Rasch Analysis of the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: A Validation Study.

The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) was developed in 1998 using the true score theory to measure students' deep approaches (DA) and surface approaches (SA) to learning. Using Rasch analyses, this study aimed to 1) validate the R-SPQ-2F's two-factor structure, and 2) explore whether the full scale (FS), after reverse scoring responses to SA items, could measure learning approach as a uni-dimensional construct. University students (N = 327) completed an online version of the R-SPQ-2F. The researchers validated the R-SPQ-2F by showing that items on the three rating scales (DA, SA, and FS) had acceptable fit; both DA and FS, but not SA, showed acceptable targeting function; and all three scales had acceptable reliabilities (0.74 - 0.79). The DA and SA scales, not the FS, satisfied the unidimensionality requirement, supporting the claim that student approaches to learning are represented by DA and SA as separate constructs.

A qualitative exploration of student perceptions of the impact of progress tests on learning and emotional wellbeing.

BACKGROUND: Progress testing was introduced to the MBChB programme at the University of Auckland in 2013. As there has been a focus in published literature on aspects relating to the format or function of progress tests, the purpose of this study was to explore a qualitative student perspective on the introduction of progress testing and its impact on approaches to learning and perceived stress. METHODS: This article presents the qualitative aspects of a longitudinal evaluation study. The qualitative data were derived from eight focus groups of Year 2-5 medical students in the University of Auckland medical programme. RESULTS: Two themes, 'Impact on Learning' and 'Emotional Wellbeing' and their subthemes offered insight into student perceptions and behaviour. Students described a variety of learning responses to progress testing that clustered around the employment of a range of learning strategies based on their experience of sitting progress tests and their individualised feedback. A range of emotional responses were also expressed, with some finding progress tests stressful, while others enjoyed not needing to intensively cram before the tests. CONCLUSIONS: Progress tests appear to influence the approach of students to their learning. They employ a mix of learning strategies, shaped by their performance, individualised feedback and the learning environment. While students expressed some stress and anxiety with respect to sitting progress tests, this form of testing was viewed by these students as no worse, and sometimes better than traditional assessments.

Student-led intervention to inNOvate hand hygiene practice in Auckland Region's medical students (the No HHARMS study).

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is important in reducing healthcare-associated infections. The World Health Organization has defined 'five moments' when hand hygiene compliance is required. During 2013, New Zealand national data showed poor compliance with these moments by medical students. AIM: To improve medical students' compliance with the five moments. METHODS: In this prospective student-led quality improvement initiative, student investigators developed, implemented and evaluated a multi-modal intervention comprising a three-month social media campaign, a competition and an entertaining educational video. Data on individual patient-medical student interactions were collected covertly by observers at baseline and at one week, six weeks and three months after initiation of the intervention. RESULTS: During the campaign, compliance improved in moment 2, but not significantly in moments 1, 3, 4 or 5. Statistical analysis of amalgamated data was limited by non-independent data points-a consideration apparently not always addressed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The initiative produced improvements in compliance by medical students with one hand hygiene moment. Statistical analysis of amalgamated data for all five moments should allow for the non-independence of each occasion in which clinicians interact with a patient. More work is needed to ensure excellent hand hygiene practices of future doctors.

Does Pukawakawa (the regional-rural programme at the University of Auckland) influence workforce choice?

AIMS: Relative shortages of rural doctors persist. In 2008 the University of Auckland medical programme introduced a Year 5 regional and rural immersion programme, Pukawakawa, based in Northland, New Zealand (NZ). This study evaluates the early workforce outcomes of graduates of this programme. METHODS: During 2013 we surveyed Auckland medical graduates who were in the 2008-2011 Pukawakawa cohorts. Questions were asked regarding recent and current place of work, future intentions for place of work, and career preference with reasons why. Qualitative analysis was undertaken to analyse free text responses about experiences of Pukawakawa on this choice. RESULTS: Of the 72 Pukawakawa participants, 45 completed the survey, for a response rate of 63%. In 2013, 62% were working in rural or regional areas, with 31% in the Northland DHB. The great majority intend to work rurally or regionally, with 35.6% intending to return to Northland DHB. Of the respondents, 68% listed general practice in their top three future career intentions. CONCLUSIONS: In the early postgraduate years, medical graduates who participated in Pukawakawa are very likely to be working in rural and regional areas. These graduates also show an intention to work in general practice and rural medicine.