All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: The design of tibial trays for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been a topic of research for several decades. Although all-polyethylene trays were developed to address issues such as osteolysis and to enhance the longevity of the prosthesis, as well as knee range of motion, metal-backed designs have remained the most commonly used type of prosthesis. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical, radiological, and survival outcomes of both designs. METHODS: Five databases were searched from inception until October 1, 2020, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the outcomes of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in TKA. The outcomes of interest included range of motion, knee society score, stairs climbing scores, radiostereographic analysis, survivorship and complication. This review was conducted in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. RESULTS: A total of 14 RCTs with 1367 TKA were included with a mean age of - years and - years for all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components groups, respectively. All-polyethylene group demonstrated statistically significant differences in five-year survivorship (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.10-0.75; p value 0.01) and stairs climbing score (OR - 2.07; 95% CI - 3.27-0.87; p value 0.0007) when compared to the metal-backed group. The metal-backed design was significantly more radiographically stable in anterior-posterior, varus-valgus, and internal-external rotations at the 2-year follow-up compared to all-polyethylene tibias (OR - 0.09; 95% CI - 0.16 to - 0.02; p value 0.02) as per the pooled radiostereographic analysis. However, ten-year survivorship (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.53-1.60; p value 0.78), range of motion (OR - 0.57; 95% CI - 2.00-0.85, p value 0.43), knee society scores (OR 1.38; 95% CI - 0.47-3.23, p value 0.14), and complications (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.5-1.39, p value 0.48) were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: While this meta-analysis suggests that all-polyethylene tibial components in total knee arthroplasty may offer advantages over metal-backed components in terms of five-year survivorship, and stairs climbing score, this finding should be considered in the context of potential confounding factors. Nonetheless, based on the results, the all-polyethylene implant should be considered a viable choice for primary knee replacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Distal Biceps Tendon Repair and Reconstruction.

Distal biceps tendon ruptures can result in functionally significant loss of supination and flexion strength, as well as decreased resistance to fatigue. Although the diagnosis of distal biceps tendon ruptures remains straightforward, substantial debate continues with regards to surgical indications, pertinent surgical anatomy, single- versus double-incision surgical technique, and fixation options. This review discusses the latest evidence-based literature regarding distal biceps tendon repair/reconstruction including types of tears, demographics, clues for diagnosis, surgical indications, anatomy with special attention to how the distal tendon inserts distally and the relevant tuberosity anatomy (height and cam effect), common reconstruction techniques (single- vs double-incision and single-incision power optimizing cost-effective technique), fixation techniques (bone tunnels, distal biceps button, interference screw, button plus screw), surgical technique pearls, postoperative rehabilitation, postoperative outcomes, as well as the treatment of chronic tears with special reconstruction techniques including Achilles allograft, pedicled latissimus transfer, and the use of a free innervated gracilis.

Total elbow arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is a less common indication for total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Higher complication rates in younger, active patients may offset short-term improvements in pain and function. The purpose of this study was to determine pain relief, functional outcomes, complications, and survival of TEA in this population. METHODS: Between 1984 and 2011, 20 consecutive TEAs were performed for primary elbow osteoarthritis. Two patients died before the 2-year follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 68 years (range, 51-85 years). Outcome measures included pain, motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, satisfaction, complications, and reoperations. Mean follow-up was 8.9 years (range, 2-20 years). RESULTS: Three elbows sustained mechanical failures. Complications included intraoperative fracture (n = 2), wound irrigation and débridement (n = 1), bony ankylosis (n = 1), humeral loosening (n = 1), humeral component fracture (n = 1), and mechanical failure of a radial head component (n = 1). Fifteen elbows without mechanical failure were examined clinically. Pain improved from 3.6 to 1.5 (P < .001). Range of motion remained clinically unchanged (P > .05), with preoperative flexion contractures not improving. Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were available for 13 elbows without mechanical failure, averaging 81.5 points (range, 60-100 points); these were graded as excellent (n = 5), good (n = 2), and fair (n = 6). Subjectively, all patients without mechanical failure were satisfied. CONCLUSION: TEA represents a reliable surgical option for pain relief in patients with primary osteoarthritis. However, restoration of extension is not always obtained, indicating that more aggressive soft tissue releases or bony resection should be considered. Complications occurred in a large number of elbows, but mechanical failure was low considering the nature of this population and the length of follow-up.

Distal biceps tendon history, updates, and controversies: from the closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons meeting-2015.

Understanding of the distal biceps anatomy, mechanics, and biology during the last 75 years has greatly improved the physician's ability to advise and to treat patients with ruptured distal tendons. The goal of this paper is to review the past and current advances on complete distal biceps ruptures as well as controversies and future directions that were discussed and debated during the closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons meeting in 2015.

Management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: appropriate use criteria.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate use criteria (AUC) were developed for full-thickness rotator cuff tears to determine when it is reasonable to recommend nonoperative care, partial repair/débridement, repair, reconstruction, or arthroplasty. The goal of this report was to interpret and summarize the results of the AUC process into clinically relevant terms. METHODS: Using the results of the AUC methodology, we systematically interpreted the clinical importance attributed to the various patient and pathologic variables. We then assessed the combination of considerations that would justify the various treatment options using "preference tables." RESULTS: A nonoperative program was appropriate if the patient had a positive response to conservative care. However, a repair could be maybe appropriate was also accepted. Rotator cuff repair was appropriate when conservative treatment failed in symptomatic patients. Reconstructive measures were recognized primarily in those with chronic massive tears. Most found arthroplasty maybe appropriate only in healthy patients, pseudoparalysis, and chronic massive tears. Surprisingly, neither factors that decreased healing nor adversely affected outcome had a strong influence on the panel's treatment recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The AUC process accounts for clinical experience and considers individual patient and pathologic characteristics of the condition. Overall, the outcome of this exercise does support the current practice for the management of rotator cuff tears (ie, repair of symptomatic tears). However, the minimal importance given to patient and pathologic considerations, well documented to influence outcome, prompts an ongoing effort to refine this important and clinically relevant process.

Anconeus interposition arthroplasty: mid- to long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Radiocapitellar arthritis and/or proximal radioulnar impingement can be difficult to treat. Interposition of the anconeus muscle has been described in the past as an alternative option in managing arthritis, but there are little published data about relief of pain and restoration of function over the long term in patients treated with this approach. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought (1) to determine whether interposition of the anconeus muscle in the radiocapitellar and/or proximal radioulnar joint relieves pain and restores elbow function; and (2) to identify complications and reoperations after anconeus interposition arthroplasty. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2012, we surgically treated 39 patients having radiocapitellar arthritis and/or proximal radioulnar impingement with an anconeus interposition arthroplasty. These were performed for situations in which capitellar and/or radial head pathology was deemed not amenable to implant replacement. We had complete followup on 29 of them (74%) at a minimum of 1 year (mean, 10 years; range, 1-20 years). These 29 patients (21 males, eight females) had interposition of the anconeus muscle at the radiocapitellar joint (10 elbows), the proximal radioulnar joint (two elbows), or both (17 elbows). Their mean age at the time of surgery was 39 years (range, 14-58 years). The reasons for the previous determination or the indications included lateral-side elbow symptoms after radial head resection (eight elbows), failed internal fixation of radial head fracture (two elbows), failed radial head replacement with or without capitellar replacement (four elbows), osteoarthritis and Essex-Lopresti injury (six elbows), failed internal fixation of distal humeral fracture involving the capitellum (two elbows), posttraumatic osteoarthritis involving the lateral compartment (one elbow), lateral compartment osteoarthritis associated with chondropathies (three elbows), and primary osteoarthritis affecting the lateral compartment (three elbows). Patient-reported outcome tools included the quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quick-DASH) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS); we also performed a chart review for complications and reoperations. RESULTS: During the followup duration, the mean MEPS was significantly improved from (mean ± SD) 64 ± 17 points before surgery to 82 ± 14 points after surgery (p < 0.001) with 21 elbows (72%) graded as excellent or good at most recent followup. The mean quick-DASH score was 24 ± 17 points (n = 25) at latest evaluation. Two patients (7%) had perioperative complications, including wound dehiscence (one elbow) and transient posterior interosseous nerve palsy (one elbow). Seven patients (24%) underwent additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Anconeus arthroplasty provides a reasonable surgical alternative in the armamentarium of procedures to address pathology at the radiocapitellar and/or proximal radioulnar joint. This procedure is especially attractive when other alternatives such as radial head replacement may be problematic secondary to capitellar erosion or marked proximal radius bone loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Transverse coronoid fracture: when does it have to be fixed?

BACKGROUND: After elbow fracture-dislocation, surgeons confront numerous treatment options in pursuing a stable joint for early motion. The relative contributions of the radial head and coronoid, in combination, to elbow stability have not been defined fully. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an approximately 50% transverse coronoid fracture and fixation in the setting of an intact or resected radial head on coronal (varus/valgus) and axial (internal and external rotational) laxity in (1) gravity varus stress; and (2) gravity valgus stress models. METHODS: Kinematic data were collected on six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities tested with passive motion throughout the flexion arc under varus and valgus gravity stress with lateral collateral ligaments reconstructed. Testing included coronoid fracture and osteosynthesis with and without a radial head. RESULTS: In the varus gravity stress model, fixation of the coronoid improved varus stability (fixed: 1.6° [95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.2], fractured: 5.6° [4.2-7.0], p < 0.001) and internal rotational stability (fixed: 1.8° [0.9-2.7], fractured: 5.4° [4.0-6.8], p < 0.001), but radial head fixation did not contribute to varus stability (intact head: 2.7° [1.3-4.1], resected head: 3.8° [2.3-5.3], p = 0.4) or rotational stability (intact: 2.7° [0.9-4.5], resected head: 3.9° [1.5-6.3], p = 0.4). With valgus stress, coronoid fixation improved valgus stability (fixed: 2.1° [1.0-3.1], fractured: 3.8° [1.8-5.8], p < 0.04) and external rotation stability (fixed: 0.8° [0.1-1.5], fractured: 2.1° [0.9-3.4], p < 0.04), but the radial head played a more important role in providing valgus stability (intact: 1.4° [0.8-2.0], resected head: 7.1° [3.5-10.7], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fixation of a 50% transverse coronoid fracture improves varus and internal rotatory laxity but is unlikely to meaningfully improve valgus or external rotation laxity. The radial head, on the other hand, is a stabilizer to resist valgus stress regardless of the status of the coronoid. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Determination as to whether it is necessary to fix a coronoid fracture should be based on the stability of the elbow when tested with a varus load. The elbow may potentially be stable with fractures involving less than 50% of the coronoid. Under all circumstances, the radial head should be fixed or replaced to ensure valgus external rotatory stability.

Radial head reconstruction in elbow fracture-dislocation: monopolar or bipolar prosthesis?

BACKGROUND: Monopolar and bipolar radial head prosthetic arthroplasties have been used successfully to treat elbow fracture-dislocation with unsalvageable radial head fractures. The relative stability of these two designs in different clinical situations is a topic of ongoing investigation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We tested the effects of monopolar and bipolar fixed-neck prosthetic radial head implants on improvement in elbow coronal and axial plane laxity in a terrible triad biomechanical model that accounted for lateral collateral ligament integrity and the presence of a transverse coronoid fracture. METHODS: Kinematic data were collected on six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities tested with passive motion throughout the flexion arc. Varus and valgus gravity stress were applied with the wrist in neutral position. A lateral collateral ligament reconstruction was simulated. We assessed instability after radial head resection and reconstruction with either a monopolar or bipolar implant in the presence of a transversely fractured (Regan and Morrey Type 2) or fixed coronoid process. RESULTS: With collateral ligament integrity, no difference was detected, with the numbers available, in valgus laxity between implants under valgus stress (p = 1.0). Laxity improvement with each prosthesis was higher when the coronoid was fractured (mean ± SD: monopolar: 7.4° ± 1.6°, p < 0.001; bipolar: 6.4° ± 1.6°, p = 0.003) than when it was fixed (monopolar: 4.0° ± 1.6°, p = 0.02; bipolar: 4.2° ± 1.6°, p = 0.01). With the numbers available, there was no difference in external rotation laxity between implants under valgus stress (p = 1.0). The greatest stabilizing effect of the prostheses occurred when the coronoid was fractured (monopolar: 3.3° ± 1.2°, p = 0.15; bipolar: 3.3° ± 1.2°, p = 0.17). Radial head arthroplasty offered no substantial stability under varus stress for varus or internal rotation laxity. CONCLUSIONS: In our terrible triad cadaveric model, coronoid fixation was effective in improving varus laxity with a monopolar or bipolar prosthesis in place. Also, both types of prostheses were effective in improving valgus and external rotation laxity to the elbow, regardless of coronoid status. With collateral ligaments reconstructed, no large kinematic differences were noted between implants regardless of the varus-valgus position or whether the coronoid was fractured or fixed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The data from our cadaveric model support the use of either implant type in terrible triad injuries if the collateral ligaments are intact or reconstructed.

Revision allograft reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex in elbows with previous failed reconstruction and persistent posterolateral rotatory instability.

BACKGROUND: Primary reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) using graft tissue restores elbow stability in many, but not all, elbows with acute or chronic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). Revision reconstruction using a tendon allograft is occasionally considered for persistent PLRI, but the outcome of revision ligament reconstruction in this setting is largely unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether revision allograft ligament reconstruction can (1) restore the stability and (2) result in improved elbow scores for patients with persistent PLRI of the elbow after a previous failed primary reconstructive attempt and in the context of the diverse pathology being addressed. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2011, 160 surgical elbow procedures were performed at our institution for the LCLC reconstruction using allograft tissue. Only patients undergoing revision allograft reconstruction of the LCLC for persistent PLRI with a previous failed primary reconstructive attempt using graft tissue and at least I year of followup were included in the study. Eleven patients (11 elbows) fulfilled our inclusion criteria and formed our study cohort. The cohort consisted of six female patients and five male patients. The mean age at the time of revision surgery was 36 years (range, 14-59 years). The revision allograft reconstruction was carried out after a mean of 3 years (range, 2.5 months to 9 years) from a failed attempted reconstruction of the LCLC. Osseous deficiency to some extent was identified in the preoperative radiographs of eight elbows. Mean followup was 5 years (range, 1-12 years). RESULTS: Revision allograft reconstruction of the LCLC restored elbow stability in eight of the 11 elbows; two of the three elbows with persistent instability were operated on a third time (at 6 and 7 months after allograft revision reconstruction). For elbows with no persistent instability, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score at most recent followup was 83 points (range, 60-100 points), and six elbows were rated with a good or excellent result. All patients with persistent instability had some degree of preoperative bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: Revision allograft reconstruction of the LCLC is an option for treating recurrent PLRI, although this is a complex and resistant problem, and nearly ½ of the patients in this cohort either had persistent instability and/or had a fair or poor elbow score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aseptic loosening rate of the humeral stem in the Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty. Does size matter?

BACKGROUND: Aseptic implant loosening is one of the most common complications leading to revision surgery in total elbow arthroplasty. Different humeral stem lengths are available with varying designs. In general, the decision of which stem length to use depends on the surgical diagnosis or simply the surgeon preference. Often, the longer stem is used for post-traumatic or revision cases while for rheumatoid patients the shorter stem is preferred. There are no data in the literature to favor one humeral stem size over the other according to the diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed the total elbow joint database of the Coonrad-Morrey design at our institution for aseptic loosening leading to revision and compared the revision rate and the survival of the 4- and 6-inch humeral stems. RESULTS: Overall, revision for aseptic humeral loosening is infrequent and occurred in only 16 of 711 total elbow arthroplasties during a mean follow-up of 88 months. There was no significant difference in the revision rate between the 2 stem lengths (1.9% for the 4-inch stems and 2.6% for the 6-inch stem). CONCLUSION: Revision rate was correlated to the surgical diagnosis and was significantly higher for post-traumatic patients than for rheumatoid patients (5.1% vs 0.66%, P < .001). Of interest, and possibly not surprising, the mean time to revision was shorter for the 4-inch stems than it was for the 6-inch stems (37 vs 95 months, P = .034).

Radiocapitellar prosthetic arthroplasty: a report of 6 cases and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Radiocapitellar prosthetic arthroplasty has recently been introduced to treat isolated degenerative arthritis of the radiocapitellar joint. Although this procedure is conceptually attractive and sound in situations in which radial head resection is inadequate, clinical experience is still limited. Its role in the treatment of isolated radiocapitellar degenerative arthritis in the ligamentous-intact elbow and forearm is not yet defined. Our purpose was to report the short-term results of 6 patients who were treated by radiocapitellar prosthetic arthroplasty for isolated radiocapitellar degenerative arthritis in the ligamentous-intact elbow, as well as to provide a review of the literature. METHODS: Six patients were treated by radiocapitellar prosthetic arthroplasty for isolated degenerative arthritis of the radiocapitellar joint in the ligamentous-intact elbow. Their medical records were reviewed, and each patient was seen in the office. The mean follow-up period was 50 months (range, 30-64 months). RESULTS: The implant survival rate was 100%. Pain improved in all patients and all patients were satisfied. The mean flexion-extension arc increased from 98° (range, 75°-115°) to 110° (range, 105°-120°) (P = .17), and the mean pronation-supination arc increased from 133° (range, 75°-115°) to 143° (range, 120°-170°) (P = .34). The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 24.3 (range, 6.7-52.5). According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, there were 3 excellent and 3 good results. CONCLUSION: The short-term follow-up results of radiocapitellar prosthetic arthroplasty for isolated radiocapitellar degenerative arthritis in the ligamentous-intact elbow and forearm seem favorable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, treatment study.

Low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus: results of open reduction and internal fixation.

BACKGROUND: This study presents the outcomes of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus treated by open reduction and internal fixation. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2010, 263 distal humeral fractures were managed at our institution. Patients with a true low transcondylar fracture treated by open reduction and internal fixation were included. Fourteen patients form the basis of this study. Fracture fixation was achieved through a triceps-sparing approach, a triceps tongue, or an olecranon osteotomy. Internal fixation was performed with parallel plates, orthogonal plates, a single lateral plate, or a single medial plate. The clinical outcome was measured with pain levels, range of motion, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Radiographs at latest follow-up were assessed for union, delayed union, nonunion, and hardware failure. RESULTS: At most recent follow-up, 11 patients had no pain, 2 had mild pain, and 1 had moderate pain. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 85. The mean arch of motion was 95°. Complications included nonunion, delayed union, wound complications, deep infection, and heterotopic ossification. DISCUSSION: Stable internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures is perceived as difficult to achieve because of the very small size of the distal fragment. However, the results of our study indicate that internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus is associated with a high union rate and satisfactory clinical results. Elbow arthroplasty does not need to be considered for most patients with a low transcondylar distal humeral fracture.

Wound complications after distal humerus fracture fixation: incidence, risk factors, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: This study set out to accurately determine the incidence of wound complications after distal humerus fracture fixation, to assess risk factors, and to determine their implications on outcome. METHODS: Eighty-nine distal humerus fractures (mean patient age, 58 years) were treated with internal fixation at an average of 4 days after injury. Mean follow-up time was 15 months (range, 6-72 months). Twenty-nine (33%) fractures were open. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to determine wound complications. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine associated risk factors. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (15.7%) developed a major wound complication requiring on average 2.5 (range, 1-6) additional surgical procedures. Six patients required plastic surgical soft tissue coverage. All 14 fractures complicated by wound problems united. The final mean range of motion in the major wound complication group was 100° (range, 65°-130°), compared with 100° (range, 10°-140°) in those with no or minor wound problems. Grade III open fractures and the use of a plate to stabilize the olecranon osteotomy were identified as significant risk factors for development of major wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of major wound complications after fixation of distal humerus fractures is substantial. The presence of a grade III open fracture and the use of an olecranon osteotomy stabilized with a plate are significant risk factors for major wound complications. Fracture healing rates and functional elbow range of motion do not appear to be affected by major wound complications when they are handled with proper soft tissue coverage techniques.

Primary repair of retracted distal biceps tendon ruptures in extreme flexion.

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps tendon ruptures may have tendinous retraction, making primary repair difficult and calling into question the need for graft reconstruction. The decision for when to primarily fix or augment high-flexion repairs has not been addressed. We hypothesized high-flexion repairs would have good outcomes without graft augmentation. The purpose of this study was to examine allograft use and outcomes of distal biceps tendon ruptures requiring repair in greater than 60° of flexion. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study 188 distal biceps tendon repairs; of these, 19 chronic and 4 acute cases were identified with repairs of >60° of flexion using a 2-incision technique. Graft need, complications, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score to assess function, were examined with a record review. Patients were surveyed regarding return to work and subjective satisfaction. A control group matched for surgeon, chronicity, and age, but without a high-flexion repair, was compared with cases by using the Student paired t test. RESULTS: Graft augmentation was used in 1 patient with poor tendon quality. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 100 for all 23 patients, with extension/flexion range of motion from 3° to 138°. All were subjectively "very satisfied/satisfied," with full work return, yet 3 reported mild fatigability. There were 4 complications: 3 transient lateral antebrachial cutaneous neurapraxias and 1 rerupture at the myotendinous junction after retrauma. Differences between cases and controls were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Contracted distal biceps tendons may be reliably reattached to their anatomic insertion with up to 90° of elbow flexion. This lessens the need for reconstruction in such circumstances.

Re-rupture rate of primarily repaired distal biceps tendon injuries.

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps tendon rupture is a common injury, and primary repair results in excellent return of function and strength. Complications resulting from distal biceps tendon repairs are well reported, but the incidence of re-ruptures has never been investigated. METHODS: A search of the Mayo Clinic's Medical/Surgical Index was performed, and all distal biceps tendon repairs from January 1981 through May 2009 were identified. All patients who completed 12 months or more of follow-up were included. All charts were reviewed and patients contacted as necessary to identify a re-rupture. We also investigated the situation causing the re-rupture. RESULTS: We identified a total of 190 distal biceps tendon ruptures that underwent repair and met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 190 repairs, 172 (90.5%) were performed by the Mayo modification of the Boyd-Anderson 2-incision technique. Bilateral ruptures occurred in 13 patients (7.3%). Six primary ruptures (3.2%) occurred in women, 4 of the 6 being partial ruptures. Partial ruptures were found to be statistically more common than complete ruptures in women (P = .05). We identified 3 re-ruptures (1.5%), all occurring within 3 weeks of the index surgery. CONCLUSION: The re-rupture rate after primary repair of the distal biceps tendon is low at 1.5% and occurs within 3 weeks of index repair. This appears to be due to patient compliance and excessive force placed on repairs. We also found the incidence of women who sustain a distal biceps tendon tear to be 3.2%, with partial tears being statistically more common than complete ruptures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, treatment study

The outcome of total elbow arthroplasty in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (juvenile rheumatoid arthritis) patients.

BACKGROUND: Elbow prosthetic replacement in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can be complicated and technically challenging. Thus, we sought to evaluate the clinical benefit and the prosthetic longevity of primary semiconstrained linked total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) performed to treat these patients. METHODS: Between 1983 and 2005, 29 elbows in 24 patients (20 women and 4 men) had been replaced because of JIA. The mean age was 37 years (range, 24-68 years). Because of underlying deformity, the implant contour was modified for 9 elbows (31%) and a customized implant was inserted in 5 elbows (17%). The mean follow-up duration was 10.5 years (range, 4.6-20.1 years). RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 8 elbows underwent reoperation, including 6 (21%) that underwent implant revision. At most recent follow-up, 22 elbows (76%) subjectively had a satisfactory overall functional result. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 78 points (range, 50-100 points), with 18 elbows graded as having an excellent or good result. Compared with preoperative range of motion, the mean extension-flexion arc improved from 65° ± 44° to 89° ± 35° (P = .01), mean flexion improved from 113° ± 23° to 126° ± 26° (P = .02), and mean extension improved from 48° ± 25° to 37° ± 26° (P = .08). By use of the Kaplan-Meier survivorship method, the rate of TEA survival from any revision was 96.4% (95% confidence interval, 89.8%-100%) and 79.9% (95% confidence interval, 65.1%-97.5%) at 5 years and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Primary TEA for JIA patients is technically challenging and frequently requires implant modification or custom designs. These patients might have high complication and revision rates. However, most benefit from the intervention for a long term.

Elbow stiffness: Interview with professor Bernard Morrey.

Stiff elbow is a complex condition whose diagnosis and management are sometimes quite a challenge. Compared to the other joints, the elbow is disproportionately affected by loss of motion following trauma or surgery. It is unclear why the elbow tends to develop stiffness; its anatomical complexity, namely the presence of three highly congruent joints in the same capsule and synovial space, the tautness of the lateral and medial collateral ligaments through the whole range of motion, and the very close relationship among tendons, muscles, and skin 2 may account for this characteristic. In a stiff elbow, it is critical to assess the possible involvement of articular and periarticular tissues, particularly the degree of preservation of the articular surfaces and joint congruency. Morrey et al have classified post-traumatic stiff elbow into three types: 1) extrinsic contracture, which involves the soft tissue around the joint (capsule, ligaments, muscles) and heterotopic ossification across the joint, 2) intrinsic contracture, secondary to intra-articular fractures that have altered the anatomy of the articular surface, and 3) mixed contracture, combining intrinsic and extrinsic contracture. In the preoperative clinical assessment, we assume capsule contracture to be present in all patients with a stiff elbow. Two main associated lesions can affect prognosis and surgical management: heterotopic ossification and an altered bone joint anatomy. According to Morrey et al, most activities of daily living can be accomplished within an arc of motion from 30° to 130° in extension and flexion and of 50° in pronation and supination. The elbow arc of motion is not compensated for by the wrist and shoulder, thus loss of extension impairs the use of the hand in the space around the body and loss of flexion limits its use for grooming and self-care. The elbow should carefully be tested for deformity of the axial bone alignment (varus and valgus deformity) and rotational stability. Several treatment options are available for stiff elbow, from conservative management with a dedicated rehabilitation program to surgical treatment and from arthroscopic capsulectomy to joint replacement.

Activities after total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of patient activities after total elbow arthroplasty may help delineate the true functional gains obtained after replacement. Experience suggests that some patients may perform activities excessively demanding on elbow implants, but compliance with activity restrictions recommended after elbow arthroplasty is largely unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary or revision total elbow arthroplasty at a single institution from 2005 to 2007 were surveyed regarding their activity level. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were assessed. Patients were also questioned about whether they recalled which activities were not recommended by their surgeon. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen completed surveys were analyzed. There were 29 men and 84 women with a mean age of 65 years. Of the patients, 64 had primary and 49 had revision operations. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 77 points (range, 15-100 points). The mean University of California, Los Angeles activity score was 5 points (range, 1-10 points). Moderate-demand activities were performed by 94% of patients, and high-demand activities were performed by 40% of patients. Male gender and a diagnosis of fracture/nonunion was associated with increased performance of high-demand activities (P < .05). Eighty percent of patients remembered receiving postoperative restrictions, and of these patients, 83% interpreted that they were compliant with their restrictions. CONCLUSION: Ninety-four percent of patients engaged in moderate-demand activities after total elbow arthroplasty. Forty percent engaged in high-demand activities. Factors correlated with more demanding activities included male gender and diagnosis of fracture/nonunion. The vast majority of patients remembered receiving postoperative restrictions.

Characterization of wear debris in total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate wear debris in periprosthetic tissues at the time of revision total elbow arthroplasty. Polyethylene, metallic, and bone cement debris were characterized, and the tissue response was quantified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Capsular and medullary tissue samples were collected during revision surgery. Polyethylene debris was characterized by scanning electron microscopy after tissue digestion. The concentrations of metal and cement debris were quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Tissue response was graded with a semiquantitative histologic method. RESULTS: Polyethylene particle size varied from the submicron range to over 100 µm. The mean diameter ranged from 0.6 µm to about 1 µm. Particles in the synovial tissues were larger and less abundant than those in tissues from the medullary canal. Cement, titanium alloy, and low levels of cobalt-chrome debris were also present, with cement predominating over metal debris. Histiocyte response was associated with small polyethylene particles (0.5-2 µm), and giant cells were associated with large polyethylene particles (>2 µm). Histiocyte scores positively correlated with the polyethylene particle number and the presence of metal. DISCUSSION: We have shown that periprosthetic tissues of total elbow patients who have undergone revision for loosening and osteolysis contain polyethylene, cement, and metal debris. Although the polyethylene particles were of a size and shape that have been previously shown to result in activation of phagocytic cells, osteolysis after total elbow arthroplasty is a multimodal process. Because of the presence of multiple wear particle sources, a cause-and-effect relationship between polyethylene debris and osteolysis cannot be established with certainty.

Medial Elbow Pain Syndrome: Current Treatment Strategies.

Medial elbow pain is a common presentation that can be a challenge to appropriately treat for the orthopedic surgeon. Causes include medial epicondylitis, ulnar neuritis, ulnar collateral ligament injury, flexor pronator strain, or snapping medial triceps. A good outcome is typically achieved with adequate treatment of tendon degeneration at the common flexor tendon origin. Mainstay treatment is nonoperative modalities such as stretching, rest, activity modification, therapy, and injections. If nonoperative management fails, intermediate interventions such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy, platelet-rich plasma injections, prolotherapy, and ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy can be attempted. Surgical treatments are dictated based on the severity of the pathology, involvement of soft tissues, and concomitant pathology. Medial elbow complaints can be multifactorial and require a broad differential diagnosis. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):e81-e88.].