The FAST-M complex intervention for the detection and management of maternal sepsis in low-resource settings: a multi-site evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the implementation of the FAST-M complex intervention was feasible and improved the recognition and management of maternal sepsis in a low-resource setting. DESIGN: A before-and-after design. SETTING: Fifteen government healthcare facilities in Malawi. POPULATION: Women suspected of having maternal sepsis. METHODS: The FAST-M complex intervention consisted of the following components: the FAST-M maternal sepsis treatment bundle and the FAST-M implementation programme. Performance of selected process outcomes was compared between a 2-month baseline phase and 6-month intervention phase with compliance used as a proxy measure of feasibility. MAIN OUTCOME RESULT: Compliance with vital sign recording and use of the FAST-M maternal sepsis bundle. RESULTS: Following implementation of the FAST-M intervention, women were more likely to have a complete set of vital signs taken on admission to the wards (0/163 [0%] versus 169/252 [67.1%], P < 0.001). Recognition of suspected maternal sepsis improved with more cases identified following the intervention (12/106 [11.3%] versus 107/166 [64.5%], P < 0.001). Sepsis management improved, with women more likely to receive all components of the FAST-M treatment bundle within 1 hour of recognition (0/12 [0%] versus 21/107 [19.6%], P = 0.091). In particular, women were more likely to receive antibiotics (3/12 [25.0%] versus 72/107 [67.3%], P = 0.004) within 1 hour of recognition of suspected sepsis. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the FAST-M complex intervention was feasible and led to the improved recognition and management of suspected maternal sepsis in a low-resource setting such as Malawi. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Implementation of a sepsis care bundle for low-resources improved recognition & management of maternal sepsis.

Development of the FAST-M maternal sepsis bundle for use in low-resource settings: a modified Delphi process.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a sepsis care bundle for the initial management of maternal sepsis in low resource settings. DESIGN: Modified Delphi process. SETTING: Participants from 34 countries. POPULATION: Healthcare practitioners working in low resource settings (n = 143; 34 countries), members of an expert panel (n = 11) and consultation with the World Health Organization Global Maternal and Neonatal Sepsis Initiative technical working group. METHODS: We reviewed the literature to identify all potential interventions and practices around the initial management of sepsis that could be bundled together. A modified Delphi process, using an online questionnaire and in-person meetings, was then undertaken to gain consensus on bundle items. Participants ranked potential bundle items in terms of perceived importance and feasibility, considering their use in both hospitals and health centres. Findings from the healthcare practitioners were then triangulated with those of the experts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Consensus on bundle items. RESULTS: Consensus was reached after three consultation rounds, with the same items deemed most important and feasible by both the healthcare practitioners and expert panel. Final bundle items selected were: (1) Fluids, (2) Antibiotics, (3) Source identification and control, (4) Transfer (to appropriate higher-level care) and (5) Monitoring (of both mother and neonate as appropriate). The bundle was given the acronym 'FAST-M'. CONCLUSION: A clinically relevant maternal sepsis bundle for low resource settings has been developed by international consensus. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: A maternal sepsis bundle for low resource settings has been developed by international consensus.

A qualitative study to develop an instrument for initial nurse assessment.

Complex health care needs focus on accountability and necessity of inclusion of nurses in documenting and monitoring clinical care plans have brought in the concept of initial nurse assessment and nursing process. However, no standardized form exists in the Armed Forces Medical Services to document initial nursing observations while a patient is being admitted in service hospitals. A focus group design was utilized to explore and conceptualize an initial nurse assessment form that may be utilized by service hospitals.

Local gene delivery of heme oxygenase-1 by adeno-associated virus into osteoarthritic mouse joints exhibiting synovial oxidative stress.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of synovial oxidative stress on joint pathology in a spontaneous mouse model of osteoarthritis (OA) by intra-articular (IA) delivery of recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) expressing anti-oxidant protein heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). METHODS: Joint transduction by rAAV vectors was evaluated with serotype 1, 2, 5 and 8 capsids carrying LacZ gene administered by IA injections into STR/ort mice. Transduced cell types were identified by ß-galactosidase staining in sectioned joints. Effect of oxidative stress on AAV transduction of primary synoviocytes in vitro was quantitated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. In vivo, the efficacy of rAAV1/HO-1 was tested by IA administration into STR/ort mice followed by histopathological scoring of cartilage. Levels of 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) and HO-1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of joint sections. RESULTS: Administration of a rAAV1 based vector into OA mouse joints resulted in transduction of the synovium, joint capsule, adipocytes and skeletal muscle while none of the serotypes showed significant cartilage transduction. All OA joints exhibited significantly elevated levels of oxidative stress marker, 3-NT, in the synovium compared to OA-resistant CBA-strain of mice. In vitro studies demonstrated that AAV transgene expression in primary synoviocytes was augmented by oxidative stress induced by H(2)O(2) and that a rAAV expressing HO-1 reduced the levels of oxidative stress. In vivo, HO-1 was increased in the synovium of STR/ort mice. However, delivery of rAAV1/HO-1 into OA joints did not reduce cartilage degradation. CONCLUSIONS: AAV-mediated HO-1 delivery into OA joints during active disease was not sufficient to improve cartilage pathology in this model.

Why do obstetric patients go to the ICU? A 3-year-study.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are at risk to develop complications due to illness related to pregnancy or due to aggravation of pre-existing disease. These patients also require critical care and ICU admissions in some cases. To determine the current spectrum of diseases in an obstetric population resulting in admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A retrospective case series study and analysis of data from obstetric patients admitted for critical care management. RESULTS: 0.26% of the total obstetric patients admitted to the hospital required ICU admissions. 46% of patients were admitted to ICU for ventilator support. Pre-eclampsia and obstetrical hemorrhage were the common diagnosis for these patients. CONCLUSION: Critically ill obstetric patients require a team approach of the obstetrician, anesthesiologist and intensive care specialist for the optimal care of these patients.

Planning health care in developing countries.

The major challenge for health care planners lies in integrating health promotion and disease prevention on the one hand and treatment of acute illness and chronic care on the other. This has to be done at all levels of the health system with the aim of delivering quality services equitably and efficiently to the whole population. This is a particular problem as many governments spend less than US $10 per person per year on health. Acute sector healthcare, including anaesthesia, is often deficient under these circumstances.

Knowledge and perceptions of quality of obstetric and newborn care of local health providers: a cross-sectional study in three districts in Malawi.

AIM: Quality of service delivery for maternal and newborn health in Malawi is influenced by human resource shortages and knowledge and care practices of the existing service providers. We assessed Malawian healthcare providers' knowledge of management of routine labour, emergency obstetric care and emergency newborn care; correlated knowledge with reported confidence and previous study or training; and measured perception of the care they provided. METHODS: This study formed part of a large-scale quality of care assessment in three districts (Kasungu, Lilongwe and Salima) of Malawi. Subjects were selected purposively by their role as providers of obstetric and newborn care during routine visits to health facilities by a research assistant. Research assistants introduced and supervised the self-completed questionnaire by the service providers. Respondents included 42 nurse midwives, 1 clinical officer, 4 medical assistants and 5 other staff. Of these, 37 were staff working in facilities providing Basic Emergency Obstetric Care (BEMoC) and 15 were from staff working in facilities providing Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Care (CEMoC). RESULTS: Knowledge regarding management of routine labour was good (80% correct responses), but knowledge of correct monitoring during routine labour (35% correct) was not in keeping with internationally recognized good practice. Questions regarding emergency obstetric care were answered correctly by 70% of respondents with significant variation depending on clinicians' place of work. Knowledge of emergency newborn care was poor across all groups surveyed with 58% correct responses and high rates of potentially life-threatening responses from BEmOC facilities. Reported confidence and training had little impact on levels of knowledge. Staff in general reported perception of poor quality of care. CONCLUSION: Serious deficiencies in providers' knowledge regarding monitoring during routine labour and management of emergency newborn care were documented. These may contribute to maternal and neonatal deaths in Malawi. The knowledge gap cannot be overcome by simply providing more training.