The number of nephroprotection targets attained is associated with cardiorenal outcomes and mortality in patients with diabetic kidney disease. The CKD-REIN cohort study.

AIM: The risk of cardiorenal events remains high among patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD), despite the prescription of recommended treatments. We aimed to determine whether the attainment of a combination of nephroprotection targets at baseline (glycated haemoglobin <7.0%, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio <300 mg/g, blood pressure <130/80 mmHg, renin-angiotensin system inhibition) was associated with better cardiorenal outcomes and lower mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the prospective French CKD-REIN cohort, we studied 1260 patients with diabetes and CKD stages 3-4 (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m2); 69% were men, and at inclusion, mean ± SD age: 70 ± 10 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate: 33 ± 11 ml/min/1.73 m2. The median follow-up was 4.9 years. RESULTS: In adjusted Cox regression models, the attainment of two nephroprotection targets was consistently associated with a lower risk of cardiorenal events [hazard ratio 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.85)], incident kidney failure with replacement therapy [0.58 (0.43-0.77)], four major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure) [0.75 (0.57-0.99)] and all-cause mortality [0.59 (0.42-0.82)] when compared with the attainment of zero or one target. For patients with a urinary albumin-creatinine ratio ≥300 mg/g, those who attained at least two targets had lower hazard ratios for cardiorenal events [0.61 (0.39-0.96)], four major adverse cardiovascular events [0.53 (0.28-0.98)] and all-cause mortality [0.35 (0.17-0.70)] compared with those who failed to attain any targets. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the attainment of a combination of nephroprotection targets is associated with better cardiorenal outcomes and a lower mortality rate in people with diabetic kidney disease.

Kidney Function Decline and Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients With CKD.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The impact of kidney function decline on serious ADR risk has been poorly investigated. We comprehensively describe ADRs and assess the relationship between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serious ADR risk. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 3,033 participants in French Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN) cohort study, a nationwide sample of nephrology outpatients with moderate to advanced CKD. PREDICTORS: Demographic and biological data (including eGFR), medication prescriptions. OUTCOME: ADRs (preventable or not) were prospectively identified from hospital discharge reports, medical records, and patient interviews. Expert pharmacologists used validated tools to adjudicate ADRs. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Restricted cubic splines in fully adjusted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the relationship between eGFR and the risk of serious ADRs (overall and by subtype). RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 4.7 years, 360 patients experienced 488 serious ADRs. Kidney and urinary disorders (n=170) and hemorrhage (n=170) accounted for 70% of serious ADRs. The most common medications classes were antithrombotics and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. The majority of those serious ADRs were associated with hospitalization (n=467), with 32 directly or indirectly associated with death and 22 associated with a life-threatening event. More than 27% of the 488 serious ADRs were preventable or potentially preventable. The eGFR is a major risk factor for serious ADRs. The risk of acute kidney injury was 2.2% higher and risk of bleeding ADRs was 8% higher for each 1mL/min/1.73m2 lower baseline eGFR. LIMITATIONS: The results cannot be extrapolated to patients who are not being treated by a nephrologist. CONCLUSIONS: ADRs constitute a major cause of hospitalization in CKD patients for whom lower eGFR level is a major risk factor. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have complex clinical presentations, take multiple medications, and often receive inappropriate prescriptions. Using data from a large, prospective CKD cohort, we found a high incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The 2 most common serious ADRs were drug-induced acute kidney injury and bleeding. A large proportion of serious ADRs required hospital admission, and 11% led to death or were life threatening. Lower kidney function was a major risk factor for serious ADRs. Many of these serious ADRs were determined to be partly preventable through greater adherence to prescription guidelines. This report enhances our understanding of the potential toxicity of drugs taken by patients with moderate to advanced CKD. It emphasizes the importance of monitoring kidney function when prescribing drugs, particularly for high-risk medications such as antithrombotic agents.

Cognitive performance is associated with glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the CKD-REIN cohort.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with cognitive impairment in general population. We assessed the association between kidney and cognitive functions in patients with CKD and the influence of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, and depression on this association. METHODS: The CKD-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network cohort included 3033 patients with CKD stages 3-4, followed for 5 years. Cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration equation-creatinin formula. Evolution of the MMSE score over time and its association with baseline eGFR were investigated with linear mixed models. We assessed the risk of incident cognitive outcome (hospitalisation or death with relevant International Classification of Disease-10 codes), with a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The mean age was 66.8, the mean eGFR was 33 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 387 patients (13.0%) had an MMSE score below 24 at baseline. A 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrement of baseline eGFR was associated with a mean MMSE decrease of 0.12 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.19) after adjustment for demographic characteristics, depression, CV risk factors and disease; but baseline eGFR was not associated with MMSE temporal evolution. HR for cognitive outcome during follow-up (median 2.01 years) associated with a 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrement of baseline eGFR was 1.35 (1.07, 1.70) (p=0.01) after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CKD, lower eGFR was associated with worse cognitive performance and incident cognitive events, independently of demographics, CV risk factors and depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03381950.

A New Approach for Cognitive Impairment Pattern in Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an elevated risk of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs). It remains unclear whether CKD-related NCDs have specific cognitive pattern or are earlier-onset phenotypes of the main NCDs (vascular NCDs and Alzheimer's disease). METHODS: We used the Mini Mental State Examination score (MMSE) to assess cognitive pattern in 3003 CKD patients (stage 3 to 4) followed up over 5 years in the Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN) cohort. After normalizing MMSE scores to a 0-to-100 scale, the associations between the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, using the CKD-EPI-creatinine formula) and changes in each MMSE domain score were assessed in linear mixed models. RESULTS: Patients (age: 67±13 years old; males: 65%, mean eGFR: 33±12 ml/min/1.73 m²) had a good baseline cognitive functions: the mean MMSE score was 26.9/30 ±2.9. After adjustment for age, sex, educational level, depression (past or present), cardiovascular risk factors, cerebrovascular disease, a lower baseline eGFR (per 10 ml/min/1.73 m²) was associated with a 0.53-point decrement (p<0.001; 95%CI [-0.98,-0.08]) for orientation, a 1.04-point decrement (p=0.03; 95%CI [-1.96,-0.13]) for attention and calculation, a 0.78-point decrement (p=0.003; 95%CI [-1.30,-0.27]) for language, and a 0.94-point decrement (p=0.02; 95%CI [-1.75,-0.13]) for praxis. Baseline eGFR was not, however, associated with significant changes over time in MMSE domain scores. CONCLUSION: A lower eGFR in CKD patients was associated with early impairments in certain cognitive domains: praxis, language and attention domains before an obvious cognitive decline. Early detection of NCD in CKD patients must be perform before clinically cognitive decline using preferably tests assessing executive, attentional functions and language than memory test. This could lead to a better management of cognitive impairment and their consequences on CKD management.

A Predictive Model for Progression of CKD to Kidney Failure Based on Routine Laboratory Tests.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Stratification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients at risk for progressing to kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy (KFRT) is important for clinical decision-making and trial enrollment. STUDY DESIGN: Four independent prospective observational cohort studies. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: The development cohort comprised 4,915 CKD patients, and 3 independent validation cohorts comprised a total of 3,063. Patients were observed for approximately 5 years. EXPOSURE: 22 demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory variables commonly assessed in CKD patients. OUTCOME: Progression to KFRT. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox proportional hazards model was fit to select laboratory variables that best identified patients at high risk for KFRT. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed and compared against the 4-variable Tangri (T4) risk equation both in a resampling approach within the development cohort and in the validation cohorts using cause-specific concordance (C) statistics, net reclassification improvement, and calibration graphs. RESULTS: The newly derived 6-variable risk score (Z6) included serum creatinine, albumin, cystatin C, and urea, as well as hemoglobin and the urinary albumin-creatinine ratio. In the the resampling approach, Z6 achieved a median C statistic of 0.909 (95% CI, 0.868-0.937) at 2 years after the baseline visit, whereas the T4 achieved a median C statistic of 0.855 (95% CI, 0.799-0.915). In the 3 independent validation cohorts, the Z6C statistics were 0.894, 0.921, and 0.891, whereas the T4C statistics were 0.882, 0.913, and 0.862. LIMITATIONS: The Z6 was both derived and tested only in White European cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: A new risk equation based on 6 routinely available laboratory tests facilitates identification of patients with CKD who are at high risk of progressing to KFRT.

Water intake and progression of chronic kidney disease: the CKD-REIN cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Optimal daily water intake to prevent chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression is unknown. Taking the kidney's urine-concentrating ability into account, we studied the relation of kidney outcomes in patients with CKD to total and plain water intake and urine volume. METHODS: Including 1265 CKD patients [median age 69 years; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 32 mL/min/1.73 m2] from the Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network cohort (2013-19), we assessed fluid intake at baseline interviews, collected 24-h urine volumes and estimated urine osmolarity (eUosm). Using Cox and then linear mixed models, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for kidney failure and eGFR decline associated with hydration markers, adjusting for CKD progression risk factors and eUosm. RESULTS: Patients' median daily intake was 2.0 L [interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-2.6] for total water and 1.5 L (1-1.7) for plain water, median urine volume was 1.9 L/24 h (IQR 1.6-2.4) and mean eUosm was 374 ± 104 mosm/L. Neither total water intake nor urine volume was associated with either kidney outcome. Kidney failure risk increased significantly with decreasing eUosm ˂292 mosm/L. Adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for kidney failure associated with plain water intake were 1.88 (1.02-3.47), 1.59 (1.06-2.38), 1.76 (0.95-3.24) and 1.55 (1.03-2.32) in patients drinking <0.5, 0.5-1.0, 1.5-2.0 and >2.0 L/day compared with those drinking 1.0-1.5 L/day. High plain water intake was also significantly associated with faster eGFR decline. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CKD, the relation between plain water intake and progression to kidney failure appears to be U-shaped. Both low and high intake may not be beneficial in CKD.

Urea levels and cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Elevated serum urea levels are common in moderate-to-advanced CKD. Several studies have shown that urea is a direct and indirect uremic toxin, especially with regard to cardiovascular disease. We sought to determine whether serum urea levels are associated with adverse cardiovascular events and death before renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients with CKD. METHODS: CKD-REIN is a prospective cohort of CKD nephrology outpatients not receiving maintenance dialysis. The 2507 patients included in the analysis were divided into three groups according to the baseline serum urea level (T1 < 10.5, T2:10.5 to 15.1, and T3 ≥ 15.1 mmol/L). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for first atheromatous or nonatheromatous cardiovascular (CV) events, and all-cause mortality before RRT. The models were adjusted for baseline comorbidities, laboratory data, and medications. FINDINGS: Of the 2507 included patients (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age: 69[61-77]; mean (standard deviation) eGFR 33.5(11.6) mL/min/1.73 m²), 54% had a history of cardiovascular disease. After multiple adjustments for cardiovascular risk factors (including eGFR), patients in T3 had a higher risk of atheromatous and nonatheromatous cardiovascular events than patient in T1 (n events = 451, HR[95%CI]: 1.93[1.39-2.69]). The adjusted HRs for death before RRT (n events = 407) were 1.31[0.97; 1.76] and 1.73[1.22; 2.45] for patients T2 and those in T3, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggested that urea is a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes beyond CV risk factors including eGFR.

New insights into acute-on-chronic kidney disease in nephrology patients: the CKD-REIN study.

BACKGROUND: Acute-on-chronic kidney disease (ACKD) is poorly understood and often overlooked. We studied its incidence, circumstances, determinants and outcomes in patients with CKD. METHODS: We used the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria to identify all-stage acute kidney injury (AKI) events in 3033 nephrology outpatients with CKD Stages 3-5 participating in the CKD-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network cohort study (2013-20), and cause-specific Cox models to estimate hazard ratios [HRs; 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] of AKI-associated risk factors. RESULTS: At baseline, 22% of the patients [mean age 67 years, 65% men, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 32 mL/min/1.73 m2] had a history of AKI. Over a 3-year follow-up, 443 had at least one AKI event: 27% were Stage 2 or 3 and 11% required dialysis; 74% involved hospitalization including 47% acquired as hospital inpatients; and a third were not reported in hospital discharge reports. Incidence rates were 10.1 and 4.8/100 person-years in patients with and without an AKI history, respectively. In 2375 patients without this history, male sex, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cirrhosis, several drugs, low eGFR and serum albumin levels were significantly associated with a higher risk of AKI, as were low birth weight (<2500 g) (adjusted HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.35-2.91) and haemoglobin level (HR 1.21; 1.12-1.32 per 1 g/dL decrease). Within 1 year, only 63% of the patients had recovered their previous kidney function, 13.7% had started kidney replacement therapy and 12.7% had died. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the high rate of hospital-acquired AKI events in patients with CKD, and their underreporting at hospital discharge. It also reveals low birth weight and anaemia as possible new risk factors in CKD patients.

Prescription patterns of dialysate potassium and potassium binders and survival on haemodialysis-the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network registry.

BACKGROUND: Management of potassium disorders in patients on haemodialysis (HD) is complex. We studied prescription patterns of dialysate potassium and potassium binders, and their associations with patient survival. METHODS: This national registry-based study included 25 629 incident adult patients alive after 3 months of HD from 2010 through 2013 and followed-up through 31 December 2014. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate multiadjusted mortality hazard ratios (HRs) associated with time-dependent exposure to facility-level dialysate potassium concentrations and patient-level potassium binder exposure. RESULTS: Almost all dialysis units used, and generally most often, dialysate potassium concentrations of 2 mmol/L. During this period, use of concentrations <2 mmol/L tended to decrease and those ≥3 mmol/L to increase. In 2014, 9% of units used a single dialysate formula, 41% used two and 50% three or more. The most frequent combinations were 2 and 3 mmol/L (40%), and <2, 2 and 3 mmol/L (37%). Compared with patients on HD in units using only one dialysate formula, those in units using two or three had adjusted mortality HRs of 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.01] and 0.84 (0.75-0.93), respectively. Potassium binders were prescribed for 37% of all patients at baseline. Adjusted mortality HRs associated with doses <4, 4-8 and ≥8 g/day versus none were 1.22 (95% CI 1.04-1.51), 0.6 (0.54-0.66) and 0.25 (0.24-0.33), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diversity in facility-level use of dialysate potassium concentrations and potassium binder use at an appropriate dose appear to be associated with better survival in HD patients.

Higher mortality risk among kidney transplant recipients than among estimated glomerular filtration rate-matched patients with CKD-preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Although kidney transplantation prolongs survival relative to dialysis, it is associated with a higher death rate than in the general population. The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the risk of mortality and frequency of non-lethal cardiovascular (CV) events in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) beyond 1 year after successful transplantation versus patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using propensity score-matched analysis of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and other parameters. METHODS: After propensity score matching, we studied 340 KTRs from the French Données Informatisées et Validées en Transplantation cohort and 605 non-transplant patients with CKD (CKDps) from the French Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network cohort. The mean ± standard deviation eGFR was 42 ± 13 and 41 ± 12 mL/min/ 1.73 m2, respectively (P = 0.649). Descriptive data were completed by a survival analysis with Cox regression models. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 2.8 years (KTRs 2.0 years, CKDp 2.9 years), 71 deaths were recorded (31 and 40 in the KTR and CKD groups, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that KTRs had a significantly greater risk of mortality than CKDps. In multivariable analysis, KTRs were found to have a 2.7-fold greater risk of mortality [hazard ratio 2.7 (95% confidence interval 1.6-4.7); P = 0.005]. There was no between-group difference concerning the risk of CV events (P = 0.448). CV death rates in KTRs (29.0%) approximated those of CKDps (22.5%), whereas death rates due to infections were higher in KTRs (19.4% versus 10.0%). CONCLUSION: Beyond 1 year after transplantation, KTRs, who possibly had a longer CKD history, had a significantly greater mortality risk than eGFR-matched CKDps. The excess risk was not associated with CV events.

Adverse outcomes of proton pump inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease: The CKD-REIN cohort study.

AIMS: Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has been associated with adverse kidney events in the general population, but their impact among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is unclear. We studied the prevalence and incidence (new users) of PPI prescriptions and their relation to kidney outcomes and mortality in CKD patients. METHODS: We collected drug prescriptions prospectively in a cohort of 3023 nephrology outpatients with CKD stages 2-5 at inclusion. Hazard ratios (HR, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]) for acute kidney injury (AKI), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and mortality associated with new PPI prescriptions as a time-dependent variable were estimated with cause-specific Cox models in 1940 non-users with eGFR ≥ 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline, adjusted for comorbidities, laboratory data and drugs. RESULTS: There were 981/3023 (32%) prevalent users (67 ± 13 years, 65% men) at baseline, and 366/3023 (12%) were prescribed PPI (new users) over a median follow-up of 3.9 years (interquartile range, 3-4.2). Among these new users, their median cumulative duration of prescription was 1 year (interquartile range: 0.4-2.3). During follow-up, 354 patients developed ESKD and 216 died before ESKD. The adjusted HRs associated with PPI prescription were 1.74 (95% CI, 1.26-2.40) for ESKD and 2.42 (95% CI, 1.73-3.39) for all-cause mortality. Over the first 3 years of follow-up, 211 AKI events had occurred. The adjusted HR for AKI associated with PPI prescription was 2.89 (95% CI, 1.91-4.38). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term PPI prescription was common in CKD patients. Our results call attention to its potential risks of both acute and chronic kidney failure.

Conversion of Urine Protein-Creatinine Ratio or Urine Dipstick Protein to Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio for Use in Chronic Kidney Disease Screening and Prognosis : An Individual Participant-Based Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although measuring albuminuria is the preferred method for defining and staging chronic kidney disease (CKD), total urine protein or dipstick protein is often measured instead. OBJECTIVE: To develop equations for converting urine protein-creatinine ratio (PCR) and dipstick protein to urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) and to test their diagnostic accuracy in CKD screening and staging. DESIGN: Individual participant-based meta-analysis. SETTING: 12 research and 21 clinical cohorts. PARTICIPANTS: 919 383 adults with same-day measures of ACR and PCR or dipstick protein. MEASUREMENTS: Equations to convert urine PCR and dipstick protein to ACR were developed and tested for purposes of CKD screening (ACR ≥30 mg/g) and staging (stage A2: ACR of 30 to 299 mg/g; stage A3: ACR ≥300 mg/g). RESULTS: Median ACR was 14 mg/g (25th to 75th percentile of cohorts, 5 to 25 mg/g). The association between PCR and ACR was inconsistent for PCR values less than 50 mg/g. For higher PCR values, the PCR conversion equations demonstrated moderate sensitivity (91%, 75%, and 87%) and specificity (87%, 89%, and 98%) for screening (ACR >30 mg/g) and classification into stages A2 and A3, respectively. Urine dipstick categories of trace or greater, trace to +, and ++ for screening for ACR values greater than 30 mg/g and classification into stages A2 and A3, respectively, had moderate sensitivity (62%, 36%, and 78%) and high specificity (88%, 88%, and 98%). For individual risk prediction, the estimated 2-year 4-variable kidney failure risk equation using predicted ACR from PCR had discrimination similar to that of using observed ACR. LIMITATION: Diverse methods of ACR and PCR quantification were used; measurements were not always performed in the same urine sample. CONCLUSION: Urine ACR is the preferred measure of albuminuria; however, if ACR is not available, predicted ACR from PCR or urine dipstick protein may help in CKD screening, staging, and prognosis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and National Kidney Foundation.

Prevalence of atheromatous and non-atheromatous cardiovascular disease by age in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) and age are major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), little is known about the relative proportions of atheromatous and non-atheromatous CVD by age in CKD patients. METHODS: We used baseline data from the French Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN) cohort of 3033 patients (65% men) with CKD Stages 3-4 to study crude and adjusted associations between age, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), atheromatous CVD (coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease and stroke) and non-atheromatous CVD (heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia and valvular heart disease). RESULTS: Mean age was 66.8 and mean Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) eGFR was 32.9 mL/min/1.73 m2. In the <65, (65-74), (75-84) and ≥85 year age groups, the prevalence was, respectively, 18.7, 35.5, 42.9 and 37.8% for atheromatous CVD, and 14.9, 28.4, 38.1 and 56.4% for non-atheromatous CVD. After adjusting for albuminuria, sex and CVD risk factors, the odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for (65-74), (75-84) and ≥85 age groups (compared with the <65 group) was, respectively, 1.99 (1.61-2.46), 2.89 (2.30-3.62), 2.72 (1.77-4.18) for atheromatous CVD and 2.07 (1.66-2.58), 3.15 (2.50-3.97), 7.04 (4.67-10.61) for non-atheromatous CVD. Compared with patients with an eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2, those with an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 had a higher OR for atheromatous CVD [1.21 (1.01-1.44)] and non-atheromatous CVD [1.16 (0.97-1.38)]. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of CKD patients, both atheromatous and non-atheromatous CVD were highly prevalent and more frequent in older patients. In a given age group, the prevalence of atheromatous and non-atheromatous CVD was similar (except for a greater prevalence of non-atheromatous CVD after 85).

Performance of creatinine-based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate changes over time.

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is commonly used to monitor chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, but its validity for evaluating kidney function changes over time has not been comprehensively evaluated. We assessed the performance of creatinine-based equations for estimating GFR slope according to patient characteristics and specific CKD diagnosis. METHODS: In the NephroTest cohort study, we measured GFR 5324 times by chromium 51-labeled ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid renal clearance in 1955 adult patients with CKD Stages 1-4 referred to nephrologists (Stages 1-2, 19%) and simultaneously estimated GFR with both the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations for isotope dilution mass spectrometry traceable creatinine; absolute and relative GFR slopes were calculated using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 3.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.0-5.6] years, the decline in mean absolute and relative measured GFR (mGFR) and CKD-EPI and MDRD estimated GFR (eGFR) was 1.6 ± 1.2, 1.5 ± 1.4 and 1.3 ± 1.3 mL/min/1.73 m2/year and 5.9 ± 5.3, 5.3 ± 5.3 and 4.8 ± 5.2%/year, respectively; 52% and 55% of the patients had MDRD and CKD-EPI eGFR slopes within 30% of mGFR slopes. Both equations tended to overestimate the GFR slope in the youngest patients and underestimate it in the oldest, thus producing inverse associations between age and mGFR versus eGFR slope. Other patient characteristics and specific CKD diagnoses had little effect on the performance of the equations in estimating associations. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows little bias, but poor precision in GFR slope estimation for both MDRD and CKD-EPI equations. Importantly, bias strongly varied with age, possibly due to variations in muscle mass over time, with implications for clinical care and research.

Extracellular fluid volume is associated with incident end-stage kidney disease and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Volume overload has been shown to be an independent risk factor for mortality in patients receiving chronic dialysis, but data in non-dialysis patients are scarce. Therefore we evaluated the prognostic value of extracellular fluid (ECF) volume for chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and mortality in a prospective hospital-based cohort with CKD stage 1-4 (NephroTest Study). ECF (scaled to body surface area) and the measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) were determined using the distribution volume and clearance of 51Cr-EDTA, respectively. Cause-specific Cox and linear mixed-effect regression models were used to analyze the association of ECF with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and mortality, and with mGFR decline, respectively. The 1593 patients were mean age 58.8 years, 67% were men, mean mGFR of 43.6 mL/min/1.73m2 and mean ECF 15.1 L/1.73m2. After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, ESKD occurred in 324 patients and 185 patients died before ESKD. In multivariable analysis, ECF was significantly associated with the risk of ESKD (hazard ratio per 1L/1.73m2 increase: 1.14; 95% confidence interval [1.07; 1.21]) and with a faster GFR decline (adjusted mean difference in mGFR slope per 1L/1.73m2 increase -0.14 [-0.23; -0.05] mL/min/year). The relationship of ECF with mortality was non-linear and not significant (per 1L/1.73m2 increase 0.92, [0.73; 1.16]), below 15L/1.73m2, but significant (1.28; [1.14-1.45]) above 15L/1.73m2. Thus, in this large cohort of carefully phenotyped patients with CKD, ECF was an independent risk factor of CKD progression and mortality. Hence, close monitoring and treatment of fluid overload are important for the clinical management of patients with non-dialysis CKD.

Epitope load identifies kidney transplant recipients at risk of allosensitization following minimization of immunosuppression.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching and minimization of immunosuppression are two major risk factors for the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies, which are associated with reduced kidney graft survival. Antibodies do not recognize whole HLA antigens but rather individual epitopes, which are short sequences of amino acids in accessible positions. However, compatibility is still assessed by the simple count of mismatched HLA antigens. We hypothesized that the number of mismatched epitopes, or ("epitope load") would identify patients at the highest risk of developing donor specific antibodies following minimization of immunosuppression. We determined epitope load in 89 clinical trial participants who converted from cyclosporine to everolimus 3 months after kidney transplantation. Twenty-nine participants (32.6%) developed de novo donor specific antibodies. Compared to the number of HLA mismatches, epitope load was more strongly associated with the development of donor specific antibodies. Participants with an epitope load greater than 27 had a 12-fold relative risk of developing donor-specific antibodies compared to those with an epitope load below that threshold. Using that threshold, epitope load would have missed only one participant who subsequently developed donor specific antibodies, compared to 8 missed cases based on a 6-antigen mismatch. DQ7 was the most frequent antigenic target of donor specific antibodies in our population, and some DQ7 epitopes appeared to be more frequently involved than others. Assessing epitope load before minimizing immunosuppression may be a more efficient tool to identify patients at the highest risk of allosensitization.

Fasting Urinary Osmolality, CKD Progression, and Mortality: A Prospective Observational Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) characterized by decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is often accompanied by various degrees of impaired tubular function in the cortex and medulla. Assessment of tubular function may therefore be useful in establishing the severity of kidney disease and identifying those at greater risk for CKD progression. We explored reductions in urinary concentrating ability, a well-known feature of CKD, as a risk factor for GFR decline and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 2,084 adult patients with CKD stages 1 to 4 from the French NephroTest Cohort Study. PREDICTOR: Fasting urinary osmolality measured using delta cryoscopy. OUTCOMES: ESRD, mortality before ESRD, and measured GFR (mGFR) assessed using 51Cr-EDTA renal clearance. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cause-specific hazards models were fit to estimate crude and adjusted associations of urinary osmolality with ESRD and death before ESRD. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were fit to evaluate the association of urinary osmolality with slope of decline in mGFR. RESULTS: At baseline, mean age was 58.7±15.2 (SD) years with a median mGFR of 40.2 (IQR, 29.1-54.5) mL/min/1.73m2 and a median fasting urinary osmolality of 502.7±151.7mOsm/kg H2O. Baseline fasting urinary osmolality was strongly associated with mGFR (R=0.54; P < 0.001). 380 ESRD events and 225 deaths before ESRD occurred during a median follow-up of 5.9 (IQR, 3.8-8.2) years. Patients with lower baseline fasting urinary osmolality had higher adjusted risk for ESRD but not for mortality (HRs of 1.97 [95% CI, 1.26-3.08] and 0.99 [95% CI, 0.68-1.44], respectively, for the lowest vs highest tertile). Based on a mixed linear model adjusted for baseline mGFR and clinical characteristics, patients in the lowest tertile of baseline urinary osmolality had a steeper decline in kidney function (-4.9% ± 0.9% per year; P < 0.001) compared with patients in the highest tertile. LIMITATIONS: Fasting was self-reported. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting urinary osmolality may be a useful tool, in addition to GFR and albuminuria, for assessing nonglomerular damage in patients with CKD who are at higher risk for CKD progression.

Risk profile, quality of life and care of patients with moderate and advanced CKD: The French CKD-REIN Cohort Study.

Background: The French Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN) cohort study was designed to investigate the determinants of prognosis and care of patients referred to nephrologists with moderate and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). We examined their baseline risk profile and experience. Methods: We collected bioclinical and patient-reported information from 3033 outpatients with CKD and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) of 15-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 treated at 40 nationally representative public and private facilities. Results: The patients' median age was 69 (60-76) years, 65% were men, their mean eGFR was 33 mL/min/1.73 m2, 43% had diabetes, 24% had a history of acute kidney injury (AKI) and 57% had uncontrolled blood pressure (BP; >140/90 mmHg). Men had worse risk profiles than women and were more likely to be past or current smokers (73% versus 34%) and have cardiovascular disease (59% versus 42%), albuminuria >30 mg/mmol (or proteinuria > 50) (40% versus 30%) (all P < 0.001) and a higher median risk of end-stage renal disease within 5 years, predicted by the kidney failure risk equation {12% [interquartile range (IQR) 3-37%] versus 9% [3-31%], P = 0.008}. During the previous year, 60% of patients reported one-to-two nephrologist visits and four or more general practitioner visits; only 25% saw a dietician and 75% were prescribed five or more medications daily. Physical and mental quality of life (QoL) were poor, with scores <50/100. Conclusions: The CKD-REIN study highlights high-risk profiles of cohort members and identifies several priorities, including improving BP control and dietary counselling and increasing doctors' awareness of AKI, polypharmacy and QoL. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03381950.

Evaluation of the adequacy of drug prescriptions in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the CKD-REIN cohort.

AIMS: Drug prescription is difficult to manage in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We assessed the prevalence and determinants of inappropriate drug prescriptions (whether contraindications or inappropriately high doses) with regard to kidney function in patients with CKD under nephrology care. We also assessed the impact of the equation used to estimate GFR on the prevalence estimates. METHODS: The CKD-REIN cohort includes 3033 outpatients with CKD (eGFR between 15 and 60 ml min-1  1.73 m-2 ). We examined the daily doses of pharmacological agents prescribed at study entry. Inappropriate prescription was defined as the reported prescription of either a contraindicated drug or an indicated drug at an inappropriately high dose level with regard to the patient's GFR, as estimated with the CKD-EPI equation, the de-indexed CKD-EPI equation, or the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the determinants of inappropriate prescription risk. RESULTS: At baseline, patients' median [interquartile range] number of drugs prescribed per patient was 8 [5-10]. Half of the patients had been prescribed at least one inappropriate drug. Anti-gout, cardiovascular agents and antidiabetic agents accounted for most of the inappropriate prescriptions. The percentage of inappropriate prescriptions varied from one GFR equation to another: 52% when using the CKD-EPI equation, 47% when using the de-indexed CKD-EPI equation and 41% with the CG equation. A multiple logistic regression analysis showed significantly higher odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for inappropriate prescriptions in male patients (1.28 [1.07; 1.53]), patients with diabetes (1.34 [1.06; 1.70]), those with a high BMI (1.58 [1.25; 1.99]), and those with a low GFR (10.2 [6.02; 17.3]). The risk of having at least one inappropriate prescription increased with the number of drugs per patient (P for trend < 0.0001) and therefore the odds ratio was 5.88 [4.17; 8.28] for those who received at least 11 prescribed medications compared to those who received fewer than 5. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the complexity of drug management for CKD patients, for whom inappropriate prescription appears to be common.

Identifying subgroups of renal function trajectories.

Background: Renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may follow different trajectory profiles. The aim of this study was to evaluate and illustrate the ability of the latent class linear mixed model (LCMM) to identify clinically relevant subgroups of renal function trajectories within a multicenter hospital-based cohort of CKD patients. Methods: We analysed data from the NephroTest cohort including 1967 patients with all-stage CKD at baseline who had glomerular filtration rate (GFR) both measured by 51 Cr-EDTA renal clearance (mGFR) and estimated by the CKD-EPI equation (eGFR); 1103 patients had at least two measurements. The LCMM was used to identify subgroups of GFR trajectories, and patients' characteristics at baseline were compared between the subgroups identified. Results: Five classes of mGFR trajectories were identified. Three had a slow linear decline of mGFR over time at different levels. In the two others, patients had a high level of mGFR at baseline with either a strong nonlinear decline over time ( n = 11) or a nonlinear improvement ( n = 94) of mGFR. Higher levels of proteinuria and blood pressure at baseline were observed in classes with either severely decreased mGFR or strong mGFR decline over time. Using eGFR provided similar findings. Conclusion: The LCMM allowed us to identify in our cohort five clinically relevant subgroups of renal function trajectories. It could be used in other CKD cohorts to better characterize their different profiles of disease progression, as well as to investigate specific risk factors associated with each profile.