Luspatercept in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a paradigm shift in treatment strategies.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), anemia is prevalent affecting 80%-85% of low-risk (LR-MDS) patients, with 40% eventually requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Except forlenalidomide, exclusively approved for those with deletion of chromosome 5q,erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the primary treatment choice for low-risk patients. Those unresponsive to ESAs face limited alternatives, eventually necessitating long-term RBC transfusions, leading to secondary iron overload and adversely affecting quality of life (QoL). AREA COVERED: Luspatercept is a pioneering erythroid maturation agent. It received approval by both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating adults experiencing transfusion-dependent anemia associated with LR-MDS or ß-thalassemia. Recently, the FDA approved luspatercept as first- line therapy in patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS who require RBC transfusions and have not previously received ESAs. This review summarizes the historical impact of luspatercept intreating LR-MDS unresponsive to ESAs and illustrates its potential benefit asfrontline therapy in MDS and its employment in patients with myelofibrosis-induced anemia. EXPERT OPINION: Luspatercept has revolutionized the therapeutic paradigm of LR-MDS, for which there was a limited therapeutic arsenal, especially in the setting of patients who did not respond or fail after ESA treatment.

The impact of different FLT3-inhibitors on overall survival of de novo acute myeloid leukemia: A network meta-analysis.

FLT3 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy are the standard of care for newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, no head-to-head studies have established the superiority of one FLT3 inhibitor over another. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate overall survival (OS) among different FLT3 inhibitors. Three relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 1.358 patients treated with midostaurin, quizartinib, and sorafenib, were included in our analysis. The hazard ratios (HRs) revealed no significant differences in OS between midostaurin and quizartinib (HR, 1.00; 95 % CI, 0.73-1.36), midostaurin and sorafenib (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.52-1.84), or quizartinib and sorafenib (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.51-1.85). This NMA, the first to explore this issue, found no OS differences among the different FLT3 inhibitors. In the absence of direct comparison trials, our findings provide practical insights for clinical decision-making.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: State of the Art and Recent Advances.

Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-T-cell therapy represents the most important innovation in onco-hematology in recent years. The progress achieved in the management of complications and the latest generations of CAR-T-cells have made it possible to anticipate in second-line the indication of this type of treatment in large B-cell lymphoma. While some types of B-cell lymphomas and B-cell acute lymphoid leukemia have shown extremely promising results, the same cannot be said for myeloid leukemias-in particular, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which would require innovative therapies more than any other blood disease. The heterogeneities of AML cells and the immunological complexity of the interactions between the bone marrow microenvironment and leukemia cells have been found to be major obstacles to the clinical development of CAR-T in AML. In this review, we report on the main results obtained in AML clinical trials, the preclinical studies testing potential CAR-T constructs, and future perspectives.

Venetoclax: A Game Changer in the Treatment of Younger AML Patients?

The combination approach based on venetoclax (VEN) with azacytidine (AZA) has significantly improved outcomes for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This innovative approach has led to higher rates of overall response, measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remissions, and overall survival compared with AZA monotherapy. As a result, this combination has emerged as the gold-standard treatment for elderly or unfit patients with AML who are not eligible for intensive therapy. In younger, fit patients with AML, intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy is commonly used as a first-line approach; however, relapse continues to be the main reason for treatment failure in approximately 30-40% of patients. Efforts to improve MRD-negative response rates and to facilitate the transition to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, particularly in high-risk AML, have inspired trials exploring the combination of intensive chemotherapy with targeted agents. VEN, a first-in-class anti-BCL2 agent, combined with intensive chemotherapy regimens has shown deep MRD-negative remissions, producing prolonged event-free survival and enhancing the transition to allogeneic transplant in first-complete-remission patients. These benefits support the incremental advantages of adding VEN to intensive chemotherapy approaches across ELN risk subcategories, and provides a robust benchmark to design future trials. In this review, we will discuss current studies assessing the efficacy of frontline regimens integrating VEN into intensive chemotherapy in younger patients with AML and specific molecularly defined subgroups.