Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Limited data is available on the incidence and outcomes of pneumothorax (PTX), pneumomediastinum (PNM), and subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) in COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of these complications in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, involving adult COVID-19 patients admitted to Mayo Clinic Florida from 03/2020-06/2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of PTX/PNM/SCE. RESULTS: 1926 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were included, of which 518 were admitted to the ICU. The incidence of PTX/PNM/SCE was 6.3%. Patients with these complications were more likely to be male, Asian, and unvaccinated. Conversely, they were less likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients who developed PTX/PNM/SCE after 72 hours of admission were more likely to receive high-dose corticosteroids and for an extended duration. The affected group had an adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality of 13.32 (95%CI, 8.19-21.59) and ICU admission of 9.14 (95%CI, 5.3-12.78) compared to the unaffected group. CONCLUSION: Although the occurrence of PTX/PNM/SCE in hospitalized COVID-19 patients was rare, it was associated with worse outcomes. Corticosteroids may contribute to the pathogenesis of these complications; however, further studies are needed to investigate this relationship in more detail.

A retrospective analysis of normal saline and lactated ringers as resuscitation fluid in sepsis.

Background: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign suggested preferential resuscitation with balanced crystalloids, such as Lactated Ringer's (LR), although the level of recommendation was weak, and the quality of evidence was low. Past studies reported an association of unbalanced solutions, such as normal saline (NS), with increased AKI risks, metabolic acidosis, and prolonged ICU stay, although some of the findings are conflicting. We have compared the outcomes with the preferential use of normal saline vs. ringer's lactate in a cohort of sepsis patients. Method: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients visiting the ED of 19 different Mayo Clinic sites between August 2018 to November 2020 with sepsis and receiving at least 30 mL/kg fluid in the first 6 h. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the type of resuscitation fluid (LR vs. NS) and propensity-matching was done based on clinical characteristics as well as fluid amount (with 5 ml/kg). Single variable logistic regression (categorical outcomes) and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups. Results: Out of 2022 patients meeting our inclusion criteria; 1,428 (70.6%) received NS, and 594 (29.4%) received LR as the predominant fluid (>30 mL/kg). Patients receiving predominantly NS were more likely to be male and older in age. The LR cohort had a higher BMI, lactate level and incidence of septic shock. Propensity-matched analysis did not show a difference in 30-day and in-hospital mortality rate, mechanical ventilation, oxygen therapy, or CRRT requirement. We did observe longer hospital LOS in the LR group (median 5 vs. 4 days, p = 0.047 and higher requirement for ICU post-admission (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.96; p = 0.026) in the NS group. However, these did not remain statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing. Conclusion: In our matched cohort, we did not show any statistically significant difference in mortality rates, hospital LOS, ICU admission after diagnosis, mechanical ventilation, oxygen therapy and RRT between sepsis patients receiving lactated ringers and normal saline as predominant resuscitation fluid. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to solidify the current guidelines on the use of balanced crystalloids.

Vaccine hesitancy with a history of Guillain Barre Syndrome: Weighing the risks and benefits of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, great hesitancies regarding the COVID-19 immunization have existed. The most striking adverse events reported include thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), myocarditis, and Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS). Post-vaccination GBS is known since the time of Influenza vaccination, but several cases of GBS have also been reported in the current COVID-19 vaccination era. As a result, our patient with a history of GBS post-Influenza vaccination, went unvaccinated for SARS-CoV-2, due to fear of GBS re-activation. Consequently, he contracted COVID-19 pneumonitis complicated with deep venous thrombosis, requiring a prolonged hospitalization. Weighing the risks and benefits of vaccination to COVID-19 is difficult, especially for people with a previous history of GBS related to Influenza vaccination. We reviewed and analyzed the reported cases of GBS temporary related to COVID-19 vaccination to determine the safety of their administration in those with a history of GBS.