What makes pharmacists successful? An investigation of personal characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to identify characteristics of pharmacists that contribute to their success. DESIGN: A working definition of success in pharmacy practice was derived from a scoping literature review and is based on the premise that successful pharmacists practice to full scope within the context of their practice setting. Semistructured individual interviews were conducted with selected pharmacists. Potential candidates were nominated by leading pharmacists in the field with the use of our prespecified definition of success. Lists from the nominators were compared, and pharmacists who appeared on more than 1 list were invited to participate. The interview tool was developed with the use of previous research on success in health care professions. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 10 practicing pharmacists in a variety of locations (5 urban/5 rural) and practice settings (5 hospital/4 community/1 ambulatory care). OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes related to successful pharmacists practicing to full scope. RESULTS: Pharmacists meeting our definition of success were engaged in assessment and care planning, other expanded scope activities, and interpersonal activities and collaboration. The 10 interviewed pharmacists described motivation, critical thinking, emotional intelligence, core competencies, and work-life balance as significant contributors to their success. CONCLUSION: Several characteristics were identified as potentially related to success. These characteristics may be useful in pharmacists identifying areas for personal growth and development.

A randomized trial of restarting warfarin at maintenance versus loading doses following an elective procedure.

Guidelines suggest restarting warfarin at known maintenance doses, although this may result in a delay to achieving therapeutic anticoagulation. As such, we compared the time to achieve an INR ≥ 2.0 between those restarting warfarin maintenance vs loading doses after transient interruption, and the impact on protein C, S and factor II levels. Patients requiring interruption of warfarin for elective procedures without hospitalization were randomized 1:1 to receive warfarin maintenance or loading doses (1.5 times the maintenance dose for 3 days followed by pre-procedural warfarin maintenance dosing). Protein C, S and Factor II were drawn at baseline (prior to warfarin interruption), 7 and 14 days after restarting warfarin. Among 19 patients randomized to maintenance and 20 to loading doses, nearly half in each group had mechanical heart valves with gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures most commonly performed (41%). The median number of days to reach an INR ≥ 2.0 was 7.8 days in the loading and 9.0 in the maintenance group (difference between medians 1.2 days, 95% CI -3.1 to 4.9; P = 0.19). Although levels of protein C, S and factor II were lower in the loading vs maintenance dose group, all remained above that of baseline. Warfarin resumption with loading doses shortened the time to achieve a therapeutic INR by a median of 1.2 days. Prompt warfarin dose escalation should be done in response to the INR. Protein C and S remained above pre-warfarin interruption levels, implying a lack of depletion with restarting warfarin.