Grassroots Approach to Forming a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee in an Academic Radiology Department.

Radiology is among the medical specialties that have made the fewest gains in closing the gap in underrepresented minorities and women. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are important for promoting healthy learning environments for trainees, health equity for patients, and equitable career development opportunities for employees, all of which contribute to innovation in today's competitive health care environment. DEI committees can self-organize or form from institutional directives. These committees can implement impactful projects in multiple domains in education, recruitment and retention, department culture, and health equity research. This article describes the formation of a grassroots DEI committee, key initiatives and strategies, and structures for accountability. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Renal Location Within the Retroperitoneum in Various Body Positions Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the difference in cranio-caudal renal position in both the supine and prone position, as well as the effect of arm position on renal location, using magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with BMI <30. METHODS: In a prospective IRB approved trial, healthy subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging in the supine, prone position with arms at the side, and prone position with arms up using vertically placed towel bolsters. Images were obtained with end expiration breath holds. Distances between the kidney and other anatomical landmarks, including the diaphragm (KDD), top of the L1 vertebra (KVD) and lower edge of the 12th rib (KRD), were recorded. Nephrostomy tract length (NTL) and other measures for visceral injury were also assessed. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for analysis (P < .05). RESULTS: Ten subjects (5 male, 5 female) with median age of 29 years and BMI of 24 kg/m2 were imaged. Right KDD was not significantly different between positions, but KRD and KVD noted significant cephalad movement when prone, as compared to supine. Left KDD noted caudal movement with prone positioning with no difference in KRD or KVD. Arm position did not affect any measurements. Right lower NTL was shorter when prone. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with BMI < 30, prone positioning led to significant cephalad right renal movement, but not left renal movement. Arm position had no effect on anticipated renal position. Preoperative end expiration supine CT may reliably predict left kidney location and be used to improve preoperative counseling and/or surgical planning.

Number of cores needed to diagnose prostate cancer during MRI targeted biopsy decreases after the learning curve.

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesized that the number of cores needed to detect prostate cancer would decrease with increasing MRI-targeted biopsy (TBx) experience. METHODS: All patients undergoing TBx at our institution from May 2017 to August 2019 were enrolled in a prospectively maintained database. Five biopsy cores were obtained from each lesion ≥3 on PI-RADS v2.0 followed by a systematic 12-core biopsy. To assess learning curve, the study population was divided into quartiles by sequential biopsies. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) was defined as Gleason Grade Group 2 or higher. RESULTS: 377 patients underwent prostate biopsy (533 lesions); 233 lesions (44%) were positive for prostate cancer and 173 lesions (32%) were csPC. There was a significant decline in the number of cores required for diagnosing any cancer (P < 0.001) and csPC (P < 0.05) after the first quartile. There was no difference when stratifying by PI-RADS score or lesion volume. Within the first quartile, limiting the biopsy to 3 cores would miss 16.2% of csPC, decreasing to 6.6% after approximately 100 patients. CONCLUSION: MRI TBx is associated with a learning curve of approximately 100 cases. Four or 5 cores should be considered during the initial experience, but thereafter, 3 cores per lesion is sufficient to detect csPC.

Do patients with a PI-RADS 5 lesion identified on magnetic resonance imaging require systematic biopsy in addition to targeted biopsy?

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-TB) improves the detection of prostate cancer. These biopsies typically involve both a 12-core systematic biopsy (SB) and MRI-TB of the lesion. Since the majority of PI-RADS 5 lesions represent clinically significant cancers, the utility of SB in addition to MRI-TB is unclear. We evaluate the utility of SB in the setting of PI-RADS 5 lesions in biopsy naïve and active surveillance patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing MRI-TB+SB with a PI-RADS 5 lesion were retrospectively reviewed in a prospectively collected database. Pathology obtained from the MRI-TB was then compared to that of the SB, and each was reported based on the highest Gleason Grade from the sample. In patients with a prior biopsy, we identified instances in which the MRI-TB+SB resulted in upgraded pathology and further subdivided these patients based on whether the pathology upgrade was a result of the TB or the SB. RESULTS: We identified PI-RADS 5 lesions in 97 patients. All lesions biopsied were found to be prostate cancer, and 86.9% were clinically significant. Gleason Grade from the MRI-TB of the PI-RADS 5 lesions was the same or higher to that of the SB in all but 3 cases (3.1%). Among 59 patients with a prior prostate biopsy, 54 had upgraded pathology from MRI-TB+SB (91.5%). Of these 54 patients, MRI-TB pathology of the PI-RADS 5 lesion was the same or higher to that of the SB in 52 patients (96.3%). In all patients with higher Gleason Grade on SB than MRI-TB, the MRI-TB demonstrated GG3 or higher and SB did not change subsequent clinical management. CONCLUSION: In the presence of a PI-RADS 5 lesion, SB offers minimal additional clinical value and could potentially be omitted when performing MRI-TB.

Optimizing MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the diagnostic benefit of additional targeted biopsy cores.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal number of biopsy cores to obtain during MRI-targeted prostate biopsy remains ill-defined. This study sought to determine the optimal number of targeted biopsy cores to obtain from a region of interest to maximize detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing MRI-targeted prostate biopsy at a single institution that newly implemented a targeted biopsy pathway from May 2017 to February 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Five biopsy cores were obtained and individually analyzed from each region rated ≥3 on PI-RADS v2.0 to determine the incremental diagnostic benefit of each additional targeted biopsy core. Variables associated with increasing Grade Group from the first to fifth biopsy core were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients (79% for elevated PSA) were enrolled, 82% of which had a prior biopsy. Men with a PI-RADS >3 lesion were more likely to have pathologic upgrading with additional targeted biopsy cores (OR:4.76; 95% CI:2.34-9.70; P < 0.0001), particularly to Grade Group ≥2 (OR:5.16; 95% CI:2.17-12.29; P = 0.0002), compared to men with PI-RADS 3 lesions. Detection of clinically significant cancer increased from 26% to 44% to 52% when comparing the first, third, and fifth biopsy cores amongst men with a PI-RADS >3 lesion and from 1% to 4% to 9% for PI-RADS 3 lesions. Urinary retention was the most common complication, occurring in 6 (5.7%) patients. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant prostate cancer detection is improved with increased number of MRI-targeted biopsy cores, particularly for urologists early in their learning curve.

Intratumoral talimogene laherparepvec injection with concurrent preoperative radiation in patients with locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities: phase IB/II trial.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) in the extremities and trunk treated with standard-of-care preoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by surgical resection are associated with local and distant relapses. In preclinical studies, oncolytic virotherapy in sarcoma has demonstrated antitumor effects via direct intratumoral oncolysis and cytotoxic T-cell-mediated immune responses. Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) is a replication-competent, immune-enhanced, oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 engineered for intratumoral injection; it has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic melanoma. METHODS: We explored a novel combination of TVEC with standard-of-care EBRT administered preoperatively in patients with locally advanced STS of the extremities and trunk in a phase IB/II clinical trial. Thirty patients with primary STS >5 cm for which EBRT was indicated to achieve negative margins were enrolled. FDA-approved TVEC doses were used. Immune correlative studies in peripheral blood, biopsy and resected tumor tissues were performed. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Adverse events were similar to those reported in prior studies with TVEC. One patient with myxoid liposarcoma exhibited a partial response. Seven of the 29 (24%) evaluable patients achieved 95% pathological necrosis. None of the patients developed a herpes infection due to the treatment. Eight of the 29 (27%) patients developed postoperative wound complications, which is consistent with previous studies. None of the patients developed local recurrence after surgical resection of the primary sarcoma. 2-year progression-free and overall survival were 57% and 88%, respectively. Caspase-3 demonstrated increased expression of both in TVEC-treated tissue samples as compared with control samples treated with radiation alone. CONCLUSION: Preoperative intratumoral TVEC with concurrent EBRT for locally advanced STS is safe and well-tolerated. This combination treatment may enhance immune responses in some cases but did not increase the proposed rate of pathological necrosis. The Caspase-3 biomarker may be associated with a positive effect of TVEC in sarcoma tumor tissue and should be explored in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02453191.

Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer. However, improvements in surgery and histopathological assessment mean that the role of radiotherapy needs to be reassessed. We compared short-course preoperative radiotherapy versus initial surgery with selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: We undertook a randomised trial in 80 centres in four countries. 1350 patients with operable adenocarcinoma of the rectum were randomly assigned, by a minimisation procedure, to short-course preoperative radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions; n=674) or to initial surgery with selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent 5-fluorouracil) restricted to patients with involvement of the circumferential resection margin (n=676). The primary outcome measure was local recurrence. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 28785842. FINDINGS: At the time of analysis, which included all participants, 330 patients had died (157 preoperative radiotherapy group vs 173 selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy), and median follow-up of surviving patients was 4 years. 99 patients had developed local recurrence (27 preoperative radiotherapy vs 72 selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy). We noted a reduction of 61% in the relative risk of local recurrence for patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.58, p<0.0001), and an absolute difference at 3 years of 6.2% (95% CI 5.3-7.1) (4.4% preoperative radiotherapy vs 10.6% selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy). We recorded a relative improvement in disease-free survival of 24% for patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.94, p=0.013), and an absolute difference at 3 years of 6.0% (95% CI 5.3-6.8) (77.5%vs 71.5%). Overall survival did not differ between the groups (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73-1.13, p=0.40). INTERPRETATION: Taken with results from other randomised trials, our findings provide convincing and consistent evidence that short-course preoperative radiotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with operable rectal cancer.

Durability of second-generation extensively porous-coated stems in patients age 50 and younger.

UNLABELLED: Early versions of uncemented femoral total hip stems were often associated with thigh pain thought to be due to micromotion between the implant and bone in the distal uncoated regions. An extensively coated stem was introduced in 1992 to reduce that risk. We therefore asked whether second-generation extensively porous-coated cementless femoral stems in patients younger than 50 years of age would (1) be durable in terms of revisions; (2) provide high functional scores and reduce thigh pain; and (3) show radiographic signs of durability, including a reduction in stress shielding. We prospectively followed all 100 patients (115 hips) age 50 and younger treated with primary cementless total hip arthroplasties using a second-generation extensively porous-coated femoral stem between June 1994 and December 1999. The average age was 39.6 years (range, 17-50 years). The stems were mated to cementless acetabular components. Ninety patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years (mean, 8.6 years; range, 5-10 years). One stem was revised after a periprosthetic fracture. None were revised for loosening and all stems demonstrated bony ingrowth at last followup. No acetabular shell was revised for loosening and none was radiographically loose. Six acetabular liners were revised for wear (three each were 22-mm and 26-mm heads). This second-generation extensively porous-coated stem was durable at 5- to 10-year followup in this young active population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aligning Requirements of Training and Assessment in Radiation Treatment Planning in the Era of Competency-Based Medical Education.

PURPOSE: Radiation treatment planning (RTP) is a unique skill that requires interdisciplinary collaboration among radiation oncologists (ROs), dosimetrists, and medical physicists (MP) to train and assess residents. With the adoption of competency-based medical education (CBME) in Canada, it is essential residency program curricula focuses on developing competencies in RTP to facilitate entrustment. Our study investigates how radiation oncology team members' perspectives on RTP education align with requirements of the CBME approach, and its implications for improving residency training. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This qualitative research study took place in the Department of Oncology at a midsize academic institution. Through convenience sampling, focus groups were conducted with radiation oncologists (n = 11), dosimetrists (n = 7), medical physicists (n = 7), and residents (n = 7). Thematic design was adopted to analyze the transcripts through open coding resulting in 3 overarching themes. RESULTS: The results identified existing strengths and weaknesses of the residency program and future opportunities to redesign the curriculum and assessment process within a CBME model. Three overarching themes emerged from the analysis: (1) the strengths of RTP in the CBME environment; (2) challenges of RTP in CBME; and (3) opportunities for change. Stakeholders were optimistic CBME will help enrich resident learning with the increased frequency and quality of competency-based assessments. Participants suggested building a library of cases and developing computer-based learning resources to provide a safe environment to develop skills in contouring, dosimetry, and plan evaluation, in accordance with CBME training. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified future opportunities to redesign the RTP curriculum and assessment process within a CBME model. The need for innovative teaching and learning strategies, including case libraries, computer-based learning, and quality assessments, were highlighted in designing an innovative RTP planning curriculum.

Transition to practice in radiation oncology: Mind the gap.

INTRODUCTION: Physicians entering independent practice often express apprehension in managing the non-clinical aspects of practice. This study examined the perceived preparedness of radiation oncology (RO) residents for independent practice, identified education gaps, and discussed how these deficiencies could be addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Focus groups with senior RO residents, fellows, new-to-practice radiation oncologists (ROs), and residency program directors were conducted. Data were coded using the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) competencies using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Commonly reported gaps in the transition to practice (TtP) for ROs were lack of experience with: practice management, understanding the structure and function of the health care system and how it varies by jurisdiction, financial planning, effective communication and collaboration with other health care team members, creation of accurate and timely documentation, and radiotherapy problem-solving related to treatment planning and evaluation. Suggestions to address these challenges included use of mentorship, educational resources, courses, simulation-based medical education, improved graded responsibility, resident longitudinal clinics, and formal curricula in radiation therapy planning and evaluation. CONCLUSION: There are gaps in TtP education for RO trainees with opportunities for enrichment through the forthcoming implementation of a competency-based medical education framework in 2019. The gap in perceived competency in physician-related radiotherapy tasks may be caused by the complex interaction of clinical workflow processes, people and technology that has led to ineffective integration of trainees. The data are informative to medical education leaders for the development of comprehensive TtP curricula.

Do radiation oncology outreach clinics affect the use of radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The scope and effect of radiation oncology (RO) outreach activities within centralized radiotherapy (RT) systems is poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to describe the outreach activities of Ontario's regional cancer centres, and to explore the relationship between radiation oncology (RO) outreach clinics and rates of radiotherapy (RT) utilization at hospitals without RT on site (HWOS-RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ontario RO centres' outreach activities were identified by semi-structured interview. A multivariate analysis determined the association between on-site RT facilities, or presence of RO clinic at HWOS-RT, and RT utilization within one year of diagnosis (RT1Y), for all patients diagnosed with cancer in Ontario in 2011-2012. RESULTS: RO outreach varied widely by region. Of the largest 58 diagnosing hospitals, 14 had RT on-site, 19 had no RT but RO outreach clinic(s) and 25 had no RT or RO clinic. RT was used more frequently for patients diagnosed at hospitals with on-site RT compared to those at HWOS-RT (RT1Y = 35% vs. 29%, RR = 1.32 [95% CI 1.27-1.38]). For HWOS-RT, RT was used more frequently if there was an RO clinic (RT1Y = 31% vs. 29%, RR = 1.06 [95% CI 1.02-1.10]). CONCLUSIONS: RO outreach clinics were associated with a small but significant increase in RT utilization. There is opportunity to improve access to RT by optimizing the effectiveness of RO outreach.

Ontario radiation oncology residents' needs in the first postgraduate year-residents' perspective survey.

PURPOSE: To assess radiation oncology residents' needs and satisfaction in their first postgraduate year (PGY-1) in the province of Ontario. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 62 radiation oncology residents, 58 who had completed their PGY-1 and were either enrolled or had graduated in 2006 were invited to participate in a 31-item survey. The questionnaire explored PGY-1 residents' needs and satisfaction in four domains: clinical workload, faculty/learning environment, stress level, and discrimination/harassment. The Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon nonparametric tests were used to determine relationships between covariate items and summary scores. RESULTS: Of 58 eligible residents, 44 (75%) responded. Eighty-four percent of residents felt that their ward and call duties were appropriate. More than 50% of respondents indicated that they often felt isolated from their radiation oncology program. Only 77% agreed that they received adequate feedback, and 40% received sufficient counseling regarding career planning. More than 93% of respondents thought that faculty members had contributed significantly to their learning experience. Approximately 50% of residents experienced excessive stress and inadequate time for leisure or for reading the medical literature. Less than 10% of residents indicated that they had been harassed or experienced discrimination. Eighty-three percent agreed or strongly agreed that their PGY-1 experience had been outstanding. CONCLUSIONS: Most Ontario residents were satisfied with their PGY-1 training program. More counseling by radiation oncology faculty members should be offered to help residents with career planning. The residents might also benefit from more exposure to "radiation oncology" and an introduction to stress management strategies.

Radiation therapy quality indicators for invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer has evolved considerably over the past two decades. A concise list of optimal care indexes is lacking. The purpose of this project was to generate a suite of quality of care indicators for breast cancer RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used including a comprehensive literature and guideline review (1995-2015), an initial review of potential quality indicators (QIs) by a steering committee, a survey of Canadian Radiation Oncologists, and a face-to-face consensus development meeting with breast cancer experts to develop a list of breast RT quality indicators. RESULTS: The literature review identified 163 potential QIs, which was reduced to 73 by the steering committee. After all rounds of the Delphi process the final suite included 33 QIs. Of these, 28 (85%) received at least 80% acceptance from the Radiation Oncologists who participated in the final online survey. CONCLUSIONS: A suite of measureable RT quality indicators to be considered during management of invasive breast cancer was developed. These indicators could be used to assess the quality and consistency of breast cancer RT practices.

Imaging pitfalls of pancreatic serous cystic neoplasm and its potential mimickers.

The aim of this article is to clarify diagnostic pitfalls of pancreatic serous cystic neoplasm (SCN) that may result in erroneous characterization. Usual and unusual imaging findings of SCN as well as potential SCN mimickers are presented. The diagnostic key of SCN is to look for a cluster of microcysts (honeycomb pattern), which may not be always found in the center. Fibrosis in SCN may be mistaken for a mural nodule of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). The absence of cyst wall enhancement may be helpful to distinguish SCN from mucinous cystic neoplasm. However, oligocystic SCN and branch duct type IPMN may morphologically overlap. In addition, solid serous adenoma, an extremely rare variant of SCN, is difficult to distinguish from neuroendocrine tumor.

Phase II study of accelerated hypofractionated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for stage T1-3 N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer: NCIC CTG BR.25.

BACKGROUND: A multi-institutional phase II trial was performed to assess a hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy regimen for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an era when stereotactic body radiotherapy was not widely available. METHODS: Eighty patients with biopsy-proven, peripherally located, T1-3 N0 M0 NSCLC were enrolled. Eligible patients received 60 Gy in 15 fractions using a three-dimensional conformal technique without inhomogeneity correction. The gross tumour volume (GTV) was the primary tumor only, and the planning target volume (PTV) margin was 1.0 to 1.5cm. The primary endpoint was the 2-year primary tumor control rate. Toxicities were measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. RESULTS: The median follow-up of patients was 49 months (range = 21-63 months). The median age of patients was 75.9 years. The actuarial rate of primary tumor control was 87.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76.2% to 93.5%) at 2 years. Overall survival was 68.7% (95% CI = 57.2% to 77.6%) at 2 years. The actuarial rates of developing regional and distant relapse at 2 years were 8.8% (95% CI = 4.1% to 18.7%) and 21.6% (95% CI = 13.5% to 33.5%), respectively. Tumor size greater than 3cm was associated with an increased risk of developing distant relapse (hazard ratio = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.30 to 7.42; two-sided log-rank test P = .007). The most common grade 3+ toxicities were fatigue (6.3%), cough (7.5%), dyspnea (13.8%), and pneumonitis (10.0%) CONCLUSIONS: Conformal radiotherapy to a dose of 60 Gy in 15 fractions resulted in favorable primary tumor control and overall survival rates in patients with T1-3 N0 M0 NSCLC. Severe toxicities were uncommon with this relatively simple treatment technique.

Managing a national radiation oncologist workforce: a workforce planning model.

PURPOSE: The specialty of radiation oncology has experienced significant workforce planning challenges in many countries. Our purpose was to develop and validate a workforce-planning model that would forecast the balance between supply of, and demand for, radiation oncologists in Canada over a minimum 10-year time frame, to identify the model parameters that most influenced this balance, and to suggest how this model may be applicable to other countries. METHODS: A forward calculation model was created and populated with data obtained from national sources. Validation was confirmed using a historical prospective approach. RESULTS: Under baseline assumptions, the model predicts a short-term surplus of RO trainees followed by a projected deficit in 2020. Sensitivity analyses showed that access to radiotherapy (proportion of incident cases referred), individual RO workload, average age of retirement and resident training intake most influenced balance of supply and demand. Within plausible ranges of these parameters, substantial shortages or excess of graduates is possible, underscoring the need for ongoing monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Workforce planning in radiation oncology is possible using a projection calculation model based on current system characteristics and modifiable parameters that influence projections. The workload projections should inform policy decision making regarding growth of the specialty and training program resident intake required to meet oncology health services needs. The methods used are applicable to workforce planning for radiation oncology in other countries and for other comparable medical specialties.