Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry assessment of bone health in Australian men with prostate cancer commencing androgen deprivation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence in Australia of bone health assessment of men with prostate cancer by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), from six months before to twelve months after initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). DESIGN, SETTING: Cross-sectional national study; linkage of de-identified Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data. PARTICIPANTS: Men (18 years or older) first dispensed PBS-subsidised ADT during 1 May 2017 - 31 July 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of MBS-subsidised DXA assessments undertaken from six months before to twelve months after first ADT prescription. RESULTS: Of 33 836 men with prostate cancer commencing ADT therapy during 2017-20, 6683 (19.8%) underwent DXA bone heath assessments between six months before and twelve months after commencing ADT; the mean time from first ADT dispensing to DXA scanning was +90 days (standard deviation, 134 days). The proportion of men aged 54 years or younger who had scans (66 of 639, 10%) was smaller than that of men aged 70-84 years (4528 of 19 378, 23.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.28-0.47). CONCLUSIONS: For about 80% of men with prostate cancer commencing ADT in Australia, therapy initiation was not accompanied by DXA assessment of bone health. Given the excellent long term prognosis for men with prostate cancer and the availability of bone protective therapy, bone health monitoring should be a routine component of prostate cancer care for men receiving ADT.

PARAGON: A Phase II study of anastrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive recurrent/metastatic low-grade ovarian cancers and serous borderline ovarian tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options are limited for patients with recurrent/metastatic low-grade ovarian cancers (LGOCs) and serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOTs) as response rates to chemotherapy are low. A subset of patients appears to derive clinical benefit from antiestrogens, but most studies have been retrospective and clinical benefit rates (CBR) remain uncertain. The primary aim of PARAGON was to prospectively investigate the CBR of anastrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive LGOC and SBOT. METHODS: Post-menopausal women with ER-positive and/or PR-positive recurrent/metastatic LGOCs and SBOTs and evaluable disease by RECIST v1.1 or GCIG CA125 criteria were treated with anastrozole 1 mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled. Clinical benefit at 3 months (primary endpoint) was observed in 23 patients (64%, 95% CI 48%-78%) and was similar at 6 months (61%, 95% CI 43%-75%). The median duration of clinical benefit was 9.5 months (95% CI 8.3-25.8). Best study response was partial response by RECIST in 5 patients (14%), stable disease in 18 patients (50%) with progressive disease in 13 patients (36%). Median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI 3.2-11.9). Anastrozole was well-tolerated. Patients with evidence of clinical benefit at 3 months reported less pain, fatigue, and improved physical and role functioning as early as 1 month of commencing treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Anastrozole was associated with a CBR of 61% of patients with recurrent ER-positive and/or PR-positive LGOC or SBOT for at least 6 months with acceptable toxicity.

A mixed methods approach to developing and evaluating oncology trainee education around minimization of adverse events and improved patient quality and safety.

BACKGROUND: Adverse events are a significant quality and safety issue in the hospital setting due to their direct impact on patients. Additionally, such events are often handled by junior doctors due to their direct involvement with patients. As such, it is important for health care organizations to prioritize education and training for junior doctors on identifying adverse events and handling them when they occur. The Cancer Cup Challenge is an educational program focuses on quality improvement and adverse event awareness targeting for junior oncology doctors across three international sites. METHODS: A mixed methodology was used to develop and evaluate the program. The Qstream spaced learning platform was used to disseminate information to participants, as it has been demonstrated to impact on both knowledge and behavior. Eight short case based scenarios with expert feedback were developed by a multidisciplinary advisory committee containing representatives from the international sites. At the conclusion of the course impact on participant knowledge was evaluated using analysis of the metrics collected by the Qstream platform. Additionally, an online survey and semi-structured interviews were used to evaluate engagement and perceived value by participants. RESULTS: A total of 35 junior doctors registered to undertake the Qstream program, with 31 (88.57 %) successfully completing it. Analysis of the Qstream metrics revealed 76.57 % of cases were answered correctly on first attempt. The post-program survey received 17 responses, with 76.47 % indicating cases for the course were interesting and 82.35 % feeling cases were relevant. Finally, 14 participants consented to participate in semi-structured interviews about the program, with feedback towards the course being generally very positive. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that an online game is well accepted by junior doctors as a method to increase their quality improvement awareness. Developing effective and sustainable training for doctors is important to ensure positive patient outcomes are maintained in the hospital setting. This is particularly important for junior doctors as they are working closely with patients and learning skills and behaviors, which will influence their practice throughout their careers.

Five-year survival and clinical correlates among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma and renal cell carcinoma treated with immune check-point inhibitors in Australian tertiary oncology centres.

AIMS: There is robust trial evidence for improved overall survival (OS) with immunotherapy in advanced solid organ malignancies. The real-world long-term survival data and the predictive variables are not yet known. Our aim was to evaluate factors associated with 3-year and 5-year OS for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients who received ICIs as management of advanced solid organ malignancies in two tertiary Australian oncology centres from 2012-2017. Data pertaining to clinical characteristics, metastatic disease burden, immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and tumour responses were collected and their relationship to survival examined. RESULTS: In this analysis of 264 patients, 202 (76.5%) had melanoma, 46 (17.4%) had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 12 (4.5%) had renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and 4 (1.5%) had mesothelioma. The 5-year OS rates were 42.1% in patients with melanoma, 19.6% with NSCLC, 75% with RCC, and none of the mesothelioma patients were alive at 5 years. In multivariate analysis, an ECOG score of 0 (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.66; p < 0.001) and the occurrence of IRAE's of any grade (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.37-0.95; p = 0.05) were associated with better 5-year survival. The presence of bone metastases (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.03-2.82; p = 0.05) and liver metastases (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.07-2.89; p = 0.03) were associated with worse 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the long-term benefits of immunotherapy that in some patients, extend to at least 5 years. ECOG performance status of 0 and the occurrence of irAEs are associated with better long-term survival. Survival is significantly influenced by metastatic site and cancer type. These predictive clinical correlates aid discussions and planning in the delivery of ICIs to patients.

New therapeutic opportunities for women with low-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) is a morphologically and molecularly distinct subtype of ovarian cancer, accounting for ~10% of serous carcinomas. Women typically present at a younger age and have a protracted clinical course compared with the more common, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Currently, the primary treatment of LGSC is the same as other epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes, with treatment for most patients comprised of debulking surgery and platinum/taxane chemotherapy. Primary surgical cytoreduction to no visible residual disease remains a key prognostic factor; however, the use of platinum-based chemotherapy in both upfront and relapsed setting is being questioned due to low response rates in LGSC. Most LGSC expresses steroid hormone receptors, and selected patients may benefit from endocrine maintenance therapy following chemotherapy, in particular, those with evidence of residual disease at completion of surgery. In the recurrent setting, while hormonal therapies may offer disease stabilisation with relatively low toxicity, objective response rates remain low. Strategies to increase response rates, including combining with CDK4/6 inhibitors, are being investigated. LGSC has a high prevalence of activating somatic mutations in mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway genes, most commonly in KRAS, BRAF and NRAS. Trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, has shown efficacy over chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. The use of combination targeted therapies, immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic agents, remain active areas of investigation for the treatment of LGSC.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most deadly cancer worldwide. Unfortunately, a quarter of the patients are diagnosed at late stages, when surgical options are limited. Targeted therapies, particularly immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are the latest addition and have been studied herein regarding their efficacy outcomes. METHODS: Clinical studies were identified through the PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Any trial that evaluated ICIs in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) and reported the objective response rate was deemed eligible. Data analysis was performed by employing the random-effects model in STATA v.17. RESULTS: A total of 461 articles were identified; 13 clinical trials were included, encompassing a total cohort of 1209 patients. Our study determined that a single PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade provides durable clinical response in mCRC patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). The combinatorial therapy of CTLA-4 + PD-1 inhibitors also showed high response rates in pre-treated MSI-H patients. The single-arm REGONIVO trial reported durable clinical response in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) status. CONCLUSIONS: Our study surmises that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as well as combination therapy with CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors show encouraging response rates in mCRC patients, albeit exclusively in patients with cancer that are of MSI-H status. A single study suggests that nivolumab + regorafenib can reach a durable response rate in MSS patients; however, further studies in larger randomized settings are required.

BRAF Mutations in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer and Response to BRAF Inhibition.

PURPOSE: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSC) responds poorly to chemotherapy and is characterized by activating mutations in the Ras sarcoma-mitogen-activated protein kinase (RAS-MAPK) pathway, including oncogenic BRAF. However, response to BRAF inhibitors is tumor-type specific. Significant improvement in survival is seen in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma, but other cancer types, such as colorectal cancers, are generally less sensitive. We examined the frequency and characteristics of BRAF-mutated LGSC and described the response to treatment with BRAF inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mutations were assessed in LGSC (N = 65) by using targeted, exome, and whole-genome sequencing. Patient characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcome were assessed, and the median follow-up time was more than 5 years. BRAF inhibitors were trialed in two patients with a somatic BRAF V600E mutation: one patient received dabrafenib monotherapy and was monitored clinically, biochemically (cancer antigen [CA]-125 levels), and with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Expression of the BRAF V600E protein in this patient was assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Among patients with LGSC, nine (13.8%) of 65 had a somatic BRAF mutation. Of the nine patients with BRAF mutation-positive LGSC, four experienced progressive disease that did not respond to conventional chemotherapy. Two of the patients experienced progression quickly and died as a result of disease progression, and two received targeted treatment. Two patients with BRAF V600E mutation received BRAF inhibitors at relapse and both achieved durable responses. CONCLUSION: BRAF mutations are not uncommon in patients with LGSC and should be routinely tested, because BRAF inhibitors can be an effective treatment for these patients. The results highlight the need for targeted treatment in this rare tumor type, and a prospective study is needed to formally assess the response rate and clinical benefit.

EIF1AX and NRAS Mutations Co-occur and Cooperate in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinomas.

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSC) are associated with a poor response to chemotherapy and are molecularly characterized by RAS pathway activation. Using exome and whole genome sequencing, we identified recurrent mutations in the protein translational regulator EIF1AX and in NF1, USP9X, KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS RAS pathway mutations were mutually exclusive; however, we found significant co-occurrence of mutations in NRAS and EIF1AX Missense EIF1AX mutations were clustered at the N-terminus of the protein in a region associated with its role in ensuring translational initiation fidelity. Coexpression of mutant NRAS and EIF1AX proteins promoted proliferation and clonogenic survival in LGSC cells, providing the first example of co-occurring, growth-promoting mutational events in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res; 77(16); 4268-78. ©2017 AACR.