Ionic and non-ionic intravenous X-ray contrast media: antibacterial agents?

X-ray contrast media have been reported to have inhibitory effects on bacterial growth. Despite its potentially beneficial effect on patients, these features of contrast media have received relatively little attention in the medical literature in the past decades. The aim of this review is to evaluate the literature concerning the bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects of X-ray contrast media, specifically if there is a known difference concerning these effects between ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Systematic literature review was performed for the years of publication between 1911 and 2019. Since the publication of Grossich in 1911, the effect of iodine on the treatment of superficial infections in surgical procedures has been established clinical knowledge. Bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of ionic X-ray contrast media are well established. However, non-ionic contrast agents have been the subject of little research in this respect. In past decades, the hypothesis emerged in the literature that mainly the concentration of free iodine might be responsible for any bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect of ionic X-ray contrast media. Nowadays, however, only non-ionic contrast media are used. The question regarding the mechanism and magnitude of bacteriostatic or bactericidal effects of these, non-ionic contrast media, could not be answered conclusively from this review. Non-ionic contrast media could be used intentionally when a local antibacterial effect is intended (e.g. in percutaneous abscess drainage), as well as to reduce the overall dose of antibiotics administered to a patient. Thus, this question remains relevant and might constitute the area of future research.

Kyphoplasty in patients with multiple myeloma a retrospective comparative pilot study.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study of 73 myeloma patients with painful vertebral lesions compares clinical and radiomorphological outcomes up to 2 years after additional kyphoplasty, radiation therapy or systemic treatment only. METHODS: We assessed pain, disability and radiomorphological parameters by visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100), Oswestry Disability Index and by re-evaluating available follow-up X-rays, respectively, in patients that were treated according to a clinical pathway. RESULTS: After 2 years the VAS score was reduced in all groups by 66 ± 8.2 (kyphoplasty), 35 ± 10.5 (radiation therapy) and 38 ± 20.5 (systemic therapy only). Only after kyphoplasty we observed a significantly reduced Oswestry Disability Index after 1 year (P < 0.001). Vertebral height remained stable after kyphoplasty (P = 0.283), in contrast to a progressive height loss in the other groups (P = 0.013 and P = 0.015 for radiation and systemic therapy only, respectively). Two years after kyphoplasty and radiotherapy the overall vertebral fracture incidence was significantly decreased as compared to the group after systemic therapy only (9.7% of all thoracic and lumbar vertebrae had new vertebral fractures after systemic therapy only, 2% after kyphoplasty (P < 0.001), 4.8% after radiation (P = 0.032)). CONCLUSION: Additional kyphoplasty was more effective than additional radiation or systemic therapy in terms of pain relief, reduction of pain associated disability and reduction of fracture incidence of the entire lumbar and thoracic spine.

Three-year outcomes after kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporosis with painful vertebral fractures.

PURPOSE: Kyphoplasty immediately improves pain and mobility in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but long-term clinical outcomes are still unclear. This controlled trial evaluates pain, mobility and fracture incidence 3 years after kyphoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kyphoplasty was performed in 40 patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures; 20 patients who were selected for kyphoplasty but chose not to undergo the procedure served as controls. All patients received pharmacologic antiosteoporosis treatment, pain medication, and physiotherapy. Pain (visual analog scale of 0-100), mobility (European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study questionnaire score of 0-100), and incident vertebral fractures were assessed at baseline, postprocedurally, and after 12 and 36 months. RESULTS: Pain score improved after kyphoplasty from 73.8 to 55.9 (immediately after kyphoplasty), 55.6 (12 months), and 54.0 (36 months; P < .001). Pain score in the control group changed from 66.4 to 65.7 at 12 months and 64.0 at 36 months (P = .521). The pain score of the kyphoplasty group was significantly improved versus controls after 36 months (P = .023). Mobility score improved after kyphoplasty from 43.8 to 54.2 (immediately after kyphoplasty), 54.5 (12 months), and 54.8 (36 months; P = .0008) and remained increased (P = .308) compared with controls (39.8 immediately after kyphoplasty, 44.3 at 12 months, and 43.6 at 36 months). The incidence of new vertebral fractures after kyphoplasty was significantly reduced versus controls after 3 years (P = .0341). CONCLUSIONS: Kyphoplasty reduces pain and improves mobility as long as 3 years after the procedure. The long-term risk of new vertebral fractures after kyphoplasty of chronically painful vertebral fractures is reduced versus controls.

Treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study.

UNLABELLED: This study investigates the effects of kyphoplasty on pain and mobility in patients with osteoporosis and painful vertebral fractures compared with conventional medical management. INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological treatment of patients with primary osteoporosis does not prevent pain and impaired activity of patients with painful vertebral fractures. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical outcome after kyphoplasty in patients with vertebral fractures and associated chronic pain for >12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with primary osteoporosis and painful vertebral fractures presenting for >12 months were included in this prospective, nonrandomized controlled study. Twenty-four hours before performing kyphoplasty, the patients self-determined their inclusion into the kyphoplasty or control group so that 40 patients were treated with kyphoplasty, whereas 20 served as controls. This study assessed changes in radiomorphology, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, daily activities (European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study [EVOS] score), number of new vertebral fractures, and health care use. Outcomes were assessed before treatment and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. All patients received standard medical treatment (1g calcium, 1000 IE vitamin D(3), standard dose of oral aminobisphosphonate, pain medication, physical therapy). RESULTS: Kyphoplasty increased midline vertebral height of the treated vertebral bodies by 12.1%, whereas in the control group, vertebral height decreased by 8.2% (p = 0.001). Augmentation and internal stabilization by kyphoplasty resulted in a reduction of back pain. VAS pain scores improved in the kyphoplasty group from 26.2 +/- 2 to 44.2 +/- 3.3 (SD; p = 0.007) and in the control group from 33.6 +/- 4.1 to 35.6 +/- 4.1 (not significant), whereas the EVOS score increased in the kyphoplasty group from 43.8 +/- 2.4 to 54.5 +/- 2.7 (p = 0.031) and in the control group from 39.8 +/- 4.5 to 43.8 +/- 4.6 (not significant). The number of back pain-related doctor visits within the 6-month follow-up period decreased significantly after kyphoplasty compared with controls: mean of 3.3 visits/patient in the kyphoplasty group and a mean of 8.6 visits/patient in the control group (p = 0.0147). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show significantly increased vertebral height, reduced pain, and improved mobility in patients after kyphoplasty. Kyphoplasty performed in appropriately selected osteoporotic patients with painful vertebral fractures is a promising addition to current medical treatment.

Calcium-phosphate and polymethylmethacrylate cement in long-term outcome after kyphoplasty of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

STUDY DESIGN: A comparative prospective trial evaluating 3-year outcome. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and morphologic outcomes as well as follow-up fractures after kyphoplasty of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with calcium-phosphate (CaP) cement (group 1) and with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-cement (group 2). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CaP cements seem to be an alternative material for usage in kyphoplasty of vertebral fractures. CaP cements are biodegradable and replaceable by newly formed bone after implantation. Concerns have been raised with regard to the stability of resorbable CaP-cements after implantation into vertebrae post kyphoplasty. Calcibon is a possible CaP cement, which exhibited adequate stability in short-term observations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kyphoplasty was performed in 40 consecutive patients with primary osteoporosis and painful vertebral fractures, 20 received CaP-cement, 20 were treated with PMMA-cement. All patients received a pharmacological antiosteoporosis treatment (1000 mg calcium, 1000 IU vitamin D3, and oral aminobisphosphonate), pain medication, and physiotherapy. Pain (visual analog scale [VAS]; range, 0-100), mobility (EVOS-score; range, 0-100) and radiomorphologic measurements were assessed at baseline and after 6, 12, and 36 months. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the CaP and PMMA-cement group regarding VAS-scores, EVOS-scores, or height-restoration at any time point. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of vertebral follow-up fractures between both groups during the 3-year follow-up period. CONCLUSION: CaP cement, e.g., Calcibon, is as effective and safe as conventional PMMA-cement with regard to immediate and sustained pain reduction and improvement of mobility after kyphoplasty of patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. CaP cement has the potential of being resorbed and replaced by newly formed bone tissue; thus, it seems to be a promising alternative for PMMA also in younger patients with painful vertebral fractures.

The intravertebral vacuum phenomen as specific sign of osteonecrosis in vertebral compression fractures: results from a radiological and histological study.

This study investigated the prevalence of the intravertebral vacuum phenomenon (IVP) and osteonecroses in vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). We therefore performed an histological analysis of biopsies obtained from VCFs prior to balloon kyphoplasty. Computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed regarding the presence of an IVP (i.e. cleft sign, Kümmell disease). We reviewed the data of 266 consecutive patients treated by balloon kyphoplasty in 501 procedures from 2002 to 2004. From 180 patients (68%) we obtained adequate bone tissue for histological evaluation. Biopsy specimens were analysed regarding the presence of osteoporosis, infection, malignancy and osteonecrosis. CT scans of all 180 patients were reviewed for presence of an IVP. Histological examination revealed 135 (75%) osteoporoses, 20 (11%) neoplasms, 12 (7%) trauma cases and 13 (7%) osteonecroses. An IVP was present in 12 (7%) patients. There was a significant association of osteonecrosis and IVP (P < 0.0001). Eleven of 12 patients with a vacuum phenomenon showed an osteonecrosis on histology, whereas 11 of 13 patients with osteonecrosis showed an IVP on CT. The IVP is a specific sign of osteonecrosis in vertebral compression fractures (sensitivity 85%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 91%). Our findings strongly support the thesis that an IVP indicates local bone ischemia associated with a non-healing vertebral collapse and pseudarthrosis.

Reduction of pain and fracture incidence after kyphoplasty: 1-year outcomes of a prospective controlled trial of patients with primary osteoporosis.

Previously, we reported significantly reduced pain and improved mobility persisting for 6 months after kyphoplasty of chronically painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the first prospective controlled trial. Since improvement of spinal biomechanics by restoration of vertebral morphology may affect the incidence of fracture, long-term clinical benefit and thereby cost-effectiveness, here we extend our previous work to assess occurrence of new vertebral fractures and clinical parameters 1 year after kyphoplasty compared with a conservatively treated control group. Sixty patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures due to primary osteoporosis were included: 40 patients were treated with kyphoplasty, 20 served as controls. All patients received standard medical treatment. Morphological characteristics, new vertebral fractures, pain (visual analog scale), physical function [European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) score] (range 0-100 each) and back-pain-related doctors' visits were re-assessed 12 months after kyphoplasty. There were significantly fewer patients with new vertebral fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine, after 12-months, in the kyphoplasty group than in the control group (P=0.0084). Pain scores improved from 26.2 to 44.4 in the kyphoplasty group and changed from 33.6 to 34.3 in the control group (P=0.008). Kyphoplasty treated patients required a mean of 5.3 back-pain-related doctors' visits per patient compared with 11.6 in the control group during 12 months follow-up (P=0.006). Kyphoplasty as an addition to medical treatment and when performed in appropriately selected patients by an interdisciplinary team persistently improves pain and reduces occurrence of new vertebral fractures and healthcare utilization for at least 12 months in individuals with primary osteoporosis.