Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transplant ; 29(12): 1128-32, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26493022

RESUMO

After a hospital-wide formulary change resulted in the replacement of filgrastim with TBO-filgrastim for all on- and off-label indications, we performed a retrospective comparison of patients with myeloma receiving 200 mg/m(2) melphalan with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to see whether the type of growth factor used post-transplant made a difference. One hundred and eighty-two consecutive patients with myeloma were studied, 91 receiving filgrastim immediately prior to the change and 91 receiving TBO-filgrastim afterward. The CD34(+) cell dose was comparable, as were other characteristics. Although the overall time to neutrophil recovery was similar for both groups, early engraftment (≤ 12 d) occurred more often (p = 0.05), and late engraftment (≥ 14 d) less often (p = 0.09) in filgrastim-treated patients. The number of documented infections was significantly less in the TBO-filgrastim group. Day 100 mortality and hospital stay were similar for the two groups. These data indicate that there is no material difference between filgrastim and TBO-filgrastim in this clinical setting.


Assuntos
Filgrastim/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Hematológicos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Neutropenia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Neutropenia/etiologia , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA