Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Br J Cancer ; 123(4): 518-524, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32507854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chemo-embolisation with drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) increased survival as compared with intravenous irinotecan in chemorefractory patients with liver-dominant metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC). First-line DEBIRI with systemic chemotherapy may increase survival and secondary resection. METHODS: In the FFCD-1201 single-arm Phase 2 study, patients with untreated, non-resectable LMCRC received DEBIRI plus mFOLFOX6. Four courses of DEBIRI were performed alternating right and left lobe or two sessions with both lobes treated during the same session. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Grade 3-5 toxicities were more frequent when both lobes were treated during the same session (90.5% versus 52.8%). Nine-month PFS rate was 53.6% (95% CI, 41.8-65.1%). The objective response rate (RECIST 1.1) was 73.2%, and the secondary R0 surgery was 33%. With a median follow-up of 38.3 months, median OS was 37.4 months (95% CI, 25.7-45.8), and median PFS 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.2-12.3). CONCLUSIONS: Front-line DEBIRI + mFOLFOX6 should not be recommended as the hypothesised 9-month PFS was not met. However, high response rate, deep responses, and prolonged OS encourage further evaluation in strategies integrating biologic agent, in particular in patients with secondary surgery as the main goal. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01839877.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Irinotecano/efeitos adversos , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organoplatínicos/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(7)2023 Apr 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37046849

RESUMO

PURPOSE: While perioperative chemotherapy provides a survival benefit over surgery alone in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinomas, the results need to be improved. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative cetuximab combined with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received six cycles of cetuximab, cisplatin, and simplified LV5FU2 before and after surgery. The primary objective was a combined evaluation of the tumor objective response (TOR), assessed by computed tomography, and the absence of major toxicities resulting in discontinuation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (45% and 90%, respectively). RESULTS: From 2011 to 2013, 65 patients were enrolled. From 64 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, 19 (29.7%) had a morphological TOR and 61 (95.3%) did not stop NCT prematurely due to major toxicity. Sixty patients (92.3%) underwent resection. Sixteen patients (/56 available, 28.5%) had histological responses (Mandard tumor regression grade ≤3). After a median follow-up of 44.5 months, median disease-free and overall survival were 24.4 [95% CI: 16.4-39.4] and 40.3 months [95% CI: 27.5-NA], respectively. CONCLUSION: Adding cetuximab to the NCT regimen in operable G/GEJ adenocarcinomas is safe, but did not show enough efficacy in the present study to meet the primary endpoint (NCT01360086).

3.
Dig Liver Dis ; 54(3): 324-330, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35027324

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRCLM), systemic doublet or triplet chemotherapy and targeted therapy is considered a standard first-line treatment. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin (HAI-ox) generates a high response rate, but this still needs to be confirmed in a randomized trial. We incorporated HAI-ox in doublet or triplet + targeted therapy to validate its efficacy. AIM: The OSCAR study is an ongoing randomized phase III trial comparing FOLFOX + targeted therapy according to RAS status, or FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab in patients eligible for triplet therapy, with the same regimen but with HAI-ox instead of IV-ox as the first-line treatment for CRCLM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Main eligibility criteria are colorectal cancer, unresectable liver metastasis, no extra-hepatic metastases except pulmonary nodules if ≤3 and <10 mm, ECOG performance status 0 or 1. ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). A difference of 4 months for the median PFS in favor of HAI-ox is expected (HR = 0.73). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, secondary liver resection, safety, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: This study is planned to include 348 patients to demonstrate the superiority of HAI-ox over systemic oxaliplatin in first-line CRCLM treatment (NCT02885753).


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Oxaliplatina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Artéria Hepática , Humanos , Infusões Intra-Arteriais , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Dig Liver Dis ; 53(7): 824-829, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33994125

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are rare diseases with a poor prognosis. Platinum-etoposide (PE) has been the recommended first-line treatment for decades. FOLFIRINEC (NCT04325425) is a national multicenter randomized phase II study which aims to challenge this standard regimen. METHODS: The primary objective is to compare the median progression-free survival (PFS) under mFOLFIRINOX versus PE. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the objective response rates (ORR), median overall survival (OS), safety and quality of life. The associated real-time translational study will establish a molecular profile for each patient enrolled. MAIN INCLUSION CRITERIA ARE: NEC of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) or unknown origin, metastatic and RECIST 1.1 evaluable disease, tumor sample available and no contraindication to chemotherapy. Patients will be randomized 1:1 between PE every 21 days for 6-8 cycles and mFOLFIRINOX every 14 days for up to 12 cycles and stratified according to center, performance status, Ki67 and pathological subtype. This trial will randomize 218 patients (24 months of follow-up) to have 80% power to detect an improvement of the median PFS from 5 months under PE to 7.5 months under mFOLFIRINOX (HR of 0.67, α =5%, two-sided). An intermediate analysis is planned at 50% of events. Recruitment started on October 20, 2020.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/tratamento farmacológico , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/tratamento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Platina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Biomarcadores/análise , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Metástase Neoplásica , Oxaliplatina/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Hepatol Int ; 15(1): 93-104, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33420951

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is limited data regarding the role for systemic treatment in patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. METHODS: PRODIGE 21 was a multicentric prospective non-comparative randomized trial. Patients were randomized to receive sorafenib (Arm A), pravastatin (Arm B), sorafenib-pravastatin (Arm C) combination, or best supportive care (Arm D). Primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), secondary endpoints included safety and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 160 patients were randomized and 157 patients were included in the final analysis. 86% of patients were BCLC C and 55% had macrovascular invasion. The safety profiles of the drugs were as expected. Median TTP was 3.5, 2.8, 2.0 and 2.2 months in arms A, B, C and D, respectively, but analysis was limited by the number of patients deceased without radiological progression (59%). Median OS was similar between the four arms: 3.8 [95% CI: 2.4-6.5], 3.1 [95% CI: 1.9-4.3], 4.0 [95% CI: 3.2-5.5] and 3.5 months [95% CI: 2.2-5.4] in arms A, B, C and D, respectively. Median OS was 4.0 months [95% CI: 3.3-5.5] for patients treated with sorafenib, vs 2.9 months [95% CI: 2.2-3.9] for patients not treated with sorafenib. In patients with ALBI grade 1/2, median OS was 6.1 months [95% CI: 3.8-8.3] in patients treated with sorafenib vs 3.1 months [95% CI: 1.9-4.8] for patients not treated with sorafenib. CONCLUSION: In the overall Child-Pugh B population, neither sorafenib nor pravastatin seemed to provide benefit. In the ALBI grade 1/2 sub-population, our trial suggests potential benefit of sorafenib. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was referenced in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01357486).


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Cirrose Hepática , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Pravastatina/uso terapêutico , Sorafenibe/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiologia , Niacinamida/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Dig Liver Dis ; 53(10): 1254-1259, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34215534

RESUMO

Pembrolizumab, a PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), was recently reported to be very effective in patients with microsatellite instable/deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer (MSI/dMMR mCRC), unlike patients with microsatellite stable/proficient MMR (MSS/pMMR) mCRC, in whom ICIs are generally ineffective. However, about 15% of MSS/pMMR CRCs are highly infiltrated by tumour infiltrating lymphocytes. In addition, both oxaliplatin and bevacizumab have been shown to have immunomodulatory properties that may increase the efficacy of an ICI. We formulated the hypothesis that patients with MSS/pMMR mCRC with a high immune infiltrate can be sensitive to ICI plus oxalipatin and bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. POCHI is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II trial to evaluate efficacy of Pembrolizumab with Capox Bevacizumab as first-line treatment of MSS/pMMR mCRC with a high immune infiltrate for which we plan to enrol 55 patients. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) at 10 months, which is expected greater than 50%, but a 70% rate is hoped for. Main secondary objectives are overall survival, secondary resection rate and depth of response. Patients must have been resected of their primary tumour so as to evaluate two different immune scores (Immunoscore® and TuLIS) and are eligible if one score is "high". The first patient was included on April 20, 2021.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Neoplasias Colorretais/imunologia , Reparo de Erro de Pareamento de DNA , Humanos , Instabilidade de Microssatélites
7.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 11(8): 1255-1262, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32334940

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib significantly increases overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated but gives toxicities. OBJECTIVES: to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib at it's approved dose in the older population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter single-arm phase II enrolled patients ≥70 years old after the failure of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, anti-VEGF, and anti-EGFR treatment. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) 2 months after initiation of regorafenib (160 mg/day, 3 weeks on/1 week off). RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled, with a median age of 77 years. The 2 months DCR was 31.4% in the 35 evaluable patients. For the 42 patients that received at least one dose of regorafenib, median progression-free survival and OS were 2.2 and 7.5 months. The median time to autonomy degradation and quality of life degradation was 3.1 and 3.2 months, respectively. A grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events was observed in 35/42 patients, notably: fatigue (45.2%), hand-foot skin reaction (19.0%), hypertension (21.4%), and diarrhea (7.1%). There is a trend to achieve DCR in patients ≤80 years and a trend to discontinue the study due to toxicity in patients with ECOG ≥1, over 80 years and with impaired baseline autonomy. CONCLUSION: Treatment with regorafenib in pretreated patients ≥70 years is feasible and demonstrate similar efficacy that was observed in previous studies in young patients. Fatigue is the most frequent severe adverse event. However, caution should be taken for older patients with ECOG ≥1, over 80 years, and with impaired baseline autonomy.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Colorretais , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Piridinas , Qualidade de Vida
8.
Dig Liver Dis ; 50(4): 408-410, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29409778

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In advanced gastric cancer, doublet regimen including platinum salts and fluoropyrimidine is considered as a standard first-line treatment. The addition of docetaxel (75 mg/m2 q3w) to cisplatin (75 mg/m2 q3w) and 5-fluorouracil has been shown to improve efficacy. However, this regimen (DCF) was associated with frequent severe toxicities (including more complicated neutropenia), limiting its use in clinical practice. Interesting alternative docetaxel-based regimens have been developed that need to be validated. AIM: GASTFOX study is a randomized phase III trial comparing FOLFOX alone or with docetaxel at 50 mg/m2 (TFOX regimen) in first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. In both arms, cycle is repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Main eligibility criteria: histologically proven locally advanced or metastatic gastric or esogastric junction adenocarcinoma, HER negative status, measurable disease, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow functions. RESULTS: The primary endpoint is radiological/clinical progression-free survival (PFS). A difference of 2 months for the median PFS in favor of TFOX is expected (HR = 0.73) Based on a two-sided α risk of 5% and a power of 90%, 454 events are required to show this difference. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, safety, quality of life and the therapeutic index. CONCLUSION: This study is planned to include 506 patients to demonstrate the superiority of TFOX over FOLFOX in first-line advanced gastric cancer treatment (NCT03006432).


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Taxoides/efeitos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organoplatínicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Taxoides/administração & dosagem
9.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0135907, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26308942

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Because cytidine deaminase (CDA) is the key enzyme in gemcitabine metabolism, numerous studies have attempted to investigate impact of CDA status (i.e. genotype or phenotype) on clinical outcome. To date, data are still controversial because none of these studies has fully investigated genotype-phenotype CDA status, pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome relationships in gemcitabine-treated patients. Besides, most patients were treated with gemcitabine associated with other drugs, thus adding a confounding factor. We performed a multicenter prospective clinical trial in gemcitabine-treated patients which aimed at investigating the link between CDA deficiency on the occurrence of severe toxicities and on pharmacokinetics, and studying CDA genotype-phenotype relationships. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred twenty patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma eligible for adjuvant gemcitabine monotherapy were enrolled in this study promoted and managed by the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive. Toxicities were graded according to National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. They were considered severe for grade ≥ 3, and early when occurring during the first eight weeks of treatment. CDA status was evaluated using a double approach: genotyping for 79A>C and functional testing. Therapeutic drug monitoring of gemcitabine and its metabolite were performed on the first course of gemcitabine. RESULTS: Five patients out of 120 (i.e., 4.6%) were found to be CDA deficient (i.e., CDA activity <1.3 U/mg), and only one among them experienced early severe hematological toxicity. There was no statistically significant difference in CDA activity between patients experiencing hematological severe toxicities (28.44%) and patients who tolerated the treatment (71.56%). CDA genetic analysis failed in evidencing an impact in terms of toxicities or in CDA activity. Regarding pharmacokinetics, a wide inter-individual variability has been observed in patients. CONCLUSION: This study, which included only 4.6% of CDA-deficient patients, failed in identifying CDA status as a predictive marker of toxicities with gemcitabine. A lack of statistical power because of smoothing effect of CDA variability as compared with real life conditions could explain this absence of impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01416662.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/metabolismo , Citidina Desaminase/metabolismo , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/farmacocinética , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Gencitabina , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA