RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ethical principles obligate researchers to maximize study participants' comprehension during the informed consent process for clinical trials. A pilot evaluation of the consent process was conducted during an international clinical trial of treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis to assess the feasibility of conducting an evaluation in a larger population and to guide these future efforts. METHODS: Study staff administered an informed consent assessment tool (ICAT) to a convenience sample of trial participants, measuring comprehension of consent components as derived from the Common Rule and FDA Title 21 Part 50, and satisfaction with the process. Participating site staff completed a consent process questionnaire about consent practices at their respective sites and provided improvement recommendations. ICAT scores and corresponding practices were compared where both were completed. RESULTS: ICATs (n = 54) were submitted from one site in Spain (n = 10), one in Uganda (n = 30), and five in the United States (n = 14). Participants were primarily male (76%), born in Africa (n = 31, 57%), and had a median age of 27 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 24-42). Median ICAT scores were 80% (IQR: 67-93) for comprehension and 89% (IQR: 78-100) for satisfaction. Ugandan participants scored higher than participants from other sites on comprehension (87% vs. 64%) and satisfaction (100% vs. 78%). Staff from 14 sites completed consent process questionnaires. Median ICAT scores for comprehension and satisfaction were higher at sites that utilized visual aids. Practice recommendations included shorter forms, simpler documents, and supplementary materials. CONCLUSIONS: Participants achieved high levels (≥80%) of comprehension and satisfaction with their current consent processes. Higher ICAT scores at one site suggest an additional evaluation may identify approaches to improve comprehension and satisfaction in future trials. Through this pilot evaluation, complexities and challenges were identified in obtaining consent in a large, international multicenter trial and provided insights for a more robust assessment of the consent process in future trials.
RESUMO
Interleukin (IL)-2 has a central role in regulating T cell responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Adjunctive immunotherapy with recombinant human IL-2 was studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial in 110 human immunodeficiency virus-seronegative adults in whom smear-positive, drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis was newly diagnosed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive twice-daily injections of 225, 000 IU of IL-2 or placebo for the first 30 days of treatment in addition to standard chemotherapy. Subjects were followed for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sputum culture conversion after 1 and 2 months of treatment. After 1 month, the proportion of patients for whom sputum culture converted to negative was 17% for the IL-2 group compared with 30% in the control group (p = 0.14; chi2). After 2 months, 77% in the IL-2 group were culture negative compared with 85% of those receiving placebo (p = 0.29, chi2). Results were similar when patients with isoniazid monoresistance were included in the analysis. There were no differences in weight gain and no improvement in fever, cough, and chest pain between groups. One patient in each arm relapsed. IL-2 did not enhance bacillary clearance or improvement in symptoms in human immunodeficiency virus-seronegative adults with drug-susceptible tuberculosis.