Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Teach ; 17(6): 700-704, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32754984

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medical student mistreatment has detrimental effects on student well-being and poses a patient safety risk, yet 40% of medical school graduates report being mistreated during their training. Unfortunately, this statistic has not changed significantly since 2013. The 'hidden curriculum' contributes to the pervasiveness of mistreatment in medical schools in the USA. The #MDsToo curriculum was developed to mitigate the effects of the hidden curriculum by sensitising faculty members and residents to mistreatment. METHODS: During the curriculum, participants are introduced to the KIND (knowledge-sharing, inclusive, non-discriminatory, developmentally appropriate) framework for modelling positive teacher-learner interactions and detecting mistreatment. Using KIND, faculty members and residents identify and categorise mistreatment in eight video cases depicting mistreatment, and reflect on their own experiences with mistreatment. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-eight participants responded to a course survey. Most had experienced mistreatment. After the training, almost half stated that there were situations in the past that they did not recognize as mistreatment that they would now classify as mistreatment, and most stated that they were likely to report mistreatment now. CONCLUSION: The #MDsToo curriculum may provide an effective design for mistreatment prevention training. Next steps include multi-institutional implementation and longitudinal outcome studies.


Assuntos
Currículo , Estudantes de Medicina , Docentes , Humanos , Faculdades de Medicina , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
J Surg Educ ; 77(5): 1194-1201, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32245718

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare expenditures account for more than 3.5 trillion dollars annually with estimates of nearly one-half being wasteful. High-value care (HVC) balances the benefits, harms, and costs of healthcare. Since 2012, the American College of Physicians and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education developed a HVC curriculum and incorporated HVC into milestones for medicine residents. However, currently no HVC curriculum or milestones exist for general surgery residents (GSR). We sought to implement a HVC curriculum for GSR and evaluate awareness and attitudes toward HVC, hypothesizing improved resident awareness and attitudes toward HVC without affecting patient outcomes. METHODS: A prospective comparison between pre-HVC curriculum (7/1/2017-11/30/2017) and post-HVC curriculum (2/1/2018-6/30/2018) was performed. The curriculum included 6 didactic lectures with group discussions. A 14-question Likert-scale survey evaluating awareness, use of, and attitudes toward HVC was performed on all GSR. Additional patient outcomes were collected for all trauma patients cared for during the study period. Bivariate analysis using Mann-Whitney U test was performed. RESULTS: There were 38/38 GSR respondents (100% response rate) for the pre-HVC survey and 35/38 (92.1% response rate) for the post-HVC survey. More post-HVC respondents somewhat agreed (34.3% vs 5.3%) and less strongly disagreed (31.4% vs 52.6%) with improved knowledge of where to find costs of labs/imaging/treatment (p = 0.02) compared to the pre-HVC group. More post-HVC respondents strongly agreed they balanced the benefit of clinical care with costs and harm when treating patients (25.7% vs 21.1%; p = 0.01). More post-HVC respondents strongly agreed they customized care plans to incorporate patients' values/concerns after implementation of the curriculum (51.4% vs 23.7%, p = 0.0006). From 3254 trauma patients studied, 1722 (52.9%) were pre-HVC and 1532 (47.1%) post-HVC patients. There was no difference between the pre- and post-HVC-curriculum trauma patients in terms of demographics and outcomes such as mortality (3.6% vs 2.4%, p = 0.07) and median length of stay (2 vs 2 days, p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a HVC curriculum for GSR led to improved awareness regarding healthcare costs and customizing decision plans for patients, with no difference in trauma patient outcomes. Future research incorporating cost data is needed; however, with implementation of the 2020 general surgery milestones (addition of Systems-Based Practice-3), this curriculum could prove beneficial.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral , Internato e Residência , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA