Impact of Direct Measurement of Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol for Long-Term Secondary Prevention in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether directly measured small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (D-sdLDL-C) can predict long-term coronary artery disease (CAD) events compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (apoB), and estimated small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (E-sdLDL-C) determined by the Sampson equation in patients with stable CAD. METHODS: D-sdLDL-C measured at Showa University between 2010 and 2022, and E-sdLDL-C were evaluated in 790 male and 244 female patients with stable CAD. CAD events, defined as sudden cardiac death, onset of acute coronary syndrome, and/or need for coronary revascularization, were monitored for 12 years. Cutoff lipid levels were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: CAD events were observed in 238 male and 67 female patients. The Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves showed that patients with D-sdLDL-C ≥32.1 mg/dL (0.83 mmol/L) had an increased risk for CAD events (P = 0.007), whereas risk in patients with E-sdLDL-C ≥36.2 mg/dL (0.94 mmol/L) was not increased. In the group with high D-sdLDL-C, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.15-1.89), and it remained significant after adjustment for LDL-C, non-HDL-C, or apoB and in patients treated with statins. HRs for high LDL-C, non-HDL-C, or apoB were not statistically significant after adjustment for high D-sdLDL-C. Higher D-sdLDL-C was associated with enhanced risk of high LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB (HR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.27-2.37). CONCLUSIONS: Higher D-sdLDL-C can predict long-term recurrence of CAD in stable CAD patients independently of apoB and non-HDL-C. D-sdLDL-C is an independent risk enhancer for secondary CAD prevention, whereas E-sdLDL-C is not.UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial Number: UMIN000027504.

Robotic versus open and laparoscopic pelvic exenterations for pelvic cancer: a multicenter propensity-matched analysis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is the last resort for achieving a complete cure for pelvic cancer; however, it is burdensome for patients. Minimally invasive surgeries, including robot-assisted surgery, have been widely used to treat malignant tumors and have also recently been used in PE. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted PE (RPE) by comparing the outcomes of open PE (OPE) with those of conventional laparoscopic PE (LPE) for treating pelvic tumors. METHODS: Following the ethics committee approval, a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration between January 2012 and October 2022 was conducted. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were collected. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed to minimize group selection bias. RESULTS: In total, 261 patients met the study criteria, of whom 61 underwent RPE, 90 underwent OPE, and 110 underwent LPE. After propensity score matching, 50 pairs were created for RPE and OPE and 59 for RPE and LPE. RPE was associated with significantly less blood loss (RPE vs. OPE: 408 mL vs. 2385 ml, p < 0.001), lower transfusion rate (RPE vs. OPE: 32% vs. 82%, p < 0.001), and lower rate of complications over Clavien-Dindo grade II (RPE vs. OPE: 48% vs. 74%, p = 0.013; RPE vs. LPE: 48% vs. 76%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This multicenter study suggests that RPE reduces blood loss and transfusion compared with OPE and has a lower rate of complications compared with OPE and LPE in patients with locally advanced and recurrent pelvic tumors.

Rapidly progressive cognitive impairment resulting in heavy psychosocial burden in a patient with Fabry disease undergoing hemodialysis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Long-term enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) may improve prognosis in the patients with Fabry disease (FD), however, detail psychosocial burden has not been focused on long life expectancy. We experienced a male case of FD under ERT, he was placed on hemodialysis and presented rapidly progressive cognitive function. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old male patient with FD has been receiving ERT from age of 38 years. Hemodialysis was initiated at the age of 47 years. The patient experienced several attacks of cerebral infarction, and brain images demonstrated wide-spread asymptomatic ischemic lesions. His behavior became problematic at the age of 51 years. He often exhibited restlessness during hemodialysis sessions and failure to communicate effectively. The patient experienced impairment of attention and executive function, topographical disorientation, and amnesia. Consequently, it was necessary for medical staff and family members to monitor his behavior for safe extracorporeal circulation and daily life activities. Annual standardized neuropsychiatric testing revealed worsening of cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: Despite treating with long-term ERT, it is necessary to determine the psychosocial burden derived from the progression of cognitive impairment in patients with FD undergoing hemodialysis.