Point of departure (PoD) selection for the derivation of acceptable daily exposures (ADEs) for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).

The Acceptable Daily Exposure (ADE) derived for pharmaceutical manufacturing is a health-based limit used to ensure that medicines produced in multi-product facilities are safe and are used to validate quality processes. Core to ADE derivation is selecting appropriate point(s) of departure (PoD), i.e., the starting dose of a given dataset that is used in the calculation of the ADE. Selecting the PoD involves (1) data collection and hazard characterization, (2) identification of "critical effects", and (3) a dose-response assessment including the determination of the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) or lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL), or calculating a benchmark dose (BMD) level. Compared to other classes of chemicals, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are well-characterized and have unique, rich datasets that must be considered when selecting the PoD. Dataset considerations for an API include therapeutic/pharmacological effects, particularities of APIs for different indications and routes of administration, data gaps during drug development, and sensitive subpopulations. Thus, the PoD analysis must be performed by a qualified toxicologist or other expert who also understands the complexities of pharmaceutical datasets. In addition, as the pharmaceutical industry continues to evolve new therapeutic principles, the science behind PoD selection must also evolve to ensure state-of-the-science practices and resulting ADEs.

Using default methodologies to derive an acceptable daily exposure (ADE).

This manuscript discusses the different historical and more recent default approaches that have been used to derive an acceptable daily exposure (ADE). While it is preferable to derive a health-based ADE based on a complete nonclinical and clinical data package, this is not always possible. For instance, for drug candidates in early development there may be no or limited nonclinical or clinical trial data. Alternative approaches that can support decision making with less complete data packages represent a variety of methods that rely on default assumptions or data inputs where chemical-specific data on health effects are lacking. A variety of default approaches are used including those based on certain toxicity estimates, a fraction of the therapeutic dose, cleaning-based limits, the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC), and application of hazard banding tools such as occupational exposure banding (OEB). Each of these default approaches is discussed in this manuscript, including their derivation, application, strengths, and limitations. In order to ensure patient safety when faced with toxicological and clinical data-gaps, default ADE methods should be purposefully as or more protective than ADEs derived from full data packages. Reliance on the subset of default approaches (e.g., TTC or OEB) that are based on toxicological data is preferred over other methods for establishing ADEs in early development while toxicology and clinical data are still being collected.

Interplay of dissolution, solubility, and nonsink permeation determines the oral absorption of the Hedgehog pathway inhibitor GDC-0449 in dogs: an investigation using preclinical studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Factors determining the pharmacokinetics of 2-chloro-N-(4-chloro-3-(pyridine-2-yl)phenyl)-4-(methylsulfonyl)benzamide (GDC-0449) were investigated using preclinical studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Multiple-dose studies where dogs were given twice-daily oral doses of either 7.5 or 25 mg/kg GDC-0449 showed less than dose-proportional increases in exposure on day 1. At steady state, exposures were comparable between the two dose groups. Oral administration of activated charcoal to dogs receiving oral or intravenous GDC-0449 (25 mg) showed a more rapid decrease in plasma concentrations, suggesting that the concentration gradient driving intestinal membrane permeation was reversible. The biliary clearance of GDC-0449 in dogs was low (0.04 ml/min/kg) and did not account for the majority of the estimated systemic clearance (approximately 19% of systemic clearance). Likewise, in vitro studies using sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes showed negligible biliary excretion. The effect of particle size on oral absorption was shown in a single-dose study where 150 mg of GDC-0449 of two particle sizes was administered. An oral PBPK model was used to investigate mechanisms determining the oral pharmacokinetics of GDC-0449. The overall oral absorption of GDC-0449 appears to depend on the interplay between the dissolution and intestinal membrane permeation processes. A unique feature of GDC-0449 distinguishing it from other Biopharmaceutical Classification System II compounds was that incorporation of the effects of solubility rate-limited absorption and nonsink permeation on the intestinal membrane permeation process was necessary to describe its pharmacokinetic behavior.

Differential induction of N(2),3-ethenoguanine in rat brain and liver after exposure to vinyl chloride.

Although vinyl chloride (VC) clearly induces hepatic angiosarcoma in humans and rodents, a causal association with brain tumors has not been definitively established with the available epidemiological and experimental evidence. Because VC acts by genotoxic mechanisms, DNA adduct formation is thought to be a sensitive biomarker of early events in carcinogenesis. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to 0 or 1100 ppm VC for 1 or 4 weeks (6 h/day, 5 days/week) by inhalation. Male weanlings were similarly exposed for 5 days. Another group of male adults was exposed to 1100 ppm [(13)C(2)]VC in a nose-only inhalation apparatus for 5 days (6 h/day). A sensitive gas chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry assay was used to measure the major promutagenic DNA adduct, N(2),3-ethenoguanine (N(2),3-epsilonG), in rat brain and hepatocyte (HEP) DNA. The respective concentrations of N(2),3-epsilonG in control rat brain DNA at 1 and 4 weeks were 5.0 +/- 0.9 and 5.6 +/- 1.1 N(2),3-epsilonG/10(8) unmodified guanine. There was no change in N(2),3-epsilonG in adult rat brain after exposure to 1100 ppm VC for 1 or 4 weeks. In HEPs from the same animals, these adduct concentrations increased from 5.5 +/- 1.4 to 55 +/- 2.0 N(2),3-epsilonG/10(8) unmodified guanine after a 1-week exposure and from 3.0 +/- 0.3 to 110 +/- 20 N(2),3-epsilonG/10(8) unmodified guanine after a 4-week exposure. When weanlings were exposed to 1100 ppm VC for 5 days, there was a statistically significant (P = 0.04) increase in N(2),3-epsilonG in brain from 1.5 +/- 0.2 to 4.4 +/- 1.1 N(2),3-epsilonG/10(8) unmodified guanine. Weanlings exposed to 1100 ppm VC had an even greater increase in N(2),3-epsilonG in HEPs from 1.6 +/- 0.1 to 97 +/- 5.0 N(2),3-epsilonG/10(8) unmodified guanine. [(13)C(2)]N(2),3-epsilonG was not detected in brain DNA from adult rats exposed to 1100 ppm [(13)C(2)]VC for 5 days but was present in HEP DNA at 55 +/- 4.0 [(13)C(2)]N(2),3-epsilonG/10(8) unmodified guanine. The concentrations of the endogenous adduct in both organs were unchanged after this exposure. 7-(Oxoethyl)guanine (OEG), the major DNA adduct formed by VC, was reduced to 7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine and measured by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandom mass spectrometry in brain and HEP DNA from rats exposed to 1100 ppm VC for 1 week. Whereas 4.0 +/- 0.8 OEG/10(6) unmodified guanine were present in HEP DNA from VC-exposed rats, no adducts were detectable in brain DNA (detection limit, 0.3 OEG/10(6) unmodified guanine). These findings indicate that the genotoxic metabolite of VC is not formed in or transported to adult rat brain. Thus, it is unlikely that N(2),3-epsilonG or other VC-induced promutagenic DNA adducts play a significant role in initiating carcinogenesis in adult rat brain after exposure to VC. The data for weanling rats are less clear. Whereas a small increase in N(2),3-epsilonG in the brains of weanlings was found after exposure to 1100 ppm VC, the resulting adduct concentration was similar to that measured in unexposed adults. Future exposures of weanling rats to the stable isotopically labeled compound will be necessary to conclusively determine whether this increase was due to VC.

Molecular dosimetry and repair of N(2),3-ethenoguanine in rats exposed to vinyl chloride.

Although the DNA adducts of vinyl chloride (VC) have been well characterized, previous studies have used single concentrations of VC that are well above contemporary human exposures. This study examined the exposure response to VC in male Sprague Dawley rats with respect to the molecular dose of the promutagenic DNA adduct N(2),3-ethenoguanine (N(2),3-epsilonG). Adult rats were exposed by inhalation to 0, 10, 100, or 1100 ppm VC for 1 or 4 weeks (6 h/day, 5 days/week). Weanling rats were similarly exposed for 5 days. The amount of N(2),3-epsilonG in hepatocyte (HEP) and nonparenchymal cell (NPC) fractions obtained from the liver was measured with a sensitive immunoaffinity/gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry assay. Endogenous N(2),3-epsilonG was present in HEPs and NPCs from all unexposed rats. The exposure response to VC in each group and cell population was supralinear, with a linear increase from 0 to 100 ppm, and a plateau between 100 and 1100 ppm. There was no statistically significant difference in N(2),3-epsilonG concentrations between HEPs and NPCs in any adult exposure group, which suggests that factors other than adduct concentrations contribute to the particular susceptibility of NPCs to VC-induced carcinogenesis. The accumulation of N(2),3-epsilonG with respect to time was nearly linear in rats exposed to 600 ppm VC for 1, 2, 4, or 8 weeks (4 h/day, 5 days/week), and no repair of N(2),3-epsilonG was detected in rats exposed to VC for 4 weeks and allowed to recover for 1 week. N(2),3-epsilonG concentrations in HEPs from weanling rats were 2-3-fold greater than those in adult rats exposed for the same time. Higher adduct concentrations in young rats may contribute to their greater susceptibility to VC-induced hepatic angiosarcoma as well as their particular susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma. The molecular dosimetry of N(2),3-epsilonG in liver appears to be a sensitive and informative biomarker of genotoxic effect after exposure to VC. N(2),3-epsilonG was the predominant etheno adduct measured in vivo after exposure to VC, and the saturable nature of VC metabolism was reflected in its molecular dose. The relationships between endogenous N(2),3-epsilonG and that formed by low exposures to VC were demonstrated. Conclusions drawn from these exposures may be more relevant for risk assessment purposes than those drawn from high exposures where activation, detoxication, and repair pathways may be saturated or otherwise perturbed. These data are well suited for consideration in future risk assessments of VC that incorporate nontumor mode of action data.

Methods for measuring DNA adducts and abasic sites I: isolation, purification, and analysis of DNA adducts in intact DNA.

The major event involved in the formation of mutations and the initiation and progression of cancer is the induction of DNA damage by reactive intermediates arising from exposure to endogenous and exogenous chemicals. Many electrophilic metabolites of chemicals covalently bind to the bases of DNA causing specific DNA adducts. This unit includes protocols for preparing samples of intact DNA and adduct analysis to quantify the number of adducts that can potentially cause mutagenic or carcinogenic damage.

Methods for measuring DNA adducts and abasic sites II: methods for measurement of DNA adducts.

This unit contains protocols for analyzing DNA adducts separated from the DNA backbone. HPLC is used to quantify total guanine or ribo- or deoxynucleotides as well as methods for analyzing specific adducts. These methods include HPLC with electrochemical detection, immunoaffininty chromatography to enrich for specific adducts, and gas and liquid chromatography in combination with HPLC and mass spectrometry.