Modulation of Chromatin by Noncoding RNA.

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are remarkably powerful, flexible, and pervasive cellular regulators. The involvement of these molecules in virtually all aspects of eukaryotic chromatin function is notable. Long and short ncRNAs play broadly complementary roles in these processes. Short ncRNAs underlie a programmable system of chromatin modification that silences mobile elements, identifies boundaries, and initiates the formation of constitutive heterochromatin in yeast. In contrast, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) enforce developmentally appropriate expression and switch gene expression programs. lncRNAs accomplish this through diverse mechanisms, but often by modulating the activity or localization of chromatin regulatory complexes. Both long and short ncRNAs play key roles in organization of complex genomes of higher eukaryotes, and their coordinated actions appear to underlie some of the more dramatic examples of epigenetic regulation. This review contrasts well-studied examples of chromatin regulation by RNA and introduces examples of coordination between these systems.

Drosophila Satellite Repeats at the Intersection of Chromatin, Gene Regulation and Evolution.

Satellite repeats make up a large fraction of the genomes of many higher eukaryotes. Until recently these sequences were viewed as molecular parasites with few functions. Drosophila melanogaster and related species have a wealth of diverse satellite repeats. Comparative studies of Drosophilids have been instrumental in understanding how these rapidly evolving sequences change and move. Remarkably, satellite repeats have been found to modulate gene expression and mediate genetic conflicts between chromosomes and between closely related fly species. This suggests that satellites play a key role in speciation. We have taken advantage of the depth of research on satellite repeats in flies to review the known functions of these sequences and consider their central role in evolution and gene expression.

siRNAs from an X-linked satellite repeat promote X-chromosome recognition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Highly differentiated sex chromosomes create a lethal imbalance in gene expression in one sex. To accommodate hemizygosity of the X chromosome in male fruit flies, expression of X-linked genes increases twofold. This is achieved by the male- specific lethal (MSL) complex, which modifies chromatin to increase expression. Mutations that disrupt the X localization of this complex decrease the expression of X-linked genes and reduce male survival. The mechanism that restricts the MSL complex to X chromatin is not understood. We recently reported that the siRNA pathway contributes to localization of the MSL complex, raising questions about the source of the siRNAs involved. The X-linked 1.688 g/cm(3) satellite related repeats (1.688(X) repeats) are restricted to the X chromosome and produce small RNA, making them an attractive candidate. We tested RNA from these repeats for a role in dosage compensation and found that ectopic expression of single-stranded RNAs from 1.688(X) repeats enhanced the male lethality of mutants with defective X recognition. In contrast, expression of double-stranded hairpin RNA from a 1.688(X) repeat generated abundant siRNA and dramatically increased male survival. Consistent with improved survival, X localization of the MSL complex was largely restored in these males. The striking distribution of 1.688(X) repeats, which are nearly exclusive to the X chromosome, suggests that these are cis-acting elements contributing to identification of X chromatin.

Identification of the Drosophila X chromosome: The long and short of it.

The different dose of X chromosomes in males and females produces a potentially fatal imbalance in X-linked gene products. This imbalance is addressed by dosage compensation, a process that modulates expression from an entire X chromosome in one sex. Dosage compensation acts on thousands of genes with disparate expression patterns. Both flies and mammals accomplish this with remarkable specificity by targeting epigenetic chromatin modifications to a single chromosome. Long noncoding RNAs that are expressed from the X chromosome are essential elements of the targeting mechanism in both lineages. We recently discovered that the siRNA pathway, as well as small RNA from satellite repeats that are strikingly enriched on the fly X chromosome, also promote X recognition. In this article we review the current understanding of X recognition in flies and discuss potential mechanisms by which the siRNA pathway, repetitive elements and long noncoding RNAs might cooperate to promote X recognition.

Identification of X chromatin is modulated by complementary pathways in Drosophila melanogaster.

Drosophila melanogaster males have one X chromosome while females have two. This creates an imbalance in X:A gene dosage between the sexes. This imbalance is corrected by increasing transcription from male X-linked genes approximately 2-fold. This process involves the Male-Specific Lethal (MSL) complex, which is recruited to Chromatin Entry Sites (CES) and transcribed X-linked genes, where it modifies chromatin to increase expression. Repetitive sequences strikingly enriched in X euchromatin, the 1.688X satellite repeats, also promote recruitment of the MSL complex to nearby genes. Unlike CES, the 1.688X repeats do not recruit the MSL complex directly. The genetic architecture of recruitment by these DNA elements remains speculative. To facilitate dissection of the mechanism of recruitment, we developed a luciferase reporter system for recruitment of compensation to an autosome. The system was validated by knock down of genes known to participate in compensation. Knock down of factors genetically linked to X recognition reveals that 1.688X repeats recruit through a different mechanism than the CES. Our findings suggest that 1.688X repeats play a larger role during embryogenesis, whereas the contribution of 1.688X repeats and CES is equivalent later in development. Our studies also reveal unexpected complexity and potential interdependence of recruiting elements.

siRNA that participates in Drosophila dosage compensation is produced by many 1.688X and 359†bp repeats.

Organisms with differentiated sex chromosomes must accommodate unequal gene dosage in males and females. Male fruit flies increase X-linked gene expression to compensate for hemizygosity of their single X chromosome. Full compensation requires localization of the Male-Specific Lethal (MSL) complex to active genes on the male X, where it modulates chromatin to elevate expression. The mechanisms that identify X chromatin are poorly understood. The euchromatic X is enriched for AT-rich, ∼359 bp satellites termed the 1.688X repeats. Autosomal insertions of 1.688X DNA enable MSL recruitment to nearby genes. Ectopic expression of dsRNA from one of these repeats produces siRNA and partially restores X-localization of MSLs in males with defective X recognition. Surprisingly, expression of double-stranded RNA from three other 1.688X repeats failed to rescue males. We reconstructed dsRNA-expressing transgenes with sequence from two of these repeats and identified phasing of repeat DNA, rather than sequence or orientation, as the factor that determines rescue of males with defective X recognition. Small RNA sequencing revealed that siRNA was produced in flies with a transgene that rescues, but not in those carrying a transgene with the same repeat but different phasing. We demonstrate that pericentromeric X heterochromatin promotes X recognition through a maternal effect, potentially mediated by small RNA from closely related heterochromatic repeats. This suggests that the sources of siRNAs promoting X recognition are highly redundant. We propose that enrichment of satellite repeats on Drosophilid X chromosomes facilitates the rapid evolution of differentiated sex chromosomes by marking the X for compensation.

roX RNAs and Genome Regulation in Drosophila Melanogaster.

Organisms with dimorphic sex chromosomes suffer a potentially lethal imbalance in gene expression in one sex. Addressing this fundamental problem can be considered the first, and most essential, aspect of sexual differentiation. In the model organisms Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, and mouse, expression from X-linked genes is modulated by selective recruitment of chromatin-modifying complexes to X chromatin. In both flies and mammals, large noncoding RNAs have a central role in recruitment and activity of these complexes. This review will summarize current knowledge of the function of the noncoding roX genes in this process in Drosophila. Identification of an autosomal function for the roX RNAs raises intriguing questions about the origin of the modern dosage compensation system in flies.

The Drosophila homolog of the mammalian imprint regulator, CTCF, maintains the maternal genomic imprint in Drosophila melanogaster.

BACKGROUND: CTCF is a versatile zinc finger DNA-binding protein that functions as a highly conserved epigenetic transcriptional regulator. CTCF is known to act as a chromosomal insulator, bind promoter regions, and facilitate long-range chromatin interactions. In mammals, CTCF is active in the regulatory regions of some genes that exhibit genomic imprinting, acting as insulator on only one parental allele to facilitate parent-specific expression. In Drosophila, CTCF acts as a chromatin insulator and is thought to be actively involved in the global organization of the genome. RESULTS: To determine whether CTCF regulates imprinting in Drosophila, we generated CTCF mutant alleles and assayed gene expression from the imprinted Dp(1;f)LJ9 mini-X chromosome in the presence of reduced CTCF expression. We observed disruption of the maternal imprint when CTCF levels were reduced, but no effect was observed on the paternal imprint. The effect was restricted to maintenance of the imprint and was specific for the Dp(1;f)LJ9 mini-X chromosome. CONCLUSIONS: CTCF in Drosophila functions in maintaining parent-specific expression from an imprinted domain as it does in mammals. We propose that Drosophila CTCF maintains an insulator boundary on the maternal X chromosome, shielding genes from the imprint-induced silencing that occurs on the paternally inherited X chromosome. See commentary: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/8/104.

Non-coding RNA in fly dosage compensation.

Dosage compensation modulates global expression of an X chromosome and is necessary to restore the balance between X-chromosome and autosome expression in both sexes. A central question in the field is how this regulation is directed. Large non-coding RNAs, such as Xist in mammals and roX in flies, have pivotal roles in targeting chromosome-wide modification for dosage compensation. Several recent studies in Drosophila provide new insight into the principles of X-chromosome recognition and the function of non-coding RNA in this process.

When Down Is Up: Heterochromatin, Nuclear Organization and X Upregulation.

Organisms with highly differentiated sex chromosomes face an imbalance in X-linked gene dosage. Male Drosophila solve this problem by increasing expression from virtually every gene on their single X chromosome, a process known as dosage compensation. This involves a ribonucleoprotein complex that is recruited to active, X-linked genes to remodel chromatin and increase expression. Interestingly, the male X chromosome is also enriched for several proteins associated with heterochromatin. Furthermore, the polytenized male X is selectively disrupted by the loss of factors involved in repression, silencing, heterochromatin formation or chromatin remodeling. Mutations in many of these factors preferentially reduce male survival or enhance the lethality of mutations that prevent normal recognition of the X chromosome. The involvement of primarily repressive factors in a process that elevates expression has long been puzzling. Interestingly, recent work suggests that the siRNA pathway, often associated with heterochromatin formation and repression, also helps the dosage compensation machinery identify the X chromosome. In light of this finding, we revisit the evidence that links nuclear organization and heterochromatin to regulation of the male X chromosome.

Coordinated regulation of heterochromatic genes in Drosophila melanogaster males.

Dosage compensation modifies the chromatin of X-linked genes to assure equivalent expression in sexes with unequal X chromosome dosage. In Drosophila dosage compensation is achieved by increasing expression from the male X chromosome. The ribonucleoprotein dosage compensation complex (DCC) binds hundreds of sites along the X chromosome and modifies chromatin to facilitate transcription. Loss of roX RNA, an essential component of the DCC, reduces expression from X-linked genes. Surprisingly, loss of roX RNA also reduces expression from genes situated in proximal heterochromatin and on the small, heterochromatic fourth chromosome. Mutation of some, but not all, of the genes encoding DCC proteins produces a similar effect. Reduction of roX function suppresses position effect variegation (PEV), revealing functional alteration in heterochromatin. The effects of roX mutations on heterochromatic gene expression and PEV are limited to males. A sex-limited role for the roX RNAs in autosomal gene expression was unexpected. We propose that this reflects a difference in the heterochromatin of males and females, which serves to accommodate the heterochromatic Y chromosome present in the male nucleus. roX transcripts may thus participate in two distinct regulatory systems that have evolved in response to highly differentiated sex chromosomes: compensation of X-linked gene dosage and modulation of heterochromatin.

Molecularly severe roX1 mutations contribute to dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Drosophila melanogaster males maintain a constant ratio of X-linked to autosomal gene products by increasing expression from their single X chromosome. This is achieved through the action of a complex composed of protein and roX RNA. This complex binds in the body of genes and increases expression through chromatin modification. The X-linked roX genes produce RNAs that are essential but redundant for recognition and modification of the male X chromosome. We report that some molecularly severe roX1 mutations with no detectable transcript accumulation contribute dramatically to male rescue by autosomal roX1 transgenes. We propose that this represents genetic complementation between a source of roX RNA (the autosomal transgene) and the severely mutated X-linked allele.

Chromatin That Guides Dosage Compensation Is Modulated by the siRNA Pathway in Drosophila melanogaster.

Many heterogametic organisms adjust sex chromosome expression to accommodate differences in gene dosage. This requires selective recruitment of regulatory factors to the modulated chromosome. How these factors are localized to a chromosome with requisite accuracy is poorly understood. Drosophila melanogaster males increase expression from their single X chromosome. Identification of this chromosome involves cooperation between different classes of X-identity elements. The chromatin entry sites (CES) recruit a chromatin-modifying complex that spreads into nearby genes and increases expression. In addition, a family of satellite repeats that is enriched on the X chromosome, the 1.688X repeats, promotes recruitment of the complex to nearby genes. The 1.688X repeats and CES are dissimilar, and appear to operate through different mechanisms. Interestingly, the siRNA pathway and siRNA from a 1.688X repeat also promote X recognition. We postulate that siRNA-dependent modification of 1.688X chromatin contributes to recognition of nearby genes. In accord with this, we found enrichment of the siRNA effector Argonaute2 (Ago2) at some 1.688X repeats. Mutations in several proteins that physically interact with Ago2, including the histone methyltransferase Su(var)3-9, enhance the lethality of males with defective X recognition. Su(var)3-9 deposits H3K9me2 on some 1.688X repeats, and this mark is disrupted upon ectopic expression of 1.688X siRNA. Furthermore, integration of 1.688X DNA on an autosome induces local H3K9me2 deposition, but enhances expression of nearby genes in a siRNA-dependent manner. Our findings are consistent with a model in which siRNA-directed modification of 1.688X chromatin contributes to recognition of the male X chromosome for dosage compensation.

roX RNAs are required for increased expression of X-linked genes in Drosophila melanogaster males.

The male-specific lethal (MSL) ribonucleoprotein complex is necessary for equalization of X:A expression levels in Drosophila males, which have a single X chromosome. It binds selectively to the male X chromosome and directs acetylation of histone H4 at lysine 16 (H4Ac16), a modification linked to elevated transcription. roX1 and roX2 noncoding RNAs are essential but redundant components of this complex. Simultaneous removal of both roX RNAs reduces X localization of the MSL proteins and permits their ectopic binding to autosomal sites and the chromocenter. However, the MSL proteins still colocalize, and low levels of H4Ac16 are detected at ectopic sites of MSL binding and residual sites on the X chromosome of roX1- roX2- males. Microarray analysis was performed to reveal the effect of roX1 and roX2 elimination on X-linked and autosomal gene expression. Expression of the X chromosome is decreased by 26% in roX1- roX2- male larvae. Enhanced expression could not be detected at autosomal sites of MSL binding in roX1- roX2- males. These results implicate failure to compensate X-linked genes, rather than inappropriate upregulation of autosomal genes at ectopic sites of MSL binding, as the primary cause of male lethality upon loss of roX RNAs.

Satellite Repeats Identify X Chromatin for Dosage Compensation in Drosophila melanogaster Males.

A common feature of sex chromosomes is coordinated regulation of X-linked genes in one sex. Drosophila melanogaster males have one X chromosome, whereas females have two. The resulting imbalance in gene dosage is corrected by increased expression from the single X chromosome of males, a process known as dosage compensation. In flies, compensation involves recruitment of the male-specific lethal (MSL) complex to X-linked genes and modification of chromatin to increase expression. The extraordinary selectivity of the MSL complex for the X chromosome has never been explained. We previously demonstrated that the small interfering RNA (siRNA) pathway and siRNA from a family of X-linked satellite repeats (1.688X repeats) promote X recognition. Now, we test the ability of 1.688X DNA to attract compensation to genes nearby and report that autosomal integration of 1.688X repeats increases MSL recruitment and gene expression in surrounding regions. Placement of 1.688X repeats opposite a lethal autosomal deletion achieves partial rescue of males, demonstrating functional compensation of autosomal chromatin. Females block formation of the MSL complex and are not rescued. The 1.688X repeats are therefore cis-acting elements that guide dosage compensation. Furthermore, 1.688X siRNA enhances rescue of males with a lethal deletion but only when repeat DNA is present on the intact homolog. We propose that the siRNA pathway promotes X recognition by enhancing the ability of 1.688X DNA to attract compensation in cis. The dense and near-exclusive distribution of 1.688X sequences along the X chromosome suggests that they play a primary role in determining X identity during dosage compensation.

The severity of roX1 mutations is predicted by MSL localization on the X chromosome.

Dosage compensation equalizes the expression of sex-linked genes between males and females. Most genes on the X chromosome of male Drosophila are transcribed at an increased level, contributing to compensation. The roX1 and roX2 genes produce non-coding transcripts that localize along the X-chromosome of male flies. Although lacking sequence similarity, they are necessary but redundant components of a system that up-regulates gene expression. Simultaneous mutation of both roX genes disrupts the X-limited distribution of proteins that modify chromatin to enhance gene expression. We have generated and characterized loss of function roX1 alleles that display a continuum of activity. Those that support intermediate male survival have strikingly reduced RNA accumulation, while alleles with minor contributions to male viability typically lack detectable transcript accumulation. Severely mutated roX1 alleles retain some ability to direct modifying proteins to the X chromosome. This ability predicts the level of male survival that each allele supports. This points to a peripheral or transient role for roX in the RNA and protein complex that binds to and regulates the X chromosome.

Host-Symbiont Interactions: Male-Killers Exposed.

Male-killing is one strategy used by maternally transmitted bacterial symbionts to boost transmission and spread in populations. In Drosophila melanogaster, Spiroplasma target males by hijacking an essential, male-limited epigenetic process. A new study reveals clues to the mode of killing.

Drosophila male-specific lethal 2 protein controls sex-specific expression of the roX genes.

The MSL complex of Drosophila upregulates transcription of the male X chromosome, equalizing male and female X-linked gene expression. Five male-specific lethal proteins and at least one of the two noncoding roX RNAs are essential for this process. The roX RNAs are required for the localization of MSL complexes to the X chromosome. Although the mechanisms directing targeting remain speculative, the ratio of MSL protein to roX RNA influences localization of the complex. We examine the transcriptional regulation of the roX genes and show that MSL2 controls male-specific roX expression in the absence of any other MSL protein. We propose that this mechanism maintains a stable MSL/roX ratio that is favorable for localization of the complex to the X chromosome.

Functional redundancy within roX1, a noncoding RNA involved in dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Drosophila melanogaster males dosage compensate by twofold upregulation of the expression of genes on their single X chromosome. This process requires at least five proteins and two noncoding RNAs, roX1 and roX2, which paint the male X chromosome. We used a deletion analysis to search for functional RNA domains within roX1, assaying RNA stability, targeting of the MSL proteins to the X, and rescue of male viability in a roX1(-) roX2(-) mutant background. We found that deletion of 10% segments of the RNA did not dramatically reduce function in most cases, suggesting extensive internal redundancy. The 3' 600 nt of roX1 were most sensitive to mutations, affecting proper localization and 3' processing of the RNA. Disruption of an inverted repeat predicted to form a stem-loop structure was found partially responsible for the defects observed.