Considering Lumpectomy Cavity PTV Expansions: Characterization of Intrafraction Lumpectomy Cavity Motion.

PURPOSE: Accelerated partial breast irradiation and lumpectomy cavity boost radiation therapy plans generally use volumetric expansions from the lumpectomy cavity clinical target volume to the planning target volume (PTV) of 1 to 1.5 cm, substantially increasing the volume of irradiated breast tissue. The purpose of this study was to quantify intrafraction lumpectomy cavity motion during external beam radiation therapy to inform the indicated clinical target volume to PTV expansion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-four patients were treated with a whole breast irradiation using traditional linear accelerator-based radiation therapy followed by lumpectomy cavity boost using magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation therapy on a prospective registry study. Two-dimensional cine-MR images through the center of the surgical cavity were acquired during each boost treatment to define the treatment position of the lumpectomy cavity. This was compared with the reference position to quantify intrafraction cavity motion. Free-breathing technique was used during treatment. Clinical outcomes including toxicity, cosmesis, and rates of local control were additionally analyzed. RESULTS: The mean maximum displacement per fraction in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction was 1.4 mm. Per frame, AP motion was <5 mm in 92% of frames. The mean maximum displacement per fraction in the superior-inferior (SI) direction was 1.2 mm. Per frame, SI motion was <5 mm in 94% of frames. Composite motion was <5 mm in 89% of frames. Three-year local control was 97%. Eight women (18%) developed acute G2 radiation dermatitis. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, cosmetic outcomes were excellent (22/44, 50%), good (19/44, 43%), and fair (2/44, 5%). CONCLUSIONS: In approximately 90% of analyzed frames, intrafraction displacement of the lumpectomy cavity was <5 mm, with even less motion expected with deep inspiratory breath hold. Our results suggest reduced PTV expansions of 5 mm would be sufficient to account for lumpectomy cavity position, which may accordingly reduce late toxicity and improve cosmetic outcomes.

Causes of Death Among Patients With Initially Inoperable Pancreas Cancer After Induction Chemotherapy and Ablative 5-fraction Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: Nearly all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) eventually die of progressive cancer after exhausting treatment options. Although distant metastases (DMs) are a common cause of death, autopsy studies have shown that locoregional progression may be directly responsible for up to one-third of PDAC-related deaths. Ablative stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (A-SMART) is a novel treatment strategy that appears to improve locoregional control compared with nonablative radiation therapy, potentially leading to improved overall survival. Methods and Materials: A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed of patients with nonmetastatic inoperable PDAC treated between 2018 to 2020 using the MRIdian Linac with induction chemotherapy, followed by 5-fraction A-SMART. We identified causes of death that occurred after A-SMART. Results: A total of 62 patients were evaluated, of whom 42 (67.7%) had died. The median follow-up time was 18.6 months from diagnosis and 11.0 months from A-SMART. Patients had locally advanced (72.6%), borderline resectable (22.6%), or resectable but medically inoperable PDAC (4.8%). All patients received induction chemotherapy, typically leucovorin calcium (folinic acid), fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin (69.4%) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (24.2%). The median prescribed dose was 50 Gy (range, 40-50), corresponding to a median biologically effective dose of 100 Gy10. Post-SMART therapy included surgery (22.6%), irreversible electroporation (9.7%), and/or chemotherapy (51.6%). Death was attributed to locoregional progression, DMs, cancer-related cachexia/malnutrition, surgery/irreversible electroporation complications, other reasons not due to cancer progression, or unknown causes in 7.1%, 45.2%, 11.9%, 9.5%, 11.9%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Intra-abdominal metastases of the liver and peritoneum were responsible for 84.2% of deaths from DMs. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first contemporary evaluation of causes of death in patients with PDAC receiving dose-escalated radiation therapy. We demonstrated that the predominant cause of PDAC-related death was from liver and peritoneal metastases; therefore novel treatment strategies are indicated to address occult micrometastatic disease at these sites.