Regorafenib in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first- or second-line treatment of colorectal cancer: results of a multicenter, phase Ib study.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is commonly treated with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin or irinotecan. The multitargeted kinase inhibitor, regorafenib, was combined with chemotherapy as first- or second-line treatment of mCRC to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (primary objectives) and tumor response (secondary objective). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were treated every 2 weeks with 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) bolus then 2400 mg/m(2) over 46 h, folinic acid 400 mg/m(2), and either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) or irinotecan 180 mg/m(2). On days 4-10, patients received regorafenib 160 mg orally once daily. RESULTS: The median duration of treatment was 108 (range 2-345 days). Treatment was stopped for adverse events or death (17 patients), disease progression (11 patients), and consent withdrawal or investigator decision (11 patients). Six patients remained on regorafenib at data cutoff (two without chemotherapy). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 44 patients [grade ≥ 3 in 32 patients: mostly neutropenia (17 patients) and leukopenia, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia (four patients each)]. Thirty-three patients achieved disease control (partial response or stable disease) for a median of 126 (range 42-281 days). CONCLUSION: Regorafenib had acceptable tolerability in combination with chemotherapy, with increased exposure of irinotecan and SN-38 but no significant effect on 5-fluorouracil or oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics.

Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: In a phase I dose-escalation study, regorafenib demonstrated tolerability and antitumour activity in solid tumour patients. The study was expanded to focus on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients received oral regorafenib 60-220 mg daily (160 mg daily in the extension cohort) in cycles of 21 days on, 7 days off treatment. Assessments included toxicity, response, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with heavily pretreated CRC (median 4 prior lines of therapy, range 0-7) were enrolled in the dose-escalation and extension phases; 26 patients received regorafenib 160 mg daily. Median treatment duration was 53 days (range 7-280 days). The most common treatment-related toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, voice change and rash. Twenty-seven patients were evaluable for response: 1 achieved partial response and 19 had stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 107 days (95% CI, 66-161). At steady state, regorafenib and its active metabolites had similar systemic exposure. Pharmacodynamic assessment indicated decreased tumour perfusion in most patients. CONCLUSION: Regorafenib showed tolerability and antitumour activity in patients with metastatic CRC. This expanded-cohort phase I study provided the foundation for further clinical trials of regorafenib in this patient population.

A randomised phase II trial of the Polo-like kinase inhibitor BI 2536 in chemo-naïve patients with unresectable exocrine adenocarcinoma of the pancreas - a study within the Central European Society Anticancer Drug Research (CESAR) collaborative network.

BACKGROUND: BI 2536, a novel Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor, was assessed in patients with unresectable advanced exocrine adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. METHODS: The study employed a two-stage design. Randomised first-line patients received BI 2536 200 mg on day 1 (n=43) or 60 mg on days 1-3 (n=43) every 21 days. Recruitment of second-line patients was planned for a second stage dependent on an interim analysis demonstrating ≥ 2 responses in the first 18 evaluable patients following 12 weeks of treatment and/or tumour control ≥ 12 weeks in 5 patients per schedule. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: By independent review, ORR was 2.3% (all partial) and 24.4% had stable disease as confirmed best response. The second stage was not initiated. Median overall and progression-free survivals were 149 (95% confidence interval (CI), 91-307) and 46 days (95% CI, 44-56). Most common drug-related adverse events were neutropenia (37.2%), leukopenia (29.1%), fatigue (29.1%) and nausea (22.1%); most common grade 3/4-related events were neutropenia (36.0%), leukopenia (27.9%) and thrombocytopenia (8.1%). CONCLUSION: Given the low ORR and poor survival, further development of BI 2536 monotherapy is not warranted in this population.

Vascular and pharmacokinetic effects of EndoTAG-1 in patients with advanced cancer and liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: EndoTAG-1 (ET), a novel formulation of cationic liposomes carrying embedded paclitaxel (Taxol), shows antitumoral activity, targeting tumor endothelial cells in solid tumors. Patients with advanced metastatic cancer were evaluated investigating effects on pharmacokinetics and tumor vasculature using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of ET (22 mg/m(2) i.v.) was evaluated after single and repeated doses. DCE-MRI and CEUS explored hepatic metastases before, during and after the 4-week treatment cycle. Angiogenic biomarkers were assessed. Tumor response was evaluated by modified RECIST. RESULTS: The PK profile demonstrated slight accumulation of paclitaxel after repeated doses. DCE-MRI parameters K(trans) and/or iAUC(60) showed a trend to decrease. Changes of blood flow-dependent parameters of DCE-MRI and CEUS were well correlated. Angiogenic biomarkers revealed no clear trend. ET was generally well tolerated; common toxic effects were fatigue and hypersensitivity reactions. Nine (9 of 18) patients had stable disease after the first treatment cycle. Four patients without disease progression continued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study including multiple pretreated patients with different metastatic cancer revealed individually distinctive hemodynamic alterations by DCE-MRI. The PK profiles of ET were similar as observed previously.

Phase II study of nimotuzumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Nimotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the EGFR. Based on phase I data, the recommended dose has been established at 200 mg weekly. This study was aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of nimotuzumab monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Pts who failed first line standard chemotherapy for advanced disease and had at least one measurable lesion were eligible for the study. Nimotuzumab was given intravenously at 200 mg once weekly for 6 weeks (wks). Follow up by CT scan was performed after 8 weeks. Pts continued receiving treatment 3-weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Endpoints included tumor response (RECIST), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 56 pts were enrolled for treatment (ECOG status of 1 [n = 41] or 0 [n = 15]), the majority (47 pts) had metastatic disease. Nearly half of the pts [n = 26] received ≥2 regimens. Pts evaluable for response: n = 36; CR: 0; PR: 0; SD: 6 pts. Median PFS for pts with SD was 19.2 weeks, for all pts 6.7 weeks (95% CI: 6.43-7.14 weeks). PFS after 1 year was 10.3% with a median overall survival of 18.1 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild including rash grade 1 in 5 pts. After a single dose of 200 mg, the t(1/2) was calculated to 45 h. CONCLUSION: These data confirm that nimotuzumab is safe and very well tolerated. To improve efficacy, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with Gem has been initiated.

Phase I dose escalation study of telatinib (BAY 57-9352) in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Telatinib (BAY 57-9352) is an orally available, small-molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 2 and 3 (VEGFR-2/-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta tyrosine kinases. In this multicentre phase I dose escalation study, 71 patients with refractory solid tumours were enroled into 14 days on/7 days off (noncontinuous dosing) or continuous dosing groups to receive telatinib two times daily (BID). Hypertension (23%) and diarrhoea (7%) were the most frequent study drug-related adverse events of CTC grade 3. The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached up to a dose of 1500 mg BID continuous dosing. Telatinib was rapidly absorbed with median t(max) of 3 hours or less. Geometric mean C(max) and AUC(0-12) increased in a less than dose-proportional manner and plateaued in the 900-1500 mg BID dose range. Two renal cell carcinoma patients reached a partial response. Tumour blood flow measured by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and sVEGFR-2 plasma levels decreased with increasing AUC(0-12) of telatinib. Telatinib is safe and well tolerated up to a dose of 1500 mg BID continuous dosing. Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria, 900 mg telatinib BID continuously administered was selected as the recommended phase II dose.

Variants in the SLCO1B3 gene: interethnic distribution and association with paclitaxel pharmacokinetics.

To explore retrospectively the relationships between paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and three known, non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in SLCO1B3, the gene encoding organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B3. Accumulation of [(3)H]paclitaxel was studied in Xenopus laevis oocytes injected with cRNA of Oatp1b2, OATP1A2, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1, OAT3, OCT1, and NTCP. The 334T>G (Ser112Ala), 699G>A (Met233Ile), and 1564G>T (Gly522Cys) loci of SLCO1B3 were screened in 475 individuals from five ethnic groups and 90 European Caucasian cancer patients treated with paclitaxel. Only OATP1B3 was capable of transporting paclitaxel to a significant extent (P=0.003). The 334T>G and 699G>A SNPs were less common in the African-American and Ghanaian populations (P<0.000001). Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were not associated with the studied SNPs or haplotypes (P>0.3). The studied SNPs in SLCO1B3 appear to play a limited role in the disposition of paclitaxel, although their clinical significance in other ethnic populations remains to be investigated.

Results from an in vitro and a clinical/pharmacological phase I study with the combination irinotecan and sorafenib.

PURPOSE: This single-centre, open-label, phase I dose-escalation study was performed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, combined with irinotecan, a cytotoxic agent, in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an initial dose-escalation phase, patients received irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) and sorafenib 100, 200 and 400 mg twice daily (bid) (cohorts 1-3). In an extended phase, colorectal cancer (CRC) patients received fixed-dose irinotecan 140 mg and sorafenib 400 mg bid (cohort 4). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were treated: 20 in the dose-escalation phase (common tumour types: CRC [45%], ovarian [5%], pancreatic [5%]) and 14 patients in the CRC extension. Frequent drug-related adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms, dermatological reactions and constitutional symptoms. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Generally, concomitant administration of irinotecan had no impact on the PK of sorafenib. Sorafenib 100 or 200 mg bid had no impact on the PK of irinotecan or its metabolite SN38. In contrast, sorafenib 400 mg bid significantly increased irinotecan and SN38 exposures; however, this was not associated with increased toxicities. Stable disease was achieved in 12/20 (60%) evaluable patients in cohorts 1-3, and 10/13 (77%) evaluable patients in cohort 4. A further patient from cohort 4 had a partial response of >200 days. The increase of SN38 exposure might be due to inhibition of formation of the SN38 glucuronide by sorafenib. In vitro, sorafenib strongly inhibited SN38 glucuronidation in human liver microsomes as indicated by a K(i) value of 2.7 micromol/l. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib 400 mg bid can be combined with irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) or 140 mg for the treatment of patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours, although monitoring for toxicity is recommended.

Population Modeling Integrating Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacogenetics, and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Sunitinib-Treated Cancer.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib is used as first-line therapy in patients with metastasized renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), given in fixed-dose regimens despite its high variability in pharmacokinetics (PKs). Interindividual variability of drug exposure may be responsible for differences in response. Therefore, dosing strategies based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models may be useful to optimize treatment. Plasma concentrations of sunitinib, its active metabolite SU12662, and the soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptors sVEGFR-2 and sVEGFR-3, were measured in 26 patients with mRCC within the EuroTARGET project and 21 patients with metastasized colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the C-II-005 study. Based on these observations, PK/PD models with potential influence of genetic predictors were developed and linked to time-to-event (TTE) models. Baseline sVEGFR-2 levels were associated with clinical outcome in patients with mRCC, whereas active drug PKs seemed to be more predictive in patients with mCRC. The models provide the basis of PK/PD-guided strategies for the individualization of anti-angiogenic therapies.

Pharmacokinetics of undiluted or diluted high-dose etoposide with or without busulfan administered to patients with hematologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: We used two different methods to administer high-dose etoposide (VP-16) during a myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy regimen before bone marrow transplantation (BMT). VP-16 was administered either diluted (0.5 mg/mL) or undiluted (20 mg/mL), with or without busulfan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were drawn from 17 patients during the infusion (6 hours) and thereafter daily until 2 days after BMT. VP-16 concentrations were measured in all plasma samples by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and electrochemical detection, and the results were analyzed with a pharmacokinetic data analysis system. RESULTS: All calculated pharmacokinetic parameters in the two patient groups (VP-16 administered diluted or undiluted) were similar. There were no statistically significant differences in half-lives, mean residence time (MRT), volume of distribution, total clearance, or area under the curve (AUC). VP-16 was found in blood samples from eight of 17 patients at the time of BMT. Significant differences in systemic drug exposure and systemic clearance were found when patients were grouped according to treatment with busulfan or with total-body irradiation (TBI). CONCLUSION: The two administration modes for VP-16, either diluted or undiluted, are bioequivalent in pharmacokinetic terms. The terminal half-lives were longer than expected and resulted in significant VP-16 plasma levels at the time of BMT. The biologic significance remains unclear. Busulfan and/or concomitant medication with phenytoin influence plasma clearance (clp) and systemic drug exposure significantly.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of epidoxorubicin and doxorubicin in humans.

Pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin (DOX), epidoxorubicin (EPI), and their metabolites in plasma have been performed in eight patients receiving 40 to 56 mg/m2 of both anthracyclines as a bolus injection in two sequential cycles. Terminal half-life and volume of distribution appeared to be smaller in case of EPI, whereas plasma clearance and cumulative urinary excretion was larger in comparison to DOX. The major metabolite of DOX was doxorubicinol (Aol) followed by 7-deoxy-doxorubicinol (7d-Aolon). Metabolism to glucuronides was found in case of EPI only. The area under the curves (AUC) of the metabolites of EPI decreased in the order of the glucoronides E-glu greater than Eol-glu, 7d-Aolon greater than epirubicinol (Eol). The AUC of Eol was half of the value in its counterpart Aol. In the case of EPI, the AUC of 7d-Aolon was twice the level of that of the corresponding metabolite of DOX. The terminal half-lives of the cytostatic metabolites Aol and Eol were similar, but longer than the corresponding values of their parent drugs. Half-lives of the glucuronides (E-glu, Eol-glu) were similar to the half-life of their parent drug. 7d-Aolon had a somewhat shorter half-life in comparison to both DOX and EPI. Approximately 6.2% of EPI and 5.9% of DOX were excreted by the kidney during the initial 48 hours. Aol was found in the urine of patients treated with DOX, whereas Eol, E-glu, and Eol-glu were detected in urine of patients treated with EPI. The cumulative urinary excretion appeared to be 10.5% for EPI and its metabolites, and 6.9% for DOX and its metabolite. The plasma concentration v time curves of (7d)-aglycones showed a second peak between two and 12 hours after injection, suggesting an enterohepatic circulation for metabolites lacking the daunosamine sugar moiety. The plasma concentrations of the glucuronides were maximal at 1.2 hours for E-glu and 1.9 hours for Eol-glu. All other compounds reached their maximum plasma concentration during the first minutes after the administration of DOX and EPI. Deviating plasma kinetics were observed in one patient, probably due to prior drug administration.

Current options in treatment of anthracycline-resistant breast cancer.

Breast cancer is a chemosensitive tumour and anthracyclines are one of the most active cytotoxic agents in chemotherapy treatment. Failure after anthracycline-containing chemotherapy is a poor prognostic factor because of low response rate to salvage chemotherapy. Several factors like P-glycoprotein mediated drug resistance (MDR-1 or MRP), glutathione or amplification of topoisomerase II have been found to be involved in anthracycline resistance. No clear benefit for patients treated with 'resistance-modifier' agents like verapamil, dexverapamil or quinidine has yet been demonstrated. Most clinical studies with non-cross resistant cytotoxic agents are lacking a strict definition of anthracycline resistance. A strict definition of anthracycline resistance implies progressive disease during anthracycline chemotherapy. Among the cytotoxic drugs only 5-Fluorouracil (given as 24 h continuous infusion with folinic acid) and the taxanes produce more than 20% objective remission (RR) in case of anthracycline resistance, whereas the highest response rate was reported for docetaxel (32-57%). Only few randomized studies were performed: docetaxel showed higher anti-tumor activity than methotrexat/5-FU (RR: 42% vs 19%, P<0.001) or mitomycin/vinblastine (RR: 30% vs 12%;P<0.001) and treatment with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) was in favour to mitomycin (RR 17% vs 6%). In combination chemotherapy most activity have been reported for paclitaxel plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (given as 24 h continuous infusion with folinic acid) (RR: 58%) or for docetaxel plus cisplatinum (RR: 46%). High-dose regimens with growth factor or stem cell support seems to be active in anthracycline-resistant disease but the toxicity is considerable. In conclusion, the taxanes, especially docetaxel as single agent or paclitaxel plus high-dose 5-FU, are the most promising therapeutic options in treatment of anthracycline resistant disease. Further clinical phase II/III studies in breast cancer should include exact definition of anthracycline pretreatment and resistance.

Toxicity, pharmacokinetics and metabolism of iododoxorubicin in cancer patients.

25 patients, mostly pretreated, received 55 courses of iododoxorubicin as a single intravenous bolus every 2 weeks. The starting dose was 2 mg/m2 with seven steps to reach the dose-limiting toxicity level. 3 patients treated with 90 mg/m2 had WHO grade 4 myelotoxicity; 2 of these patients had not had cytostatic chemotherapy. 3 of 7 patients treated with 75 mg/m2 had grade 3-4 myelotoxicity; 4 had grade 1-2. Non-haematological toxicities were minor. Acute cardiotoxicity and objective tumour responses were not observed. Plasma and urine levels of iododoxorubicin and five metabolites were assayed in 16 patients. Metabolism to iododoxorubicinol was rapid and plasma clearance was dose-dependent and rapid. Plasma levels and the area under the curve for iododoxorubicin increased with dose. The mean residence time was 3.9 h in patients without liver metastasis and 10.4 h in patients with liver metastasis. Renal excretion was minor. The maximally tolerated dose was 90 mg/m2.

Altered clearance of unbound paclitaxel in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.

The pharmacokinetic behaviour of anticancer drugs may be altered with aging due to (for example) differences in body composition and decreased hepatic and renal function. To address this issue for paclitaxel, we studied the pharmacokinetics of the drug in eight elderly women (>or=70 years) with metastatic breast cancer (median age (range), 77 years (70-84 years)) and a control group of 15 patients aged <70 years (median age (range), 54 years (22-69 years)). Paclitaxel was administered as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion at a dose of 80 (elderly) or 100 mg/m(2) (<70 years), and serial blood samples were obtained at baseline, and up to 24 h after the end of infusion. Paclitaxel concentration-time profiles were fitted to a linear three-compartment model without any demonstration of saturable behaviour. The clearance of unbound paclitaxel was 124+/-35.0 (elderly) versus 247+/-55.4 l/h/m(2) (<70 years) (P=0.002), and was inversely related to the patient's age (R(2)=0.857; P<0.00001). Total plasma clearance of the formulation vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) was 150+/-60.7 (elderly) versus 115+/-39.2 ml/h/m(2) (<70 years) (P=0.04). These data indicate an approximately 50% change in total body clearance of unbound paclitaxel and a concomitant significant increase in systemic exposure with age, most likely as a result of altered CrEL disposition. The clinical relevance of these observations with respect to toxicity profiles and antitumour efficacy requires further evaluation.

Phase I study of paclitaxel administered as a 1-hour infusion: toxicity and pharmacokinetics.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is one of the most important new drugs used in the treatment of solid tumors. Use of paclitaxel, however, is associated with some toxicity. The main adverse side effects include myelotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, and asthenia. Toxicity seems to be schedule dependent. Currently, paclitaxel is routinely administered via 3- or 24-hour infusions. This study was performed to evaluate the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of a 1-hour infusion. Thirty-four patients with incurable solid tumors were included. Dose levels were escalated from 150 to 250 mg/m2. Thirty-four patients received a total of 105 courses of paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicity was World Health Organization grade 3 neuropathy at a dose of 250 mg/m2 in two of three patients. Two patients were not evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity because treatment was stopped after fewer than three courses due to disease progression. Neither had experienced a dose-limiting toxicity. Other toxicities were World Health Organization grade 1/2 neutropenia, asthenia, myalgia, arthralgia, and grade 1 hypersensitivity. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for preliminary anticancer efficacy. A partial response was observed in five patients (24%), stable disease in three (14%), and progressive disease in 13 (62%). The maximum tolerated dose was established at 250 mg/m2. A dose of 225 mg/m2 is recommended for further phase II trials. There was considerable interindividual and some intraindividual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were linear up to 225 mg/m2, while a slightly overproportional increase in the peak plasma concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve was observed at 250 mg/m2, suggesting that paclitaxel's pharmacokinetic characteristics may be nonlinear at higher doses.

Pharmacokinetics of high-dose VP-16: 6-hour infusion versus 34-hour infusion.

VP-16 was administered in high doses (30-45 mg/kg) in combination with busulfan (BU) and cyclophosphamide (CY). The anticancer activity of VP-16 is thought to be schedule-dependent. We investigated a 6-h and a 34-h infusion of VP-16 to compare pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity. Blood samples were taken from a total of 16 patients during infusion time (6 h and 34 h, respectively) and thereafter up to 2 days after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). VP-16 concentrations were measured in all plasma samples with HPLC technique and electrochemical detection and the results were analyzed with a pharmacokinetic data analysis system. All calculated pharmacokinetic parameters in the two patient groups were essentially similar. There were no statistically significant differences in half-lives, mean residence time, volume of distribution, total clearance and area under the curve. The treatment-related toxicity was not different between groups. The major difference was the maximal concentration in the case of 6-h infusions (122 +/- 35 micrograms/ml) and in the case of 34-h infusions (23.2 +/- 4.9 micrograms/ml) and the duration of VP-16 concentrations with > 10 and > 1 microgram/ml. Drug levels above these thresholds were always longer in case of 34-h infusions. In 8 of 16 patients VP-16 concentrations were measured in plasma samples at the time of BMT ranging from 80 to 820 ng/ml. The two different schedules for VP-16 administration, either given as a 6-h infusion or as a 34-h infusion, are bioequivalent in pharmacokinetic terms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inhibition of CFU-C growth by VP-16 containing plasma samples obtained from patients after conditioning therapy for bone marrow transplantation.

The introduction of VP-16 into high-dose therapy regimens used for conditioning before BMT or PBSCT has resulted in higher remission rates and prolonged disease-free survival, even in high risk patients. VP-16 levels have been measured in plasma at the time of transplantation. The question is, is there a biological activity that corresponds with the risk of delayed engraftment or graft failure? We investigated the inhibitory effects of plasma samples obtained from patients under high-dose VP-16 therapy on the growth of human bone marrow progenitor cells. Bone marrow cells from healthy donors were exposed to the plasma samples and seeded into methylcellulose-culture (CFU-C-assay). We found a dose dependent CFU-C inhibition related to VP-16 plasma levels at the time of transplantation (k = 0.769, P < 0.01). There were signs of a correlation between CFU-C growth inhibition at the time of BMT and haematological recovery (k = 0.656, P < 0.05) between CFU-C inhibition and the time until leucocytes reached 0.2 x 10(9)/l. Patients with CFU-C growth inhibition at the time of BMT may show delayed engraftment of leucocytes and that there might be a correlation with VP-16 levels, but further investigation is necessary to determine the significance of the latter thesis and if VP-16 plasma levels could lead to failure of engraftment. We recommend a minimum time interval between VP-16 infusion and graft transplantation of 72 h.