RESUMO
Background and aims: Human islet preparations designated for research exhibit diverse insulin-secretory profiles. This study aims to assess the impact of donor- and isolation-related factors on in vitro islet secretory function. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 46 isolations from 23 pancreata discarded for clinical transplantation was conducted. In vitro islet secretory function tests were performed on Day 1 and Day 7 of culture. Linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) were employed to investigate the relationships between various predictors characterizing the patient and donor characteristics as well as the isolation effectiveness and two functional outcomes including the islet stimulation index (SI) and area under the insulin curve (AUC). Fixed effects were introduced to represent the main effects of each predictor, and backward elimination was utilized to select the most significant fixed effects for the final model. Interaction effects between the timepoint (Day 7 vs. Day 1) and the predictors were also evaluated to assess whether predictors were associated with the temporal evolution of SI and AUC. Fold-change (Fc) values associated with each predictor were obtained by exponentiating the corresponding coefficients of the models, which were built on log-transformed outcomes. Results: Analysis using LMMs revealed that donor body mass index (BMI) (Fc = 0.961, 95% CI = 0.927-0.996, p = 0.05), donor gender (female vs. male, Fc = 0.702, 95% CI = 0.524-0.942, p = 0.04), and donor hypertension (Fc = 0.623, 95% CI = 0.466-0.832, p= <0.01) were significantly and independently associated with SI. Moreover, donor gender (Fc = 0.512, 95% CI = 0.302-0.864, p = 0.02), donor cause of death (cerebrovascular accident vs. cardiac arrest, Fc = 2.129, 95% CI = 0.915-4.946, p = 0.09; trauma vs. cardiac arrest, Fc = 2.129, 95% CI = 1.112-7.106, p = 0.04), pancreas weight (Fc = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.001-1.019, p = 0.03), and islet equivalent (IEQ)/mg (Fc = 1.277, 95% CI = 1.088-1.510, p ≤ 0.01) were significantly and independently associated with AUC. There was no predictor significantly associated with the temporal evolution between Day 1 and Day 7 for both SI and AUC outcomes. Conclusion: This study identified donor- and isolation-related factors influencing in vitro islet secretory function. Further investigations are essential to validate the applicability of these results in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Parada Cardíaca , Doadores de Tecidos , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Massa Corporal , InsulinaRESUMO
Background: In islet transplantation, the use of dynamic hypothermic preservation techniques is a current challenge. This study compares the efficacy of 3 pancreas preservation methods: static cold storage, hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), and oxygenated HMP. Methods: A standardized human pancreas split model was employed using discarded organs from both donation after brain death (nâ =â 15) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) (nâ =â 9) donors. The pancreas head was preserved using static cold storage (control group), whereas the tail was preserved using the 3 different methods (study group). Data on donor characteristics, pancreas histology, isolation outcomes, and functional tests of isolated islets were collected. Results: Insulin secretory function evaluated by calculating stimulation indices and total amount of secreted insulin during high glucose stimulation (area under the curve) through dynamic perifusion experiments was similar across all paired groups from both DCD and donation after brain death donors. In our hands, islet yield (IEQ/g) from the pancreas tails used as study groups was higher than that of the pancreas heads as expected although this difference did not always reach statistical significance because of great variability probably due to suboptimal quality of organs released for research purposes. Moreover, islets from DCD organs had greater purity than controls (P ≤ 0.01) in the HMP study group. Furthermore, our investigation revealed no significant differences in pancreas histology, oxidative stress markers, and apoptosis indicators. Conclusions: For the first time, a comparative analysis was conducted, using a split model, to assess the effects of various preservation methods on islets derived from pancreas donors. Nevertheless, no discernible variances were observed in terms of islet functionality, histological attributes, or isolation efficacy. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings for clinical application.