Now or Later? Patient Satisfaction and Anxiety Among Women Undergoing Breast Biopsies Performed the Same Day as Recommended Versus a Later Day.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine differences in patient satisfaction and anxiety among women undergoing core-needle breast biopsies performed the same day as recommended versus a future date. METHODS: After institutional review board exemption was granted, a survey was administered to patients at four sites on the day of imaging-guided core-needle breast biopsy. The survey was available from November 2020 through January 2022. Questions pertained to biopsy timing (same day versus later day), pre- and postbiopsy satisfaction with overall breast-care experience, biopsy wait-time satisfaction, pre- and postbiopsy anxiety, radiologist-patient communication, demographics, life stressors, breast cancer history, and risk factors. Comparisons were made between same-day and later-day biopsies by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Of 974 respondents (response rate 65.6%), almost half were scheduled for same-day biopsies (47.8% [466 of 974]). In multivariate analyses, same-day biopsies were associated with higher prebiopsy overall breast-care satisfaction (P < .001), higher wait-time satisfaction (P < .001), and higher prebiopsy (P = .001) and postbiopsy anxiety (P = .001). Better radiologist-patient communication was associated with lower prebiopsy anxiety (P < .001) and greater prebiopsy overall (P < .001) and wait-time (P < .001) satisfaction. Compared with White women, Black women reported lower postbiopsy anxiety (P < .001) but also lower prebiopsy satisfaction (P = .03) and wait-time satisfaction (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Same-day versus later-day biopsies resulted in better prebiopsy overall breast-care and wait-time patient satisfaction scores; however, no satisfaction differences were noted after biopsy. Clinically significant anxiety was associated with both same- and later-day biopsies but was higher for same-day biopsies. Higher anxiety levels correlated with lower overall satisfaction, suggesting that interventions to reduce anxiety and improve communication could improve patient experiences during same-day biopsies.

Return to the Reading Room: Implementation of a Hybrid Radiology Clerkship Model after Emergent Conversion to Remote Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the virtualization of historically in-person radiology rotations for medical students. As students return to in-person clinical education, there is an opportunity to reevaluate teaching strategies and incorporate best practices from the pandemic. We describe our experience with the conversion of a four-week radiology clerkship from an in-person (IP) to remote learning (RL) to hybrid model (HM) and its impact on student performance and satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stratified by curriculum (Group 1 IP, Group 2 RL, Group 3 HM), student standardized final examination scores, final grades, lecture evaluation scores, and satisfaction scores were compared. Additional analysis was performed for Group 3 clinical divisions in which IP or RL models predominated. RESULTS: A significant decrease in mean final exam score was noted in Group 2 (p < 0.0001). Average lecture rating decreased in Group 3 compared to Group 1 (p < 0.001). Group 3 students reported improved faculty (Group 1: 59, Group 2: 61, Group 3: 82; p < 0.001) and resident (Group 1: 76.5, Group 2: 68, Group 3: 90; p < 0.001) teaching effectiveness. Student-reported quantity and quality of formative feedback were also highest for Group 3 (Quantity; Group 1: 60.6, Group 2: 74, Group 3: 93; p < 0.001) (Quality; Group 1: 59.1, Group 2: 77, Group 3: 97; p < 0.001). Group 3 subanalysis demonstrated increased student-perceived usefulness of activities within IP divisions (p < 0.01) and a decrease for RL divisions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A hybrid curriculum resulted in improved student satisfaction and preserved student performance after an emergent conversion to remote learning.

Learning from errors: Implementation of a resident-oriented radiology morbidity and mortality conference as an educational tool.

PURPOSE: Our diagnostic radiology (DR) program lacked a formalized, structured process for residents to learn from errors. Prior DR residency Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) survey results additionally demonstrated opportunity for improvement in resident evaluation, resources, and patient safety/teamwork. Our project's purpose was to implement and evaluate a new resident-oriented radiology morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference to enhance resident education. METHODS: All DR residents (n = 48) were surveyed regarding a new didactic M&M consisting of quarterly resident-led and faculty-moderated M&Ms. Cases for potential review were collected and stored in a REDCap database via an anonymous survey, from which resident-selected faculty curators would select 4-6 for presentation. Residents presented these cases and the group discussed applicable improvements. An anonymous survey of residents followed each conference. Relevant questions from ACGME survey data were extracted from the two years preceding the didactic M&M and the pilot year. RESULTS: Before implementation, 86% of responding residents (n = 29; 60% of resident complement) supported the program, 90% expressed willingness to share their own mistakes, and 79% preferred faculty involvement. Respondents favored careful selection of faculty to promote education. At one year, 100% of respondents (n = 17; 35% of resident complement) approved of adding the didactic M&M and endorsed program continuance. All respondents expressed a willingness to share their own mistakes. There was also coincident improvement in ACGME survey data in the domains of evaluation, resources, and patient safety/teamwork. CONCLUSION: We designed and implemented a resident-oriented M&M conference that resulted in increased resident confidence and impacted ACGME survey results in evaluation, resources, and patient safety/teamwork. PRECIS: Implementation of a structured, resident-oriented radiology M&M conference can increase resident confidence and impact ACGME survey results in the domains of evaluation, resources, and patient safety/teamwork.

Health care resource utilization and treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The economic burden of cancer in the United States is substantial, and better understanding it is essential in informing health care policy and innovation. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) represents a late complication of primary cancer spreading to the leptomeninges. METHODS: The IBM MarketScan Research databases were queried for adults diagnosed with LC from 2001 to 2015, secondary to 4 primary cancers (breast, lung, gastrointestinal, and melanoma). Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and treatment utilization were quantified at baseline (1-year pre-LC diagnosis) and 30, 90, and 365 days post-LC diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 4961 cases of LC (46.3% breast cancer, 34.8% lung cancer, 13.5% gastrointestinal cancer, and 5.4% melanoma). The median age was 57.0 years, with 69.7% female and 31.1% residing in the South. Insurance status included commercial (71.1%), Medicare (19.8%), and Medicaid (9.1%). Median follow-up was 66.0 days (25th percentile: 24.0, 75th percentile: 186.0) and total cumulative costs were highest for the gastrointestinal subgroup ($167 768) and lowest for the lung cancer subgroup ($145 244). There was considerable variation in the 89.6% of patients who used adjunctive treatments at 1 year, including chemotherapy (64.3%), radiotherapy (57.6%), therapeutic lumbar puncture (31.5%), and Ommaya reservoir (14.5%). The main cost drivers at 1 year were chemotherapy ($62 026), radiation therapy ($37 076), and specialty drugs ($29 330). The prevalence of neurologic impairments was 46.9%, including radiculopathy (15.0%), paresthesia (12.3%), seizure episode/convulsive disorder not otherwise specified (11.0%), and ataxia (8.0%). CONCLUSIONS: LC is a devastating condition with an overall poor prognosis. We present the largest study of LC in this real-world study, including current treatments, with an emphasis on HCRU. There is considerable variation in the treatment of LC and significant health care costs.

Targeting Glioblastoma Stem Cells with 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose (2-DG) Potentiates Radiation-Induced Unfolded Protein Response (UPR).

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, and despite optimized treatment options, median survival remains dismal. Contemporary evidence suggests disease recurrence results from expansion of a robustly radioresistant subset of GBM progenitor cells, termed GBM stem cells (GSCs). In this study, we utilized transmission electron microscopy to uncover ultrastructural effects on patient-derived GSC lines exposed to supratherapeutic radiotherapy levels. Elevated autophagosome formation and increased endoplasmic reticulum (ER) internal diameter, a surrogate for ER stress and activation of unfolded protein response (UPR), was uncovered. These observations were confirmed via protein expression through Western blot. Upon interrogating genomic data from an open-access GBM patient database, overexpression of UPR-related chaperone protein genes was inversely correlated with patient survival. This indicated controlled UPR may play a role in promoting radioresistance. To determine if potentiating UPR further can induce apoptosis, we exposed GSCs to radiation with an ER stress-inducing drug, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), and found dose-dependent decreases in viability and increased apoptotic marker expression. Taken together, our results indicate GSC radioresistance is, in part, achieved by overexpression and overactivation of ER stress-related pathways, and this effect can be overcome via potentiation of UPR, leading to loss of GSC viability.