presence of the M184V/I mutation may undermine virological outcomes of ART, particularly in the context of proposed treatment with two-drug combinations that include drugs affected by M184V, such as lamivudine. In suppressed patients for whom historical data are seldom available, resistance assays evaluating integrated viral DNA can help select a fully active switch regimen. OBJECTIVES: To compare detectability of M184V/I in historical HIV-1 RNA analyses versus HIV-1 DNA sequencing. METHODS: We analysed the detection of the M184V/I mutation in a prospective study and compared HIV historical genotypes (plasma) versus integrated HIV DNA (PBMCs) obtained via a validated commercial proviral HIV DNA assay. Eligible participants had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for ≥6 consecutive months prior to screening. A plasma historical genotypic report (HGR) showing the presence of M184V/I was required for all participants and proviral HIV DNA analysis was conducted prior to enrolment. RESULTS: All 84 participants had evidence of M184V or M184I in their HGR (100%), whereas the mutation was detected in only 40/84 participants by proviral HIV DNA sequencing analysis (48%). Differential detection of M184V/I was not associated with timing differences between the HGR and proviral HIV DNA sampling, the overall duration of ART, or CD4 cell counts and HIV-1 viral load at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that undetected M184V/I should be considered when switching virologically suppressed patients to new regimens, particularly two-drug lamivudine- or emtricitabine-containing combinations.

EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF Bioequivalence Comparing Whole Tablets with Tablets Dissolved in Tap Water.

Medication adherence can be challenging for persons with difficulty swallowing tablets. We investigated the bioequivalence of a dissolved tablet when compared with that of a whole tablet of the fixed-dose combination elvitegravir (EVG)/cobicistat (COBI)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir (TFV) alafenamide fumarate (TAF). A within-subject fixed-order two-period open-label study was conducted in 12 HIV-negative research participants after obtaining informed consent. Participants took a single dose each of the whole tablet and dissolved tablet under direct observation, separated by a 14-day washout period. The dissolved tablet was prepared by adding one whole EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF tablet to 120 mL tap water and stirring. Both dosage types were taken with a standardized meal. Plasma samples were obtained for 72 h postdose. Plasma EVG, FTC, TAF, and TFV were analyzed with liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric methods. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) were estimated using WinNonlin software (v.8.3). The primary outcome was bioequivalence consistent with FDA guidance using the 90% confidence interval or the geometric mean ratio. Of 12 participants, 7 were black (58%) and 5 were white (42%), 4 were women (33%), 8 were men (67%), and the mean age was 43.6 years (23-54). There were no complaints about taste with the dissolved tablet. Bioequivalence was established only for FTC. EVG Cmax and AUC0-∞ were higher by 18% and 12%, respectively, when taking the dissolved compared with the whole tablet. TAF AUC0-∞ and Cmax were both 8% lower, whereas TFV Cmax and AUC0-∞ were 8% and 5% lower, respectively, when taken after dissolution. EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF dissolved rapidly in water and had no unpleasant taste. Increases in EVG and decreases in TAF and TFV concentrations were observed when taking dissolved EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF. These changes were judged to be clinically insignificant. Dissolving EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF in water may be suitable for those with pill swallowing challenges. The trial was registered on (//clinicaltrials.gov NCT03717129).

Advanced HIV Infection in Treatment-Naïve Individuals: Effectiveness and Persistence of Recommended 3-Drug Regimens.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of newly diagnosed people with HIV (PWH) in the United States have advanced HIV infection, yet the literature on current antiretroviral therapy (ART) options is limited. The discontinuation/modification and effectiveness of common regimens were compared among ART-naïve people with advanced HIV infection (CD4 cell count <200 cells/µL). METHODS: ART-naïve adults with advanced HIV infection initiating bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) or a boosted darunavir (bDRV)-, dolutegravir (DTG)-, or elvitegravir/cobicistat (EVG/c)-based 3-drug regimen between January 1, 2018, and July 31, 2019, in the OPERA cohort were included. The association between regimen and discontinuation or viral suppression (<50 or <200 copies/mL) was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weights. RESULTS: Overall, 961 PWH were included (416 B/F/TAF, 106 bDRV, 271 DTG, 168 EVG/c); 70% achieved a CD4 cell count ≥200 cells/µL over a 16-month median follow-up. All regimens were associated with a statistically higher likelihood of discontinuation than B/F/TAF (bDRV: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.65; 95% CI, 1.75-4.02; DTG: aHR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.75-3.35; EVG/c: aHR, 3.52; 95% CI, 2.44-5.07). Compared with B/F/TAF, bDRV initiators were statistically less likely to suppress to <50 copies/mL (aHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99) and <200 copies/mL (aHR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43-0.70); no statistically significant difference was detected with DTG or EVG/c. CONCLUSIONS: Among people with advanced HIV infection, those initiating B/F/TAF were less likely to discontinue/modify their regimen than those on any other regimen, and more likely to achieve viral suppression compared with those on bDRV but not compared with those on other integrase inhibitors.

High efficacy of switching to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in people with suppressed HIV and preexisting M184V/I.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prevalence of preexisting M184V/I and associated risk factors among clinical trial participants with suppressed HIV and evaluated the impact of M184V/I on virologic response after switching to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF). DESIGN: Participant data were pooled from six clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of switching to B/F/TAF in virologically suppressed people with HIV. METHODS: Preexisting drug resistance was assessed by historical genotypes and/or baseline proviral DNA genotyping. Virologic outcomes were determined by last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA. Stepwise selection identified potential risk factors for M184V/I in a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Altogether, 2034 participants switched treatment regimens to B/F/TAF and had follow-up HIV-1 RNA data, and 1825 of these participants had baseline genotypic data available. Preexisting M184V/I was identified in 182 (10%), mostly by baseline proviral DNA genotype ( n  = 167). Most substitutions were M184V ( n  = 161) or M184V/I mixtures ( n  = 10). Other resistance substitutions were often detected in addition to M184V/I ( n  = 147). At last on-treatment visit, 98% (179/182) with preexisting M184V/I and 99% (2012/2034) of all B/F/TAF-treated participants had HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml, with no treatment-emergent resistance to B/F/TAF. Among adult participants, factors associated with preexisting M184V/I included other resistance, black race, Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity, lower baseline CD4 + cell count, advanced HIV disease, longer duration of antiretroviral therapy, and greater number of prior third agents. CONCLUSION: M184V/I was detected in 10% of virologically suppressed clinical trial participants at study baseline. Switching to B/F/TAF demonstrated durable efficacy in maintaining viral suppression, including in those with preexisting M184V/I.

Switching to Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Adults With HIV and M184V/I Mutation.

BACKGROUND: The ability of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) to maintain virologic suppression in participants with M184V and/or M184I resistance mutations from historical genotypic reports when switching from a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based or abacavir (ABC)-based regimen was investigated. SETTING: Phase IIIb, 48-week, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, clinical trial (NCT02616029). METHODS: Virologically suppressed adults with HIV and documented M184V/I on historical genotypic records switched to E/C/F/TAF from a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based or ABC-based regimen. The primary end point was HIV-1 RNA of <50 copies per milliliter at week 12 using pure virologic response (PVR). Secondary end points included HIV-1 RNA of <50 copies per milliliter at weeks 24/48 (PVR) and at weeks 12, 24, and 48 (Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm), and change in CD4+ count at weeks 12, 24, and 48. RESULTS: M184V alone was reported in 82.8% of 64 participants; 9.4% and 7.8% had M184I and M184V/I, respectively, and 43.8% had archived M184V/I (baseline DNA). All (62/62 with available data, 100%, 95% confidence interval 94.2% to 100%) participants maintained PVR at weeks 12, 24, and 48. By Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm, one participant had HIV-1 RNA of ≥50 copies per milliliter (week 12); confirmatory HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies per milliliter. No significant changes were observed in CD4+ cell count. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 10 (15.6%) participants. Six (9.4%) and 5 (7.8%) participants had grade 3-4 AEs or serious AEs, respectively (none drug related). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the resistance mutations M184V/I did not jeopardize the efficacy of switching to E/C/F/TAF in virologically suppressed adults. High rates of virologic suppression were maintained throughout 48 weeks of therapy and treatment was well tolerated.

Brief Report: Efficacy and Safety of Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Females Living With HIV: An Integrated Analysis of 5 Trials.

BACKGROUND: We characterized the efficacy and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in a broad population of pediatric/adolescent/adult/elderly females living with HIV (FWH). SETTING: Integrated analysis. METHODS: Available data from 5 trials were integrated. Week 48 virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL), resistance, adverse events (AEs), and laboratory parameters were assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-three FWH [304 virologically suppressed; 69 antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive] received B/F/TAF [data from comparator regimens available for 306 individuals (236 virologically suppressed and 70 ART-naive participants)]. Virologic suppression rates with B/F/TAF at week 48 were high regardless of age in participants virologically suppressed at baseline (≥95%) and in ART-naive participants (≥87%). Virologic suppression rates were similar in B/F/TAF and comparator regimens (both virologically suppressed and ART-naive groups). Treatment-emergent resistance was not detected in the B/F/TAF group. AEs considered related to study drugs were experienced by 9.2% (B/F/TAF) and 5.5% (comparator regimen) of virologically suppressed participants and 15.9% (B/F/TAF) and 31.4% (comparator regimen) of ART-naive participants. For virologically suppressed and ART-naive FWH combined, only 1 of the 373 B/F/TAF-treated and 2 of the 306 comparator-regimen participants discontinued because of AEs (none were bone/renal/hepatic AEs); grade 3/4 AEs were experienced by 5.1% (B/F/TAF) and 7.8% (comparator regimen); and grade 3/4 elevation of low-density lipoprotein/total cholesterol occurred in 2.7%/0.3% (B/F/TAF) and 5.9%/2.0% (comparator regimen). At week 48, median changes from baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate in adults were <5 mL/min; results were similar in B/F/TAF and comparator-regimen groups. CONCLUSION: B/F/TAF treatment was effective and well tolerated over 48 weeks, confirming B/F/TAF as an option for a broad population of FWH.

Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Virologically Suppressed People with HIV Aged ≥ 65 Years: Week 48 Results of a Phase 3b, Open-Label Trial.

INTRODUCTION: We report the 48-week results of an ongoing study to assess the efficacy and safety of switching older people with HIV to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF). METHODS: This was a 96-week, phase 3b, open-label, single-arm study (GS-US-380-4449; NCT03405935). Virologically suppressed individuals aged ≥ 65 years receiving elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimen were switched to B/F/TAF. Primary endpoint was the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml at week 24. RESULTS: Eighty-six participants (median age 69 [range 65-80] years; 87% male; 95% white) were enrolled and treated in five European countries. Rates of virologic suppression were 97.7% at week 24 and 90.7% at week 48; none had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/ml, and 100% had virologic suppression by missing = excluded analysis at both time points. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed. There were no grade 3-4 study drug-related adverse events (AEs) or study drug-related serious AEs or deaths. Three AEs led to premature discontinuation; one (moderate abdominal discomfort) was attributed to the study drug by the investigator. At week 48, median changes from baseline in weight and estimated glomerular filtration rate were + 0.1 kg (interquartile range [IQR] - 1.0, 2.3) and - 6.0 ml/min (IQR - 10.2, 0.0), respectively. There were no clinically relevant changes from baseline to week 48 in fasting lipid parameters. Treatment satisfaction improved, and health-related quality of life was maintained from baseline through week 48. Median adherence to the study drug was 98.6% (IQR 96.0, 100). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to B/F/TAF was effective and well tolerated through 48 weeks in virologically suppressed adults aged ≥ 65 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03405935.

Etravirine and rilpivirine: nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 strains resistant to previous nonnucleoside agents.

Etravirine and rilpivirine are two new nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) that have the distinct advantage of being able to be used in patients with exposure to previous NNRTIs (e.g., nevirapine or efavirenz). Etravirine was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to be used twice/day in treatment-experienced patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. The approval was based on phase III clinical studies in which 61% of etravirine-treated patients reached an undetectable viral load of less than 50 copies/ml compared with 40% of patients who received the optimized background regimen. Etravirine was well tolerated with a self-limiting skin rash being the most common toxicity, reported in 19% of patients. Rilpivirine, a once-daily NNRTI, is entering phase III studies; the drug appears to be effective against a broad range of NNRTI-resistant viruses including etravirine-resistant strains.

Bone mineral density in virologically suppressed people aged 60 years or older with HIV-1 switching from a regimen containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to an elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide single-tablet regimen: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3b, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir alafenamide is associated with less renal and bone toxicity than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and might improve the long-term safety of antiretroviral therapy. We aimed to investigate the effect on bone mineral density of switching from a regimen containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to one containing tenofovir alafenamide in participants aged 60 years and older. METHODS: We did a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial in 36 European centres. Participants were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL), aged 60 years or older, on a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing regimen and were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive web-response system to open-label elvitegravir (150 mg), cobicistat (150 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (10 mg) daily or continued therapy containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg). Participants were stratified by spine and hip bone mineral density categories. Primary endpoints were change from baseline to week 48 in spine and hip bone mineral density with a null hypothesis of zero between-group difference tested at a significance level of 0·05. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02616783. FINDINGS: Between Dec 22, 2015, and March 21, 2018, 167 participants were randomly assigned to elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (n=111 [66%]) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n=56 [34%]). One participant in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group did not receive treatment and was excluded from all analyses. At week 48, the mean percentage change in spine bone mineral density was 2·24% (SD 3·27) in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and -0·10% (3·39) in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group (between-group difference 2·43% [95% CI 1·34-3·52]; p<0·0001), and mean percentage change in hip bone mineral density was 1·33% (2·20) in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and -0·73% (3·21) in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group (difference 2·04% [1·17-2·90]; p<0·0001). The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (12 [11%]), back pain (nine [8%]), and diarrhoea (eight [7%]) in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; and bronchitis (six [11%]), vitamin D deficiency (four [7%]), and arthralgia (four [7%]) in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group. 22 (20%) participants in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and one (2%) participant in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group had an adverse event that was considered to be related to treatment. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed. The proportions of adverse events leading to premature treatment discontinuation were similar between groups (four [4%] in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; and one (2%) in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). INTERPRETATION: The significantly improved bone mineral density, overall safety, and efficacy data show the feasibility of switching from a regimen containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed people living with HIV aged 60 years or older. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Analysis of drug-drug interactions among patients receiving antiretroviral regimens using data from a large open-source prescription database.

PURPOSE: Results of a study of contraindicated concomitant medication use among recipients of preferred antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens are reported. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate concomitant medication use in a cohort of previously treatment-naive, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected U.S. patients prescribed preferred ART regimens during the period April 2014-March 2015. Data were obtained from a proprietary longitudinal prescription database; elements retrieved included age, sex, and prescription data. The outcome of interest was the frequency of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) associated with concomitant use of contraindicated medications. RESULTS: Data on 25,919 unique treatment-naive patients who used a preferred ART regimen were collected. Overall, there were 384 instances in which a contraindicated medication was dispensed for concurrent use with a recommended ART regimen. Rates of contraindicated concomitant medication use differed significantly by ART regimen; the highest rate (3.2%) was for darunavir plus ritonavir plus emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DRV plus RTV plus FTC/TDF), followed by elvitegravir-cobicistat-emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/c/FTC/TDF)(2.8%). The highest frequencies of DDIs were associated with ART regimens that included a pharmacoenhancing agent: DRV plus RTV plus FTC/TDF (3.2%) and EVG/c/FTC/TDF (2.8%). CONCLUSION: In a large population of treatment-naive HIV-infected patients, ART regimens that contained a pharmacoenhancing agent were involved most frequently in contraindicated medication-related DDIs. All of the DDIs could have been avoided by using therapeutic alternatives within the same class not associated with a DDI.

A Pharmacist-Led Program to Evaluate and Reduce Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older HIV-Positive Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this pharmacist-led study was to utilize two validated instruments, Beers Criteria and Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP), to assess potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and evaluate pharmacist interventions. DESIGN: Prospective randomized interventional trial. SETTING: Large urban clinic providing interdisciplinary primary and HIV care for ~2700 HIV-positive publicly insured patients. DATA SOURCE: A computerized electronic record search was conducted for all patients who met the two search criteria: 50 years and older, and a primary care appointment within the last 12 months. PATIENTS: After identification of 857 patients meeting the search criteria, 324 patients were randomly selected and contacted, resulting in 248 patients assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 58 years, 71% male, 44% white, and a mean CD4 count of 536 cells/mm3 . Common comorbidities included hypertension (56%), depression (52%), asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (48%), dyslipidemia (39%), coronary artery disease (27%), and diabetes (22%). Patients sampled were prescribed a mean of 11.6 ± 5.7 concomitant medications (excluding antiretrovirals) with 35% receiving at least 16 medications. PIP was identified in 54% and 63% of patients using the STOPP and Beers Criteria, respectively. Twenty-five contraindicated drug interactions were identified in 20 patients. After the pharmacist visit, at least 69% of patients had at least one medication discontinued with almost 10% having six or more medications discontinued. More than 40% of patients had at least one Beers or STOPP criteria that required immediate correction by the pharmacist. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that targeting individuals with 11 or more chronic medications would have the highest yield and greatest impact. Pharmacist-led review of medication prescribing using Beers and STOPP criteria revealed a large number of PIP, many amenable to immediate clinical pharmacist intervention.

On the horizon: promising investigational antiretroviral agents.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection affects close to 40 million individuals worldwide. Since 1981 when the first case reports of individuals dying from a then rare opportunistic infection were published, twenty million people have died from this epidemic. With 3 or more antiretrovirals as the standard of care, the prevalence of single, double and triple-class resistant HIV strains has increased significantly over the last 5 years due to the tremendous replicative capacity of HIV and selective drug pressure. With greater resistance comes the need for novel and effective antiretrovirals to treat these resistant strains. The purpose of this review is to highlight the most promising agents and classes in Phase II-III drug development by assessing the clinical efficacy, pharmacology, resistance and tolerability. Three out of the four existing antiretroviral classes (nucleosides, non-nucleosides, protease inhibitors) with agents in clinical trials will be discussed such as nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (D-d4FC, SPD754), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (capravirine, TMC125) and protease inhibitors (tipranavir, TMC114). In the next several years, antiretrovirals from novel pharmacologic classes will enter the HIV armamentarium. Based on the early clinical studies, these promising agents will be reviewed from the following classes: attachment inhibitors (TNX-355, BMS-488043), CCR5 coreceptor antagonists (SCH-D, UK-427857, GW 873140) and a maturation inhibitor (PA-457). It is hoped that these agents will represent a therapeutic advance and better activity against HIV resistant strains by providing effective therapy that will reduce viral load, increase the CD4+ cell count and ultimately, prolong survival with minimal adverse effects.

Drug Interactions with Cobicistat- or Ritonavir-Boosted Elvitegravir.

Cobicistat and ritonavir are structurally distinct compounds that both potently inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, the metabolizing enzyme primarily responsible for the elimination of several antiretroviral medications, and, as such, are pharmacokinetic boosters for antiretroviral agents that require longer dosing intervals. Recently, cobicistat was approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in treatment-naive adults as a component of a single-tablet regimen consisting of cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir plus emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. While studies have demonstrated that boosting with either cobicistat or ritonavir results in comparable plasma exposure of the target antiretroviral agent, a better understanding of drug-drug interactions between cobicistat- and ritonavir-boosted antiretrovirals and other medications will inform treatment decisions in HIV-infected patients. In connection with their distinct structural properties, COBI and RTV differ with respect to their drug-drug interaction profiles. Compared with ritonavir, cobicistat lacks induction potential and is a more specific inhibitor of 3A and therefore, has reduced effects on other CYP isoforms. To date, more studies have assessed ritonavir drug-drug interactions with other medications than have assessed cobicistat drug-drug interactions. The objective of this article is to review the drug-drug interactions when cobicistat- or ritonavir-boosted elvitegravir, cobicistat, or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir are coadministered with antiretroviral therapies or drugs that are either substrates, inducers, or inhibitors of the CYP3A metabolic pathway, as well as with drugs that alter intra-gastric pH or are substrates of P-gp, in order to inform the proper use of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir.

Adherence and HIV RNA Suppression in the Current Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy.

BACKGROUND: We examined trends in adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and HIV RNA suppression and estimated the minimum cutoff of adherence to newer HAART formulations needed for HIV RNA suppression by regimen type. METHODS: We used Veterans Affairs pharmacy dispensing data from the Veterans Aging Cohort Study Virtual Cohort between October 2000 and September 2010 and defined adherence as the duration of time the patient had the medications available, relative to the total number of days between refills for all antiretrovirals in a year. Temporal trends in adherence and viral load suppression were examined by the patient's most frequently used HAART regimen in the year. The minimum needed adherence was defined as the level at which the odds of suppression was not significantly different than that observed with ≥ 95% adherence using repeated-measures logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 21,865 HAART users contributed 82,217 person-years of follow-up. There was a significant increase (P(trend) < 0.001) in the proportion virally suppressed even among those with <95% adherence (2001: 38% to 2010: 84%), and the trend was similar when restricting to their first HAART regimen. For nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor multi-pill users, the odds of suppression did not differ for 85%-89% adherence compared to those with ≥ 95% adherence [odds ratios: 0.82 (0.64-1.04)], but for protease inhibitor users, the odds of suppression significantly differed if adherence levels were <95% compared to ≥ 95% adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Although all HIV-infected persons should be instructed to achieve perfect adherence, concerns of slightly lower adherence should not hinder prescribing new HAART regimens early in HIV infection.

Enfuvirtide: first fusion inhibitor for treatment of HIV infection.

PURPOSE: The mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and availability of enfuvirtide are discussed. SUMMARY: To date, 20 antiretrovirals have been approved by FDA for the treatment of HIV infection. The recent approval of enfuvirtide offers a new and fourth class of antiretroviral agents called fusion inhibitors. Enfuvirtide is indicated for use in treatment-experienced patients who have evidence of viral replication despite receiving current therapy. The drug is a 36-amino-acid synthetic peptide that prevents completion of the HIV fusion sequence. Absolute bioavailability after subcutaneous injection is 84%. Clinical trials indicate that adding enfuvirtide to a salvage regimen in heavily treated patients may lead to an improved virologic response. Up to a 1.48 log decrease in the viral load was seen at 48 weeks when enfuvirtide was combined with an optimized background regimen. Patients who have at least two or more active drugs in the regimen, a CD4+ cell count of >100 cells/mm3, and previous exposure to two or more antiretrovirals prior to starting enfuvirtide appear to respond best. The most common adverse effect, occurring in 98% of all enfuvirtide recipients, is an injection-site reaction that generally can be managed nonpharmacologically. A much less common but more significant concern is an increased risk of bacterial pneumonia. Enfuvirtide is available through the Fuzeon Progressive Distribution Program. The annual cost of therapy is about 24,000 dollars. CONCLUSION: Enfuvirtide is the first fusion inhibitor available for the treatment of HIV infection. The drug is indicated for use with other antiretroviral agents in treatment-experienced patients who have evidence of HIV replication despite ongoing antiretroviral treatment.

Polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions, and potentially inappropriate medications in older adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency of medication-related problems in older adults with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: HIV-positive individuals aged 60 and older and age- and sex-matched HIV-negative individuals. MEASUREMENTS: Total number of medications, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) according to the modified Beers Criteria, anticholinergic drug burden according to the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and drug-drug interactions using the Lexi-Interact online drug interactions database. RESULTS: Of 89 HIV-positive participants, most were Caucasian (91%) and male (94%), with a median age of 64 (range 60-82). Common comorbidities included hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and depression. Participants were taking a median of 13 medications (range 2-38), of which only a median of four were antiretrovirals. At least one PIM was prescribed in 46 participants (52%). Sixty-two (70%) participants had at least one Category D (consider therapy modification) drug-drug interaction, and 10 (11%) had a Category X (avoid combination) interaction. One-third of these interactions were between two nonantiretroviral medications. Fifteen participants (17%) had an ARS score of 3 or greater. In contrast, HIV-negative participants were taking a median of six medications, 29% had at least one PIM, and 4% had an ARS score of 3 or greater (P < .05 for each comparison, except P = .07 for anticholinergic burden). CONCLUSION: HIV-positive older adults have a high frequency of medication-related problems, of which a large portion is due to medications used to treat comorbid diseases. These medication issues were substantially higher than HIV-negative participants. Attention to the principles of geriatric prescribing is needed as this population ages in order to minimize complications from multiple medication use.