Safety and Feasibility of Early Mobilization in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and External Ventricular Drain.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In November 2014, our Neurointensive Care Unit began a multi-phased progressive early mobilization initiative for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and an external ventricular drain (EVD). Our goal was to transition from a culture of complete bed rest (Phase 0) to a physical and occupational therapy (PT/OT)-guided mobilization protocol (Phase I), and ultimately to a nurse-driven mobilization protocol (Phase II). We hypothesized that nurses could mobilize patients as safely as an exclusively PT/OT-guided approach. METHODS: In Phase I, patients were mobilized only with PT/OT at bedside; no independent time out of bed occurred. In Phase II, nurses independently mobilized patients with EVDs, and patients could remain out of bed for up to 3 h at a time. Physical and occupational therapists continued routine consultation during Phase II. RESULTS: Phase II patients were mobilized more frequently than Phase I patients [7.1 times per ICU stay (± 4.37) versus 3.0 times (± 1.33); p = 0.02], although not earlier [day 4.9 (± 3.46) versus day 6.0 (± 3.16); p = 0.32]. All Phase II patients were discharged to home PT services or acute rehabilitation centers. No patients were discharged to skilled nursing or long-term acute care hospitals, versus 12.5% in Phase I. In a multivariate analysis, odds of discharge to home/rehab were 3.83 for mobilized patients, independent of age and severity of illness. Other quality outcomes (length of stay, ventilator days, tracheostomy placement) between Phase I and Phase II patients were similar. No adverse events were attributable to early mobilization. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-driven mobilization for patients with EVDs is safe, feasible, and leads to more frequent ambulation compared to a therapy-driven protocol. Nurse-driven mobilization may be associated with improved discharge disposition, although exact causation cannot be determined by these data.

Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after severe brain injury.

Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) is characterized by the rapid onset and paroxysmal cycling of agitation and dystonia in association with autonomic symptoms. These symptoms may include the following: tachycardia, hypertension, tachypnea, fever, pupil dilation, decreased level of consciousness, diaphoresis, and ventilator dyssynchrony. In a critically ill patient, these are all nonspecific symptoms that may reflect impending sepsis, seizure, or a number of other complications. This can confound and delay the diagnosis and treatment of PSH. While this phenomenon has been frequently observed in the traumatic brain injured population, management is highly variable, prompting this review of the literature. This article aims to outline the evidence base for the management of PSH, as well as to describe an algorithm for management developed at our institution.

An Integrative Review: Early Mobilization of Patients With External Ventriculostomy Drains in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at a high risk for immobility due to their high acuity and need for invasive devices including external ventriculostomy drains (EVDs). Prolonged patient immobilization is associated with poor outcomes. METHODS: Whittemore and Knafl's 5-stage framework was used to conduct an integrative review to synthesize findings from quantitative research studies on early patient mobilization for patients with EVDs in the neurological ICU. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was used as the reporting guideline. RESULTS: In 12 studies, a total of 412 patients with EVDs in neurological ICUs were actively mobilized with a goal of progressing to ambulation. Mobilization out of bed with a ventriculostomy drain was safe and feasible without significant adverse events. CONCLUSION: There is a need to clarify best practices for early mobilization of patients with EVDs in the neurological ICU and to explore the influence of early mobilization on patients' rates of venous thromboembolism, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, catheter line-associated blood stream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and ventriculostomy-related infections. No studies measured the total time the EVD was clamped during the patient mobilization intervention or the total amount of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on the day of mobilization. Early mobilization of patients with EVDs in the neurological ICU who were permitted out of bed was universally safe and feasible, with minimal adverse events when safety checks were integrated into mobilization protocols.

Performance improvement measures in achieving glycemic control in the acute brain injury population.

Glycemic control is becoming a standard practice in the intensive care environment because it has been shown to produce positive patient outcomes and benefits. A 14-bed neurointensive care unit initiated a strict glycemic protocol and evaluated the results over a 1-year period through a performance improvement initiative. Results indicated that tight glycemic control could be achieved safely by adhering to an evidence-based established protocol. The average blood glucose level for all patients was between 90 and 130 mg/dl by Day 2 after the implementation of the glycemic control protocol. The purpose of this article was to explain how a strict glycemic protocol was safely implemented. Further research is necessary to determine long-term benefits of glycemic control in the population with neurocritical illness.

Implementation of an Early Mobility Pathway in Neurointensive Care Unit Patients With External Ventricular Devices.

BACKGROUND: Patients with an external ventricular drain (EVD) may not be readily mobilized because of concerns of catheter dislodgment and/or inappropriate cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Delayed mobilization may result in longer hospital stays and an increased risk for complications related to immobility. We aimed to determine the safety, feasibility, and outcome of an EVD mobilization protocol in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: A multidisciplinary group developed a formal algorithm for the mobilization of patients with SAH with EVDs. Outcome measures included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), day to first mobilization, and discharge disposition. Patients were prospectively enrolled during a 12-month period and compared with a historical control group of patients with SAH for the preceding 12-month period. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 45 (86.7%) patients were women. Mean age did not differ significantly between the preintervention (n = 19) and postintervention (n = 26) groups (59.6 vs 55.7). Number of EVD device days did not differ significantly between groups (16.3 vs 15, P = .422]. Of 101 attempted postintervention mobilization sessions, six were aborted for increased lethargy (1), pain (1), elevated intracranial pressure (1), drain malfunction (1), and hypotension (2). Twenty-four sessions were attempted but never initiated because of worsening neurologic examination (10), pulmonary instability (2), hemodynamic instability (2), medical instability (3), and provider request (1). No patient experienced catheter dislodgment. Mean ICU LOS was not different between groups (20.7 vs 18.2, P = .262). The day of first mobilization was significantly earlier in the postintervention group (18.7 vs 6.5, P < .0001). The percentage of patients discharged home or to acute rehabilitation was higher in the postintervention group (63.2% vs 88.5%, P = .018], when accounting for Hunt and Hess grade. CONCLUSIONS: The mobilization of patients with EVDs is safe and feasible; it may be associated with earlier mobilization, reduced ICU LOS, and better discharge disposition. No major complications were attributable to early mobilization.