[Clinical presentation and performance of urine dipstick for diagnosis of urinary infection in geriatric population]. / Présentation clinique et performance de la bandelette urinaire pour le diagnostic d'infection urinaire en population gériatrique.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the second cause of community-acquired bacterial infections in the elderly. Distinguishing symptomatic UTI from asymptomatic bacteriuria is problematic, as older adults are less likely to present with localized urinary symptoms. We evaluated characteristics of patients presenting UTI among elderly with sepsis. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate the sensibility and specificity of urine dipstick tests in the diagnosis of UTI in geriatric population. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We led a prospective, monocentric, observational study between April 2017 and January 2018. We included patients hospitalized in geriatric wards, who were prescribed urine culture for UTI symptoms or/and infection without primary sites for which a urine culture was prescribed. Dipstick urinalyses were performed for all patients. Clinical and biological characteristics of all patients were compared according to the final diagnosis of UTI. Moreover, results of dipstick tests were evaluated for the diagnosis of UTI in this population. RESULTS: Among 165 patients, 67 (40.6 %) had a UTI and 98 (59.4 %) had another diagnosis. These two groups were comparable for age and daily-living activities. In the UTI group, the proportion of women was higher than in the other group (P<0.05), and mean MMSE score was lower (P<0.05). Positive urine dipstick test for leukocytes and/or nitrites had high sensitivity (92 %), but low specificity (50 %). Negative predictive value of this test was high (91 %). CONCLUSION: For suspicion of UTI among elderly, few criteria are specific. Negative dipstick tests can suggest an absence of UTI due to its high negative predictive value.

[Geriatric intervention team in an academic orthopedic surgery department: activity at the Ambroise-Paré Hospital in Boulogne, France]. / L'équipe d'intervention gériatrique dans un service de chirurgie orthopédique adulte: Bilan de la première année d'activité à l'hôpital Ambroise-Paré de Boulogne.

To respond to increasing demand resulting from population aging, a geriatric intervention team was created at the Ambroise-Paré hospital in February 2004. The main activity of the team is to improve medical and social care of elderly patients who are regularly frail with multiple morbid conditions and taking multiple medications. During the first year of activity, 23% of requests came from the orthopedic surgery department which annually cares for 720 patients aged over 75 years. Physicians and nurses from this department need to adapt their practices to the specific features of geriatric care. The geriatric intervention team provides advice, support, and suggestions as well as professional training.

[Falls, frailty and osteoporosis in the elderly: a public health problem]. / Chutes, fragilité et ostéoporose chez la personne âgée: un problème de santé publique.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly people can be subdivided into three groups: healthy elderly persons (65-70% of the population), elderly subjects with diseases (about 5%) and frail old people. Frailty represents "age-related physiologic vulnerability resulting from impaired homeotasic stock and a reduced capacity of the organism to withstand stress". It could lead elderly subjects to pathological, barely reversible, ageing. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: One of the main objective of geriatricians is to develop useful screening tools to identify people at high risk, thus allowing them to benefit from preventive interventions as early as possible. It has been suggested that the decline in homeostatic stock involves numerous physiological systems. Those at the core of frailty would be neuromuscular changes resulting in sarcopenia, neuroendocrine dysregulation, and immune disorders. A recent study has shown that increased levels of interleukin 6 is a risk factor for frailty. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: Work in progress aimed at identification of at-risk patients should: lead to early detection; draw attention on underestimated fields such as the nutritional status, sarcopenia, or gait disorders; promote the development of the standardized gerontological evaluation in order to identify the different components of frailty; and promote the development of non-pharmacological programmes including physical training, nutritional managing, and optimal social life.

Perception of Alzheimer's disease in the French population.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the perception, knowledge, opinions and beliefs about AD in the French population to improve care for patients with Alzheimer's disease. DESIGN: A cross-sectional telephone survey in 2008. SETTING: French "Alzheimer Plan 2008-2012". PARTICIPANTS: 2013 respondents, representative of the French population. MEASUREMENTS: The respondents answered a questionnaire in which they were presented with a series of attitudinal statements about health in general and AD. RESULTS: Main results are summarized as followed: (a) Respondents think that AD can be devastating for a family (93%). This devastating feeling prevails in the population >75 years old and in people who know patient with AD. (b) General population has a reasonable knowledge about AD, but is still unable to recognize early stages: 95% of respondents considered that difficulties to manage administrative papers and find their way back home suggest early AD. (c) 91% of the population would like to know the diagnosis if they had AD. (d) 38% of the population know or have known at least one patient within their social circle. People think that the care of AD's patient can be better but they trust in the French government to improve it. CONCLUSION: General representation of AD is changing in a positive way and, even though AD is perceived as a calamity, people are confident that solutions will be found in the future.

[Transfusion in clinical practice in geriatric wards]. / Enquête transversale sur la transfusion dans les services de gériatrie.

PURPOSE: In the absence of specific recommendations on blood transfusion in elderly subjects, we carried out a survey to assess transfusion practices in geriatric medicine. METHODS: A descriptive, national, cross-sectional survey was conducted in 14 French geriatric departments (12 teaching hospitals and two general hospitals). In each department, five patients receiving transfusions were randomly selected in order to analyze their characteristics, the indications of blood transfusion, the criteria for and the methods of transfusion compared with Afssaps recommendations on transfusion thresholds. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 70 patients (mean age 86+/-7 years, sex ratio female to male 1.8, with an average of five+/-two pathologies and six+/-three treatments). The indicators of poor tolerance included confusion (23 %), somnolence (22 %), acute heart failure (17 %) or coronary heart disease (16 %), and differed from the Afssaps criteria in the majority of cases. The transfusion threshold that were considered in the absence of poor tolerance (45 % of transfusions) differed from that recommended by Afssaps in 26 % of cases. The main adverse event in transfusion recipients was heart failure. CONCLUSION: When criteria for poor anaemia tolerance or transfusion thresholds are considered, transfusion practices in geriatric subjects have specific features. Further studies are needed to validate the appropriateness of the practices described in this survey.

[Ethic reflexion in the care of elderly people with cancer]. / Réflexion éthique dans le cadre de la prise en charge des patients âgés atteints de cancer.

Medical ethics is concerned with practices of care, their purposes, their feasibility. It raises questions about taking care of elderly patients with cancer. The decision criteria of exploration in search of cancer or treatment of confirmed cancer are numerous. Some are medical criteria (benefit on survival, polypathology, impact on the body, the prognosis associated with comorbidities), others are more subjective (quality of life, difficulty of patient's information, longer hospitalisation, ageism). Age appears to be the first lock, the second is cognitive disorders. Overexpenditure of current assumptions seems necessary to improve the care of elderly patients with cancer. Especially since many publications indicate that cancer treatments are generally well supported and beneficial to advanced ages.

Prevalence of sedative drug use in geriatric in-patients: a multi-centre study.

OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study registered the prevalence of sedative drug use and withdrawal strategies in geriatric in-patients from 30 centres in nine European countries. METHODS: We conducted a survey among young geriatricians using a standardised questionnaire on sedative drug use for more than three weeks. The study population consisted of 1972 in-patients aged 75 years or older. Acute care (620), intermediate care/rehabilitation (359), long-term care (261), terminal care (47) and nursing home (685) settings were represented. The pre-specified outcomes included the prevalence of sedative drug use; the identification of main prescribers and main reasons for prescribing and, the assessment of withdrawal policy, including psychological counselling and involvement of general practitioners. RESULTS: Prevalence of sedative use was highest in long-term care (72%), followed by nursing homes (70%) and terminal care (59%). Geriatricians started prescribing sedatives after admission on 52% of all occasions. The main reasons for prescribing were continuation of medication taken at home (37%), sleep problems emerging after admission (26%) and post-admission worsening of existing sleep problems (20%). Most prescribers (70%) applied an active withdrawal policy. Short-term withdrawal programmes were mostly applied (57%). Most patients (60%) were psychologically counselled during withdrawal from sedatives. General practitioners were often (60%) involved in withdrawal policy. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of prescription of sedative drugs in geriatric in-patients is high. Appropriate setting specific guidelines are needed to control use of sedatives in geriatric in-patients and to ensure withdrawal from these drugs whenever possible.