Verbal communication for the ventilator-dependent patient requiring an inflated tracheotomy tube cuff: A prospective, multicenter study on the Blom tracheotomy tube with speech inner cannula.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to present our findings on the impact of the Blom tracheotomy tube with speech inner cannula on voice production abilities and speech intelligibility scores of ventilator-dependent patients requiring a fully inflated tracheotomy tube cuff. METHODS: Prospective single group case-series design permitted consecutive accrual of 23 adult inpatients from acute care and rehabilitation settings. Maximum ambient room noise, voice intensity, phonation duration of vowel /a/, and speech intelligibility scores were determined over 3 sessions. RESULTS: All participants achieved audible voicing with the Blom tracheotomy tube. Voice intensity was significantly greater than ambient room noise by >10 dB SPL (p = .003). Speech intelligibility scores improved significantly from 80% to 85% (p = .03). Phonation duration averaged from 3.30 to 3.45 seconds. There were no significant changes in oxygen saturation (p > .05), and no significant complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The Blom tracheotomy tube with speech inner cannula permitted individuals requiring mechanical ventilation with a fully inflated tracheotomy tube cuff to produce excellent speech intelligibility for verbal communication. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2013.

Clinical response to unintentionally rapid infusion of drotrecogin alfa (activated).

PURPOSE: The case of a patient with severe sepsis who received a bolus dose of 184 microg/kg of drotrecogin alfa (activated) over one hour is reported. SUMMARY: An 84-year-old woman who had undergone right total knee replacement was admitted to the hospital from a rehabilitation facility with an initial diagnosis of mental status changes and a suspected urinary tract infection. Examination of the patient's incision from her recent knee surgery revealed a discharge, and a culture was obtained. The patient was diagnosed with sepsis, intubated, and transferred to the intensive care unit. Multiple antibiotics were administered, but the patient's condition continued to deteriorate. In addition, the patient developed acute renal failure, required a ventilator, had cyanotic limbs, and had partially compensated metabolic acidosis. On hospital day 7, drotrecogin alfa (activated) was initiated. She inadvertently received an infusion of 184 microg/kg of drotrecogin alfa over 1 hour. Nine hours later, she received drotrecogin alfa 24 microg/kg/hr for 95 hours. The patient's clinical status was improved after the initial infusion. Peripheral limb cyanosis was markedly decreased, with pink, warm extremities. In addition, the patient's clinical laboratory test values improved after administration of drotrecogin alfa. However, the patient was unable to recover fully from the acute kidney failure and was discharged to hospice care. CONCLUSION: A drotrecogin alfa dose of 184 microg/kg i.v. was erroneously administered over 1 hour to a patient with sepsis. Nine hours later, a drotrecogin alfa infusion of 24 microg/kg/hr was started and continued for 95 hours. The patient improved clinically and had no apparent adverse events.

Presence of a tracheotomy tube and aspiration status in early, postsurgical head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the effects, if any, that the presence of a tracheotomy tube has on aspiration status in early, postsurgical head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive adult, postoperative head and neck cancer patients were prospectively evaluated with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) under three conditions: (1) tracheotomy tube present, (2) tracheotomy tube removed and tracheostoma covered with gauze sponge; and (3) tracheotomy tube removed and tracheostoma left open and uncovered. For each condition, the endoscope was first inserted transnasally to determine aspiration status during FEES and then inserted through the tracheostoma to corroborate aspiration status by examining the distal trachea inferiorly to the carina. Three experienced examiners determined aspiration status under each condition and endoscope placement. RESULTS: There was 100% agreement on aspiration status between FEES results and endoscopic examination through the tracheostoma. Specifically, 13 of 22 patients (59%) swallowed successfully and nine of 22 (41%) aspirated. There was also 100% agreement on aspiration status for tracheotomy tube present, decannulation and tracheostoma covered by gauze sponge, and decannulation and tracheostoma left open and uncovered. CONCLUSIONS: Neither presence of a tracheotomy tube nor decannulation affected aspiration status in early, postsurgical head and neck cancer patients. The clinical impressions that a tracheotomy or tracheotomy tube increases aspiration risk or that decannulation results in improved swallowing function are not supported. Rather, need for a tracheotomy indicates comorbidities (eg, respiratory failure, trauma, stroke, advanced age, reduced functional reserve, and medications used to treat the critically ill) that by themselves predispose patients for dysphagia and aspiration.