Simplifying the ISCHEMIA trial algorithm for clinical practice: Identifying left main coronary artery disease using coronary artery calcium scans.

BACKGROUND: Several recent trials have evaluated invasive versus medical therapy for stable ischemic heart disease. Importantly, patients with significant left main coronary stenosis (LMCS) were excluded from these trials. In the ISCHEMIA trial, these patients were identified by a coronary CT angiogram (CCTA), which adds time, expense, and contrast exposure. We tested whether a coronary artery calcium scan (CACS), a simpler, less expensive test, could replace CCTA to exclude significant LMCS. METHODS: We hypothesized that patients with ≥50% LMCS would have a LM CACS score > 0. As a corollary, we postulated that a LM CACS = 0 would exclude patients with LMCS. To test this, we searched Intermountain Healthcare's electronic medical records database for all adult patients who had undergone non-contrast cardiac CT for quantitative CACS scoring prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Patients aged <50 and those with a heart transplant were excluded. Cases with incomplete (qualitative) angiographic reports for LMCS and those with incomplete or discrepant LM CACS results were reviewed and reassessed blinded to CACS or ICA findings, respectively. RESULTS: Among 669 candidate patients with CACS followed by ICA, 36 qualifying patients were identified who had a quantitative CACS score and LMCS ≥ 50%. Their age averaged 71.8 years, and 81% were men. Angiographic LMCS averaged 72% (range 50%-99%). Median time between CACS and ICA was 6 days. Total CACS score averaged 2,383 Agatston Units (AU), range 571-6,636. LM CACS score averaged 197 AU, range 31-610. Importantly, no LMCS patient had a LM CACS score of 0 vs 57% (362/633) of non-LMCS controls (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that an easily administered, inexpensive, low radiation CACS can identify a large subset of patients with a very low risk of LMCS who would not have the need for routine CCTA. Using CACS to exclude LMCS may efficiently allow for safe implementation of an initial medical therapy strategy of patients with stable ischemic heart disease in clinical practice. These promising results deserve validation in larger data sets.

Loss of Pulsatility: Another Cause of Syncope in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

We report a case of a 55-year-old man who presented with recurrent syncope 15 months after HeartWare left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and was found to have diminished LVAD flow and pulsatility on tilt table testing leading to severe orthostatic hypotension (OH). The prevalence of OH is common, but autonomic dysfunction leading to OH has not been well described in patients with chronic LVAD support. The diagnosis of OH in this setting is challenging due to the decreased pulsatility in the flow generated by LVADs, and tilt table testing can be useful in the evaluation of OH in these patients.

Utility of Oncotype DX Risk Assessment in Patients With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Oncotype DX (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA) uses reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis to measure tumor gene expression for determining recurrence risk (RR) and guiding chemotherapy decisions for breast cancer patients. Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a histologic subtype that has not been the focus of prior studies validating Oncotype DX. The study purpose was to develop a model using histologic tumor characteristics to predict uniformly low Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores (RS) in ILC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ILC cases in our pathology database with Oncotype DX testing were identified. Histologic tumor characteristics, immunohistochemical (IHC) of estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PgR) percent, HER2, E-cadherin expression, and Ki-67 levels were obtained for cases. Discriminant analysis was used to test the hypothesis that tumors classified as lower/higher risk based on Oncotype DX RS would differ significantly on a linear combination of variables. RESULTS: From 2006 - 2014, 158 cases of ILC having Oncotype DX testing were identified; 90 low risk (RS < 18), 66 intermediate risk (RS 18 - 30) and 2 high risk (RS > 30). Discriminant analysis showed that PgR% followed by Ki-67 provided the greatest contribution to discern low versus elevated RS. A subset of 57 cases (∼36%) with predicted probabilities > 86% for either low or high RS yielded 96.5% correct classification, 92.3% sensitivity, and 97.7% specificity. CONCLUSION: Our analytical model may be useful in predicting lower RR in patients with ILC. If validated, this provides a faster and less expensive alternative to Oncotype DX testing in certain patients with ILC.