Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Evaluations of competence to stand trial are evolving amid a national "competency crisis".
Behav Sci Law
; 41(5): 310-325, 2023.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37056195
2.
Evaluator empathy in risk assessment interviews.
Law Hum Behav
; 46(5): 325-336, 2022 10.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36107689
3.
Competency to stand trial evaluations: A state-wide review of court-ordered reports.
Behav Sci Law
; 38(1): 32-50, 2020 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32012335
4.
The impact of misdemeanor arrests on forensic mental health services: A state-wide review of Virginia sanity evaluations.
Law Hum Behav
; 44(4): 286-299, 2020 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32757609
5.
Rater experience and the predictive validity of Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version scores.
Psychiatr Psychol Law
; 27(5): 912-923, 2020.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33841023
6.
How does evaluator empathy impact a forensic interview?
Law Hum Behav
; 43(1): 56-68, 2019 02.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30394765
7.
Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Use and Reporting Practices in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations.
Sex Abuse
; 29(6): 592-614, 2017 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26518713
8.
Reformulating Suicide Risk Formulation: From Prediction to Prevention.
Acad Psychiatry
; 40(4): 623-9, 2016 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26667005
9.
Jurors report that risk measure scores matter in sexually violent predator trials, but that other factors matter more.
Behav Sci Law
; 33(1): 56-73, 2015 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25613035
10.
Rater differences in psychopathy measure scoring and predictive validity.
Law Hum Behav
; 39(4): 321-31, 2015 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25485981
11.
Static-99R reporting practices in sexually violent predator cases: Does norm selection reflect adversarial allegiance?
Law Hum Behav
; 39(3): 209-18, 2015 Jun.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495715
12.
Jurors' views on the value and objectivity of mental health experts testifying in sexually violent predator trials.
Behav Sci Law
; 32(4): 483-95, 2014.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25043830
13.
Evaluator differences in Psychopathy Checklist-Revised factor and facet scores.
Law Hum Behav
; 38(4): 337-45, 2014 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24341836
14.
How likely is "likely to reoffend" in sex offender civil commitment trials?
Law Hum Behav
; 38(3): 293-304, 2014 Jun.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24885113
15.
Same score, different message: perceptions of offender risk depend on Static-99R risk communication format.
Law Hum Behav
; 38(5): 418-27, 2014 Oct.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24377910
16.
Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them?
Psychol Sci
; 24(10): 1889-97, 2013 Oct.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23969777
17.
How reliable are forensic evaluations of legal sanity?
Law Hum Behav
; 37(2): 98-106, 2013 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22775304
18.
Field reliability of competence to stand trial opinions: How often do evaluators agree, and what do judges decide when evaluators disagree?
Law Hum Behav
; 36(2): 130-9, 2012 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22471417
19.
When experts disagreed, who was correct? A comparison of PCL-R scores from independent raters and opposing forensic experts.
Law Hum Behav
; 36(6): 527-37, 2012 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22353047
20.
Do PCL-R scores from state or defense experts best predict future misconduct among civilly committed sex offenders?
Law Hum Behav
; 36(3): 159-69, 2012 Jun.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22667805