Evaluation of neurotrophic factor secreting mesenchymal stem cells in progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous mesenchymal stem cell neurotrophic factor-secreting cells (NurOwn®) have the potential to modify underlying disease mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS). OBJECTIVE: This open-label phase II study was conducted to evaluate safety/efficacy of three intrathecal cell treatments. METHODS: Eighteen participants with non-relapsing PMS were treated. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers; timed 25-foot walk speed, nine-hole peg test (9-HPT), low-contrast letter acuity, symbol digit modalities test, and 12-item multiple sclerosis (MS) walking scale. Seventeen participants received all treatments. RESULTS: No deaths/adverse events related to worsening of MS, clinical/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of disease activation, and clinically significant changes in safety lab results were reported. Two participants developed symptoms of low back and leg pain, consistent with a diagnosis of arachnoiditis, occurring in one of three intrathecal treatments in both participants. Nineteen percent of treated participants achieved pre-specified ⩾ 25% improvements in timed 25-foot walk speed/nine-HPT at 28 weeks compared to baseline, along with consistent efficacy signals for pre-specified response criteria across other secondary efficacy outcomes. CSF neuroprotective factors increased, and inflammatory biomarkers decreased after treatment, consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. CONCLUSION: Based on these encouraging preliminary findings, further confirmation in a randomized study is warranted.

Spontaneous Motor Recovery after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Issues for Nerve Transfer Surgery Decision Making.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To quantify spontaneous upper extremity motor recovery between 6 and 12 months after spinal cord injury (SCI) to help guide timing of nerve transfer surgery to improve upper limb function in cervical SCI. SETTING: Nineteen European SCI rehabilitation centers. METHODS: Data was extracted from the European Multicenter Study of SCI database for individuals with mid-level cervical SCI (N = 268). Muscle function grades at 6 and 12 months post-SCI were categorized for analysis. RESULTS: From 6 to 12 months after SCI, spontaneous surgically-relevant recovery was limited. Of all limbs (N = 263) with grade 0-2 elbow extension at 6 months, 4% regained grade 4-5 and 11% regained grade 3 muscle function at 12 months. Of all limbs (N = 380) with grade 0-2 finger flexion at 6 months, 3% regained grade 4-5 and 5% regained grade 3 muscle function at 12 months. CONCLUSION: This information supports early (6 month) post-injury surgical consultation and evaluation. With this information, individuals with SCI can more fully engage in preference-based decision-making about surgical intervention versus continued rehabilitation and spontaneous recovery to gain elbow extension and/or hand opening and closing.

Evaluation of Functional Independence in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Surgery to Restore Upper Limb Function.

PURPOSE: To help individuals make informed choices regarding the optimal type and timing of restorative surgical treatment for cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), more precise information is needed on their ability to perform activities of daily living. The goal of this work was to describe functional independence achieved by individuals with differing levels of cervical SCI. METHODS: Using the comprehensive European Multicenter Study of Spinal Cord Injury dataset, analysis was undertaken of individuals with traumatic SCI, motor-level C5-C8. Data on feeding, bladder management, and transfers (bed to wheelchair) were compared between individuals with different levels of injury. Subgroup analyses of symmetrical and asymmetrical SCI and between complete and incomplete SCI were performed. The impact of age, sex, and time postinjury on functional independence was ascertained. RESULTS: Data were available for individuals with symmetrical (n = 204) and asymmetrical (n = 95) patterns of SCI. Independence with feeding, urinary function, and transfer ability was increased in individuals with strong finger flexion. Unexpectedly, the presence of strong elbow extension did not uniformly result in the ability to transfer independently. There was no change in any of the analyzed activities between 6 and 12 months postinjury. CONCLUSIONS: People with cervical SCI who gain finger flexion have greater independence with feeding, urinary, and transfer activities. Restoration of finger flexion should be a reconstructive priority for individuals with midcervical-level SCI. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Pridopidine Does Not Significantly Prolong the QTc Interval at the Clinically Relevant Therapeutic Dose.

INTRODUCTION: Pridopidine is a highly selective sigma-1 receptor (S1R) agonist in development for the treatment of Huntington's disease (HD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Pridopidine's activation of S1R enhances cellular processes that are crucial for neuronal function and survival but are impaired in neurodegenerative diseases. Human brain positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies show that at the therapeutic dose of 45 mg twice daily (bid), pridopidine selectively and robustly occupies the S1R. We conducted concentration-QTc (C-QTc) analyses to assess pridopidine's effect on the QT interval and investigated its cardiac safety profile. METHODS: C-QTc analysis was conducted using data from PRIDE-HD, a phase 2, placebo-controlled trial evaluating four pridopidine doses (45, 67.5, 90, 112.5 mg bid) or placebo over 52 weeks in HD patients. Triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) with simultaneous plasma drug concentrations were determined in 402 patients with HD. The effect of pridopidine on the Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) was evaluated. Cardiac-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed from PRIDE-HD alone and from pooled safety data of three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with pridopidine in HD (HART, MermaiHD, and PRIDE-HD). RESULTS: A concentration-dependent effect of pridopidine on the change from baseline in the Fridericia-corrected QT interval (ΔQTcF) was observed, with a slope of 0.012 ms (ms) per ng/mL (90% confidence interval (CI), 0.0109-0.0127). At the therapeutic dose of 45 mg bid, the predicted placebo-corrected ΔQTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was 6.6 ms (upper bound 90% CI, 8.0 ms), which is below the level of concern and not clinically relevant. Analysis of pooled safety data from three HD trials demonstrates that at 45 mg bid, pridopidine cardiac-related AE frequencies are similar to those with placebo. No patients reached a QTcF of 500 ms and no patients experienced torsade de pointes (TdP) at any pridopidine dose. CONCLUSIONS: At the 45 mg bid therapeutic dose, pridopidine demonstrates a favorable cardiac safety profile, with an effect on the QTc interval that is below the level of concern and not clinically relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PRIDE-HD (TV7820-CNS-20002) trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02006472, EudraCT 2013-001888-23; HART (ACR16C009) trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00724048; MermaiHD (ACR16C008) trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00665223, EudraCT No. 2007-004988-22.

Additional Safety and Exploratory Efficacy Data at 48 and 60 Months from Open-HART, an Open-Label Extension Study of Pridopidine in Huntington Disease.

BACKGROUND: Open-HART was an open-label extension of HART, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pridopidine in Huntington disease (HD). Previously, we reported safety and exploratory efficacy data after 36 months of treatment with pridopidine 45 mg twice daily. In the interim, emerging data suggests pridopidine may have neuroprotective effects mediated by sigma-1 receptor agonism. OBJECTIVE: To report additional safety and exploratory efficacy data for continued open-label use of 45 mg BID pridopidine at 48 and 60 months. METHODS: Patients in Open-HART were followed up to or greater than 60 months. Adverse events, concomitant medications, vital signs, laboratory values, and ECG data were monitored. Rates of decline in total functional capacity (TFC) and total motor score (TMS) over 60 months were evaluated in an exploratory analysis and compared between Open-HART and placebo recipients from the 2CARE trial. To account for missing data, sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the original Open-HART baseline cohort (N = 118), 40 remained in the study at 48 months and 33 at 60 months. Pridopidine remained safe and well tolerated over the 60-month interval. TFC and TMS at 48 and 60 months remained stable, showing less decline at these timepoints compared to historical placebo controls from the 2CARE trial. TFC differences at 48 and 60 months observed remained nominally significant after sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: The 45 mg BID pridopidine dosage remained safe and tolerable over 60 months. Exploratory analyses show TFC and TMS stability at 48 and 60 months, in contrast to placebo historical controls from the 2CARE trial. Results are consistent with data reported from the recent Phase 2 PRIDE-HD trial showing less functional decline in the pridopidine 45 mg BID treated group at 52 weeks.

NurOwn, phase 2, randomized, clinical trial in patients with ALS: Safety, clinical, and biomarker results.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-neurotrophic factor (NTF) cells (NurOwn®, autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs, induced to secrete NTFs) delivered by combined intrathecal and intramuscular administration to participants with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in a phase 2 randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The study enrolled 48 participants randomized 3:1 (treatment: placebo). After a 3-month pretransplant period, participants received 1 dose of MSC-NTF cells (n = 36) or placebo (n = 12) and were followed for 6 months. CSF was collected before and 2 weeks after transplantation. RESULTS: The study met its primary safety endpoint. The rate of disease progression (Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale [ALSFRS-R] slope change) in the overall study population was similar in treated and placebo participants. In a prespecified rapid progressor subgroup (n = 21), rate of disease progression was improved at early time points (p < 0.05). To address heterogeneity, a responder analysis showed that a higher proportion of treated participants experienced ≥1.5 points/month ALSFRS-R slope improvement compared to placebo at all time points, and was significant in rapid progressors at 4 and 12 weeks (p = 0.004 and 0.046, respectively). CSF neurotrophic factors increased and CSF inflammatory biomarkers decreased in treated participants (p < 0.05) post-transplantation. CSF monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels correlated with ALSFRS-R slope improvement up to 24 weeks (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A single-dose transplantation of MSC-NTF cells is safe and demonstrated early promising signs of efficacy. This establishes a clear path forward for a multidose randomized clinical trial of intrathecal autologous MSC-NTF cell transplantation in ALS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This phase II study provides Class I evidence.

Acetyl-L-carnitine improves pain, nerve regeneration, and vibratory perception in patients with chronic diabetic neuropathy: an analysis of two randomized placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated frozen databases from two 52-week randomized placebo-controlled clinical diabetic neuropathy trials testing two doses of acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC): 500 and 1,000 mg/day t.i.d. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Intention-to-treat patients amounted to 1,257 or 93% of enrolled patients. Efficacy end points were sural nerve morphometry, nerve conduction velocities, vibration perception thresholds, clinical symptom scores, and a visual analogue scale for most bothersome symptom, most notably pain. The two studies were evaluated separately and combined. RESULTS: Data showed significant improvements in sural nerve fiber numbers and regenerating nerve fiber clusters. Nerve conduction velocities and amplitudes did not improve, whereas vibration perception improved in both studies. Pain as the most bothersome symptom showed significant improvement in one study and in the combined cohort taking 1,000 mg ALC. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that ALC treatment is efficacious in alleviating symptoms, particularly pain, and improves nerve fiber regeneration and vibration perception in patients with established diabetic neuropathy.

A Toolkit for the Management of Protocol Deviations.

BACKGROUND: The DIA's Good Clinical Practice and Quality Assurance Community (DIA GCP/QA) created a working group to develop templates for a protocol deviation standard operating procedure (SOP) and protocol deviation handling plan (PDHP). METHODS: The working group consisted of QA auditors, data managers, statisticians, and clinical monitors from several pharmaceutical companies, academia, and independent auditing firms. Various examples of standard operating procedures, data handling plans, and auditing plans were examined, and the core elements extracted into the initial PD SOP and PDHP templates. The draft templates were presented at a workshop at the DIA 51st Annual Meeting held in June 2015 in Washington, DC, and feedback was incorporated. The workshop came at the heels of a previously published position paper, "The Lifecycle and Management of Protocol Deviations." RESULTS: The PD SOP and the PDHP templates are presented in this article. They are a starting point, and each company will need to modify to suit its individual needs. CONCLUSIONS: This article expands on the position paper to include concrete tools for the management of protocol deviations, including best practices for detection, classification, mitigation, and management of protocol deviations with a goal to reduce the impact on subject safety and data integrity.

Comorbidities, Concomitant Medications, and Diet as Factors Affecting Levothyroxine Therapy: Results of the CONTROL Surveillance Project.

BACKGROUND: The CONTROL Surveillance Project was a comprehensive patient-based survey conducted among hypothyroid patients undergoing treatment. The primary objective of the study was to specifically quantify the prevalence of factors adversely affecting levothyroxine therapy. METHODS: Participants were selected from a large proprietary database. Those eligible for the study completed a 21-question survey. RESULTS: Of the eligible hypothyroid patients, 925 (92.5%) were being treated with levothyroxine monotherapy. The mean age was 60.4 years; 755 (81.6%) were female and 168 (18.2%) were male. Almost half of those receiving levothyroxine (435, 47.0%) had at least one comorbid condition that could adversely affect its absorption: gastroesophageal reflux disease (33.8% of patients), irritable bowel syndrome (9.7%), lactose intolerance (7.8%), or a history of gastric bypass surgery or bowel resection (3.0%). Other factors reported by many patients that could adversely affect levothyroxine absorption included use of prescription medications (20.6%) and over-the-counter medications (34.3%) used to treat comorbid gastrointestinal (GI) conditions; use of dietary supplements (51.8%, primarily calcium and iron); and intake of foods/beverages high in fiber, iodine, or soy (68.0%). Of the 13.4% who reported difficulty controlling their hypothyroid symptoms, significantly more patients with comorbid GI conditions reported such difficulty (7.8 versus 5.6%, P < 0.01). Frequent changes in levothyroxine dosing (two or more dose changes in the past year) were reported by 8.0% of survey participants. Those with GI comorbidities were nearly twice as likely to have such changes (5.0 versus 3.0%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Better initial workup of patients, including identification of relevant GI comorbidities and allergies, may help in the early detection of factors that may affect the performance of levothyroxine.

The Life Cycle and Management of Protocol Deviations.

Clinical trials are designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, or other characteristics associated with medical products. Trials are usually complex and require a large group of professionals to follow a clinical trial protocol, standard operating procedures, and study-specific manuals, guidelines, and plans. Clinical trial protocols prospectively describe the background and rationale for conducting the trial, the objectives of the trial, the trial design, the equipment to be used, the procedures to be performed, and the statistical methods on how the trial data are to be analyzed. Deviations from the protocol can result in harm to subjects, biased or inaccurate results, and possible rejection of all or part of the trial data by the sponsor or regulatory authorities. Despite preventive efforts, protocol deviations are likely to occur in most trials. This position paper proposes a common definition of protocol deviations and recommends best practices for their detection, classification, and management as part of their life cycle, with a goal of reducing their impact on subject safety and data integrity. The information contained herein is drawn globally from industry experts within the DIA Good Clinical Practice and Quality Assurance community, an industry-wide survey, and presentations with discussions at various industry meetings.

The Nitinol SMART stent vs Wallstent for suboptimal iliac artery angioplasty: CRISP-US trial results.

PURPOSE: The Cordis Randomized Iliac Stent Project-US (CRISP-US) trial evaluated, with an equivalence design, the performance of the shape memory alloy recoverable technology (SMART) nitinol self-expanding stent and the stainless steel Wallstent for treating iliac artery disease after suboptimal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, randomized trial comprised 203 patients with chronic limb ischemia who received either the SMART stent (n = 102) or the Wallstent (n = 101) after suboptimal PTA. The primary equivalence end point was a composite of 9-month restenosis, 30-day death, and 9-month target vessel revascularization. Functional, clinical, and hemodynamic assessments were made at hospital discharge and at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: The 9-month composite end point rate was equivalent for the SMART stent and Wallstent (6.9% vs 5.9%), with low rates of restenosis (3.5% vs 2.7%), death (2.0% vs 0.0%), and revascularization (2.0% vs 4.0%) in the two groups. Primary patency at 12 months was 94.7% and 91.1% with the SMART stent and Wallstent, respectively. Functional and hemodynamic improvement was also comparable between the groups. The acute procedural success rate was higher in the SMART stent group (98.2% vs 87.5%; P =.002). The frequency of major adverse events was similar at 1 year (4.9% vs 5.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the SMART stent was equivalent to that of the Wallstent for treating iliac artery stenosis. The design characteristics of the SMART stent may contribute to greater procedural success and more accurate stent deployment.