Integral Health Status-Based Cluster Analysis in Moderate-Severe COPD Patients Identifies Three Clinical Phenotypes: Relevant for Treatment As Usual and Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: The purposes of the study are to identify clinical phenotypes that reflect the level of adaptation to the disease and to examine whether these clinical phenotypes respond differently to treatment as usual (TAU) and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), the latter with its strong emphasis on improving adaptation. METHODS: Clusters were identified by a cluster analysis using data on many subdomains of the four domains of health status (HS) (physiological functioning, functional impairment, symptoms and quality of life) in 160 outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving TAU. By discriminant analysis in the TAU sample, all 459 PR patients could be assigned to one of the identified clusters. The effect of TAU and PR on HS was examined with paired t tests. RESULTS: Three distinct phenotypes were identified in the TAU sample. Two types were labelled adapted: phenotype 1 (moderate COPD-low impact on HS, n = 53) and phenotype 3 (severe COPD-moderate impact on HS, n = 73). One type was labelled non-adapted: phenotype 2 (moderate COPD-high impact on HS, n = 34). After 1-year TAU, the integral health status of all patients did not improve in any subdomain. In contrast, at the end of PR, significant improvements in HS were found in all three phenotypes especially the non-adapted. CONCLUSIONS: Different phenotypes exist in COPD that are based on behavioural aspects (i.e. the level of adaptation to the disease). Non-adapted patient responds better to treatments with a strong emphasis on improving adaptation by learning the patient better self-management skills. Knowing to which clinical phenotype a patient belongs helps to optimize patient-tailored treatment.

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for lung cancer patients and their partners: Results of a mixed methods pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer patients and partners show high rates of impaired quality of life and heightened distress levels. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction has proven to be effective in reducing psychological distress in cancer patients. However, studies barely included lung cancer patients. AIM: We examined whether Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction might be a feasible and effective intervention for patients with lung cancer and partners. DESIGN: Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction is a training in which mindfulness practices are combined with psycho-education to help participants cope with distress. In this mixed methods pilot study, questionnaires on psychological distress and quality of life were administered before, directly after and 3 months after the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction training, in combination with semi-structured interviews. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Patients with lung cancer and partners were recruited at one tertiary care academic medical centre. A total of 19 lung cancer patients and 16 partners participated in the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction training. RESULTS: Most patients were diagnosed with advanced stage lung cancer. Vast majority completed the training. Those receiving anti-cancer treatment did not miss more sessions than patients who were not currently treated. Patients and partners felt positive about participating in a peer group and with their partner. Among participants no significant changes were found in psychological distress. Caregiver burden in partners decreased significantly after following Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction. The qualitative analysis showed that the training seemed to instigate a process of change in participants. CONCLUSION: The Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction training seemed to be feasible for patients with lung cancer and their partners. A randomized controlled trial is needed to examine the effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in reducing psychological distress in lung cancer patients and partners.

Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction with treatment as usual in reducing psychological distress in patients with lung cancer and their partners: the MILON study.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide and characterized by a poor prognosis. It has a major impact on the psychological wellbeing of patients and their partners. Recently, it has been shown that Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is effective in reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms in cancer patients. The generalization of these results is limited since most participants were female patients with breast cancer. Moreover, only one study examined the effectiveness of MBSR in partners of cancer patients. Therefore, in the present trial we study the effectiveness of MBSR versus treatment as usual (TAU) in patients with lung cancer and their partners. METHODS/DESIGN: A parallel group, randomized controlled trial is conducted to compare MBSR with TAU. Lung cancer patients who have received or are still under treatment, and their partners are recruited. Assessments will take place at baseline, post intervention and at three-month follow-up. The primary outcome is psychological distress (i.e. anxiety and depressive symptoms). Secondary outcomes are quality of life (only for patients), caregiver appraisal (only for partners), relationship quality and spirituality. In addition, cost-effectiveness ratio (only in patients) and several process variables are assessed. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide information about the clinical and cost-effectiveness of MBSR compared to TAU in patients with lung cancer and their partners.

Assessing the stages of the grieving process in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): validation of the Acceptance of Disease and Impairments Questionnaire (ADIQ).

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) encounter many (gradual) losses due to their disease, which trigger a grieving process. This process is characterized by stages of denial, resistance, sorrow, and acceptance. PURPOSE: This study examined whether these stages are conceptually distinct and whether the Acceptance of Disease and Impairments Questionnaire (ADIQ) can validly and reliably measure these stages in three samples of patients with COPD in the Netherlands. METHODS: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on 145 outpatients with moderate to severe COPD. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed on 303 outpatients with mild to very severe COPD and 127 patients entering an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program. Furthermore, internal reliability, construct validity, sensitivity to change, and floor and ceiling effects were examined. RESULTS: EFA yielded a four-factor solution that explained 73.2 % of variance. Confirmatory factor analyses showed a good fit of the four-factor structure in all study samples. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients were .79 or higher. Subscales showed to be sensitive to change. CONCLUSIONS: Four distinct stages of grief are recognized in COPD. The ADIQ is a valid and reliable instrument to measure these stages: denial, resistance, sorrow, and acceptance. Measuring the stages of grieving is important for disease management: addressing patients with a specific therapeutic approach for the stage they are in could help to motivate patients to engage in self-management and change their lifestyle.

Decline of health status sub-domains by exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective survey.

BACKGROUND: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are held responsible for a decline in health status (HS). This may not apply equally to all exacerbations, because different definitions are required for quite different illnesses. Selection of definitions and the sensitivity of the HS instrument may affect results regarding the impact of exacerbations. Sensitivity of a new HS instrument, which covers different and more aspects, has not yet been tested, with respect to exacerbations. OBJECTIVES: Confirmation of the negative HS effect of exacerbations by using a highly differentiated instrument, and to evaluate which aspects of HS are affected most. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-eight ambulatory patients with COPD were evaluated prospectively with regard to a wide range of HS aspects, at the beginning and end of a 1-year follow-up. Recording of symptom changes and treatment on monthly diary cards resulted in the identification of event-based exacerbations. HS was assessed via a newly validated instrument integrating both physiological and non-physiological sub-domains. Parametric correlations were calculated between exacerbation frequency and HS scores at the end of the study. Partial corre-lations were then explored using HS scores at baseline to correct for prior HS levels. RESULTS: Correlations between -exacerbation frequency and HS sub-domains were found to be frequent, predominantly in non-physiological sub--domains. After correction for hs scores at baseline, only 2 sub-domains (belonging to the main domain 'complaints') remained significantly but weakly correlated. CONCLUSION: Exacerbation frequency and HS show weak correlations after a year, but most of these disappear after correction for prior HS levels. In such exacerbations, aggravated HS probably takes much longer to manifest itself.

Validity of an automated telephonic system to assess COPD exacerbation rates.

Current tools for recording chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are limited and often lack validity testing. We assessed the validity of an automated telephonic exacerbation assessment system (TEXAS) and compared its outcomes with existing tools. Over 12 months, 86 COPD patients (22.1% females; mean age 66.5 yrs; mean post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s 53.4% predicted) were called once every 2 weeks by TEXAS to record changes in respiratory symptoms, unscheduled healthcare utilisation and use of respiratory medication. The responses to TEXAS were validated against exacerbation-related information collected by observations made by trained research assistants during home visits. No care assistance was provided in any way. Diagnostic test characteristics were estimated using commonly used definitions of exacerbation. Detection rates, compliance and patient preference were assessed, and compared with paper diary cards and medical record review. A total of 1,824 successful calls were recorded, of which 292 were verified by home visits (median four calls per patient, interquartile range three to five calls per patient). Independent of the exacerbation definition used, validity was high, with sensitivities and specificities between 66% and 98%. Detection rates and compliance differed extensively between the different tools, but were highest with TEXAS. Patient preference did not differ. TEXAS is a valid tool to assess COPD exacerbation rates in prospective clinical studies. Using different tools to record exacerbations strongly affects exacerbation occurrence rates.

Inaccuracy of estimating peak work rate from six-minute walk distance in patients with COPD.

INTRODUCTION: The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) are used to prescribe the appropriate training load for cycling and walking exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The primary aims were: (i) to compare estimated peak work rate (Wpeak(estimated)) derived from six existing Wpeak regression equations with actual peak work rate (Wpeak(actual)); and (ii) to derive a new Wpeak regression equation using six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and conventional outcome measures in COPD patients. METHODS: In 2906 patients with COPD, existing Wpeak regression equations were used to estimate Wpeak using 6MWD and a new equation was derived after a stepwise multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The 6 existing Wpeak regression equations were inaccurate to predict Wpeak(actual) in 82% of the COPD patients. The new Wpeak regression equation differed less between Wpeak(estimated) and Wpeak(actual) compared to existing models. Still, in 74% of COPD patients Wpeak(estimated) and Wpeak(actual) differed more than (±) 5 watts. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, estimating peak work load from 6MWD in COPD is inaccurate. We recommend assessment of Wpeak using CPET during pre-rehabilitation assessment in addition to 6MWT.

Health status in COPD cannot be measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire alone: an evaluation of the underlying concepts of this questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Improving patients' health status is one of the major goals in COPD treatment. Questionnaires could facilitate the guidance of patient-tailored disease management by exploring which aspects of health status are problematic, and which aspects are not. Health status consists of four main domains (physiological functioning, symptoms, functional impairment, and quality of life), and at least sixteen sub-domains. A prerequisite for patient-tailored treatment is a detailed assessment of all these sub-domains. Most questionnaires developed to measure health status consist of one or a few subscales and measure merely some aspects of health status. The question then rises which aspects of health status are measured by these instruments, and which aspects are not covered. As it is one of the most frequently used questionnaires in COPD, we evaluated which aspects of health status are measured and which aspects are not measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). METHODS: One hundred and forty-six outpatients with COPD participated. Correlations were calculated between the three sections of the SGRQ and ten sub-domains of the Nijmegen Integral Assessment Framework, covering Symptoms, Functional Impairment, and Quality of Life. As the SGRQ was not expected to measure physiological functioning, we did not include this main domain in the statistical analyses. Pearson's r > or = 0.70 was used as criterion for conceptual similarity. RESULTS: The SGRQ sections Symptoms and Total showed conceptual similarity with the sub-domain Subjective Symptoms (main domain Symptoms). The sections Activity, Impacts and Total were conceptual similar to Subjective Impairment (main domain Functional Impairment). The SGRQ sections were not conceptual similar to other sub-domains of Symptoms, Functional Impairment, nor to any sub-domain of Quality of Life. CONCLUSIONS: The SGRQ could facilitate the guidance of disease management in COPD only partially. The SGRQ is appropriately only for measuring problems in the sub-domains Subjective Symptoms and Subjective Impairment, and not for measuring problems in other sub-domains of health status, such as Quality of Life.

Development of a battery of instruments for detailed measurement of health status in patients with COPD in routine care: the Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument.

PURPOSE: To compose a battery of instruments that provides a detailed assessment of health status (HS) in COPD but that is applicable and clinically meaningful in routine care. METHODS: In a previous study, we developed the Nijmegen Integral Assessment Framework (NIAF) that organizes existing tests and instruments by the sub-domains of HS they measure. Based on clinical and statistical criteria (correlation coefficients and Cronbach alpha's) we selected for each sub-domain instruments from the NIAF. A COPD-study group was used to determine c-scores, and two control groups were used to determine the score ranges indicating normal functioning versus clinically relevant problems for each sub-domain. Existing questionnaire completion software (TestOrganiser) was adapted to enhance clinical applicability. RESULTS: The NCSI measures eleven sub-domains of physiological functioning, symptoms, functional impairment, and quality of life. The TestOrganiser automatically processes the data and produces the graphical PatientProfileChart, which helps to easily interpret results. This envisages the problem areas and discrepancies between the different sub-domains. CONCLUSION: The NCSI provides a valid and detailed picture of a patient's HS within 15-25 min. In combination with the PatientProfileChart, the NCSI can be used perfectly in routine care as screening instrument and as a guide in patient-tailored treatment.

Do family physicians' records fit guideline diagnosed COPD?

BACKGROUND: In family practice, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is usually not diagnosed until clinically apparent and of moderately advanced severity. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the diagnostic process from early development onwards and to assess the current state of underpresentation and underdiagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care in the Netherlands. METHODS: The population-based study sample consisted of formerly undiagnosed subjects (n = 532) from family practice. Family physicians' (FPs) chronic respiratory disease diagnoses (as recorded over 10 years in their patient records) were compared to a cross-sectional but extensive diagnostic assessment by a chest physician. Logistic regression modelling was used for a retrospective analysis on the relation between respiratory symptoms, practice visit rate and FPs' diagnosis of COPD. RESULTS: After 10 years, the chest physician diagnosed 26% of subjects as COPD and 16% as (late-onset) asthma. Underpresentation of these patients in family practice was 46%, whereas underdiagnosis occurred in 37% of patients. A chest physician diagnosis of COPD was associated with the presence of chronic cough [odds ratio (OR) = 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-4.6], a FP diagnosis of COPD with chronic phlegm (OR = 10.6, 95% CI 1.3-83.6). Repeated practice visits (OR = 1.8) and presence of wheeze and breathlessness (OR = 5.5) appeared to trigger the diagnostic process in family practice. CONCLUSIONS: There is still considerable underpresentation and underdiagnosis of COPD in family practice. As FPs focus on presented symptoms and as detection increases with the frequency of practice visits, diagnostic guidelines should stress the importance of persistent cough and phlegm to support timely diagnosis of COPD in family practice.

An Integral assessment framework of health status in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

BACKGROUND: To date, many health status instruments exist, but the validity of these instruments is questionable. This is caused by the fact that health status is poorly defined. PURPOSE: To develop a validated framework that improves conceptual insight into health status and its domains. METHODS: Based on theoretical and clinical considerations, we defined the domains of health status into concrete sub-domains by formulating conceptual models. Guided by these conceptual models, for each sub-domain, existing instruments were selected. We validated the conceptual models in the data of 168 COPD patients. Using factor analysis, underlying concepts in the data were identified. RESULTS: The resulting framework included physiological functioning, complaints, functional impairment, and quality of life. These main domains were shown to be subdivided into 15 sub-domains. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that health status consists of conceptually distinct sub-domains. Integral assessment of health status thus entails measuring all sub-domains. Existing instruments measure only few sub-domains. Integral assessment of health status thus requires the combination of different instruments. The present framework of health status can help in composing such a battery of instruments. Patient profiles obtained by the framework are essential in individualizing treatment.

Are Mindfulness and Self-Compassion Related to Psychological Distress and Communication in Couples Facing Lung Cancer? A Dyadic Approach.

Lung cancer patients and their spouses report high rates of distress. Due to the increasing popularity of and evidence for mindfulness-based interventions in cancer, mindfulness and self-compassion have been identified as potentially helpful skills when coping with cancer. This dyadic study examined how mindfulness and self-compassion are related to psychological distress and communication about cancer in couples facing lung cancer. Using the actor-partner interdependence model, self-reported mindfulness, self-compassion, psychological distress and communication about cancer were analyzed in a cross-sectional sample of 88 couples facing lung cancer. Regarding psychological distress, no difference was found between patients and spouses. In both partners, own levels of mindfulness (B = -0.19, p = .002) and self-compassion (B = -0.45, p < .001) were negatively related to own distress levels. At a dyadic level, own self-compassion was less strongly associated with distress if the partner reported high self-compassion (B = 0.03, p = .049). Regarding communication about cancer, patients reported to communicate more openly with their partner than with spouses. However, after controlling for gender, this difference was no longer significant. In both partners, own self-compassion (B = 0.03, p = .010) was significantly associated with own communication while mindfulness was not. A trend showed that mindfulness of the partner was related to more open communication in the individual (B = 0.01, p = .080). These findings give a first indication that mindfulness and self-compassion skills may go beyond the individual and could impact couple functioning. Future research should examine whether couples facing (lung) cancer may benefit from programs in which mindfulness and self-compassion are cultivated.

The suitability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and other instruments to screen for psychiatric disorders in both lung cancer patients and their partners.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer patients and their partners report high rates of distress. Although distress is of importance, psychiatric disorders might be more important in terms of prognostic value and additional psychological treatment. This study examined the suitability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Distress Thermometer (DT), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and State subscale of State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) to screen for psychiatric disorders in lung cancer patients and partners. METHODS: A consecutive sample of lung cancer patients and partners completed the screening instruments. The Structured Clinical Interview DSM-IV (SCID-I) was used to diagnose psychiatric axis I disorders. RESULTS: In 144 patients, overall ability of HADS total score (HADS-T) screening for patients with psychiatric disorders was good, whereas DT appeared less suitable. In 98 partners, the performance of HADS-T was good. Although no instrument was successful in identifying psychiatric disorders, HADS-T came closest with a fair performance in patients and partners. LIMITATIONS: Several patients and partners declined participation because they perceived participation as too distressing. As decliners possibly have the highest rates of disorders, our findings might underestimate the prevalence of psychiatric disorders. A low prevalence negatively affects the positive predictive value and complicates efficient screening for psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSION: The HADS-T appears to be a suitable screening instrument for ruling out those lung cancer patients and partners without a psychiatric disorder. Regarding identifying those with a psychiatric disorder, HADS-T should be used to refer both patients and partners for further diagnostics and treatment to a psychiatrist/psychologist.

Bronchial challenge, assessed with forced expiratory manoeuvres and airway impedance.

OBJECTIVE: The Methacholine concentration at which a 20% decrease of the forced expiratory volume in 1s (PC20_FEV1) or a 40% increase in airway resistance (PC40_Rrs6) occur are accepted indicators for airway hyperresponsiveness. We hypothesised that the level of detection of bronchial hyperresponsiveness will differ between the two methods. METHODS: The response to Methacholine was assessed by forced oscillation technique (FOT) and spirometry in 20 stable hyperresponsive asthmatics. The effects of repeated lung function measurements on respiratory muscle fatigue were measured from maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP). After each dose, patients scored their perception of dyspnoea on a BORG scale. Differences in patient's burden were measured by comparing the BORG-score at PC40_Rrs6 (BORG-PC40_Rrs6) and at PC20_FEV1 (BORG-PC20_FEV1). Reproducibility was also evaluated. RESULTS: The PC20_FEV1-values were 2.2 (0.4) doubling dose higher as compared to the PC40_Rrs6 (P<0.001). The mean BORG-score at PC40_Rrs6 was 1.7 points lower as compared to the BORG-score at PC20_FEV1 (P<0.001). The difference (mean(sd)) between the PC20_FEV1 of measurement 1 and 2 was -0.1 (1.4) doubling dose, and -0.3 (2.7) doubling dose for PC40_Rrs6. The MIP after Methacholine provocation was 1.0(0.2) kPa lower as compared to the MIP before the challenge test (P<0.001), suggesting respiratory muscle fatigue. CONCLUSION: Measuring PC40_Rrs6 shortens the challenge test and lowers the concentrations of bronchoconstrictor agents as compared to measurements of PC20_FEV1. The FOT-method was less strenuous for patients. In spite of the fact that the reproducibility is two-fold worse than measuring PC20_FEV1, it still remains quite acceptable at a mean of 0.3 doubling dose. The respiratory muscle strength was deteriorated after the challenge test.

The course of inhalation profiles during an exacerbation of obstructive lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with increased airflow Limitation, hyperinflation and respiratory muscle fatigue. It is unclear, whether patients are able to perform adequate inhalations through various inhalation devices with different orfices during an exacerbation. The aim of this study was to examine the evolution of inhalation profiles of patients inhaling through Diskus, Turbuhaler, pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and Volumatic and consequently the appropriateness of using the various devices during an exacerbation. MEASUREMENTS: 15 hospitalized patients participated in this randomized comparison of inhalation profiles through the four placebo-devices. For each device, triplicate inhalation profiles were recorded during day 1-9 of admission and in stable phase (day 50). RESULTS: The mean percentage of patients performing optimum inhalation profiles was 100% for Diskus, 60% for Turbuhaler, 14% for pMDI and 87% for Volumatic over the interval of day 1-9 and day 50. Patients with an inspiratory muscle strength (MIP) of less than 6kPa were generally unable to generate the optimum flow through the Turbuhaler (>60 l/min). CONCLUSION: The Diskus and Volumatic can be used effectively in the acute phase of an exacerbation of asthma or COPD. The Turbuhaler could be optimally used after the fifth day of convalescence. The pMDI is rather unsuitable during an exacerbation.

In Check Dial: accuracy for Diskus and Turbuhaler.

OBJECTIVE: The In Check Dial was developed to evaluate whether a patient is able to generate an adequate peak inspiratory flow (PIF) through a certain inhalation device. The inhalation profile recorder (IPR) is a calibrated instrument that measures flows through Diskus and Turbuhaler in our research setting. The aim of this study was to compare the PIFs of patients when inhaling through a Diskus or Turbuhaler connected with the IPR (PIF_diskus and PIF_TH) to the flows through the corresponding orifices of the In Check Dial (Diskus_In Check and TH_In Check). METHODS: Twenty-four stable asthma and twenty-one chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients inhaled, on two separate occasions, in randomised order, via the Diskus or Turbuhaler connected with the IPR. Subsequently, patients inhaled through the In Check Dial using the orifices of Diskus or Turbuhaler. RESULTS: The difference between Diskus_In Check and PIF_diskus was 3.9 (11.9)l/min (P=0.038). The difference between TH_In Check and PIF_TH was 3.5 (10.6) l/min (NS). All Diskus- and Turbuhaler-inhalations were performed with the minimum required flow of 30 l/min. However, four COPD patients inhaled with the non-optimal flow (<60 l/min) through the Turbuhaler. The In Check Dial did not indicate two of them. CONCLUSION: Measuring PIF through Diskus and Turbuhaler using the IPR and the In Check Dial, respectively shows a disagreement of 3.9l/min. A disagreement of 3.5l/min was found for the Turbuhaler. The In Check Dial did not identify two of four patients as 'non-optimal' users.

Inhalation profiles in asthmatics and COPD patients: reproducibility and effect of instruction.

Turbuhaler and Salbutamol-Diskus produce therapeutic doses at peak inspiratory flow (PIF) of >30 L/min. However, the optimum flow for Fluticasone-Diskus and Turbuhaler, in terms of total emitted dose and fine particle mass, is >60 L/min. The Turbuhaler achieved a higher output at this flow, as compared to Diskus. For pMDI 25 < PIF < 90 L/min, an actuation time of 0.0-0.2 sec is optimal. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of optimum inhalation profiles, the effect of instruction, reproducibility, and the relationship between inhalation profiles and patient characteristics in stable asthmatics and mild/moderate/severe COPD patients. For each device, triplicate inhalation profiles were recorded during 6 sessions in a 10-week period. All patients achieved PIF > 30 L/min using Diskus. After instruction, all Diskus inhalations were performed with >60 L/min, except 7% of the inhalations of the severe COPD patients. At least 95% of the Turbuhaler inhalations was also performed with the minimum flow; however, 19% of the inhalations of the severe COPD patients were not optimally performed. The hand-lung coordination was inadequate in 40% of pMDI inhalation profiles, and 80% was performed with a too high flow. The reproducibility of PIF of both dry powder inhalers (DPIs) was very high (coefficient of variation = 4-10%). The reproducibility of the pMDI variables was lower (coefficient of variation = 9-18%). The major lung function variables predictive for PIF(diskus) and PIF(turbuhaler) were maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP), PIF, and inspiratory capacity. No significant predictive lung function variables for PIF(pMDI) were found. Most patients performed reproducible optimum inhalation profiles through Diskus and Turbuhaler. However, in the severe COPD group, 7-19% of the patients were not able to generate the optimum flows through the DPIs. For these patients, a flow-independent aerosol delivery system might be more suitable. The majority of patients were using the pMDI incorrectly. Instruction had no effect. So, we concluded that the pMDI should not be used in these patient groups because of the coordination problems.

Associations of muscle depletion with health status. Another gender difference in COPD?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Muscle mass depletion occurring in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease still leaves questions regarding its relation with health status. How health status should be conceived and assessed is a significant obstacle in answering these questions. This study tries to appoint which domains of health status are challenged by muscle depletion and evaluates evidence of gender difference. METHODS: 135 Patients enrolled in a cohort study with initial assessment of health status by the Nijmegen Integral Assessment Framework. In here 4 main domains and 16 sub-domains are recognized. These sub-domains were correlated with fat free mass index using baseline data. Associations of fat free mass and diffusion parameters with sex were elaborated. RESULTS: Muscle depletion occurred predominantly in those with low body mass index, and did not correlate with sub-domains of 3 main domains: Complaints, Functional Impairment and Quality of Life. In Physiological Functioning Hyperinflation correlated weakly. Diffusion capacity significantly correlated with fat free mass index in separate analyses of pulmonary function data. Interestingly, diffusion capacity was significantly lower in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle depletion hardly affects health status in COPD. Physiological correlations, however, do exist, pointing to severe disease, especially emphysema, and female sex as important concomitant factors.

Course of normal and abnormal fatigue in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and its relationship with domains of health status.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the difference between patients with normal and patients with abnormal fatigue on aspects of health status, and investigate the natural course of fatigue in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). METHODS: Fatigue, physiological functioning, functional impairment, symptoms, and Quality of Life (QoL) were measured in 168 patients with COPD, and longitudinal data on fatigue of 77 patients were collected. RESULTS: Fifty percent of patients had abnormal fatigue. Patients with abnormal fatigue reported significantly more problems on the sub-domains of functional impairment (except actual physical activity), symptoms, and QoL as compared to patients with normal fatigue. With respect to physiological functioning patients with normal fatigue scores had better exercise capacity. Four years later the percentage of patients with abnormal fatigue was increased to 64%. In 1/3 of the patients an increase of more than the minimal clinically important difference was found. CONCLUSION: Many COPD patients suffer from abnormal fatigue. Patients with abnormal fatigue have more limitations on many aspects of health status, especially on symptoms, functional impairment, and QoL. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Fatigue should be evaluated in usual care with a questionnaire that corrects for normal fatigue in order to tailor treatment to patients' need.