Health care utilization and costs of systemic lupus erythematosus in the United States: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate health care utilization and costs for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by disease severity. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase from January 2000 to June 2020 for observational studies examining health care utilization and costs associated with SLE among adults in the United States. Two independent reviewers reviewed the selected full-text articles to determine the final set of included studies. Costs were converted to 2020 US $. RESULTS: We screened 9224 articles, of which 51 were included. Mean emergency department visits were 0.3-3.5 per year, and mean hospitalizations were 0.1-2.4 per year (mean length of stay 0.4-13.0 days). Patients averaged 10-26 physician visits/year. Mean annual direct total costs were $17,258-$63,022 per patient and were greater for patients with moderate or severe disease ($19,099-$82,391) compared with mild disease ($12,242-$29,233). Mean annual direct costs were larger from commercial claims ($24,585-$63,022) than public payers (Medicare and Medicaid: $18,302-$27,142). CONCLUSIONS: SLE remains a significant driver of health care utilization and costs. Patients with moderate to severe SLE use more health care services and incur greater direct and indirect costs than those with mild disease.

Early treatment of psoriatic arthritis is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes: findings from the etanercept PRESTA trial.

OBJECTIVES: The present paper aims to investigate the effect of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) disease duration on the outcome of treatment with etanercept (ETN) in patients with PsA who also have moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Patients from the PRESTA trial who received ≥1 ETN 50 mg once weekly (QW) dose and had ≥1 post-baseline value were evaluated. Baseline and after-treatment changes were compared between patients with PsA ≤2 years versus PsA >2 years in efficacy measures (physician global assessment [PGA] arthritis, swollen joint count and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]) and patient reported outcomes (PROs; joint pain, arthritis activity, Euro-Qol [EQ-5D] utility and visual analogue score [VAS]) using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Baseline efficacy measures were similar between the PsA ≤2 years (n=103) and PsA >2 years (n=269) groups, with the exception of PGA arthritis (p=0.006). At week 24, improvements in efficacy measures were observed in both groups but were significantly greater for PGA arthritis in the PsA ≤2 years group (p=0.03). Quality of life (QoL), measured using PROs, was generally lower at baseline in patients with PsA >2 years. Clinically meaningful improvements were seen in QoL with ETN treatment in both groups, but the change from baseline scores at week 24 were significantly higher in PsA ≤2 years group for joint pain (p=0.007), arthritis activity (p=0.01), EQ-5D utility (p=0.046) and EQ-5D VAS (p=0.04) responses. CONCLUSIONS: PsA patients responded to ETN 50 mg QW treatment irrespective of disease duration; however, patients with shorter PsA duration had greater improvements in arthritis scores and several PRO measures.

Short-term efficacy of etanercept plus methotrexate vs combinations of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs with methotrexate in established rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate the short-term benefit of etanercept (ETN) + MTX vs conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs; HCQ, LEF or SSZ) + MTX in subjects with established RA. The effect of disease duration (≤2 years vs >2 years) and severity (moderate vs severe) on treatment outcomes was also assessed. Methods. Data from Asian and Latin American subjects with inadequate response to MTX were pooled from the APPEAL (ETN 25 mg biweekly + MTX or csDMARD + MTX; NCT00422227) and Latin RA (ETN 50 mg/week + MTX or csDMARD + MTX; NCT00848354) studies. Endpoints included the 28-joint DAS with ESR (DAS28-ESR) low disease activity (LDA; ≤3.2), DAS28 remission (<2.6) and HAQ score ≤0.5. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-eight subjects received ETN + MTX, 245 subjects received csDMARD + MTX [HCQ + MTX (n = 81), LEF + MTX (n = 69), SSZ + MTX (n = 95)]. At week 16, significantly more subjects receiving ETN + MTX vs subjects on csDMARDs + MTX achieved DAS28-ESR LDA (39% vs 18%, P < 0.001), remission (18% vs 7%, P < 0.001) and HAQ ≤0.5 (48% vs 34%, P < 0.001). For both treatment arms, these endpoints were achieved by a greater proportion of subjects with ≤2 years vs >2 years disease duration and with moderate vs severe disease activity. CONCLUSION: Overall, ETN + MTX was more effective in treating subjects with established RA than csDMARDs + MTX at 16 weeks. More subjects with shorter disease duration and moderate disease activity achieved optimal response regardless of treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00422227 and NCT00848354.

Association between disease activity and risk of serious infections in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving etanercept (ETN) or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and to identify factors that predict a higher risk. METHODS: Five-year data from the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR), a prospective observational study of patients with active RA treated with ETN, were used. These data were compared with a cohort of patients receiving DMARDs with active RA. RESULTS: Total follow-up was 19,964 patient-years (py; ETN, 14,381 py; DMARDs, 5583 py). Over the study period, 651 first-recorded serious infections were reported (ETN, 469 [39.9 per 1000 py]; DMARDs, 182 [35.0 per 1000 py]). Overall the risk of serious infection was similar for the 2 treatments; however, in the first 6 months of treatment the hazard ratio (HR) was higher in the ETN than the DMARD group (1.979; p=0.015). A linear association was observed between the serious infection rate and disease-activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) in patients from each treatment group and overall (DAS28 <4, 27.1 per 1000 py; DAS28 ≥8, 64.4 per 1000 py; 7.5% increase in serious infection for each unit increase of DAS28 score at baseline). In a time-dependent analysis, a DAS28 change of 1 unit during follow-up predicted a 27% increase in serious infection rates. CONCLUSIONS: No significant increase in the risk of serious infection was observed with ETN versus DMARDs over the 5-year study; a linear relationship existed between the serious infection rate and disease activity, as measured by DAS28.

Improved health outcomes with etanercept versus usual DMARD therapy in an Asian population with established rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are especially useful in assessing treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) since they measure dimensions of health-related quality of life that cannot be captured using strictly objective physiological measures. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of combination etanercept and methotrexate (ETN + MTX) versus combination synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and methotrexate (DMARD + MTX) on PRO measures among RA patients from the Asia-Pacific region, a population not widely studied to date. Patients with established moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to methotrexate were studied. METHODS: Patients were randomized to either ETN + MTX (N = 197) or DMARD + MTX (N = 103) in an open-label, active-comparator, multicenter study, with PRO measures designed as prospective secondary endpoints. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue), Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health (WPAI:GH) were used. RESULTS: Significantly greater improvements were noted for the ETN + MTX group at week16 for HAQ mean scores and for proportion of patients achieving HAQ score ≤ 0.5, compared to patients in the DMARD + MTX group. SF-36 Summary Scores for physical and mental components and for 6 of 8 health domains showed significantly greater improvements at week16 for the ETN + MTX group; only scores for physical functioning and role-emotional domains did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms. Greater improvements at week16 were noted for the ETN + MTX group for FACIT-Fatigue, HADS, and WPAI:GH mean scores. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy using ETN + MTX demonstrated superior improvements using a comprehensive set of PRO measures, compared to combination therapy with usual standard of care DMARDs plus MTX in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis from the Asia-Pacific region. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clintrials.gov # NCT00422227.

Application of composite disease activity scores in psoriatic arthritis to the PRESTA data set.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the performances of the Modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) and the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) in an interventional study of etanercept in psoriatic arthritis. METHODS: The components of the CPDAI and DAPSA were extracted using PRESTA (Psoriasis Randomized Etanercept STudy in subjects with psoriatic Arthritis) study data. Data for four of the five domains of the CPDAI-thus an mCPDAI-were available: joints, skin, dactylitis and enthesitis (spinal involvement was not assessed). Domains in the calculation of DAPSA were subjected to global assessment of pain, swollen and tender joint counts, and C reactive protein. SUBJECTS: were randomised to etanercept 50 mg weekly (n=373) or 50 mg twice weekly (n=379) for 12 weeks; all subjects then received etanercept 50 mg weekly for 12 weeks. The performance of the scores at baseline and on weeks 12 and 24 was compared between the two treatment regimens. RESULTS: The mCPDAI and DAPSA could distinguish response to treatment comparing baseline and 12-week or 24-week values (p<0.0001). The mCPDAI, not DAPSA, could distinguish response between the two treatment groups at 12 weeks (p=0.0492), but not at 24 weeks. All domains evaluated contributed to the data variability of the mCPDAI; the most significant were dactylitis (r=0.64) and enthesitis (r=0.60). CONCLUSION: In psoriatic arthritis with severe skin involvement, the mCPDAI was able to distinguish treatment response between the two etanercept doses. DAPSA, while demonstrating improvement in both groups over time, was unable to distinguish response between the different doses of etanercept. Further studies are needed to confirm the sensitivity of both indexes.

The Burden of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Germany: Incidence, Prevalence, and Healthcare Resource Utilization.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated incidence, prevalence, costs, and healthcare utilization associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in patients in Germany. METHODS: Adult patients with SLE were identified from the German Betriebskrankenkassen (BKK) health insurance fund database between 2009 and 2014. SLE incidence and prevalence were calculated for each year and extrapolated (age and sex adjusted) to the German population. The 2009 SLE population was followed through 2014. Healthcare utilization and costs for patients with SLE were calculated and compared with controls matched by age, sex, and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index scores. RESULTS: This analysis included 1160 patients with SLE. Estimated SLE incidence between 2009 and 2014 ranged from 4.59 to 6.89 per 100,000 persons and prevalence ranged from 37.32 to 47.36 per 100,000. SLE incidence in Germany in 2014 was 8.82 per 100,000 persons; prevalence was 55.80 (corrected for right-censored data). At baseline, 12.8, 41.7, and 45.5% of patients were categorized as having mild, moderate, and severe SLE, respectively. Patients with SLE had greater mean (standard deviation [SD]) annual medical costs compared with matched controls 1 year after index diagnosis (€6895 [14,424] vs. €3692 [3994]; P < 0.0001) and in subsequent years. Patients with moderate or severe SLE had significantly more hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and prescription medication use compared with matched controls. Mean annual costs for 5 years ranged from €1890 to 3010, €4867 to 5876, and €8396 to 10,001 for patients with mild, moderate, and severe SLE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SLE incidence in Germany increased 1.4-fold over 5 years. Patients with SLE have higher healthcare costs, and costs increase with baseline severity. Early and effective treatments may delay progression and reduce the burden of SLE.

Healthcare Utilization and Costs of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus by Disease Severity in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify healthcare utilization and costs by disease severity for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the United States. METHODS: We conducted descriptive analyses of Humedica electronic health record (EHR) data from 2011 to 2015 (utilization analysis) and integrated Optum administrative claims/Humedica EHR data from 2012 to 2015 (cost analysis) for patients with SLE. All-cause utilization outcomes examined were hospitalizations, outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and prescription drug use. Analyses of costs stratified by disease severity were limited to patients enrolled in an Optum-participating health insurance plan for ≥ 1 year after the earliest observed SLE diagnosis date. Costs were converted to 2016 US dollars (US$). RESULTS: Healthcare utilization was evaluated in 17,257 patients with SLE. Averaged over the 2011-2015 study period, 13.7% of patients had ≥ 1 hospitalization per year, 25.7% had ≥ 1 ED visit, and 94.4% had ≥ 1 outpatient visit. Utilization patterns were generally similar across each year studied. Annually, 88.0% of patients had ≥ 1 prescription, including 1.3% who used biologics. Biologic treatment doubled between 2011 (0.7%) and 2015 (1.4%). Cost analyses included 397 patients. From 2012 to 2015, patients with severe SLE had mean annual costs of $52,951, compared with $28,936 and $21,052 for patients with moderate and mild SLE, respectively. Patients with severe SLE had increased costs in all service categories: inpatient, ED, clinic/office visits, and pharmacy. CONCLUSION: Patients from the US with SLE, especially individuals with moderate or severe disease, utilize significant healthcare resources and incur high medical costs.

Study protocol for the international Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Prospective Observational Cohort Study (SPOCS): understanding lupus and the role of type I interferon gene signature.

INTRODUCTION: The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Prospective Observational Cohort Study (SPOCS) aims to describe the disease course of SLE and its association with type I interferon gene signature (IFNGS) status. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SPOCS is an international, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study designed to follow patients through biannual study visits during a 3-year observation period. Patients ≥18 years old with a physician diagnosis that meets the American College of Rheumatology or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics SLE classification criteria will be included. SPOCS will comprehensively analyse clinical features, disease progression and treatment, SLE outcomes, health status assessments and quality of life, and healthcare resource utilisation of patients with moderate to severe SLE. A four-gene test will be used to measure IFNGS status; scores will be compared with a pre-established cut-off. Patients will be stratified by low or high IFNGS expression levels. Enrolment began in June 2017, and study completion is expected in 2022. The total number of anticipated patients was initially planned for 1500 patients and was amended to 900 patients owing to slow accrual of eligible patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethics committee/institutional review board/independent ethics committee at each study site approved the SPOCS protocol prior to study initiation (protocol number: D3461R00001, version 3.0, 26 June 2019). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03189875.

Association between organ damage and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: At least half of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) develop organ damage as a consequence of autoimmune disease or long-term therapeutic steroid use. This study synthesised evidence on the association between organ damage and mortality in patients with SLE. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature for observational (cohort, case-control and cross-sectional) studies published between January 2000 and February 2017. Included studies reported HRs or ORs on the association between organ damage (measured by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) score) and mortality. Study quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa assessment. Pooled HRs were obtained using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q (Q) and I2 statistics. RESULTS: The search yielded 10 420 articles, from which 21 longitudinal studies were selected. Most studies (85%) were of high quality. For 10 studies evaluating organ damage (SDI) as a continuous variable and reporting HR as a measure of association, a 1-unit increase in SDI was associated with increased mortality; pooled HR was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.24 to 1.44, p<0.001; Q p=0.027, I2=52.1%). Exclusion of one potential outlying study reduced heterogeneity with minimal impact on pooled HR (1.33 (95% CI: 1.25 to 1.42), p<0.001, Q p=0.087, I2=42.0%). The 11 remaining studies, although they could not be aggregated because of their varying patient populations and analyses, consistently demonstrated that greater SDI was associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Organ damage in SLE is consistently associated with increased mortality across studies from various countries. Modifying the disease course with effective therapies and steroid-sparing regimens may reduce organ damage, improve outcomes and decrease mortality for patients with SLE.

Lupus Low Disease Activity State and Reduced Direct Health Care Costs in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Treat-to-target end points for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been assessed for their impact on damage accrual and flare, but whether they have an impact on the high health care utilization and costs in SLE has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to examine our hypothesis that the recently described lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) would be associated with reduced health care cost. METHODS: Data from a single tertiary hospital longitudinal SLE cohort were assessed. Baseline demographics, disease activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2K], physician global assessment [PhGA], and flare index), and medication use were evaluated, and direct health care utilization and cost data were obtained from hospital information systems. LLDAS was defined as previously published: briefly, SLEDAI-2K ≤4 with no new activity, PhGA ≤1, prednisolone ≤7.5 mg/day, and optimal standard immunosuppressive agents. Analysis was performed using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Two hundred SLE patients, contributing 357.8 person-years of observation, were included. A history of lupus nephritis was present in 42% of patients, and damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index >0) was present at study commencement in 57.3% of patients. The mean ± SD annual direct medical cost per patient was US$7,413 ± 13,133/year. In multivariable analysis, increased cost was associated with the presence of baseline organ damage (41.7% increase; P = 0.009) and corticosteroid use (>7.5-15 mg/day: 55.7% increase; P = 0.02; and >15 mg/day: 202% increase; P < 0.001). In contrast, spending ≥50% of the observation period in LLDAS was associated with a 25.9% reduction in annual direct medical cost (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Greater time spent in LLDAS was associated with significantly reduced direct hospital health care costs among patients with SLE.

Randomized comparison of etanercept with usual therapy in an Asian population with active rheumatoid arthritis: the APPEAL trial.

AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an important rheumatologic disease in Asia-Pacific countries, as in other parts of the world. However, limited information is available regarding RA therapy in this region. The Asia-Pacific Study in Patients to be Treated With Etanercept or an Alternative Listed DMARD (APPEAL) compared efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) versus usual disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) + MTX (reflecting regional practice) in subjects with moderate to severe RA from multiple Asia-Pacific countries. METHOD: In this open-label, active-comparator, parallel-design, multicenter study, subjects (n = 300) in the Asia-Pacific region were randomized to ETN + MTX (n = 197) or DMARD + MTX (n = 103). The primary efficacy endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response (ACR-N) area under the curve (AUC) over 16 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At Week 16, ACR-N AUC indicated a significantly greater response with ETN + MTX compared with DMARD + MTX (mean difference -145.3; P < 0.001). Significantly greater proportions of subjects achieved ACR 20, 50 and 70 responses with ETN + MTX versus DMARD + MTX at Week 16 (P < 0.05). Low Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count (DAS28 < 3.2) was also achieved by significantly more subjects in the ETN + MTX group versus the DMARD + MTX group (P < 0.001). Greater improvements were shown for DAS28, pain visual analogue scale, health assessment questionnaire, and physician and patient global assessments (P < 0.05) for ETN + MTX versus DMARD + MTX. No new safety signals were found. CONCLUSION: In this Asia-Pacific population of subjects with moderate to severe RA, ETN + MTX showed superior efficacy versus usual DMARD + MTX regimens, with similar safety profiles.