Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 2024 Aug 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39098652

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the type and duration of screw fixation affects ankle joint functional scores and patient activity levels. We evaluated 55 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for ankle fracture with concomitant distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. The follow-up period ranged from 2 years to 4 years and 2 months (mean 36 months). Depending on the time of screw removal, patients were divided into 2 groups (the 8-15-week group-19 patients, and the 16-22-week group-36 patients). There were 17 patients with tricortical and 38 patients with quadricortical syndesmosis fixation. The following parameters were assessed: range of motion, rates of complications, level of pain in visual analogue scale (VAS), and function. In the quadricortical fixation group the range of plantar flexion p = .04 and adduction p = .043 were significantly lower in the operated than in the nonoperated limb. In the patients who had their syndesmotic screws removed after 16-22 weeks, the range of plantar flexion in the operated limb was significantly lower than that in the nonoperated limb. We observed no differences between the evaluated groups in terms of ankle joint mobility, VAS pain levels, functional outcomes, or complication rates. All the analyzed subgroups showed poorer ranges of some types of motion in the ankle and worse functional scale and VAS pain scores after treatment in comparison with those before the injury. We suggest removing the syndesmotic screws after 8-15 weeks, due to the possibility of earlier rehabilitation, faster return to work and physical activity and less burden on the health care system. Tricortical or quadricortical syndesmosis fixation is at the surgeon's discretion.

2.
Eur Spine J ; 32(12): 4355-4361, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37805564

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to identify the clinical predictive factors for worsened spinal deformity (SD) following surgical resection via posterior approach for primary intramedullary tumors. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to extract potential references. Observational studies reporting predictive factors for worsened SD following surgical resection via posterior approach for primary intramedullary tumors were included. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated for dichotomous parameters. RESULTS: Four retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. They were comprised of two groups of patients; those who developed SD (n = 87) and those who did not (n = 227). For patients with IMSCTs, age under 25 years as well as age under 13 years were the demographic variables associated with postoperative SD (odds ratio [OR] 3.92; p = 0.0002 and OR 4.22; p = 0.003). In both the fusion and the non-fusion subgroups, preoperative spinal deformity strongly predicted postoperative SD (OR 11.94; p < 0.001), with the risk highly elevated among the non-fusion patients (OR 24.64; p < 0.0002). Thoracolumbar junction involvement was also found to be a predictor of postoperative SD for patients with IMSCT (OR 2.89; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of considering age, preoperative spinal deformity, and thoracolumbar junction involvement as predictors of postoperative spinal deformity following surgical resection for IMSCT. These findings may provide guidance for the management of these patients, including the development of preoperative planning strategies and the selection of the most appropriate surgical approach for high-risk patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Medula Espinal , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Adulto , Adolescente , Laminectomia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Medula Espinal/patologia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia
3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(4)2023 Mar 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37109632

RESUMO

Chronic neuropathic pain (CNP), a complex and debilitating condition arising from damage or dysfunction of the somatosensory nervous system, affects millions of people worldwide [...].


Assuntos
Anestesia , Dor Crônica , Neuralgia , Humanos , Dor Crônica/terapia
4.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(7)2023 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37512066

RESUMO

The introduction of the term Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS-T1/2), replacing the older term Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), has significantly influenced our approach to diagnosing and treating post-surgical spinal pain. This comprehensive review discusses this change and its effects on patient care. Various diagnostic methods are employed to elucidate the underlying causes of back pain, and this information is critical in guiding treatment decisions. The management of PSPS-T1/2 involves both causative treatments, which directly address the root cause of pain, and symptomatic treatments, which focus on managing the symptoms of pain and improving overall function. The importance of a multidisciplinary and holistic approach is emphasized in the treatment of PSPS-T1/2. This approach is patient-centered and treatment plans are customized to individual patient needs and circumstances. The review concludes with a reflection on the impact of the new PSPS nomenclature on the perception and management of post-surgical spinal pain.


Assuntos
Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/terapia , Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/diagnóstico , Manejo da Dor , Coluna Vertebral , Dor Pós-Operatória , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Neurol Neurochir Pol ; 56(1): 96-100, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35014691

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic greatly disrupted the national healthcare system in Poland, resulting in the implementation of new protocols allowing only patients with severe diagnoses to receive immediate treatment. Given that an intracranial aneurysm (IA) is regarded as one of the most severe diagnoses, we planned to assess whether the current protocol has successfully provided the standard treatment for IAs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on all IA cases treated from 2015 to 2020 was extracted from the JGP (a homogeneous group of patients) catalogue provided by the National Health Index of Poland (NFZ, Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia). Poisson regression was used to determine the significance of the change in hospital admissions, and differences between proportions were analysed using the "N-1" Chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 21,801 IA patients treated during 2015-2020 were included in this study. The overall number of hospitalisations due to IAs fell in the open surgery group, but not in the endovascular cohort. Mortality rates following IA treatment increased significantly by 21% in 2020 compared to preceding years. The demographics changed as well; the patients were significantly younger during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the current strategy for optimal care for patients diagnosed with IAs in Poland during the pandemic is failing to maintain high quality treatment. New methods to improve the current plan should be implemented to address future crises.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Aneurisma Intracraniano , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Incidência , Aneurisma Intracraniano/cirurgia , Aneurisma Intracraniano/terapia , Pandemias , Polônia/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Neurol Neurochir Pol ; 56(3): 261-266, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35554884

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Retrospective study to assess correlation between the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and the long-term outcomes of long cervical fusion due to cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), with the emphasis on T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1S-CL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Growing evidence shows that the sagittal profile can play a major role in the outcomes of treatment, but the role of its correction is yet to be established. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 54 patients treated for CSM from 2006 to 2012. The neck pain-related disability was measured using NDI, the myelopathy was measured with the mJOA and Nurick scales. Six years after the surgery, standardised X-ray measurements were obtained, including C2-C7 lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical alignment (SVAC2-C7), T1 slope (T1S), and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL). The patients were divided based on the T1S-CL into two groups, using the threshold value of 16.5 degrees. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement was noted in the mean NDI, mJOA, and median Nurick scale during the initial two years in both groups. The better aligned group had a better outcome measured with NDI at all follow-ups. The mJOA was significantly better in the better aligned group, but only preoperatively; at all follow-ups, the difference was not significant. T1S-CL had the strongest correlation with the NDI at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: T1S-CL is an effective prognostic factor of the long term outcome after long cervical fusion in CSM treatment.


Assuntos
Lordose , Doenças da Medula Espinal , Fusão Vertebral , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Humanos , Lordose/diagnóstico por imagem , Lordose/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia
7.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 139(9): 1203-1208, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30874895

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in spite of usually favourable outcomes is still a major operation. Therefore, efforts are being undertaken to minimalize the procedure, reduce the surgical trauma and postoperative convalescence. The study was designed to compare posterior minimal invasive surgery using navigation based on intraoperative 3D imaging and standard open instrumented fusion in Lenke 5C idiopathic scoliosis treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From eight patients with Lenke 5C curves planned for posterior correction and instrumented fusion, four were treated with minimally invasive and four had open procedure. Operation length, estimated blood loss, number of fusion levels, days of opioid intake, length of hospital stay and radiation doses required were noted. Radiographic assessment of spinal curvatures was performed (magnitude, flexibility, sagittal alignment). The comparison of the data was done between open and minimally invasive treated patients. RESULTS: In minimally invasive surgery group, the operations were longer on average 285 min ± 47.5 than in the open surgery group, 242.5 min ± 44.5 (p = 0.371) and resulted in slightly inferior coronal curve correction by 68.25% ± 6.2 vs. 78.25% ± 8.8, respectively (p = 0.072). We observed a clear reduction of intraoperative blood loss in minimally invasive patients (mean 138.75 ± 50 vs. 450 ± 106 ml, p = 0.016), shorter hospital stay, average 3.75 vs. 7 days (p = 0.043) and lower opioid requirements postoperatively - 2 vs. 3.25 days (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive approach to idiopathic scoliosis treatment is a very promising technique to limit the extent of surgery maintaining the same goals as in the open method. It allows for lower blood loss, less requirement for opioids and a shorter hospital stay.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral , Adolescente , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fusão Vertebral/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 476(5): 1020-1027, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29432262

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical value of pedicle screws in spinal deformity surgery is well known; however, screw insertion is demanding and sometimes associated with complications. Navigation systems based on intraoperatively obtained three-dimensional (3-D) images were developed to minimize pedicle screw misplacements. However, there is a lack of data confirming superiority of navigation above other techniques. There are also concerns regarding increased radiation used during the procedure. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to compare accuracy of the two methods of pedicle screws placement: intraoperative 3-D image navigation versus a freehand technique in patients with idiopathic scoliosis; and (2) to assess the radiation dose received by patients with both methods. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2016, 49 patients underwent posterior spinal fusion with all pedicle screw constructs for idiopathic scoliosis performed by two surgeons. The study design involved alternating the use of the freehand technique and navigation to position pedicle screws in consecutive patients, forming groups of 27 patients with 451 navigated screws and 22 patients with 384 screws positioned freehand. The two groups did not differ in age, sex, or magnitude of deformity. Two observers not involved in the treatment evaluated the position of the screws. The pedicle breach was assessed on intraoperatively obtained 3-D O-arm® scans according to a grading system: Grade 0 = no pedicle wall violation; Grade 1 = perforation ≤ 2 mm; Grade 2 = 2 to 4 mm; and Grade 3 = perforation > 4 mm. Grades 0 and 1 were considered properly positioned and Grades 2 and 3 represented malposition. RESULTS: In terms of accuracy, we found no differences, with the numbers available, between the freehand and navigated groups in terms of the proportion of screws that were properly positioned (96% freehand and 96% in the navigation group, respectively; p = 0.518). Grade 3 pedicle screws were observed only in the freehand group and were all located in the upper thoracic spine. Patients undergoing navigated pedicle screw placement received a greater mean radiation dose than those whose screws were placed freehand (1071 ± 447 mGy-cm versus 391 ± 53 mGy-cm; mean difference, 680 mGy-cm; 95% confidence interval, 217-2053 mGy-cm; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate idiopathic scoliosis undergoing primary surgery, we did not observe benefits of pedicle screw placement with CT-based navigation, but the patients experienced greater exposure to radiation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Assuntos
Parafusos Pediculares , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
9.
Brain Inj ; 30(1): 79-82, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26714216

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The purpose of this study was to provide data on epidemiology of TBI in Poland during 2009-2012. METHODS: The national data on hospitalizations with TBI as a primary diagnosis was obtained from the National Health Fund of Poland. The sub-set of two diagnosis-related groups (DRG) was used for analysis. The incidence and mortality were calculated with the emphasis on diagnosis. The external causes of injuries were investigated based on the representative sample. RESULTS: Within the study period there were 194,553 hospitalizations due to the TBI in two DRGs. The overall incidence was 126.52/10(5)/year (95% CI = 125.96-127.09). The most common diagnosis was concussion, with an incidence of 81.66/10(5)/year, and the most prevalent structural injury was subdural haematoma (15.27/10(5)/year). The predominant external causes were traffic accidents (40.52%) followed by falls (32.77%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TBIs in Poland compared with other countries in Europe is relatively low. The incidence of concussions mirrored current treatment guidelines rather than real epidemiology.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia , Acidentes por Quedas/mortalidade , Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Concussão Encefálica/mortalidade , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/mortalidade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hematoma Subdural/epidemiologia , Hematoma Subdural/mortalidade , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polônia/epidemiologia
10.
Neurol Neurochir Pol ; 50(2): 101-8, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26969566

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Herniated lumbar disc (HLD) is arguably the most common spinal disorder requiring surgical intervention. Although the term is fairly straightforward, the exact pathology and thus the clinical picture and natural history may vary. Therefore, it is immensely difficult to formulate universal guidelines for surgical treatment. AIM: The aim of this paper is to organize the terminology and clear the inconsistencies in phraseology, review treatment options and gather available published evidence to address the clinical questions to create a set of clinical guidelines in relevant to the topic. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve queries, addressing optimal surgical treatment of the HLD have been formulated. The results, based on the literature review are described in the present work. The final product of the analysis was a set of guidelines for the surgical treatment of symptomatic HLD. Categorized into four tiers based on the level of evidence (I-III and X), they have been designed to assist in the selection of optimal, effective treatment leading to the successful outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence based medicine (EBM) is becoming ever more popular among spinal surgeons. Unfortunately this is not always feasible. Lack of uniform guidelines and numerous conflicts of interest introduce flaws in the decision making process. The key role of experts and professional societies is to provide high value recommendation based on the most current literature. Present work contains a set of guidelines for the surgical treatment of HLD officially endorsed by the Polish Spine Surgery Society.


Assuntos
Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/normas , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Radiculopatia/cirurgia , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Humanos , Polônia
11.
Neurol Neurochir Pol ; 50(2): 109-13, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26969567

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative cervical spondylosis (DCS) with radiculopathy is the most common indication for cervical spine surgery despite favorable natural history. Advances in spinal surgery in conjunction with difficulties in measuring the outcomes caused the paucity of uniform guidelines for the surgical management of DCS. AIMS: The aim of this paper is to develop guidelines for surgical treatment of DCS. For this purpose the available up-to-date literature relevant on the topic was critically reviewed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six questions regarding most important clinical questions encountered in the daily practice were formulated. They were answered based upon the systematic literature review, thus creating a set of guidelines. The guidelines were categorized into four tiers based on the level of evidence (I-III and X). They were designed to assist in the selection of optimal and effective treatment leading to the most successful outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence based medicine (EBM) is increasingly popular among spinal surgeons. It allows making unbiased, optimal clinical decisions, eliminating the detrimental effect of numerous conflicts of interest. The key role of opinion leaders as well as professional societies is to provide guidelines for practice based on available clinical evidence. The present work contains a set of guidelines for surgical treatment of DCS officially endorsed by the Polish Spine Surgery Society.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/normas , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Radiculopatia/cirurgia , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Espondilose/cirurgia , Humanos , Polônia
12.
Neurol Neurochir Pol ; 50(5): 363-9, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27591062

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility and accuracy of a new insertion technique of S1 transpedicular screw. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Transpedicular stabilization in the first sacral vertebra (S1) is a technically demanding surgical procedure with inherent risk of loosening of the implant. A modification of the technique was recently proposed, along with the analytical verification which was performed based on the available literature. In the study, we performed radiological assessment of screws inserted into the S1 using the classical and modified techniques. METHODS: The analysis was performed in two parts. The first part was performed on eight cadaver specimens after implantation of the screws. In the second part, we used computed tomography images of patients with degenerative disk disease with a superimposed representation of screws. The thickness of the posterior cortex adherent to the screws, screw trajectory and their position with regard to the spinal canal was measured. The area of posterior cortex in contact with the screws was also calculated. RESULTS: The contact length and area was found to be two times greater for screws introduced with the modified technique. The convergence angle was comparable between the techniques, despite the shift of entry point. There was no canal breach, although with the modified technique the screws passed closer to the spinal canal. CONCLUSIONS: The modified technique is considered safe. In this technique, the screws pass through a thicker portion of the posterior cortex compared to the classical technique that aims at improving the stability of the fixation.


Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cadáver , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Canal Medular/diagnóstico por imagem , Canal Medular/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
13.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(8): 2611-21, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26041903

RESUMO

Nocardiosis is a rare disease that is caused by Gram-positive actinobacteria of the Nocardia genus and affects predominantly immunocompromised patients. In its disseminated form, it has a predilection for the central nervous system and is associated with high mortality rates. Therefore, prompt identification of the pathogen is critical. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry is a relatively novel technique used for identification of microorganisms. In this work, an upgraded MALDI-TOF Biotyper database containing Corynebacterineae representatives of strains deposited in the Polish Collection of Microorganisms was created and used for identification of the strain isolated from a nocardial brain abscess, mimicking a brain tumor, in an immunocompetent patient. Testing with the API Coryne system initially incorrectly identified Rhodococcus sp., while chemotaxonomic tests, especially mycolic acid analysis, enabled correct Nocardia identification only at the genus level. Subsequent sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and secA1 genes confirmed the identification. To improve the accuracy of the results, an in-house database was constructed using optimized parameters; with the use of the database, the strain was eventually identified as Nocardia farcinica. Clinical laboratories processing various clinical strains can upgrade a commercial database to improve and to accelerate the results obtained. This is especially important in the case of Nocardia, for which valid microbial diagnosis remains challenging; reference laboratories are often required to identify and to survey these rare actinobacteria.


Assuntos
Abscesso Encefálico/diagnóstico , Nocardiose/diagnóstico , Nocardia/isolamento & purificação , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Abscesso Encefálico/microbiologia , DNA Bacteriano/química , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Ribossômico/química , DNA Ribossômico/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Nocardia/química , Nocardiose/microbiologia , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA
14.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 28(4): E194-8, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25611146

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiographic study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the free-hand placement of pedicle screws (PSs) using a new method of localization of entry points. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The PSs are essential in modern spinal surgery but their placement can be technically demanding. To improve this accuracy, numerous aids have been developed, some of them technologically advanced. Despite advances in technology the free-hand technique is still very popular. A simple geometric method of localization of entry points is proposed, designed to improved anatomic orientation. METHODS: The radiographic and clinical data of 92 consecutive patients who underwent primary placement of PS in the lumbar spine were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative computed tomography scans were used to assess the accuracy of screw placement using both quantitative and anatomic criteria. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with 410 screws were included in the study. Twenty screws were malpositioned, thus the overall accuracy was 95.12%. Of all levels instrumented the breach rate for the L1 level was highest (21.43%) and the difference was statistically significant. Two screws in 2 patients were symptomatic, causing radicular pain. Both underwent successful revisions. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method of PS placement is safe and reliable for all levels from L2 to S1, with the accuracy similar to image-guided navigation systems.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/terapia , Vértebras Lombares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Região Sacrococcígea , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
15.
Telemed J E Health ; 21(2): 120-4, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25453719

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In early management of low back pain (LBP) the identification of "red flags" (RFs) plays an important role, as this condition is highly prevalent, and advanced treatment would not be feasible in every case. These alarm signs are designed to detect serious causes requiring prompt interventions, such as malignancy, fracture, inflammation, or cauda equina syndrome. Although their predictive value has been questioned, they are commonly used in clinical practice. The use of RFs in Web applications has never been evaluated before. In theory, they should reduce risks related to online counseling on LBP, screening for possible potentially serious underlying conditions based on relatively simple questionnaires. This study was designed to assess the prevalence of RFs among Internet users with LBP seeking information about spinal disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 2,471 respondents who completed the RF questionnaire, 2,349 entries were used for analysis. Of another 1,959 respondents who completed the additional questionnaire containing the Oswestry Disability Scale, data from 1,850 were included in the study. RESULTS: The majority of subjects (68.16%) reported at least one RF. The most prevalent RF was a foot weakness; the least prevalent was unexplained weight loss. Pain intensity was a significant risk factor for presence of at least one RF. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that RFs are highly prevalent and that most likely the negative predictive value of RFs will be low. Unfortunately, considering the nature of this study it was impossible to evaluate their sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, although RFs are highly prevalent in the population studied, simple screening should be mandatory in all Web sites providing information on spinal health. Further research should be undertaken to optimize RFs.


Assuntos
Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor/normas , Comportamento de Busca de Informação , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
Eur Spine J ; 23(4): 898-903, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24363040

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patient reported outcome measures play an increasingly important role in the outcomes research. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a short, multidimensional instrument initially developed for the use by patients with low back pain. This study is an evaluation of a Polish version of COMI adapted for neck pain. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients complaining of neck pain were enrolled. All of them completed a questionnaire booklet containing COMI-neck, Neck Disability Index and Likert-type questions regarding the frequency of use of pain medications and pain frequency. Ninety-eight patients returned the retest questionnaire. Data quality was also assessed. Assessment of psychometric properties included examination of data quality, construct validity, test-retest reliability and factor analysis. RESULTS: The quality of data was good with no missing answers and a little floor effect. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a single-factor structure. Reliability expressed as intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.92) for the overall COMI score and was generally good for most of individual core items. The minimum detectable change (MDC95%) was 1.97. CONCLUSION: This version of the COMI-neck is a valid and reliable instrument, with good psychometric properties. It can be recommended for Polish-speaking patients.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Cervicalgia/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Medição da Dor/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polônia , Psicometria , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
17.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 24 Suppl 1: S269-73, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24496913

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The controversial practice of methylprednisolone (MP) application in acute spinal cord injury (ASCI) is gradually decreasing. This is a survey study designed to assess the current use of MP in ASCI in Poland. METHODS: The questionnaire comprised of five questions was distributed among 251 spinal surgeons, members of the Polish Society of Spinal Surgery. One hundred and ten (43.8 %) responded, and data from 108 were included in the study. RESULTS: Majority of respondents (73.1 %) declared the use of MP in ASCI. Most of them (41.7 %) adhered to the NASCIS II protocol, and 24.1 % rather used the NASCIS III protocol. Predominant rationale for the use of steroids was fear of litigation (36.7 %), 30.4 % declared it is as an institutional standard, nearly one-third believed in the effectiveness of drug in improving neurological outcomes. The subgroup analyses revealed no statistically significant interaction for specialty, age, personal involvement in care and institutional case volume. CONCLUSIONS: As opposed to the literature data from similar studies performed in other countries, the rate of use of MP in ASCI remains high.


Assuntos
Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/uso terapêutico , Neurocirurgia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ortopedia/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polônia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
World Neurosurg ; 184: e178-e184, 2024 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246529

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent data have identified that certain risk factors for rupture differ between small and larger intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Such differing risk factors make up 5 out of the 6 predictor variables used in the PHASES score, which raises the question on whether IA size has a significant effect on the score's performance. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with an IA incidentally or due to a subarachnoid hemorrhage between 2015 and 2023 were selected for potential inclusion. The median IA size of the cohort was chosen as the cutoff point to categorize small and large (6 mm). The PHASES score was calculated for all patients, and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the classification accuracy of PHASES in predicting rupture for small and large IAs. RESULTS: A total of 677 IAs were included. Among the IAs, 400 (58.9%) presented as UIAs and 279 (41.0%) as subarachnoid hemorrhage. The average PHASES score was 2.9 and 6.5 for small (n = 322) and large (n = 355) IAs, respectively. The PHASES score performed significantly lower for predicting rupture in smaller IAs (area under the curve: 0.634) compared with the larger (area under the curve: 0.741) (P = 0.00083). CONCLUSIONS: PHASES was shown to underperform on small IAs. The decision to treat small unruptured IAs remains highly controversial, and the development of a new score to estimate the annual rupture rate while accounting for IA morphology is of great need. Our findings can help encourage future researchers to develop such a score.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Roto , Aneurisma Intracraniano , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Intracraniano/cirurgia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/cirurgia , Aneurisma Roto/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco
19.
Eur Spine J ; 22(5): 995-1001, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23229802

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The core outcome measures index (COMI) is a short, multidimensional outcome scale validated for the use by patients with spinal disorders. It is a recommended instrument in the Spine Society of Europe Spine Tango Registry. The purpose of this study was to produce a cross-culturally adapted and validated Polish COMI. METHODS: The cross-cultural adaptation was carried out using the established guidelines. One-hundred and sixty-nine patients with chronic low back pain were enrolled, 89 took part in the reproducibility part of the study. Data quality, construct validity and reproducibility were assessed. RESULTS: The quality of data was very good with very few missing answers and modest floor effect. Reliability expressed as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.90 (95 % CI 0.85-0.93) for the overall COMI score and for most of the individual core items. The minimum detectable change (MDC95%) was 1.79. CONCLUSIONS: The Polish version of COMI showed a favorable reproducibility similar to that of previously tested language versions. The COMI scores correlated sufficiently with existing measures. This version of the COMI is a valuable instrument for the use by Polish-speaking patients with spinal disorders.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Polônia , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Traduções
20.
Adv Clin Exp Med ; 32(11): 1299-1309, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37093089

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has greatly affected the treatment of most medical conditions. In particular, the treatment of seriously ill patients had to be adjusted due to the limited availability of in-hospital procedures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of COVID-19-related changes on neuro-oncological surgeries in the Polish medical system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from the period of 2010-2020 were collected from National Health Insurance database for 2 diagnosis-related groups: A11 (complex intracranial procedures) and A12 (large intracranial procedures). The total number of procedures and diagnoses per year, trend changes and changes in procedures grouped by medical type were analyzed, including resections/biopsies, malignant/stable (nonmalignant) lesions, elective/acute procedures, and length of stay. RESULTS: Mean yearly numbers of 7177 (standard deviation (SD) = 760) procedures and 5934 (SD = 1185) diagnoses were recorded. Both numbers were growing up to 9.1% per year until 2018. From 2018, a 3.1% decrease in the number of procedures was observed, with a significantly larger decrease of 10.5% observed in 2020 (p < 0.001). The number of diagnoses decreased in 2019 by 2.7%, and by 9.2% in 2020 (p = 0.706), with a statistically significant change in the annual growth rate (p = 0.044). The number of resections decreased by 11.5% in 2020 (p = 0.204), with a significant change in the annual growth rate (p < 0.001). The number of biopsies decreased by 2.5% in 2020 (p = 0.018), with the annual decrement in 2019/2020 also being significant (p = 0.004). Decreases were observed in 2019 and 2020 for the number of malignant (0.5% and 6.3%, respectively) and nonmalignant (5.4% and 12.9%, respectively) tumors (p = 0.233 and p = 0.682 for absolute values, and p = 0.008 and p = 0.004 for the annual growth rates, respectively). The number of acute procedures in 2020 further decreased by 9.8% from 5.5% decrease in 2019 (p = 0.004), and the number of elective procedures decreased by 11.8% (p = 0.009). The annual growth rates for both acute and elective procedures were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in the number of neuro-oncological surgeries appeared to be much lower than the 20% decrease observed for general oncological surgeries in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic. This seems to have resulted from postponing the treatment of less critical cases (i.e., nonmalignant and elective) and focusing on the treatment of the most precarious patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , COVID-19 , Humanos , Polônia/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA