Disfagia orofaríngea neurogénica: caracterización clínica y percepción de síntomas en Antioquia, Colombia entre los años 2019 a 2021 / Neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia: clinical characterization and perception of symptoms in Antioquia, Colombia between the years 2019 to 2021

Introducción: la disfagia es un trastorno de la deglución, el cual es habitualmente desatendido por profesionales de la salud, en especial la disfagia orofaríngea neurogénica, que es capaz de producir varios síntomas, signos y complicaciones secundarias en los pacientes. Objetivo: realizar una caracterización clínica incluyendo percepción de síntomas de disfagia en pacientes con disfagia orofaríngea neurogénica de causas neurológicas y neuromusculares en Antioquia, Colombia entre los años 2019 y 2021. Metodología: estudio transversal realizado en 80 pacientes con disfagia orofaríngea neurogénica confirmada a través de la herramienta Eating Assessment Tool-10, evaluación clínica y/o resultados de video fluoroscopia de la deglución. Resultados: 71 pacientes presentaron causas neurológicas centrales. La enfermedad cerebrovascular y la enfermedad de Parkinson fueron las etiologías más frecuentes. Solo 18% de los pacientes con causas neurológicas y 33% con causas neuromusculares reportaron tolerancia a todas las consistencias de alimentos. Mediana de 16 puntos en cuanto a autopercepción de síntomas de disfagia mediante el instrumento Eating Assessment Tool-10, con puntuaciones más altas en pacientes con presencia de gastrostomía, antecedente de neumonía, odinofagia y alteración en la oclusión mandibular al examen físico. En los pacientes con causas neurológicas hubo mayor presencia de signos motores linguales y apraxias orofaciales. Conclusión: existen características clínicas como sensación de comida pegada, dificultad para tragar alimentos sólidos, tos y ahogo al tragar, que son útiles en el reconocimiento de casos de disfagia orofaríngea, y apoyan que esta genera más síntomas que signos al examen físico en pacientes con condiciones neurológicas y neuromusculares.

Introduction: dysphagia is a swallowing disorder that is usually neglected by health professionals, especially neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia, which can produce various symptoms, signs and secondary complications in patients. Objective: to perform a clinical characterization, including perception of dysphagia symptoms, in patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia of neurological and neuromuscular causes in Antioquia, Colombia between 2019 and 2021. Methodology: cross-sectional study conducted in 80 patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia confirmed through the Eating Assessment Tool-10, clinical assessment and/ or video fluoroscopy results of swallowing. Results: 71 patients presented central neurological causes. Cerebrovascular disease and Parkinson's disease were the most frequent etiologies. Only 18% of patients with neurological causes and 33% with neuromuscular causes reported tolerance to all food consistencies. Median of 16 points in terms of self-perception of dysphagia symptoms using the Eating Assessment Tool-10, with higher scores in patients with gastrostomy, a history of pneumonia, odynophagia, and abnormal mandibular occlusion on physical examination. In patients with neurological causes, there was a greater presence of lingual motor signs and orofacial apraxia. Conclusion: there are clinical characteristics such as a sensation of stuck food, difficulty swallowing solid foods, coughing, and choking when swallowing, which are useful in recognizing cases of oropharyngeal dysphagia, and support that this generates more symptoms than signs on physical examination in patients with neurological and neuromuscular conditions.

Development of a prediction rule for diagnosing postoperative meningitis: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE Diagnosing nosocomial meningitis (NM) in neurosurgical patients is difficult. The standard CSF test is not optimal and when it is obtained, CSF cultures are negative in as many as 70% of cases. The goal of this study was to develop a diagnostic prediction rule for postoperative meningitis using a combination of clinical, laboratory, and CSF variables, as well as risk factors (RFs) for CNS infection. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed in 4 intensive care units in Medellín, Colombia. Patients with a history of neurosurgical procedures were selected at the onset of febrile symptoms and/or after an increase in acute-phase reactants. Their CSF was studied for suspicion of infection and a bivariate analysis was performed between the dependent variable (confirmed/probable NM) and the identified independent variables. Those variables with a p value ≤ 0.2 were fitted in a multiple logistic regression analysis with the same dependent variable. After determining the best model according to its discrimination and calibration, the ß coefficient for each selected dichotomized variable obtained from the logistic regression model was used to construct the score for the prediction rule. RESULTS Among 320 patients recruited for the study, 154 had confirmed or probable NM. Using bivariate analysis, 15 variables had statistical associations with the outcome: aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), traumatic brain injury, CSF leak, positioning of external ventricular drains (EVDs), daily CSF draining via EVDs, intraventricular hemorrhage, neurological deterioration, age ≥ 50 years, surgical duration ≥ 220 minutes, blood loss during surgery ≥ 200 ml, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 6 mg/dl, CSF/serum glucose ratio ≤ 0.4 mmol/L, CSF lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L, CSF leukocytes ≥ 250 cells, and CSF polymorphonuclear (PMN) neutrophils ≥ 50%. The multivariate analysis fitted a final model with 6 variables for the prediction rule (aSAH diagnosis: 1 point; CRP ≥ 6 mg/dl: 1 point; CSF/serum glucose ratio ≤ 0.4 mmol/L: 1 point; CSF leak: 1.5 points; CSF PMN neutrophils ≥ 50%: 1.5 points; and CSF lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L: 4 points) with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit = 0.71) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS The prediction rule for diagnosing NM improves the diagnostic accuracy in neurosurgical patients with suspicion of infection. A score ≥ 6 points suggests a high probability of neuroinfection, for which antibiotic treatment should be considered. An independent validation of the rule in a different group of patients is warranted.