Open-label randomised phase III trial of vinflunine versus an alkylating agent in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Background: There is no standard treatment after progression on second-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We compared vinflunine with physician's choice of alkylating agent (AA) for patients with heavily pretreated MBC. Patients and methods: In this open-label phase III trial, patients with MBC were included if they had received at least two prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC and had received anthracycline, taxane, antimetabolite and vinca alkaloid therapy. Patients were no longer candidates for these chemotherapies because of resistance and/or intolerance. Patients were randomised to either vinflunine 280 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks (q3w) or AA monotherapy q3w. Stratification factors were performance status, number of prior chemotherapy lines for MBC, disease measurability and study site. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 594 patients were randomised (298 to vinflunine, 296 to AA). There was no difference between treatment arms in OS (hazard ratio 1.04, P = 0.67; median 9.1 months for vinflunine versus 9.3 months for AA), progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.94, P = 0.49; median 2.5 versus 1.9 months, respectively) or overall response rate (6% versus 4%, respectively). However, the disease control rate was significantly higher with vinflunine than AA (44% versus 35%, respectively; P = 0.04). The most common adverse events (any grade) were haematological and gastrointestinal disorders and asthenia in both arms. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (19% versus 11% with vinflunine versus AA, respectively) and asthenia (10% versus 4%). Conclusions: Vinflunine 280 mg/m2 q3w did not improve OS compared with the physician's choice of AA as third- or later-line therapy for MBC. Vinflunine demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, suggesting that vinflunine 320 mg/m2 merits evaluation. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01091168.

Multicentric neoadjuvant pilot Phase II study of cetuximab combined with docetaxel in operable triple negative breast cancer.

Systemic therapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is mostly based upon chemotherapy. Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in around 50% of TNBC and may play a role in its pathogenesis. Consequently, we performed a multicentric pilot Phase II neoadjuvant trial of cetuximab (anti-EGFR antibody) combined with docetaxel for patients with operable, Stage II-III TNBC. Therapy consisted of weekly cetuximab (first infusion: 400 mg/m(2), then 250 mg/m(2)) combined with six cycles of docetaxel (T: 100 mg/m(2)) q.3 weeks. Subsequently, all patients underwent surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) while clinical response, toxicity and ancillary studies were secondary endpoints. Paraffin-embedded and frozen tumor samples were systematically collected in order to identify predictive biomarkers of efficacy and resistance. From a total of 35 accrued patients, 25 were assessable for pathologic response. The pCR rate was 24% [95% CI: 7.3-40.7]. Complete clinical response rate (cCR) was observed in 22% of cases. Conservative surgery was performed in 75% of patients. Toxicity, mostly cutaneous and hematologic, was manageable. The pre-therapy ratio between CD8+ and FOXP3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes equal or higher than 2.75 was predictive of pCR: 43% versus 0%, p = 0.047. Cetuximab in combination with docetaxel displays a modest activity, but acceptable toxicity as neoadjuvant therapy of operable TNBC. Similarly to previous observations using panitumumab, another anti-EGFR antibody, the immune component of the tumor microenvironment may play an important role in predicting TNBC response to the neoadjuvant therapy.

Multicentric neoadjuvant phase II study of panitumumab combined with an anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy in operable triple-negative breast cancer: identification of biologically defined signatures predicting treatment impact.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors for some of which the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway may play an important role. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of an anti-EGFR antibody (panitumumab) combined with a standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with operable, stage II-III, TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment in this multicentric neoadjuvant pilot study consisted of panitumumab (9 mg/kg) for eight cycles q.3 weeks combined with four cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC100: 500/100/500 mg/m(2)) q.3 weeks, followed by four cycles of docetaxel (T: 100 mg/m(2)) q.3 weeks. Following therapy, all patients underwent surgical resection. Pathologic complete response (pCR) in assessable patients was the main end point while clinical response, toxicity and ancillary studies were secondary end points. Paraffin-embedded and frozen tumor samples were systematically collected with the aim to identify predictive biomarkers of efficacy and resistance in order to select biologically defined subpopulations for potential further clinical development of the anti-EGFR antibody. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included with 47 assessable for pathologic response. The pCR rates were 46.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 32.5% to 61.1%] and 55.3% [95% CI: 41.1% to 69.5%] according, respectively, to Chevallier and Sataloff classifications. The complete clinical response (cCR) rate was 37.5%. Conservative surgery was carried out in 87% of cases. Toxicity was manageable. The association of high EGFR and low cytokeratin 8/18 expression in tumor cells on one hand and high density of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on the other hand were significantly predictive of pCR. CONCLUSIONS: Panitumumab in combination with FEC100 followed by docetaxel appears efficacious, with acceptable toxicity, as neoadjuvant therapy of operable TNBC. Several biomarkers could help define large subsets of patients with a high probability of pCR, suggesting a potential interest to further develop this combination in biologically defined subgroups of patients with TNBC. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00933517.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with or without palbociclib in low-risk patients: a phase III randomized double-blind SAFIA trial.

BACKGROUND: The most prevalent subtype of breast cancer (BC) is luminal hormonal-positive breast cancer. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens have side effects, emphasizing the need to identify new startegies. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the complete pathologic response (pCR) rate and overall response in a low-risk hormone-positive subset of patients receiving neoadjuvant hormone treatment (NAHT) with or without Palbociclib (a CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor) to boost NAHT effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the upfront 21-gene Oncotype DX or low-risk Breast Recurrence Score assay (RS™), the SAFIA trial is designed as a prospective multicenter international, double-blind neoadjuvant phase-III trial that selects operable with luminal BC patients that are HER2-negative for the induction hormonal therapy with Fulvestrant 500 mg ± Goserelin (F/G) followed by randomization of responding patients to palbociclib versus placebo. The pCR rate served as the study's main outcome, while the secondary endpoint was a clinical benefit. RESULTS: Of the 354 patients enrolled, 253 initially responded and were randomized to either F/G fulvestrant with palbociclib or placebo. Two hundred twenty-nine were eligible for the evaluation of the pathologic response. No statistically significant changes were observed in the pCR rates for the patients treated with the F/G therapy with placebo or palbociclib (7% versus 2%, respectively) per the Chevallier classification (Class1 + Class2) (p = 0.1464) and 3% versus 10% assessed per Sataloff Classification (TA, NA/NB) (p = 0.3108). Palbociclib did not increase the rate of complete pathological response. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is feasible in a selected population with a low RS score of < 31 CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT03447132.

Prognostic value of initial tumor parameters after metastatic relapse.

Classical prognostic factors of breast cancer are correlated to disease-free survival and overall survival (OS); their precise role is less known on metastatic disease. A total of 511 breast cancer patients without initial metastasis were treated. OS was divided in time to distant recurrence and metastatic survival (MS). Age, Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grade, hormone receptor, axillary node involvement, and Nottingham prognostic index predicted MS in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis retained age, SBR grade, and axillary lymph node involvement as significant independent prognostic factors. Interactions are still present between initial parameters and MS. The clinician has to take into account for treatment choice.

Modification of Kiel and working formulation classifications for improved survival prediction in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The total survival of 203 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) was analyzed according to the working formulation (WF) and "expanded" Kiel classifications. The original Kiel classification consisting of low grade (LG) and high grade (HG) forms corresponded well to the LG and HG forms of the WF. When an expanded Kiel containing an intermediate grade (IG) composed of the original LG diffuse group was devised, this gave a much better separation of survival of the three grades as compared with the WF where the survival of IG and HG forms were nonsignificantly different. The main reason for this difference was the inclusion of the so-called centroblastic diffuse form in the HG Kiel, but in the IG according to the WF. In a "modified" WF analysis where this histologic entity was placed in the HG subgroup, the three survival curves then gave excellent separation like the expanded Kiel classification. Since the centroblastic diffuse form (and its analogous forms according to other classifications) has a poor prognosis, it is important that it be so recognized and treated accordingly with aggressive therapy. We propose either our expanded Kiel or modified WF classification of the three grade forms as an excellent predictor of survival.

Phase II study of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This pilot phase II study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) as first-line chemotherapy for anthracycline-naive patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients received a total of 359 courses consisting of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 given intravenously (IV) over 1 hour, preceded by IV doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for a maximum of eight 3-week cycles. RESULTS: After an independent panel review, the overall objective response rate was 77% (complete response, 6%). Overall objective response rates in patients with visceral, bone, and liver involvement were 82%, 82%, and 80%, respectively. Median duration of response was 52 weeks, and median time to progression was 42 weeks. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the median survival had not yet been reached, whereas the 2-year survival was 57%. The main toxicities were hematologic (neutropenia grade 3/4 in 100% of patients and 95% of cycles; febrile neutropenia in 34% of patients and 9% of cycles). Documented grade 3 infection was seen in one patient (2%) in one cycle, and no toxic death was reported. Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse events were infrequent, and docetaxel-specific toxicities (such as fluid retention and nail changes) were mild, with only one patient being discontinued for fluid retention. Congestive heart failure was seen in two patients (4%). CONCLUSION: TAC is an active and manageable regimen that has been chosen as the basis of five randomized phase III trials, including two pivotal studies comparing TAC to fluorouracil plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in the metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results of a North American multicenter randomized trial. Arimidex Study Group.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and tolerability of anastrozole (Arimidex; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, and Macclesfield, United Kingdom) and tamoxifen were compared as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 353 postmenopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was designed to evaluate anastrozole 1 mg once daily relative to tamoxifen 20 mg once daily in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors or tumors of unknown receptor status who were eligible for endocrine therapy. Primary end points were objective response (OR), defined as complete (CR) or partial (PR) response, time to progression (TTP), and tolerability. RESULTS: Anastrozole was as effective as tamoxifen in terms of OR (21% v 17% of patients, respectively), with clinical benefit (CR + PR + stabilization > or = 24 weeks) observed in 59% of patients on anastrozole and 46% on tamoxifen (two-sided P =.0098, retrospective analysis). Anastrozole had a significant advantage over tamoxifen in terms of TTP (median TTP of 11.1 and 5.6 months for anastrozole and tamoxifen, respectively; two-sided P =.005). The tamoxifen:anastrozole hazards ratio was 1.44 (lower one-sided 95% confidence limit, 1.16). Both treatments were well tolerated. However, thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding were reported in fewer patients who received anastrozole compared with those who received tamoxifen (4.1% v 8.2% [thromboembolic events] and 1.2% v 3.8% [vaginal bleeding], respectively). CONCLUSION: Anastrozole satisfied the predefined criteria for equivalence to tamoxifen. Furthermore, we observed both a significant increase in TTP and a lower incidence of thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding with anastrozole. These findings indicate that anastrozole should be considered as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Multicenter, randomized comparative study of two doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the therapeutic index of two different doses of paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), who had failed to respond to previous chemotherapy. A total of 471 patients with MBC were randomized to receive intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 or 135 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Better treatment results were achieved with high-dose (HD) versus low-dose (LD) paclitaxel: overall response rate, 29% versus 22% (P = .108); complete response (CR) rate, 5% versus 2% (P = .088); median time to disease progression, 4.2 versus 3.0 months (P = .027); and median survival time, 11.7 versus 10.5 months (P = .321). Patients previously exposed or resistant to anthracyclines were as likely to respond as those without such prior exposure. Treatment was well tolerated, as documented by the number of administered treatment courses (median, six v five; range, one 17 v one to 18), the low frequency of dose reductions (14% v 7%, P = .024), and the small number of patients (n = 9 or 4% vn = 5 or 2%) who required treatment discontinuation for adverse reactions. The incidence and severity of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were dose-related. After quality-of-life-adjusted time-to-progression analysis, the HD arm (175 mg/m2) retained its advantage over the LD arm (135 mg/m2). CONCLUSION: The results of this trial substantiate the activity of paclitaxel in the treatment of MBC. The observed superior efficacy with a dose of 175 mg/m2 over 135 mg/m2 suggests a dose-effect relationship. The clinical activity in anthracycline-resistant patients is particularly noteworthy. Paclitaxel in breast cancer needs further evaluation in large trials that use combination chemotherapy and involve earlier disease stages.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel with mitomycin plus vinblastine (MV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=392) were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks (n=203) or mitomycin 12 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks plus vinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks (n=189), for a maximum of 10 3-week cycles. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, docetaxel produced significantly higher response rates than MV overall (30.0% v 11.6%; P < .0001), as well as in patients with visceral involvement (30% v 11%), liver metastases (33% v 7%), or resistance to previous anthracycline agents (30% v 7%). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were significantly longer with docetaxel than MV (19 v 1 weeks, P=.001, and 1 1.4 v 8.7 months, P=.0097, respectively). Neutropenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with docetaxel (93.1 % v62.5%; P < .05); thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with MV (12.0% v 4.1%; P < .05). Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse events were infrequent in both groups. Withdrawal rates because of adverse events (MV, 10.1%; docetaxel, 13.8%) or toxic death (MV, 1.6%; docetaxel, 2.0%) were similar in both groups. Quality-of-life analysis was limited by a number of factors, but results were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is significantly superior to MV in terms of response, TTP, and survival. The safety profiles of both therapies are manageable and tolerable. Docetaxel represents a clear treatment option for patients with MBC progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

A longitudinal prospective study of health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous blood stem cell transplantation.

This prospective longitudinal study examined both short- and long-term changes in health-related quality of life (HRQL) in 52 breast cancer patients with poor prognosis receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) treatment with autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT). HRQL was measured seven times from baseline to 2 years post enrollment with the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC), the EuroQol (EQ-5D), and a quality of life visual analogue scale. The percentage of questionnaires returned at each assessment time ranged from 80 to 92%. All three measures showed a similar pattern of change, with HRQL decreasing following administration of HDC, and returning to baseline levels 8 weeks post HDC. A repeated-measures analysis of variance showed that the FLIC at 2 years was significantly better than baseline (P=<0.0001). Difficulty sleeping, headaches, and decreased sexual interest were the most common symptoms reported in the longer term. Our results have implications for early psychosocial intervention in the care of breast cancer patients with poor prognosis undergoing treatment with HDC and ASCT because such interventions can further improve the quality of their survival.

Anastrozole (Arimidex) versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: survival analysis and updated safety results.

We present an initial survival analysis and an update of the safety data of the North American and Tamoxifen or Arimidex Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability (TARGET) double-blind, randomised, multicentre studies which compared anastrozole with tamoxifen as first-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with oestrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor-positive (ER+/PR+) or receptor-unknown advanced breast cancer (ABC). At a median follow-up of 43.7 months, 56.0% of patients in the anastrozole group and 56.1% of patients in the tamoxifen group had died. The proportion of patients dead at 2 years was 31.1 and 32.0% in the anastrozole and tamoxifen groups, respectively. In the ER+/PR+ subgroup, 55.1 and 55.9% of patients had died and median time to deaths (TTD) were 40.8 and 41.3 months in the anastrozole and tamoxifen groups, respectively. Both agents remained well tolerated, with fewer reports of vaginal bleeding (anastrozole versus tamoxifen, 1.0% versus 2.5%) and thromboembolic events (anastrozole versus tamoxifen, 5.3% versus 9.0%) in the anastrozole group versus the tamoxifen group. Hot flushes and vaginal dryness were reported marginally less in the tamoxifen group compared with the Anastrozole group. Although no improvement in survival was observed, the favourable profile of anastrozole with respect to efficacy (TTP) and tolerability [Cancer 92 (2001) 2247] support the use of anastrozole in advance of tamoxifen as the first-line therapy choice in postmenopausal women with ABC.

Efficacy of tamoxifen following anastrozole ('Arimidex') compared with anastrozole following tamoxifen as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Anastrozole ('Arimidex') is indicated for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Combined analysis of two international randomised, double-blind trials (n=1021) showed that in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumours, first-line treatment with anastrozole significantly prolonged the time to progression (TTP) compared with tamoxifen (median TTP: 10.7 versus 6.4 months, respectively; P=0.022). Second-line tamoxifen following anastrozole, or vice versa, in this trial population was unblinded. The treatments were crossed over and then efficacy was assessed using a questionnaire. Of 511 patients randomised to anastrozole, 137 (26.8%) received second-line tamoxifen. Questionnaire data were available for 119 patients; 58 (48.7%) gained clinical benefit (CB=complete+partial response (CR+PR)+(stable disease (SD) >/=24 weeks)), while 12 (10.1%) had an objective response (OR=CR+PR). Of 510 patients randomised to tamoxifen, 134 (26.3%) received second-line anastrozole. Questionnaire data from 95 patients showed that 54 (56.8%) gained CB and 7 of the patients gaining CB (7.4%) had an OR. Previous studies showed anastrozole is effective after first-line tamoxifen. These data show that the sequential administration of first-line anastrozole followed by tamoxifen provides effective use of these drugs in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) plus doxorubicin-based combinations: the evidence of activity in breast cancer.

The high individual response rates of doxorubicin and docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA) as single agents in breast cancer and their lack of cross-resistance provide the rationale for investigation of the combination of these two uniquely acting agents. A dose-finding study defined the recommended doses for the combination given every 3 weeks as docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, or docetaxel 60 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m2. Phase II studies conducted with these doses in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients resulted in overall response rates ranging between 57% and 77% with long durations of response. The high response rates were maintained in patients with unfavorable prognostic features, such as multiple metastatic disease sites, visceral involvement, and prior exposure to adjuvant chemotherapy. Without prophylactic G-CSF, grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were the predominant hematologic toxicities. However, infectious complications occurred infrequently. The nonhematologic toxicities of docetaxel and doxorubicin in combination are low in frequency and mild in severity. Additionally, the incidence of congestive heart failure was no greater than that expected with single-agent doxorubicin. The safety and efficacy results of these phase I and II trials appear to be confirmed in a randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in first-line metastatic breast cancer. Preliminary results reveal a superior overall response rate of 60% with docetaxel plus doxorubicin versus 47% with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (p = .008). Time to disease progression and overall survival results are awaited. The results of these trials, in addition to others being conducted in the adjuvant and the neoadjuvant settings, will establish the ultimate place in therapy for the docetaxel and doxorubicin combination in the management of patients with breast cancer.

New adjuvant strategies for breast cancer: meeting the challenge of integrating chemotherapy and trastuzumab (Herceptin).

Improvements in breast cancer treatment will arrive with better understanding of its biology and through biologically oriented therapeutic interventions as well as better identification of patient populations susceptible to benefit from classical therapies (endocrine and chemotherapy). Among the new chemotherapies, the taxanes have emerged as powerful agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and a strong emphasis has been pursued into their development in the adjuvant setting. Two generations of adjuvant pivotal trials with taxanes have been developed. The first generation compared taxane/anthracycline regimens to nontaxane combinations or sequence regimens. The second generation of trials is presently being performed and contains taxanes in both arms, comparing their use in combination or in sequence. Trastuzumab (Herceptin; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) is the first biologic modifier with significant activity in advanced breast cancer patients amplifying the HER2 gene. As a consequence of these results, including improved survival in the metastatic setting, this agent has been very quickly considered for adjuvant development. However, the significant cardiac toxicity observed with trastuzumab/anthracycline combinations has led to two main strategies for integrating trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting: (1) addition of trastuzumab to mostly anthracycline-based programs (sequential approach); and (2) biology-oriented strategy based on synergism between trastuzumab and chemotherapy agents. Large-scale clinical research programs are presently being developed and will create a challenge for clinical researchers. The adequate scientific hypothesis, related to the pivotal studies of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting, require large sample sizes (several thousand patients) and a very strict selection of the patient population (tumors amplifying the HER2 gene). Success in a timely fashion requires global collaboration, dedication to high-standard clinical research, and awareness of all available protocols by oncologists and patients with breast cancer.

Phase III studies of single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have progressed despite previous chemotherapy regimens: preliminary results.

A recent large phase III trial has for the first time demonstrated that choice of treatment can influence survival duration in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have progressed despite previous anthracycline-containing therapy. In a multicenter study, patients who received docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) experienced a longer median survival time (II.4 months v 8.7 months; P = .0097) as well as a longer time to progression (19 weeks v II weeks; P < .001) and higher overall response rate (30% v II.6%; P < .0001) than patients receiving treatment with mitomycin C and vinblastine. The toxicity profile was manageable and tolerable for both arms. Evidence for a risk to benefit ratio favoring docetaxel is also provided by a second phase III trial in which docetaxel was compared with doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer patients who have progressed despite prior alkylating chemotherapy. In these patients, docetaxel was more active than doxorubicin, achieving an overall response at a significantly higher rate (47.8% v 33.3%; P = .008) and in a shorter time (median, 12 weeks v 23 weeks; P = .007). In this study, the duration of survival was not influenced by treatment. However, the higher response rate with docetaxel was achieved without the risk of potentially fatal cardiac toxicity seen in some patients who received doxorubicin. To date, docetaxel is the only single agent shown to have a potential superior activity when compared with doxorubicin in patients with progressive metastatic disease.

Taxane-based three-drug combination in metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Considering the recommended dose of the docetaxel/doxorubicin combination (75 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively), we decided to proceed with a pilot program in untreated metastatic breast cancer aimed at defining a multidrug regimen that could be later randomly compared with a standard doxorubicin-containing polychemotherapy regimen with equidoses of doxorubicin such as the FAC protocol (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) in first-line metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer patients. We proceeded with a pilot phase II study of the TAC combination, which consists of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion preceded by doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, both given as an intravenous bolus. Three hundred seventy courses were delivered in 54 anthracycline-naive patients, among whom 62% had visceral metastases. Median relative dose intensity was above 98% for all drugs. Grade 4 neutropenia was the main toxicity (70% of cycles) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia and infection was acceptable (6% and 0.8% of cycles, respectively). Acute and chronic extrahematologic toxicities were mild, mostly grade 2, and the docetaxel-specific toxicities (fluid retention, nail changes, etc) were not major clinical problems; no patient was discontinued due to fluid retention. The major response rate was 73% overall and 79% in measurable disease. Time to progression and survival are still under evaluation. The TAC combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen that is the basis of two currently open, pivotal, randomized phase III trials comparing TAC with FAC in the metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Review of docetaxel and doxorubicin-based combinations in the management of breast cancer: from metastatic to adjuvant setting.

Considering the efficacy of docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) and doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer and their potential noncross-resistance, two pilot studies of docetaxel/doxorubicin (TA)-based combinations were conducted, one being a phase I dose-finding study of TA and the second a phase II study of docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (TAC). The only significant toxicity, seen in both trials, was neutropenia and its consequences such as febrile neutropenia without significant documented infections. Extrahematologic and particularly docetaxel-specific side effects (fluid retention) were mild. Particularly noteworthy was the absence of significant cardiac toxicity; overall, there was only one case of congestive heart failure (1%). In terms of efficacy, response rates in excess of 70% and 80% were noted in both studies, even for patients with visceral metastases. Several phase III randomized trials using TA or TAC are presently being performed in first-line metastatic breast cancer and most importantly in the adjuvant setting to assess whether TA-based combinations will change the natural history of breast cancer.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) in combination with anthracyclines in the treatment of breast cancer.

Considering the single-agent activity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) and doxorubicin in breast cancer and their potential non-cross-resistance, several docetaxel/anthracycline-based combination chemotherapies were developed in phase I and II programs for metastatic breast cancer patients. The rationale for these combinations was also reinforced by the fact that docetaxel showed significant activity in phase III trials in patients previously exposed or having failed anthracycline chemotherapy. In a pivotal randomized phase III study of doxorubicin plus docetaxel versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for 429 patients with metastatic breast cancer, doxorubicin/docetaxel emerged as the more effective regimen. Despite a lower-dose intensity of doxorubicin, patients receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel experienced a higher response rate as well as a significantly longer time to progression and time to treatment failure. This difference was seen even in patients with poor-prognosis disease. Febrile neutropenia was more common in doxorubicin/docetaxel-treated patients. However, there were no septic deaths among 213 patients receiving doxorubicin/ docetaxel. Extrahematologic toxicity appeared mild for both regimens and the combination docetaxel/doxorubicin did not increase the cardiac toxicity expected for an anthracycline-containing regimen. Docetaxel plus doxorubicin is the first regimen, involving a newly developed agent, proven superior to a standard anthracycline-containing combination in metastatic breast cancer and its potential is now being investigated in the adjuvant setting.

The academic global virtual concept in clinical cancer research and its application to breast cancer: The Breast Cancer International Research Group.

In contrast to previous decades, the 1990s have witnessed an increase of new agents with significant activity in breast cancer, including chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and, more recently, biologic modifiers. All information appears to confirm that such a trend will persist and even accelerate in the coming decades. Unless clear strategies of development for new drugs are strictly followed, it will become difficult to adequately assess the many new agents with potentially important activity against breast cancer, and patient access may become a limiting key factor. The academic, global virtual concept is calling for the definition of a new relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and clinical researchers. The main aspect is related to the creation of partnerships with an academically controlled global strategy of development for promising new agents, in which the quality and independence of processes (adjuvant setting, for example) are critical. The means are based on the globalization of patient access (worldwide network) and the virtuality of the approach (modern means of communication as well as access to subgroups of patients). The Breast Cancer International Research Group is the first academic global virtual cooperative group in breast cancer and is making contributions in the development of new drugs, such as taxanes, new antiestrogens, and new cytokines.