Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 25(12): 2809-2813, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27576212

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Head computed tomography (CT) is critical for stroke code evaluations and often happens prior to completion of the neurological exam. Eye deviation on neuroimaging (DeyeCOM sign) has utility for predicting stroke diagnosis and correlates with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) gaze score. We further assessed the utility of the DeyeCOM sign, without complex caliper-based eye deviation calculations, but simply with a visual determination method. METHODS: Patients with initial head CT and final diagnosis from an institutional review board-approved consecutive prospective registry of stroke codes at the University of California, San Diego, were included. Five stroke specialists and 1 neuroradiologist reviewed each CT. DeyeCOM+ patients were compared to DeyeCOM- patients (baseline characteristics, diagnosis, and NIHSS gaze score). Kappa statistics compared stroke specialists to neuroradiologist reads, and visual determination to caliper measurement of DeyeCOM sign. RESULTS: Of 181 patients, 46 were DeyeCOM+. Ischemic stroke was more commonly diagnosed in DeyeCOM+ patients compared to other diagnoses (P = .039). DeyeCOM+ patients were more likely to have an NIHSS gaze score of 1 or higher (P = .006). The NIHSS score of DeyeCOM+ stroke versus DeyeCOM- stroke patients was 8.3 ± 6.0 versus 6.7 ± 8.0 (P = .065). Functional outcomes were similar (P = .59). Stroke specialists had excellent agreement with the neuroradiologist (Κ = .89). Visual inspection had excellent agreement with the caliper method (Κ = .88). CONCLUSIONS: Using a time-sensitive visual determination of gaze deviation on imaging was predictive of ischemic stroke diagnosis and presence of NIHSS gaze score, and was consistent with the more complex caliper method. This study furthers the clinical utility of the DeyeCOM sign for predicting ischemic strokes.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Movimentos Oculares , Olho/diagnóstico por imagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , California , Olho/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia
2.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 24(6): 1299-304, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25891758

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnosis in stroke is critical. Computed tomography is often performed initially, even before a neurologic examination. Gaze deviation has been correlated with stroke diagnosis in some cohorts. Conjugate gaze deviation on stroke code imaging, the "DeyeCOM sign," may have emergency stroke care implications. METHODS: We evaluated stroke code imaging from the University of California, San Diego database (2007-2013) for "DeyeCOM sign" diagnostic and predictive utility. Patients were grouped as DeyeCOM+ if conjugate gaze deviation was noted. The differences were assessed using the Fisher exact test for categorical and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. RESULTS: We evaluated 342 patients; 106 (31%) were DeyeCOM+. Mean age was 63. The most common diagnoses in the DeyeCOM+ group were ischemic stroke (50.94%), transient ischemic attack (8.49%), other (8.49%), somatization (6.6%), and hemorrhage (5.66%). The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was greater in stroke patients than that in nonstroke (8.2 versus 3.8; P < .0001), and in DeyeCOM+ compared with DeyeCOM- (6.8 versus 5.6; P = .03). DeyeCOM+ patients were more likely to have a +gaze score (26.4% versus 9.8%; P < .0001), and +gaze patients were more likely to have final stroke diagnosis (26.0% versus 3.6%; P < .0001). There was no overall difference between groups in final stroke diagnosis; however, patients with deviation of 15° or more were more likely to have final diagnosis stroke (63.9% versus 47.9%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: DeyeCOM+ patients scored higher and were more likely to have +gaze on the stroke scale, and deviation of 15° or more was correlated with final diagnosis stroke. In current environments, there is pressure to complete stroke evaluations rapidly. Reliable imaging information obtained early (such as gaze deviation on scan correlating with scale score and final stroke diagnosis) could augment decision making even with negative imaging.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Movimentos Oculares/fisiologia , Hemorragias Intracranianas/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Idoso , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragias Intracranianas/fisiopatologia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/diagnóstico por imagem , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Neurológico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Radiografia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA