Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (ACTION-CVT): A Multicenter International Study.

BACKGROUND: A small randomized controlled trial suggested that dabigatran may be as effective as warfarin in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). We aimed to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in a real-world CVT cohort. METHODS: This multicenter international retrospective study (United States, Europe, New Zealand) included consecutive patients with CVT treated with oral anticoagulation from January 2015 to December 2020. We abstracted demographics and CVT risk factors, hypercoagulable labs, baseline imaging data, and clinical and radiological outcomes from medical records. We used adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox-regression models to compare recurrent cerebral or systemic venous thrombosis, death, and major hemorrhage in patients treated with warfarin versus DOACs. We performed adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression to compare recanalization rates on follow-up imaging across the 2 treatments groups. RESULTS: Among 1025 CVT patients across 27 centers, 845 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 44.8 years, 64.7% were women; 33.0% received DOAC only, 51.8% received warfarin only, and 15.1% received both treatments at different times. During a median follow-up of 345 (interquartile range, 140-720) days, there were 5.68 recurrent venous thrombosis, 3.77 major hemorrhages, and 1.84 deaths per 100 patient-years. Among 525 patients who met recanalization analysis inclusion criteria, 36.6% had complete, 48.2% had partial, and 15.2% had no recanalization. When compared with warfarin, DOAC treatment was associated with similar risk of recurrent venous thrombosis (aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.51-1.73]; P=0.84), death (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.22-2.76]; P=0.70), and rate of partial/complete recanalization (aOR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.48-1.73]; P=0.79), but a lower risk of major hemorrhage (aHR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.82]; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CVT, treatment with DOACs was associated with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes and favorable safety profile when compared with warfarin treatment. Our findings need confirmation by large prospective or randomized studies.

Black Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Hyperglycemia have Worse outcome than Whites if given Intensive Glucose Control.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is common after acute ischemic stroke and is associated with worse outcome, but intensive glucose control has not improved outcome. There is also a racial disparity in outcome after stroke, with Black patients more likely to have functional impairment than whites. We aimed to evaluate if there were racial differences in outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intensive glucose control. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial to determine if Black patients had worse functional outcome than whites and if standard versus intensive glucose control modified that association. We included non-Hispanic white and Black patients. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Score of 0-1). To account for patient clustering by study site, we fit mixed-effects logistic regression models to our outcome and tested the interaction of treatment and race. RESULTS: We included 895 patients, of which 304 (34%) were Black and 591 (66%) were white. The rate of excellent outcome was 31.6% in Black patients versus 41.0% in white patients (p=0.006). After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds ratio for excellent outcome in Black patients was 0.54 (95% CI 0.38-0.77). The interaction term between treatment and race was significant (p=0.067). In the intensive treatment arm, Black patients had a predicted probability of excellent outcome of 26.4% (20.1-32.8) versus 42.7% (37.6-47.9) for white patients (p<0.001), while in the standard treatment arm the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with acute ischemic stroke and hyperglycemia had worse functional outcome at 90 days than white patients, particularly if given intensive glucose control. These findings are from a post-hoc analysis and may be confounded, thus warrant additional study.

Baseline Serum Biomarkers of Inflammation and Subsequent Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability: A Post Hoc Analysis of MESA.

BACKGROUND: Higher blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with the development of major vascular diseases, independent of mean blood pressure. However, despite data indicating that serum inflammatory markers are linked to hypertension, the association between serum inflammatory markers and BPV has not been studied in humans. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) study. The study exposure was tertiles of serum level of interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), d-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PAP), fibrinogen antigen, and calibrated Factor VIII (%) at the baseline study visit. The primary outcome was visit-to-visit BPV measured as the residual standard deviation (rSD) of at least 4 study visits (2000-2018). Two logistic regression models were fit to the top tertile of rSD during follow-up: in Model 1, we adjusted for age, sex, and hypertension, and in Model 2, for patient age categories, sex, race/ethnicity, education, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, drinking, body mass index, lipid-lowering medication, and mean systolic blood pressure. RESULTS: Our analysis included 5,483 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 61.4 (10.0) years, 52.9% female, and 40.7% White. In unadjusted analyses, all markers of inflammation were associated with higher BPV, but after adjustment, only IL-6 retained significance (P < 0.001). The odds ratio for the highest tertile of BPV and IL-6 was 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-1.74, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline serum IL-6 was associated with increased subsequent BPV in a large multiracial cohort. Further investigation is needed to better understand the relationship between chronic inflammation and BPV.

Predictors of Recurrent Venous Thrombosis After Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Analysis of the ACTION-CVT Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke carrying a nearly 4% risk of recurrence after 1 year. There are limited data on predictors of recurrent venous thrombosis in patients with CVT. In this study, we aim to identify those predictors. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the ACTION-CVT study which is a multicenter international study of consecutive patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of CVT over a 6-year period. Patients with cancer-associated CVT, CVT during pregnancy, or CVT in the setting of known antiphospholipid antibody syndrome were excluded per the ACTION-CVT protocol. The study outcome was recurrent venous thrombosis defined as recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or de novo CVT. We compared characteristics between patients with vs without recurrent venous thrombosis during follow-up and performed adjusted Cox regression analyses to determine important predictors of recurrent venous thrombosis. RESULTS: Nine hundred forty-seven patients were included with a mean age of 45.2 years, 63.9% were women, and 83.6% had at least 3 months of follow-up. During a median follow-up of 308 (interquartile range 120-700) days, there were 5.05 recurrent venous thromboses (37 VTE and 24 de novo CVT) per 100 patient-years. Predictors of recurrent venous thrombosis were Black race (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.13, 95% CI 1.14-3.98, p = 0.018), history of VTE (aHR 3.40, 95% CI 1.80-6.42, p < 0.001), and the presence of one or more positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aHR 3.85, 95% CI 1.97-7.50, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses including events only occurring on oral anticoagulation yielded similar findings. DISCUSSION: Black race, history of VTE, and the presence of one or more antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with recurrent venous thrombosis among patients with CVT. Future studies are needed to validate our findings to better understand mechanisms and treatment strategies in patients with CVT.

Impact of mean blood pressure and blood pressure variability after diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and risk of dementia.

Hypertension and increased blood pressure variability (BPV) are associated with the development of dementia. However, previous studies did not focus on the risk of dementia among participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and controlled blood pressure level. To address this limitation, the authors performed a post-hoc analysis of SPRINT MIND participants diagnosed with MCI (mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score at diagnosis 16.1±3.1). The primary outcome was subsequent diagnosis of probable dementia. The exposure was mean blood pressure and BPV following MCI diagnosis until the end of follow-up or a dementia event (mean follow-up 2.6±1.2 years). The primary outcome occurred in 76/516 (14.7%) patients. The mean blood pressure was not significantly higher in participants who developed dementia. In the lowest quartile of BPV (systolic standard deviation), the rate of dementia was 8.5% (11/129), while in the highest quartile it was 21.7% (28/129). The highest quartile of systolic BPV had an adjusted hazard ratio for dementia of 2.73 (95% CI, 1.31-5.69) and for diastolic BPV it was 2.62 (95% CI, 1.26-5.47). In SPRINT MIND participants, the authors found that increased BPV after MCI diagnosis was associated with incident probable dementia during subsequent follow-up.

MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy.

ABSTRACT: Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, and the incidence of ischemic stroke is projected to continue to rise in coming decades. These projections emphasize the need for improved imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis allowing effective treatments for ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke is commonly evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Noncontrast CT is typically used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to identify candidates for thrombolysis. Beyond this time window, thrombolytic therapy may lead to poor outcomes if patients are not optimally selected using appropriate imaging. MRI provides an accurate method for the earliest identification of core infarct, and MR perfusion can identify salvageable hypoperfused penumbra. The prognostic value for a better outcome in these patients lies in the ability to distinguish between core infarct and salvageable brain at risk-the ischemic penumbra-which is a function of the degree of ischemia and time. Many centers underutilize MRI for acute evaluation of ischemic stroke. This review will illustrate how perfusion-diffusion mismatch calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI and MR perfusion is a reliable approach for patient selection for stroke therapy and can be performed in timeframes that are comparable to CT-based algorithms while providing potentially superior diagnostic information.