Airborne Isolation Cardiac Arrest: A Simulation Program for Interdisciplinary Code Blue Team Training.

Introduction: In-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with COVID-19 presents significant challenges to health care teams. Airborne precautions can delay patient care, place providers at high risk of virus exposure, and exacerbate an already stressful environment. Within the constraints of an ongoing pandemic, an efficient educational program is required to prepare health care teams for airborne isolation code blue. Methods: This simulation was conducted in a room on the target unit using a CPR manikin to represent the patient. A "talk-through walk-through" scripted simulation directed learners (internal medicine residents, unit nurses, and other code blue responders) through a resuscitation using an airborne isolation code blue protocol. Key scripted events prompted role identification, communication, and item transfer. Learners self-assessed their airborne isolation code blue knowledge and skills and their confidence in providing quality care while maintaining safety using a pre-/posttraining 5-point Likert-scale survey. Results: We trained 100 participants over a 5-month period, with 65 participants surveyed (43 respondents; 16 residents, 22 nurses). Following training, participants had a statistically significant (p < .001) increase in percentage selecting agree/strongly agree for all statements related to knowledge and skills specific to airborne isolation code blue protocol, as well as confidence in providing care while keeping themselves and their colleagues safe. Discussion: Our simulation program allowed a small number of educators to feasibly train a large number of learners, let learners practice required skills, and improved learners' self-assessed knowledge, skills, and confidence regarding quality and safety of care.

Development of a Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Image Acquisition Assessment Tool.

Background: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) is widely used by healthcare providers to answer specific questions about cardiac structure and function at the bedside. Currently, no widely accepted FCU image acquisition checklist exists to assess learners with varying skill levels from different specialties. Objective: The primary objective of this project was to develop a consensus-based FCU image acquisition checklist using a multispecialty group of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) experts. Methods: The essential components of an FCU examination were identified on the basis of published recommendations from echocardiography and international ultrasound societies. A checklist of the essential components of an FCU examination was drafted. A panel of POCUS experts from different medical specialties in the United States and Canada was convened to vote on each checklist item by answering two questions: 1) Is this item important to include in a checklist of essential FCU skills applicable to any medical specialty? and 2) Should the learner be required to successfully complete this item to be considered competent? A modified Delphi approach was used to assess the level of agreement for each checklist item during four rounds of voting. Checklist items that achieved an agreement of 80% or greater were included in the final checklist. Results: Thirty-one POCUS experts from seven different medical specialties voted on sixty-five items to be included in the FCU image acquisition assessment tool. The majority of POCUS experts (61%) completed all four rounds of voting. During the first round of voting, 59 items reached consensus, and after revision and revoting, an additional 3 items achieved 80% or greater consensus. A total of 62 items were included in the final checklist, and 57 items reached consensus as a requirement for demonstration of competency. Conclusion: We have developed a multispecialty, consensus-based FCU image acquisition checklist that may be used to assess the skills of learners from different specialties. Future steps include studies to develop additional validity evidence for the use of the FCU assessment tool and to evaluate its utility for the translation of skills into clinical practice.

Role of Toll-like receptor 5 in the innate immune response to acute P. aeruginosa pneumonia.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of hospital-acquired pneumonia and an important pathogen in patients with chronic lung disease, such as cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis. The contribution of Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) to the innate immune response to this organism is incompletely understood. We exposed wild-type and TLR5-deficient (Tlr5(-/-)) mice to aerosolized P. aeruginosa at low and high inocula and assessed bacterial clearance, lung inflammation, and cytokine production 4 and 24 h after infection. Bacterial clearance was impaired in Tlr5(-/-) mice after low-inoculum, but not high-inoculum, infection. Early bronchoalveolar accumulation of neutrophils was reduced in Tlr5(-/-) mice after low- and high-dose infection. Cytokine responses, including markedly impaired monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production 4 h after low- and high-inoculum challenge, were selectively altered in Tlr5(-/-) mice. In contrast, there was no impairment of bacterial clearance, neutrophil recruitment, or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production in Tlr5(-/-) mice after infection with a nonflagellated isotypic strain of P. aeruginosa. Thus TLR5-mediated recognition of flagellin is involved in activating pulmonary defenses against P. aeruginosa and contributes to antibacterial resistance in a manner that is partially inoculum dependent. These data are the first to demonstrate a unique role for TLR5 in the innate immune response to P. aeruginosa lung infection.

The association between body mass index and clinical outcomes in acute lung injury.

BACKGROUND: The association between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes in critically ill patients is unclear. Our objective was to determine the association between BMI and outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with acute lung injury (ALI). METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of all ICU patients in King County, Washington, with ALI in 1 year (1999 to 2000), 825 patients had a BMI recorded. Using multivariate analysis, patients in the abnormal BMI groups were compared to normal patients in the following areas: mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, duration of mechanical ventilation, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: There was no mortality difference in any of the abnormal BMI groups compared to normal-weight patients. Severely obese patients had longer hospital LOS than normal-weight patients (mean increase, 10.5 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8 to 16.2 days; p < 0.001); this was accentuated when analysis was restricted to survivors (mean increase, 14.3 days; 95% CI, 7.1 to 21.6 days; p < 0.001). ICU LOS and duration of mechanical ventilation were also longer in the severely obese group when analysis was restricted to survivors (mean increase, 5.6 days; 95% CI, 1.3 to 9.8 days; p = 0.01; and mean increase, 4.1 days; 95% CI, 0.4 to 7.7 days, respectively; p = 0.03). Severely obese patients were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility than to home. CONCLUSIONS: BMI is not associated with mortality in patients with ALI, but severe obesity is associated with increased morbidity and resource utilization in the hospital and after discharge.

A comparison of Google Glass and traditional video vantage points for bedside procedural skill assessment.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study assessed the feasibility of using first person (1P) video recording with Google Glass (GG) to assess procedural skills, as compared with traditional third person (3P) video. We hypothesized that raters reviewing 1P videos would visualize more procedural steps with greater inter-rater reliability than 3P rating vantages. METHODS: Seven subjects performed simulated internal jugular catheter insertions. Procedures were recorded by both Google Glass and an observer's head-mounted camera. Videos were assessed by 3 expert raters using a task-specific checklist (CL) and both an additive- and summative-global rating scale (GRS). Mean scores were compared by t-tests. Inter-rater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The 1P vantage was associated with a significantly higher mean CL score than the 3P vantage (7.9 vs 6.9, P = .02). Mean GRS scores were not significantly different. Mean inter-rater reliabilities for the CL, additive-GRS, and summative-GRS were similar between vantages. CONCLUSIONS: 1P vantage recordings may improve visualization of tasks for behaviorally anchored instruments (eg, CLs), whereas maintaining similar global ratings and inter-rater reliability when compared with conventional 3P vantage recordings.

Point-of-care ultrasound: seeing the future.

Practitioners other than radiologists and certified sonographers are increasingly using ultrasound at the bedside to facilitate immediate patient management from both procedural and diagnostic standpoints. This editorial provides a brief overview of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in clinical practice, its potential to improve patient care, and some of the unanswered questions surrounding issues of training, scope of practice, and quality assurance.